CS 430/585 Computer Graphics I 3D Representation and Solid Modeling Week 8, Lecture 15 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

CS 430/585 Computer Graphics I 3D Representation and Solid Modeling Week 8, Lecture 15

Description:

Solid Modeling Week 8 ... Solid Geometry Boundary Representation 3D Modeling 3D Representations Wireframe models Surface Models Solid Models Meshes and ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:418
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 46
Provided by: William1530
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: CS 430/585 Computer Graphics I 3D Representation and Solid Modeling Week 8, Lecture 15


1
CS 430/585Computer Graphics I3D Representation
and Solid Modeling Week 8, Lecture 15
  • David Breen, William Regli and Maxim Peysakhov
  • Geometric and Intelligent Computing Laboratory
  • Department of Computer Science
  • Drexel University
  • http//gicl.cs.drexel.edu

2
Overview
  • 3D Modeling
  • Wireframes
  • Surface Models
  • Solids and Solid Modeling
  • Sweep Representations
  • Constructive Solid Geometry
  • Boundary Representation

1994 Foley/VanDam/Finer/Huges/Phillips ICG
3
3D Modeling
  • 3D Representations
  • Wireframe models
  • Surface Models
  • Solid Models
  • Meshes and Polygon soups
  • Voxel/Volume models
  • Decomposition-based
  • Octrees, voxels
  • Modeling in 3D
  • Constructive Solid Geometry (CSG), Breps and
    feature-based

4
Representing 3D Objects
  • Exact
  • Wireframe
  • Parametric Surface
  • Solid Model
  • CSG
  • BRep
  • Implicit Solid Modeling
  • Approximate
  • Facet / Mesh
  • Just surfaces
  • Voxel
  • Volume info

5
Representing 3D Objects
  • Exact
  • Precise model of object topology
  • Mathematically represent all geometry
  • Approximate
  • A discretization of the 3D object
  • Use simple primitives to model topology and
    geometry

6
Negatives when Representing 3D Objects
  • Exact
  • Complex data structures
  • Expensive algorithms
  • Wide variety of formats, each with subtle nuances
  • Hard to acquire data
  • Translation required for rendering
  • Approximate
  • Lossy
  • Data structure sizes can get HUGE, if you want
    good fidelity
  • Easy to break (i.e. cracks can appear)
  • Not good for certain applications
  • Lots of interpolation and guess work

7
Positives when Representing 3D Objects
  • Exact
  • Precision
  • Simulation, modeling, etc
  • Lots of modeling environments
  • Physical properties
  • Many applications (tool path generation, motion,
    etc.)
  • Compact
  • Approximate
  • Easy to implement
  • Easy to acquire
  • 3D scanner, CT
  • Easy to render
  • Direct mapping to the graphics pipeline
  • Lots of algorithms

8
Exact Representations
  • Wireframe
  • Parametric Surface
  • Solid Model
  • operations
  • CSG, BRep, implicit geometry

9
Wireframes
  • Basic idea
  • Represent the model as the set of all of its
    edges
  • ExampleA simple cube
  • 12 lines
  • 8 vertices
  • How about the faces?

Foley/VanDam, 1990/1994
10
Wireframes Examples
  • Cube with extra wires
  • Question why would you want this?

Foley/VanDam, 1990/1994
11
Issues with Wireframes
  • Visually ambiguous
  • No surfaces!
  • Whats inside? Whats outside?
  • Hidden line removal?
  • What does validity entail?
  • Dont we just have a bunch of wires?
  • Do they need to add up to something?
  • How to model wireframe shapes?
  • Wire by wire? Not very easy!

