Title: THE OBJECTIVES-ORIENTED EVALUATION APPROACH Case Study: When Hard Questions Are Asked: Evaluating Writing Centers. James H. Bell
1THE OBJECTIVES-ORIENTED EVALUATION APPROACHCase
Study When Hard Questions Are Asked Evaluating
Writing Centers. James H. Bell
- Gabriel M. Telleria
- Program Evaluation and Policy Analysis
- Spring 2008
- January 23, 2008
2THE OBJECTIVES-ORIENTED EVALUATION APPROACH
- Why is evaluation important?
- Why do we evaluate?
- Evaluation is the systematic collection and
interpretation of evidence, leading, as part of
the process, to a judgment of value with a view
to action (Beeby, qtd. In Wolf 3, qtd. in Bell
8, 2000).
3 THE OBJECTIVES-ORIENTED EVALUATION APPROACH
- Establish broad goals or objectives
- Classify the goals or objectives
- Define objectives in behavioral terms
- Find situations in which achievement of
objectives can be shown - Develop or select measurement techniques
(indicators) - Collect performance data
- Compare performance data with behaviorally stated
objectives
4Advantages
- focus on outcomes
- ease of use, simplicity
- forces objectives to be set
- widespread acceptability
5Disadvantages
- oversimplification
- outcomes-only orientation
- may neglect the value of the objectives
themselves - may overlook unintended outcomes
6Case Study When Hard Questions Are Asked
Evaluating Writing Centers. By James H. Bell
- Should writing centers evaluate themselves on a
regular basis? - What is the best-type of evaluation approach for
a Writing Center? - What will an evaluation achieve?
7What is the best-type of evaluation approach for
a Writing Center?
- Evaluation is the systematic collection and
interpretation of evidence, leading, as part of
the process, to a judgment of value with a view
to action (from Bell, 2000). - 4 important aspects of evaluations for writing
centers - Systematic
- Interpretation
- Judgment
- Action
8What is the purpose of the evaluation?
- Improvement
- Audience program personnel
- Formative evaluation
- i.e.
- Funding
- Audience Supervisors, consumers, funders
- Summative evaluation
9So how should writing centers be evaluated?
- Consumer-oriented,
- Adversary-oriented
- Management-oriented
- Naturalistic and participant-oriented
- Expertise oriented
- Objectives oriented
10Objectives-Oriented
- Writing centers are essentially trying to
accomplish things. - Writing centers are aiming to alter behavior
- Objectives-oriented evaluation specializes in
documenting behavior change. - Speaks to administrators and funders.
11The Writing Center at the University of Northern
British Columbia
- Formative-evaluation approach implemented during
start-up. - Followed by a small-scale evaluation.
- Focuses on one aspect of the program at a time.
- An objective-oriented evaluation with a summative
emphasis was chosen. - Determine whether the positive evaluations
students gave to the center lasted. - Determine whether students had learned something
and gained long-term value.
12Results
- 100 of clients were immediately satisfied with
the objectives focused on in their conferences
and they could immediately apply the newly gained
knowledge to their school work. - 83.3 agreed or agreed strongly that they were
able to apply the knowledge gained after two
weeks. - 86.6 said that what they learned would be of
benefit for the future. - ¾ of the clients agreed that they could still
apply the knowledge gained through the sessions,
even after two months. - The study was replicated, with new staff and
tutors, and different student evaluator. - Results were slightly less enthusiastic but still
followed the same pattern as the previous
evaluation.
13What did the evaluation achieve?
- Confirmed that the Writing Center had a positive
impact on students writing. - A small-scale, objectives-oriented evaluation
method works well for evaluating writing centers. - There is value in evaluations
- Identities need
- Legitimizes the goals of the writing center
- Improves a centers chances long-term
sustainability.
14Questions or comments?