Constraint-Based Modeling of Metabolic Networks based on: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 53
About This Presentation
Title:

Constraint-Based Modeling of Metabolic Networks based on:

Description:

Evaluating the consequences of constraints', Price, et. al (2004) Tomer Shlomi ... Bioengineering; efficient production of biological products. 4 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:471
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 54
Provided by: Dudi1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Constraint-Based Modeling of Metabolic Networks based on:


1
Constraint-Based Modeling of Metabolic Networks
based on Genome-scale models of microbial
cellsEvaluating the consequences of
constraints, Price, et. al (2004)
Tomer Shlomi School of Computer Science, Tel-Aviv
University, Tel-Aviv, Israel January, 2006
2
Outline
  • Metabolism and metabolic networks
  • Kinetic models vs. constraints-based modeling
  • Flux Balance Analysis
  • Exploring the solution space
  • Altering phenotypic potential gene knockouts

3
Cellular Metabolism
  • The essence of life..
  • Catabolism and anabolism
  • The metabolic core production of energy
    anaerobic and aerobic metabolism
  • Probably the best understood of all cellular
    networks metabolic, PPI, regulatory, signaling
  • Tremendous importance in Medicine antibiotics,
    metabolic disorders, liver disorders, heart
    disorders
  • Bioengineering efficient production of
    biological products.

4
Metabolites and Biochemical Reactions
  • Metabolite an organic substance, e.g. glucose,
    oxygen
  • Biochemical reaction the process in which two or
    more molecules (reactants) interact, usually with
    the help of an enzyme, and produce a product

Glucose ATP
Glucokinase Glucose-6-Phosphate ADP
5
(No Transcript)
6
Kinetic Models
  • Dynamics of metabolic behavior over time
  • Metabolite concentrations
  • Enzyme concentrations
  • Enzyme activity rate depends on enzyme
    concentrations and metabolite concentrations
  • Solved using a set of differential equations
  • Impossible to model large-scale networks
  • Requires specific enzyme rates data
  • Too complicated

7
Constraint Based Modeling
  • Provides a steady-state description of metabolic
    behavior
  • A single, constant flux rate for each reaction
  • Ignores metabolite concentrations
  • Independent of enzyme activity rates
  • Assume a set of constraints on reaction fluxes
  • Genome scale models

Flux rate ยต-mol / (mg h)
8
Constraint Based Modeling
  • Find a steady-state flux distribution through
    all
  • biochemical reactions
  • Under the constraints
  • Mass balance metabolite production and
    consumption rates are equal
  • Thermodynamic irreversibility of reactions
  • Enzymatic capacity bounds on enzyme rates
  • Availability of nutrients

9
Metabolic Networks
Biochemistry
Cell Physiology
Genome Annotation
Inferred Reactions
Network Reconstruction
Analytical Methods
Metabolic Network
10
Mathematical Representation
  • Stoichiometric matrix network topology with
    stoichiometry of biochemical reactions

Glucokinase
Glucose ATP
Glucokinase Glucose-6-Phosphate ADP
Glucose -1
ATP -1
G-6-P 1
ADP 1
Mass balance Sv 0 Subspace of R
Thermodynamic vi gt 0 Convex cone
Capacity vi lt vmax Bounded convex cone
n
11
Growth Medium Constraints
  • Exchange reactions enable the uptake of nutrients
    from the media and the secretion of waste products

Lower bound Upper bound
Glucose 0 2.5
Oxygen 0
Inf
CO2 -Inf
0
G-Ex O-Ex Co2-Ex
Glucose 1
Oxygen 1
CO2 1
12
Determination of Likely Physiological States
  • How to identify plausible physiological states?
  • Optimization methods
  • Maximal biomass production rate
  • Minimal ATP production rate
  • Minimal nutrient uptake rate
  • Exploring the solution space
  • Extreme pathways
  • Elementary modes

13
Outline Optimization Methods
  • Predicting the metabolic state of a wild-type
    strain
  • Flux Balance Analysis (FBA)
  • Predicting the metabolic state after a gene
    knockout
  • Minimization Of Metabolic Adjustment
  • Regulatory On/Off Minimization

14
Biomass Production Optimization
  • Metabolic demands of precursors and cofactors
    required for 1g of biomass of E. coli
  • Classes of macromolecules
  • Amino Acids, Carbohydrates
  • Ribonucleotides, Deoxyribonucleotides
  • Lipids, Phospholipids
  • Sterol, Fatty acids
  • These precursors are removed from the
  • metabolic network in the corresponding ratios
  • We define a growth reaction
  • Z 41.2570 VATP - 3.547VNADH18.225VNADPH .

