THE OBJECTIVES-ORIENTED EVALUATION APPROACH Case Study: When Hard Questions Are Asked: Evaluating Writing Centers. James H. Bell - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

THE OBJECTIVES-ORIENTED EVALUATION APPROACH Case Study: When Hard Questions Are Asked: Evaluating Writing Centers. James H. Bell

Description:

THE OBJECTIVES-ORIENTED EVALUATION APPROACH Case Study: When Hard Questions Are Asked: Evaluating Writing Centers. James H. Bell Gabriel M. Telleria – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:1229
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: Gabr50
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: THE OBJECTIVES-ORIENTED EVALUATION APPROACH Case Study: When Hard Questions Are Asked: Evaluating Writing Centers. James H. Bell


1
THE OBJECTIVES-ORIENTED EVALUATION APPROACHCase
Study When Hard Questions Are Asked Evaluating
Writing Centers. James H. Bell
  • Gabriel M. Telleria
  • Program Evaluation and Policy Analysis
  • Spring 2008
  • January 23, 2008

2
THE OBJECTIVES-ORIENTED EVALUATION APPROACH
  • Why is evaluation important?
  • Why do we evaluate?
  • Evaluation is the systematic collection and
    interpretation of evidence, leading, as part of
    the process, to a judgment of value with a view
    to action (Beeby, qtd. In Wolf 3, qtd. in Bell
    8, 2000).

3
THE OBJECTIVES-ORIENTED EVALUATION APPROACH
  • Establish broad goals or objectives
  • Classify the goals or objectives
  • Define objectives in behavioral terms
  • Find situations in which achievement of
    objectives can be shown
  • Develop or select measurement techniques
    (indicators)
  • Collect performance data
  • Compare performance data with behaviorally stated
    objectives

4
Advantages
  • focus on outcomes
  • ease of use, simplicity
  • forces objectives to be set
  • widespread acceptability

5
Disadvantages
  • oversimplification
  • outcomes-only orientation
  • may neglect the value of the objectives
    themselves
  • may overlook unintended outcomes

6
Case Study When Hard Questions Are Asked
Evaluating Writing Centers. By James H. Bell
  • Should writing centers evaluate themselves on a
    regular basis?
  • What is the best-type of evaluation approach for
    a Writing Center?
  • What will an evaluation achieve?

7
What is the best-type of evaluation approach for
a Writing Center?
  • Evaluation is the systematic collection and
    interpretation of evidence, leading, as part of
    the process, to a judgment of value with a view
    to action (from Bell, 2000).
  • 4 important aspects of evaluations for writing
    centers
  • Systematic
  • Interpretation
  • Judgment
  • Action

8
What is the purpose of the evaluation?
  • Improvement
  • Audience program personnel
  • Formative evaluation
  • i.e.
  • Funding
  • Audience Supervisors, consumers, funders
  • Summative evaluation

9
So how should writing centers be evaluated?
  • Consumer-oriented,
  • Adversary-oriented
  • Management-oriented
  • Naturalistic and participant-oriented
  • Expertise oriented
  • Objectives oriented

10
Objectives-Oriented
  • Writing centers are essentially trying to
    accomplish things.
  • Writing centers are aiming to alter behavior
  • Objectives-oriented evaluation specializes in
    documenting behavior change.
  • Speaks to administrators and funders.

11
The Writing Center at the University of Northern
British Columbia
  • Formative-evaluation approach implemented during
    start-up.
  • Followed by a small-scale evaluation.
  • Focuses on one aspect of the program at a time.
  • An objective-oriented evaluation with a summative
    emphasis was chosen.
  • Determine whether the positive evaluations
    students gave to the center lasted.
  • Determine whether students had learned something
    and gained long-term value.

12
Results
  • 100 of clients were immediately satisfied with
    the objectives focused on in their conferences
    and they could immediately apply the newly gained
    knowledge to their school work.
  • 83.3 agreed or agreed strongly that they were
    able to apply the knowledge gained after two
    weeks.
  • 86.6 said that what they learned would be of
    benefit for the future.
  • ¾ of the clients agreed that they could still
    apply the knowledge gained through the sessions,
    even after two months.
  • The study was replicated, with new staff and
    tutors, and different student evaluator.
  • Results were slightly less enthusiastic but still
    followed the same pattern as the previous
    evaluation.

13
What did the evaluation achieve?
  • Confirmed that the Writing Center had a positive
    impact on students writing.
  • A small-scale, objectives-oriented evaluation
    method works well for evaluating writing centers.
  • There is value in evaluations
  • Identities need
  • Legitimizes the goals of the writing center
  • Improves a centers chances long-term
    sustainability.

14
Questions or comments?
  • Thank you.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com