COORDINATION OF SATELLITE NETWORKS Presented by Avram Sion avram'sionitu'int BRSSDSSC - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 74
About This Presentation
Title:

COORDINATION OF SATELLITE NETWORKS Presented by Avram Sion avram'sionitu'int BRSSDSSC

Description:

space station in the BSS (non-planned) with respect to terrestrial services ... any station of a space service for which the requirement to seek the agreement ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:107
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 75
Provided by: trif2
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: COORDINATION OF SATELLITE NETWORKS Presented by Avram Sion avram'sionitu'int BRSSDSSC


1
COORDINATION OF SATELLITE NETWORKSPresented by
Avram Sion(avram.sion_at_itu.int)BR/SSD/SSC
BR Radiocommunications Seminar Geneva, November
2002
2
  • PROPAGATION OF RADIO WAVES - laws of physics
  • Radio waves do not stop at national borders
  • INTERFERENCE - possible between radio stations
    of different countries
  • This risk is high in Space Radiocommunications
  • RADIO REGULATIONS One of its main purposes
  • Interference-free operation of RadioComms

3
INTERFERENCE
TERRESTRIAL STATION
4
RR MECHANISMS TO CONTROL INTERFERENCE ALLOCATION
Frequency separation of stations of
different services REGULATORY PROTECTION
e.g. No. 22.2 Non-GSO to protect GSO (FSS
and BSS) POWER LIMITS - PFD - to protect TERR
services - EIRP - to protect SPACE
services - EPFD - to protect GSO from
Non-GSO and
5
INTERFERENCE
TERRESTRIAL STATION
6
INTERFERENCE
RECEIVING EARTH STATION
TRANSMITTING EARTH STATION
7
and COORDINATION
  • Obligatory NEGOTIATION
  • between Administrations
  • to arrive at interference-free operation
  • Process and Procedure described in RR

8
PROVISIONS OF RADIO REGULATIONS
  • PLANNED SERVICES Broadcasting satellite
    service (Appendices 30 and 30A)
    Fixed-satellite service (Appendix 30B)
  • NON-PLANNED SERVICES Coordination and
    Notification procedures

9
ADVANCE PUBLICATION OF INFORMATION
Central part of a 3-stage process
COORDINATION
RECORDING IN MIFR
10
ADVANCE PUBLICATION OF INFORMATION
Submit, Publish
Request, Examine, Establish Findings
Coordination Requirements, Publish, Coordinate
COORDINATION
RECORDING IN MIFR
Notify, Examine, Check Coordination Agreements,
Record
11
PROCEDURES APPLICABLE TO NON-PLANNEDSATELLITE
NETWORKS
  • ARTICLE 9
  • Procedure for Effecting Coordination with or
    Obtaining Agreement of other Administrations

12
WRC-95, -97, -2000 SIMPLIFIED COORDINATION
PROCEDURE Article 9 contains (almost) all cases
of coordination in non-planned bands for GSO and
N-GSO networks, earth and terrestrial stations
(previously Articles 11, 14 and
Resolutions 33, 46)
13
INTERFERENCE
TERRESTRIAL STATION
14
REGULATORY PROCEDURES APPLICABLE TONON-PLANNED
SPACE SERVICES
Applies for all satellitenetworks except for
those to be operated in accordance with a Plan
i.e. App. 30, 30A 30B
ADVANCE PUBLICATION Art. 9,Section I,
Sub-Sections IA and IB
REQUEST AGREEMENT Art. 9/9.21 Ap4/II or III
REQUEST COORDINATION
Ap4/II
GEO only
GEO Non-GEO
GEO Non-GEO
Applies only in certain bands services
Non-GEO v. Non-GEO, GEO,
TERR GEO v. Non-GEO,TERR 9.11A (12, 12A, 13, 14)
GEO v. GEO Art. 9/9.7 Res. 33/II
BSS v. TERR 9.11 Res. 33/I
Non-GEO
NOTIFICATION Art. 11 Res. 33
RECORDING IN MIFR
15
ADVANCE PUBLICATION OF INFORMATIONON SATELLITE
NETWORKS(Section I of Article 9)
  • Aim is to inform all administrations of any
    planned satellite network (GSO or N-GSO) and its
    general description
  • Formal mechanism for making initial assessment of
    the interference effects of that planned
    satellite network

16
ADVANCE PUBLICATION (1) Section I has two
sub-sections
  • 1A Advance publication of information on
    satellite systems that are NOT subject to
    coordination procedure under Section II of
    Article 9
  • 1B Advance publication of information on
    satellite systems that are SUBJECT to the
    coordination procedure under Section II of
    Article 9