15
Biomass Composition Issues
  • Varies across different organisms
  • Depends on the growth medium
  • Depends on the growth rate
  • The optimum does not change much with changes in
    composition within a class of macromolecules
  • The optimum does change if the relative
    composition of the major macromolecules changes

16
Flux Balance Analysis (FBA)
  • Successfully predicts
  • Growth rates
  • Nutrient uptake rates
  • Byproduct secretion rates
  • Solved using Linear Programming (LP)
  • Finds flux distribution with maximal growth rate

Max vgro, - maximize growth s.t Sv
0, - mass balance constraints vmin ? v ?
vmax - capacity constraints
Fell, et al (1986), Varma and Palsson (1993)
17
FBA Example (1)
18
FBA Example (2)
19
FBA Example (2)
20
Linear Programming Basics (1)
21
Linear Programming Basics (2)
22
Linear Programming Basics (3)
23
Linear Programming Types of Solutions (1)
24
Linear Programming Types of Solutions (2)
25
Linear Programming Algorithms
  • Simplex
  • Used in practice
  • Does not guarantee polynomial running time
  • Interior point
  • Worse case running time is polynomial

growth
26
Phenotype Predictions Evolving Growth Rate
27
(No Transcript)
28
Exploring the Convex Solution Space
29
Alternative Optima
  • The optimal FBA solution is not unique

One solution Optimal
solutions Near-optimal solutions
  • Basic solutions enumeration MILP (Lee, et. al,
    2000)
  • Flux variability analysis (Mahadevan, et. al.
    2003)
  • Hit and run sampling (Almaas, et. al, 2004)
  • Uniform random sampling (Wiback, et. al, 2004)

30
What Do Multiple Solutions Represent ?
  • Some of the solutions probably do not represent
    biologically meaningful metabolic behaviors as
    there are missing constraints
  • Previous studies tackled this problem by
  • Incorporating additional constraints regulatory
    constraints (Covert, et. al., 2004)
  • Looking for reactions for which new constraints
    may significantly reduce the solution space
    (Wiback, et. al., 2004)

FBA solution space
Meaningful solutions
31
Interpretations of Metabolic Space
  • Effect of exogenous factors the metabolic space
    corresponds to growth in a medium under various
    external conditions that are beyond the models
    scope such as stress or temperature
  • Heterogeneity within a population - the metabolic
    space represents heterogenous metabolic behaviors
    by individuals within a cell population
    (Mahadevan, et. al., 2003, Price, et. al., 2004)
  • Alternative evolutionary paths the metabolic
    space represents different metabolic states
    attainable through different evolutionary paths
    (Mahadevan, et. al., 2003, Fong, et. al., 2004)
  • The three interpretations are obviously not
    mutually exclusive

32
Alternative Optima Basic Solutions Enumeration
  • Lee, et. al, 2000
  • Basic solutions metabolic states with minimal
    number of non-zero fluxes
  • Different solutions differ in at least a single
    zero flux
  • Use Mixed Integer Linear Programming
  • Formulate optimization as to identify new
    solutions that are different from the previous
    ones
  • Applicable only to small scale models

growth
33
Alternative Optima Flux Variability Analysis
  • Mahadevan, et. al. 2003
  • Find metabolic states with extreme values of
    fluxes
  • Use linear programming to minimize and maximize
    the flux through each reaction while satisfying
    all constraints

Max / Min vi, - maximize growth s.t Sv
0, - mass balance constraints vmin ? v ?
vmax - capacity constraints Vgro Vopt
- set maximal growth rate
34
Alternative Optima Hit and Run Sampling
  • Almaas, et. al, 2004
  • Based on a random walk inside the solution space
    polytope
  • Choose an arbitrary solution
  • Iteratively make a step in a random direction
  • Bounce off the walls of the polytope in random
    directions

35
Alternative Optima Uniform Random Sampling
  • Wiback, et. al, 2004
  • The problem of uniform sampling a
    high-dimensional polytope is NP-Hard
  • Find a tight parallelepiped object that binds the
    polytope
  • Randomly sample solutions from the parallelepiped
  • Can be used to estimate the volume of the
    polytope

36
Topological Methods
  • Not biased by a statement of an objective
  • Network based pathways
  • Extreme Pathways (Schilling, et. al., 1999)
  • Elementary Flux Modes (Schuster, el. al., 1999)
  • Decomposing flux distribution into extreme
    pathways
  • Extreme pathways defining phenotypic phase planes
  • Uniform random sampling

37
Extreme Pathways andElementary Flux Modes
  • Unique set of vectors that spans a solution space
  • Consists of minimum number of reactions
  • Extreme Pathways are systematically independent
    (convex basis vectors)

