Title: Mapping social networks to support smoking cessation in pregnancy
1Mapping social networks to support smoking
cessation in pregnancy
- Fiona Dobbie, Lesley Sinclair,
- School of Heath Sciences and Sport, University of
Stirling - Andrew Radley, NHS Tayside
2Content
- Background
- Aim
- Study design
- Key findings orientation phase
- Intervention design
- Feedback on proposed intervention
- Next steps
3The problem
- SmokingĀ in pregnancy is a harmful for both
mother and child - Rates of smoking in pregnancy remain high
particularly in communities with high levels of
social disadvantage - 29 of pregnant women living in the most deprived
areas of Scotland were current smokers in
comparison with 4.5 living in least deprived
area. (Information Service Division Scotland,
2015) - UK Stop Smoking Services support pregnant women
to quit. - But, outcomes are poor with only a small
proportion of pregnant women who smoke make use
of existing services more innovative approaches
required (NICE, 2010)
4Social Networks and Health
- Our embeddedness in social networks affect our
health and behavioural choices (Perkins et al
2015, Hunter et al, 2015) - Attitude and smoking behaviour of partners,
family and friends have been identified as
barriers to cessation (Hiscock et al 2011, Prady
et al 2011). - Studies have shown that reducing the number of
smoking friends in a network can help quit
attempts (Hitchman, et al, 2014) - Lorencatto et al (2012) emphasised the importance
of social support BCTs to aid smoking cessation
in pregnancy - Yet, few examples of how this link can be
applied.
5Study aim
- To design an intervention to support pregnant
women living in deprived areas stop smoking using
social support from their social networks.
6Study design
- Three phases to the study
- Orientation identifying the evidence base,
existing theory, clarifying scope and purpose - Intervention design
- Feedback on proposed intervention
7Study design
- Rapid literature review
- identity theory and possible models/components of
the intervention - Co-creation approach consultation with
- pregnant women (n7)
- members of their social networks (n8)
- academics working in social network research and
smoking cessation - Service providers in NHS, Local Authority, and
pharmacy staff working in smoking cessation /
tobacco control (workshop n25)
8Key findings orientation phase
9Rapid literature review
- Searched for studies using the social network of
pregnant women to facilitate any type of HBC
during pregnancy and up to 6 weeks postpartum - All type of study design included
- Limits
- social network defined as friends and family
only, not professionals - Articles written in English from 2000 onwards
10Summary of paper search and selection process
for rapid review
11Literature review
- Six studies identified where social network
members provided social support. - But, long term efficacy was poor and none of them
mapped the social network to identify sources of
support. - This highlights an important gap in social
network health behaviour change theory. - Focus was to identify someone from the social
network to offer social support, not how and why
they were the most relevant person.
12Literature review - existing theory
- Who should provide what to whom and when?
(Heaney and Israel, 2008) - who friends and family
- what social support to stop smoking
- whom pregnant women trying to stop smoking
- when during pregnancy and three months post
partum - how - ?
- To measure effectiveness and access the target
group intervention need to be delivered by
service providers working with pregnant women
(e.g. midwives, health visitors, pharmacists,
smoking cessation advisors).
13Literature review - existing theory
- Heaney and Israel (2008) 5 typologies
- Enhancing existing network ties
- Developing new social network linkage
- Enhancing networks through the use of natural
helpers and community health workers - Enhancing networks through community building and
problem solving - Combing strategies
14Literature review - existing theory
- Valentes (2012) taxonomy of SN interventions
- identify individuals to promote behaviour change
- segmentation identifying groups (cliques) who
are targets for the intervention - Induction cascading of information e.g. word of
mouth, also used as recruitment tool - Alteration seeks to alter the network to change
behaviour by adding or deleting nodes
15Literature review
- Useful but requires mapping and analysis of
social networks - ambitious and resource
intensive for service providers - Raised our interest in network visualisation
tools (such as concentric circles) and potential
hypothesis - If pregnant women mapped their network and had a
better understanding of network structure and
resources within it would this influence who they
picked to offer social support and how would this
affect their smoking cessation attempt?
16Intervention design
17Concentric circles
- Respondent name in centre
- Add names of people they feel close to on post it
notes - Circles indicate level of closeness
- Add detail on
- Relationship to them
- Age
- Employment status
- Smoker or non-smoker
- Frequency of contact
18Concentric circles
- Coloured dots added to identify
- Who is/has helped them try to quit (yellow dot)
- Anyone who is making difficult /made it difficult
to quit? (red dot) - Anyone who they would like / would have liked to
help them quit but didnt? (blue dot)
19(No Transcript)
20Concentric circles
- Maps then used as a tool to enable pregnant women
to reflect on - Strong and weak sources of support
- The type of support they receive
- Identify ways they can optimise support from
their social network - Strategies to manage non supportive members of
their social network
21Feedback on proposed intervention
22Feedback from interviews with PW (N7)
- Support for the idea
- Good to visually see network and think about
sources of support - Triggered new insights and ideas
- Liked the visual aspect something they could
refer back to and update - Easy to complete and did not take long (around 5
minutes depending on network size)
23Feedback from interviews
- Points to consider
- Network size varied, common to consist of family
members with few friends - Lack of awareness of how social networks could
support them - self reliance and will power
common approach (one respondent added no dots) - Practicalities of completing the map language
and literacy barriers
24Feedback from practitioners
- Potential to consolidate existing practice
- Gives women insight and lets them make informed
choices on network support - Can be used for other health behaviour change
- But
- Where does it fit? Who will administer it?
- How often would it be used/revisited?
- How do you measure impact? (realistic
expectations) - Success dependant on confidence of women to
engage with her network, but also who delivers it
(need staff buy in)
25Next steps
26Progress to date
Feasibility/Piloting 2017-2020 Pilot 3-arm
randomised controlled trial process evaluation
to assess feasibility and acceptability
Evaluation 1. Assessing effectiveness 2.
Understanding change process 3. Assessing
cost-effectiveness
Development 2014-2016 Develop and co-produce
intervention theory, website, mobile app, user
manual and training resources.
Implementation 1. Dissemination 2. Surveillance
and monitoring 3. Long term follow-up
27Research team advisory group
- funded by CRUK/BUPA innovation award
28Thank you
- Fiona Dobbie
- fiona.dobbie_at_stir.ac.uk