Marzano - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 36
About This Presentation
Title:

Marzano

Description:

Construct a rubric, or other type of common scale, for each learning goal. ... Rubrics. Clean refrigerator. 4 Entire refrigerator is ... rubric design. 0. 1. 2 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:208
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 37
Provided by: rmar1
Category:
Tags: marzano | rubric

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Marzano


1
Data and Learning
Quality Classroom
2
  • Deciding to enter into a quality process in
    education is not because good things are not
    happening but because of a desire to have good
    things happen regularly, consistently, and
    predictable at every level of the school system.
    Random acts of excellence have little effect on
    the desired strategic results.
  • Margaret Byrnes

3
Essential Questions
  • What do we want students to know or be able to
    do?
  • How do we know? What evidence do we have of the
    learning?
  • How do we respond if they struggle or dont
    learn?
  • How do we respond if they already know it?

4
Student Questions
  • What do I need to know?
  • Where am I now?
  • How do I get there?
  • What happens if I struggle or fail?

5
Assessment What is it?
  • Can you define it?
  • Force Field Analysis
  • Drivers Preventors
  • With your group.

6
Types of Assessment
  • Formative
  • In-Process
  • Summative
  • High Stakes Testing
  • What do these terms mean?
  • Discuss with your group.

7
PurposeAssess to meet whose needs?
8
PURPOSETwo Uses of Assessment
  • SUMMATIVE
  • Assessments OF Learning
  • How much have students learned as of a particular
    point in time?
  • FORMATIVE
  • Assessments FOR Learning
  • How can we use assessment information to help
    students learn more?

9
Assessment for Learning
  • Rick Stiggins

10
Balanced Assessment Meeting the Needs of All
Stakeholders
  • Annual accountability testing
  • Interim, short-cycle or benchmark
  • Ongoing, accurate classroom assessment for
    learning

11
Overview
Summative Formative

Reason
To Inform
Focus
Assessment OF Learning
Assessment FOR Learning
Improve Learning
Check Status
Others about students
Students about themselves
Enabling Targets
Standards
12
Key IDEA
  • Formative assessment can and should be done
  • BY STUDENTS,
  • as well as by teachers. The key to improvement
    is how students and teachers use assessment
    information.

13
Assessment and Student Learning
  • Robert J Marzanohttp//www.marzanoandassociates.c
    om/
  • Mid-Continent Research for Education and
    Learninghttp//www.mcrel.org/
  • Rick StigginsAssessment Training
    Institutehttp//www.assessmentinst.com/

14
Factors Influencing Achievement
1. Guaranteed and Viable Curriculum
2. Challenging Goals and Effective
Feedback 3. Parent and Community
Involvement 4. Safe and
Orderly Environment
5. Collegiality and Professionalism



6. Instructional Strategies 7. Classroom
Management 8. Classroom Curriculum Design
9. Home Environment 10. Learning Intelligence/
Background Knowledge 11. Motivation
Marzano
15
(No Transcript)
16
100





80
Increase of 34ile to 84ile
60
13ile increase to 63ile
Starting percentile 50th
Starting percentile 50th
ile improvement increase
40
20
0
Teacher assessment effectiveness
Student Achievement
17
100





Increase of 49ile to 99ile
80
28ile increase to 78ile
60
Starting percentile 50th
Starting percentile 50th
ile improvement increase
40
20
0
Teacher assessment effectiveness
Student Achievement
18
John Hattiereviewed 7,827 studies on learning
and instruction.
Conclusion The most powerful single innovation
that enhances achievement is feedback. The
simplest prescription for improving education
must be dollops of feedback.
19
Like most things in education, classroom
assessment enhances student achievement under
certain conditions only.
  • Feedback from classroom assessments should
    provide students with a clear picture of
  • their progress on learning goals and
  • how they might improve
  • Feedback from classroom assessment should
    encourage students to improve.
  • Classroom assessment should be formative in
    nature.
  • Formative classroom assessments should be quite
    frequent.

20
  • Feedback from classroom assessments should
    provide students with a clear picture of
  • their progress on learning goals and
  • how they might improve

Bangert-Drowns, Kulik, Kulik, Morgan, 1991
of studies Characteristic of Feedback from Classroom Assessment Percentile Gain/Loss
6 Right/wrong -3
39 Provide correct answers 8.5
30 Criteria understood by student vs. not understood 16
9 Explain 20
4 Student reassessed until correct 20
21
  • Feedback from classroom assessments should
    provide students with a clear picture of
  • their progress on learning goals and
  • how they might improve