38
Extreme Pathways andElementary Flux Modes
  • Inherent redundancy in metabolic networks (Price,
    et. al., 2002)
  • Robustness to gene deletion and changes in gene
    expression (Stelling, et. al., 2002)
  • Enzyme subsets (correlated reaction sets) in
    yeast (Papin, et. al., 2002)
  • Design strains (Carlson, et. al., 2002)
  • Assign functions to genes (Forster, et. al, 2002)

39
Altering Phenotypic Potential Gene Knockouts
40
Altering Phenotypic Potential Gene Knockouts
  • Minimization Of Metabolic Adjustment (MOMA)
    (Segre et. al, 2002)
  • The flux distribution after a knockout is close
    to the wild-types state under the Euclidian norm
  • Regulatory On/Off Minimization (ROOM) (Shlomi et.
    al, 2005)
  • Minimize the number of Boolean flux changes from
    the wild-types state

41
Altering Phenotypic Potential
  • Explaining gene dispensability (Papp, el. al.,
    2004)
  • Only 32 of yeast genes contribute to biomass
    production in rich media
  • Considered one arbitrary optimal growth solution
  • OptKnock Identify gene deletions that generate
    desired phenotype (Burgard, et. al., 2003)
  • OptStrain Identify strains which can generate
    desired phenotypes by adding/deleting genes
    (Pharkya, el., al., 2004)

42
Modeling Gene Knockouts
  • Gene knockout
  • Enzyme knockout
  • Reaction knockout

43
Cellular Adaptation to Genetic and Environmental
Perturbations
  • Transient changes in expression levels in
    hundreds of genes (Gasch 2000, Ideker 2001)
  • Convergence to expression steady-state close to
    the wild-type (Gasch 2000, Daran 2004, Braun
    2004)
  • Drop in growth rates followed by a gradual
    increase (Fong 2004)

44
Regulatory On/Off Minimization (ROOM)
  • Predicts the metabolic steady-state following the
    adaptation to the knockout
  • Assumes the organism adapts by minimizing the set
    of regulatory changes

Boolean Regulatory Change
Boolean Flux Change
  • Finds flux distribution with minimal number of
    Boolean flux changes

45
ROOM Implementation
  • Solved using Mixed Integer Linear Programming
    (MILP)
  • Boolean variable yi

yi 1
Flux vi change from wild-type
  • Min ?yi - minimize changes
  • s.t
  • v y ( vmax - w) ? w - distance constraints
  • v y ( vmin - w) ? w - distance constraints
  • Sv 0, - mass balance constraints
  • vj 0, j?G - knockout constraints
  • MILP is NP-Hard
  • Relax Boolean constraints - solve using LP
  • Relax strict constraint of proximity to
    wild-type

46
Example Network
47
ROOMs Implicit Growth Rate Maximization
  • ROOM implicitly attempts to maintain the maximal
    possible growth rate of the wild-type organism
  • A change in growth requires numerous changes in
    fluxes

M1
M2
Growth Reaction
. .
Biomass
Mn
48
Intracellular Flux Measurements
  • Intracellular fluxes measurements in E. coli
    central carbon metabolism
  • Obtained using NMR spectroscopy in C labeling
    experiments
  • 5 knockouts pyk, pgi, zwf, gnd, ppc in
    Glycolysis and Pentose Phosphate pathways
  • Glucose limited and Ammonia limited medias
  • FBA wild-type predictions above 90 accuracy

13
  • Emmerling, M. et al. (2002), Hua, Q. et al.
    (2003), Jiao, Z et al. (2003), Peng, et. al
    (2004)

49
Knockout Flux Predictions
  • ROOM flux predictions are significantly more
    accurate than MOMA and FBA in 5 out of 9
    experiments
  • ROOM steady-state growth rate predictions are
    significantly more accurate than MOMA

50
ROOM vs. MOMA
  • ROOM predicts metabolic steady-state after
    adaptation
  • Provides accurate flux predictions
  • Preserved flux linearity
  • Finds alternative pathways
  • Predicts steady-state growth rates
  • MOMA predicts transient metabolic states
    following the knockout
  • Provides more accurate transient growth rates

51
Additional Constraints
  • Transcriptional regulatory constraints (Covert,
    et. al., 2002)
  • Boolean representation of regulatory network
  • Used to predict growth, changes in expression
    levels, simulate courses of batch cultures
  • Energy balance analysis (Beard, et. al., 2002)
  • Loops are not feasible according to thermodynamic
    principles resulting in a non-convex solution
    space

52
Additional Constraints Slow Changes in the
Environment
  • Timescales of cellular process are shorter than
    those of surrounding environment
  • Generate dynamic curves to simulate batch
    experiments (Varma, et. al., 1994)

53
  • Thank you for listening
  • Questions
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com