17
ADVANCE PUBLICATION (2)
  • Information to be communicated to the BR AP4
    (Forms of notice APS4/V and APS4/VI)
  • To be initiated 2- 5 years before the planned
    date of bringing into use of the network (or
    system) - 9.1
  • BR publishes Special Section API/A

18
(No Transcript)
19
(No Transcript)
20
ADVANCE PUBLICATION (3)
  • API phase is obligatory, before coordination
    phase or notification
  • No priority in being first to start advance
    publication

21
ADVANCE PUBLICATION (4)
  • Must be re-started
  • for new frequency band(s)
  • for a change of GSO orbital location by gt12
    degrees

22
COORDINATION OF SATELLITE NETWORKS
  • Section II, Article 9
  • Procedure for effecting coordination
  • Contains almost all cases of coordination for
    non-planned satellite networks (GSO and N-GSO),
    earth and terrestrial stations

23
COORDINATION CASES Not in Art.9 Article 7 of
Appendix 30 Non-planned FSS or BSS w.r. to
BSS Plan Article 7 of Appendix 30A Non-planned
FSS of BSS w.r. to Feeder Link Plan Resolution
77 (WRC-2000) FSS w.r. to Terrestrial
Services (11.7-12.2 GHz) Resolution 84 (WRC-2000)
FSS w.r. to Terrestrial Services in R2
(37.5-40 GHz)
24
COORDINATION (2)
  • Procedure for coordination of GSO and Non-GSO
    satellite network
  • Article 9 shall be applied for coordination of
    GSO and N-GSO networks in the following cases

25
COORDINATION (3)
  • Between GSO networks - 9.7
  • Between GSO and N-GSO and between N-GSO
    networks (in accordance with a footnote in the
    Table) - 9.12, 9.12A, 9.13
  • Space station of a satellite network w.r. to
    stations of terrestrial services where threshold
    value is exceeded - 9.14

26
COORDINATION (4)
  • space station in the BSS (non-planned) with
    respect to terrestrial services - -
    9.11/Res. 33
  • any station of a space service for which the
    requirement to seek the agreement of other
    administrations is included in a footnote to the
    Table - 9.21

27
COORDINATION (5)
  • in all these cases, request for coordination
    shall be sent by the requesting administration to
    the BR together with the appropriate information
    listed in Ap4 (9.30)
  • simultaneous request for all applicable forms of
    coordination (9.23)

28
COORDINATION (6)
  • date of receipt of the coordination request must
    be gt six months after the date of receipt of API
    (9.1)
  • request for coordination must come within 24
    months after the date of receipt of the advance
    information, otherwise restart API (9.5D)

29
COORDINATION (7)Action of the BR
  • The Bureau examines coordination requests (if
    complete) for conformity with
  • the Table of Frequency Allocations 9.35
  • other provisions of the RR 9.35
    (e.g. compliance with PFD limits)
  • The BR identifies, in accordance with Ap5 , any
    administration with which coordination may need
    to be effected 9.36

30
COORDINATION (8)
  • Appendix 5
  • Identification of administrations with which
    coordination is to be effected or agreement
    sought under the provisions of Article 9
  • Ap5 contains criteria for identification of
    assignments to be taken into account in effecting
    coordination or seeking agreement

31
COORDINATION (9)
  • Methods, threshold levels and conditions given
    in Tables 5-1 and 5-2 differ according to the
    specific cases of coordination (GSO/GSO,
    GSO/N-GSO, GSON-GSO with respect to terrestrial
    services)

32
COORDINATION (10)
  • GSO/GSO
  • criterion DeltaT/Tgt6, method of
  • calculation
    in Ap8
  • Coordination Arc GSO FSS in certain
  • frequency
    bands
  • List of ADMINISTRATIONS
  • List of NETWORKS, for information

33
COORDINATION (11)
  • The BR publishes the information (network
    data) in a Special Section of its IFIC, on
    CD-ROM, fortnightly since 2000, as well as the
    results of its examination, i.e. findings,
    coordination requirements (list of ADMINS), list
    of networks (for information, where appropriate)

34
(No Transcript)
35
(No Transcript)
36
(No Transcript)
37
(No Transcript)
38
BR COMMENTS - Findings with respect to
No.9.35/11.31
1. For frequency assignments in the 12.5-12.7
GHz band 1.1 UNFAVOURABLE for all frequency
assignments in transmitting space station beams
ETH and ETV with maximum power density greater
than or equal to 55.8 dBW/Hz (p.f.d. limits of
21.16 are exceeded).
39
BR COMMENTS - Findings with respect to
No.9.35/11.31
  • 1.2 UNFAVOURABLE for frequency assignment 12.5
    GHz in transmitting space station beam UPC
    (out-of-band).
  • 1.3 FAVOURABLE for all other frequency
    assignments.

