Evidence-based Policy in DEFRA - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Loading...

PPT – Evidence-based Policy in DEFRA PowerPoint presentation | free to download - id: 5780e4-ZjJlY



Loading


The Adobe Flash plugin is needed to view this content

Get the plugin now

View by Category
About This Presentation
Title:

Evidence-based Policy in DEFRA

Description:

Evidence-based Policy in DEFRA Louise Shaxson Drivers of change Increasing emphasis on the quality of evidence and its use (Modernising Government); To underpin ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:101
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: johny9
Learn more at: http://www.odi.org.uk
Category:
Tags: defra | based | evidence | policy

less

Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Evidence-based Policy in DEFRA


1
Evidence-based Policy in DEFRA Louise Shaxson
2
Drivers of change
  • Increasing emphasis on the quality of evidence
    and its use (Modernising Government)
  • To underpin inform strategy, policy, regulatory
    work, foresight and to mitigate risk
  • Importance of challenge to evidence (BSE inquiry,
    Science Advisory Committees)
  • Depth and breadth of future evidence needs will
    increase given complex and overlapping strategic
    priorities

3
Evidence for policy is
  • any robust information that helps to turn a
    Departments strategic priorities other
    objectives into something concrete, manageable
    and achievable.
  • evidence as data
  • analytical evidence
  • evidence of stakeholder opinions
  • is good science the same as good evidence for
    policy?

4
Why do we need evidence analysis?
  • To
  • Confirm what we think we know
  • Enrich our understanding
  • Explain complex issues
  • Challenge received wisdom
  • Scope opportunities for change

5
Components of robust evidence analysis (supply
side)
  • Is the evidence credible?
  • Can we make generalisations from it?
  • Is it reliable enough for ME or impact
    assessments?
  • Is it objective? How do we account for bias?
  • Is it rooted in an understanding of the framing
    assumptions?

6
Components of robust evidence analysis (demand
side)
  • Is the evidence policy relevant?
  • Is it timely? Has it been delivered fast enough
    to inform policy decisions?
  • Is it accessible to all key stakeholders, not
    just researchers?
  • Is the evidence cost-effective?
  • Is it interdisciplinary enough to address
    cross-cutting issues?

7
Evidence-based policy making is not a sacred cow
There are policies that
Use good information
and use it well
Use poor information
and use it poorly
8
Analysis evidence for policy
Longer-term policy and strategy development
Procuring, managing and carrying out research to
provide new evidence
Interpreting applying new or existing evidence,
monitoring evaluating the policy once
implemented
Scoping the issue, asking the question, deciding
what sort of evidence is needed
Evidence and analysis needed rapidly to answer
pressing policy questions
9
EBPM in practice
  • Defras Evidence Innovation Strategy
  • Putting policy in the lead
  • Developing a clear line of sight between policy
    priorities and evidence provision
  • Constructing lines of argument with stakeholders
    (how to keep them current?)
  • Analysing in relation to the policy cycle -
    policy mapping tool
  • Being very clear that good science is not the
    same as good evidence for policy.

10
EBPM in practice five whys
  • Constructing a line of argument against which to
    assess policys needs for evidence analysis
  • Why is this issue important?
  • Why are thing changing, for better or for worse?
  • Why does Government need to intervene?
  • Why do we need a policy on this issue?
  • Then summarise into
  • Why does CIDA need to develop a policy on this
    issue?

11
EBPM in practice the policy mapping tool
  • Given the line(s) of argument, what evidence do
    we need to

Monitoring evaluate policy outcomes and impacts
Understand where we are where were heading
Improve deliver our policy outputs
A. Understanding the context - fundamental
processes and phenomena, baselines benchmarks
B. Development of models, methodologies and tools
C. Developing and using the evidence
base to scope the issue and help set targets
D. Development appraisal of options /
solutions, including pilots
E. Effective implementation with
delivery partners and other stakeholders
F. Monitoring progress towards policy/
programme targets
G. Policy / programme evaluation
12
DEFRA Climate Change
13
DEFRA SCP
  • EIS consultation if its a mature policy area,
    why no ME?
  • Big change management process but stick with
    it!
  • Results of five whys workshops
  • Identified two policy holes
  • Real difference of emphasis / direction for the
    evidence
  • Rigorous prioritisation exercises using academic
    advisory group policy leads
About PowerShow.com