Fuchs Fuchs 1988
of studies Characteristic of Feedback from Classroom Assessment Percentile Gain/Loss
49 Evaluation by rule uniform way of interpreting results of classroom assessments using a tight logic) 32
89 Displaying results graphically 26
49 Evaluation by rule uniform way of interpreting results of classroom assessments using a tight logic) 32
22
Track Learning Goals
  • Identify one grade level (or course) learning
    goal per quarter or per semester for each of the
    following subject areas mathematic, reading,
    writing, science, and social studies.
  • Construct a rubric, or other type of common
    scale, for each learning goal.
  • Have teachers formally and informally assess each
    learning goal at least once every two weeks
    keeping track of each students score on each
    learning goal. (Use of appropriate computer
    software is highly recommended)
  • Have students keep track of their progress on
    each goal and use the data as the basis for
    teacher/student interactions about student
    progress.
  • Periodically (at least, once per quarter)
    aggregate the data by grade level. Have teachers
    meet to discuss student progress and how it might
    be improved

23
How effective am I when I set objectives? When I
set objectives, to what extent do I believe that
my students
  • could describe what they are learning, not just
    describe what they are doing
  • focus more on learning goals than on completing
    assignments
  • personalize the learning goals

Not at all To a great
extent 1 2 3 4
24
Setting Objectives and Providing Feedback
Generalizations from research on Providing
Feedback
  1. Feedback should be corrective in nature.
  2. Feedback should be timely.
  3. Feedback should be specific to a criterion.
  4. Students can effectively provide their own
    feedback.

25
  • How do you provide feedback in a way that
    students
  • Know what they are learning and how well the are
    progressing
  • Can explain what they need to do to get better.

Rubrics
26
Clean refrigerator
4 Entire refrigerator is sparkling and smells
clean. All items are fresh, in proper
containers (original or Tupperware, with lids),
and organized into categories
3 Refrigerator is generally wiped clean. All
items are relatively fresh, in some type of
container (some Tupperware lids are missing or
dont fit) and are sitting upright
27
2 Some of the shelves are wiped clean, although
there are some crusty spots. There are some
suspicious smells. Items are in containers, but
there seems to be some green stuff growing in
some of the Tupperware
1 Items stick to the shelves when they are
picked up. The smells linger long after the
refrigerator door is closed. Several items
need to be thrown out Tupperware and all
28
A generic template forrubric design
29
4
3 The students responses demonstrate no major errors or omissions regarding any of the information and/or processes (THAT WERE EXPLICITLY TAUGHT)
2
1
0
30
4
3 The students responses demonstrate no major errors or omissions regarding any of the information and/or processes
2 The students responses indicate major errors or omissions regarding the more complex ideas and processes however they do not indicate major errors or omissions relative to the simpler details and processes
1
0
31
4
3 The students responses demonstrate no major errors or omissions regarding any of the information and/or processes
2 The students responses indicate major errors or omissions regarding the more complex ideas and processes however they do not indicate major errors or omissions relative to the simpler details and processes
1 The student provides responses that indicate a distinct lack of understanding of the knowledge. However, with help, the student demonstrates partial understanding of some of the knowledge.
0
32
4
3 The students responses demonstrate no major errors or omissions regarding any of the information and/or processes
2 The students responses indicate major errors or omissions regarding the more complex ideas and processes however they do not indicate major errors or omissions relative to the simpler details and processes
1 The student provides responses that indicate a distinct lack of understanding of the knowledge. However, with help, the student demonstrates partial understanding of some of the knowledge.
0 The student provides little or no response. Even with help the student does not exhibit a partial understanding of the knowledge.
33
4 In addition to exhibiting level 3 performance, the students responses demonstrate in-depth inferences and applications that go beyond what was taught in class
3 The students responses demonstrate no major errors or omissions regarding any of the information and/or processes
2 The students responses indicate major errors or omissions regarding the more complex ideas and processes however they do not indicate major errors or omissions relative to the simpler details and processes
1 The student provides responses that indicate a distinct lack of understanding of the knowledge. However, with help, the student demonstrates partial understanding of some of the knowledge.
0 The student provides little or no response. Even with help the student does not exhibit a partial understanding of the knowledge.
34
4 In addition to exhibiting level 3 performance, the students responses demonstrate in-depth inferences and applications that go beyond what was taught in class.
3 The students responses demonstrate no major errors or omissions regarding any of the information and/or processes
2 The students responses indicate major errors or omissions regarding the more complex ideas and processes however they do not indicate major errors or omissions relative to the simpler details and processes
1 The student provides responses that indicate a distinct lack of understanding of the knowledge. However, with help, the student demonstrates partial understanding of some of the knowledge.
0 The student provides little or no response. Even with help the student does not exhibit a partial understanding of the knowledge.
35
On this writing task, I will be working on, and
would like to receive feedback on,
_______________________________.
In my next writing assignment, I need to work
on_____________________.
36
My Progress in Writing ProcessContent and
Organization
4 3 2 1








Achievement
Date__9/17_
Date_9/24_
Date_10/1_
Date_10/20_
Date_10/31_
Date_11/15_
Date_______
Date______
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com