40
BR COMMENTS Coordination Requirements (No.9.36)
  • Applicable forms of COORD (CR/C, page 1)
  • Summary of COORD Requirements per provision
    List of Admins (CR/C, p. 2)
  • (Last part of CR/C)
  • Detailed COORD requirements (Admins) for each
    group of frequency assignments
  • List of networks identified (for info only)

41
COORDINATION (12)
  • The list of
  • administrations identified by the BR under 9. 11
    to 9.14 and 9.21
  • networks identified by the BR under 9.7/9.27
  • are only for information purposes (to help
    administrations comply with procedures) - 9.36.1,
    9.36.2

42
COORDINATION (13)
  • The list of ADMINs identified under S9.7, as a
    result of Coordination Arc or DeltaT/T, is the
    formal list of administrations with which
    coordination is required
  • Coordination Arc results 9.41/9.42, inclusion,
    exclusion (4 months)
  • Four months for comments

43
COORDINATION (14)
  • For coordination requests under 9.11 to 9.14 and
    9.21, the BR shall, 45 days prior to the expiry
    of the four-month period, dispatch a circular
    telegram to all administrations bringing the
    matter for their attention and 30 days later a
    reminder (9.52D)

44
COORDINATION (15) Action by administrations
  • An administration having received a request for
    coordination shall examine the matter with
    respect to interference which may be caused to,
    or caused by, its own assignments

45
COORDINATION (16) Action by administrations
  • inform the requesting administration and the BR
    within four months from the date of publication
    of the IFIC of either
  • its agreement to the proposal, or
  • the disagreement, giving pertinent details upon
    which the disagreement is based

46
COORDINATION (17) Action by administrations
  • For coordination requests under 9.11 (Res. 33,
    w.r. to terrestrial services), 9.12 to 9.14 and
    9.21, the absence of response within the 4-month
    period means agreement (9.52C)

47
COORDINATION (18) Res. 33 (Rev. WRC-97)
  • Procedure applicable to non-planned BSS is
    included in Article 9. However, WRC-97 decided
    that for satellite networks for which advance
    information requests were received prior to
    01.01.1999 - Resolution 33 applies. If advance
    information was received after 01.01.99 9.11
    applies

48
COORDINATION (19)
  • Coordination is a regulatory obligation
  • for the administration wishing to assign a
    frequency to a station
  • for any other administration whose services might
    be affected. (9.53)
  • The agreement resulting from the coordination
    involves certain legal rights and obligations.

49
COORDINATION (20)
  • Coordination is to be effected in accordance with
    RR procedures and on the basis of criteria
    established by the RR or agreed to between
    administrations

50
Extension of the date of bringing into use of
frequency assignments to space networks
  • 9.1 Advance publication procedure shall be
    initiated not earlier than 5 years before the
    planned date of bringing into use of the network.

51
Extension (2)
  • 11.44 The notified date of bringing into use of
    any frequency assignment to a space station shall
    be not later than 5 years following the date of
    receipt by the BR of the relevant information
    under 9.1.

52
Extension (3)
  • 11.44 The notified date of bringing into use may
    be extended by not more than 2 years, only under
    conditions specified in Nos. 11.44B to 11.44I.
  • That is, a maximum of 7 years from the date of
    receipt of API.

53
Extension (4)
  • 11.44B The notified date of bringing into use
    will be extended by the Bureau in accordance with
    No. 11.44 if due diligence information required
    by Resolution 49 is provided for the satellite
    network if the procedure for effecting
    coordination in accordance with Section II of
    Article 9 (if applicable) has commenced and if
    the notifying administration certifies that the
    reason for the extension is one or more of the
    following specific circumstances

54
Extension (5)
  • 11.44C a) launch failure
  • 11.44D b) launch delays due to circumstances
    outside the control of the administration or
    operator
  • 11.44E c) delays caused by modifications of
    satellite design necessary to reach coordination
    agreements
  • 11.44F d) problems in meeting the satellite
    design specifications
  • 11.44G e) delays in effecting coordination after
    the assistance of the Bureau was requested under
    No. 9.59
  • 11.44H f) financial circumstances outside the
    control of the administration or the operator or
  • 11.44I g) force majeure.

55
Extension (6)
  • Res. 51 (WRC-2000)
  • Transitional arrangements relating to the API
    and coordination of satellite networks
  • Resolves - For satellite networks for which API
    had been received by the BR prior to 22.11.97,
    the maximum allowed time period to bring
    frequency assignment into use shall be 6 years
    plus the extensions pursuant to RR1550 from the
    date of publication of the API.

56
Due Diligence (Administrative)
  • Resolution 49 to address the problem of
    reservation of orbit and spectrum capacity
    without actual use (Res. 18 of Kyoto
    Plenipotentiary)
  • Application for any satellite network in the
    FSS, MSS, BSS subject to coordination from
    22.11.97

57
Due Diligence (2)Due Diligence information
required
  • Annex 2 to Resolution 49
  • A. Identity of the satellite network
  • B. Spacecraft manufacturer
  • C. Launch services provider

58
Annex 2 to Resolution 49 A. Identity of the
satellite network
  • a) Identity of the satellite network
  • b) Name of the administration
  • c) Country symbol
  • d) Reference to the advance publication
    information or to the request for modification of
    the Plans in Appendices 30 and 30A

59
Annex 2 to Resolution 49
  • e) reference to the request for coordination
  • f) Frequency band(s)
  • g) Name of the operator
  • h) Name of the satellite
  • I) Orbital characteristics

60
Annex 2 to Resolution 49 B. Spacecraft
manufacturer
  • a) Name of the spacecraft manufacturer
  • b) Date of execution of the contract
  • c) Contractual delivery window
  • d) Number of satellites procured

61
Annex 2 to Resolution 49 C. Launch services
provider
  • a) Name of the launch vehicle provider
  • b) Date of execution of the contract
  • c) Anticipated launch or in-orbit delivery window
  • d) Name of the launch vehicle
  • e) Name and location of the launch facility

62
Due Diligence (3)
  • Six months before expiry of the notified period
    of bringing into use, the BR sends a reminder.
  • If the complete due diligence information is not
    received within the specified time limit, the
    network shall no longer be taken into account and
    shall not be recorded in the Master Register.

63
COORDINATION REQUEST PROCESSING
64
COORDINATION REQUEST PROCESSING
Capture network data in .MDB and .GXT format,
Validate, Submit to BR
Administration
Receivability, as-received publication,
pre-validate, 2D-date, prepare, validate
BR
SNS GIMS DataBase Ready for Examination
BR
65
COORDINATION REQUEST PROCESSING
BR
Examination
Table of Frequency Allocation
Other provisions of RR (PFD)
9.35
Split Groups of Frequency Assignments
Forms of Coordination
Findings, Enter them
A, B, N
RoP 9.35
66
GROUP OF FREQUENCY ASSIGNMENTS

Orbital Position Beam Assigned Bandwidth Service
(CoS) Assigned Frequency Emission/Power (Data
Elements) Assignments
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
16
6
1
2
3
4
4 in a group
10 50000 in one network
67
GROUP SPLITTING Re-GROUPING

Orbital Position Beam Assigned Bandwidth Service
(CoS) Assigned Frequency Emission/Power Assignmen
ts
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
4 in a group
68
GROUP SPLITTING Re-GROUPING

Orbital Position Beam Assigned Bandwidth Service
(CoS) Assigned Frequency Emission/Power Assignmen
ts
1
1
1
A
N
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
COORD
NO COORD
4 in a group
2 in a group
2 in a group
69
COORDINATION REQUEST PROCESSING
BR
Examination
Table of Frequency Allocation
Other provisions of RR (PFD)
9.35
Split Groups of Freq. Assign.
Forms of Coordination
Findings, Enter them
A, B, N
RoP 9.35
70
COORDINATION REQUEST PROCESSING
9.36
Examination (Cont)
BR
Forms of Coordination
9.7, 9.7A, 9.7B, 9.11, RS33, 9.11A, 9.12, 9.12A,
9.13, 9.14, 9.21/A, 9.21/B, 9.21/C, Ap30/Art.7,
Ap30A/Art.7, RS77, RS84
Software Tools for Coordination Requirements
.mdb .mdb .mdb .mdb .mdb
.MDB
SNS
71
COORDINATION REQUEST PROCESSING
SNS
Publication
CR/C Special Section
72
COORDINATION REQUEST PROCESSING
CR/C Special Section Final Coordination
Requirements Potentially Affected Administrations
(only for info under 9.36.1) Only Admins that,
within 4-months, inform of disagreement under
9.52, enter coordination. Others are considered
to have agreed !!!
W.R. to SPACE 9.7, RS333, 9.7A, 9.7B A307.1,
A30A7.1 9.11A 9.12, 9.12A, 9.13 9.21 9.21/A,
9.21/B CR/D
W.R. TERR RS77, RS84 9.11/RS332.1 9.11A/9.14 9.
21-9.21/C CR/D
73
COORDINATION REQUEST PROCESSING
SNS
CR/D
Publication
BR
IFIC.mdb
CR/C Special Section
ADMIN
74
INTERFERENCE
QUESTIONS ?
TERRESTRIAL STATION
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com