12
Surface Models
  • Basic idea
  • Represent a model as a set of faces/patches
  • Limitations
  • Topological integrity how do faces line up?
    which way is inside/ outside?
  • Used in many CAD applications
  • Why? They are fine for drafting and rendering,
    not as good for creating true physical models

13
Surface Models Examples
  • Utah Teapot
  • Original IGES standard
  • Bezier patches

14
Solids and Solid Modeling
  • Solid modeling introduces a mathematical theory
    of solid shape
  • Domain of objects
  • Set of operations on the domain of objects
  • Representation that is
  • Unambiguous
  • Accurate
  • Unique
  • Compact
  • Efficient

15
Solid Objects and Operations
  • Solids are point sets
  • Boundary and interior
  • Point sets can be operated on with boolean
    algebra (union, intersect, etc)

Foley/VanDam, 1990/1994
16
Solid Object Definitions
  • Boundary points
  • Points where distance to the object and the
    objects complement is zero
  • Interior points
  • All the other points in the object
  • Closure
  • Union of interior points and boundary points

17
Issues with 3D Set Operations
  • Ops on 3D objects can create non-3D objects or
    objects with non-uniform dimensions
  • Objects need to be Regularized
  • Take the closure of the interior

Input set Closure
Interior Regularized
Foley/VanDam, 1990/1994
18
Regularized Boolean Operations
  • 3D Example
  • Two solids A and B
  • Intersection leaves a dangling wall
  • A 2D portion hanging off a 3D object
  • Closure of interior gives a uniform 3D result

Pics/Math courtesy of Dave Mount _at_ UMD-CP
19
Boolean Operations
  • Other Examples
  • (c) ordinary intersection
  • (d) regularized intersection
  • AB - objects on the same side
  • CD objects on different sides

Foley/VanDam, 1990/1994
20
Boolean Operations
Foley/VanDam, 1990/1994
21
Constructive Solid Geometry (CSG)
  • A tree structure combining primitives via
    regularized boolean operations
  • Primitives can be solids or half spaces

22
A Sequence of Boolean Operations
  • Boolean operations
  • Rigid transformations

Pics/Math courtesy of Dave Mount _at_ UMD-CP
23
The Induced CSG Tree
Pics/Math courtesy of Dave Mount _at_ UMD-CP
24
The Induced CSG Tree
  • Can also be represented as a directed acyclic
    graph (DAG)

Pics/Math courtesy of Dave Mount _at_ UMD-CP
25
Issues with Constructive Solid Geometry
  • Non-uniqueness
  • Choice of primitives
  • How to handle more complex modeling?
  • Sculpted surfaces? Deformable objects?

26
Issues with Constructive Solid Geometry
  • Non-Uniqueness
  • There is more than one way to model the same
    artifact
  • Hard to tell if A and B are identical

27
Issues with CSG
  • Minor changes in primitive objects greatly affect
    outcomes
  • Shift up top solid face

Foley/VanDam, 1990/1994
28
Uses of CSG Constructive Solid Geometry
  • Found (basically) in every CAD system
  • Elegant, conceptually and algorithmically
    appealing
  • Good for
  • Rendering, ray tracing, simulation
  • BRL CAD

29
Sweep Representations
  • An alternative way to represent 3D obj.
  • Idea
  • Given a primitive (e.g. polygon,sphere )
  • And a sweep(e.g. vector, curve)
  • Define solid as space swept out by primitive

Foley/VanDam, 1990/1994
30
Sweep Representations
  • Issue how to define intersection?

Foley/VanDam, 1990/1994
31
CAD Feature-Based Design
  • CSG is the basic machinery behind CAD features
  • Features are
  • Local modifications to object geom/topo with
    engineering significance
  • Often are additive or subtractive mods to shape
  • Hole, pocket, etc

32
Parametric Modeling in CAD
  • Feature relationships
  • Constraints

Foley/VanDam, 1990/1994
33
Boundary Representation Solid Modeling
  • The de facto standard for CAD since 1987
  • BReps integrated into CAGD surfaces analytic
    surfaces boolean modeling
  • Models are defined by their boundaries
  • Topological and geometric integrity constraints
    are enforced for the boundaries
  • Faces meet at shared edges, vertices are shared,
    etc.

34
Lets Start SimplePolyhedral Solid Modeling
  • Definition
  • Solid bounded by polygons whose edges are each a
    member of an even number of polygons
  • A 2-manifold edges members of 2 polygons

35
Properties of 2-Manifolds
  • For any point on the boundary, its neighborhood
    is a topological 2D disk
  • If not a 2-manifold, neighborhood not a disk

Foley/VanDam, 1990/1994
36
Eulers Formula
  • For simple polyhedra (no holes)Vertices -
    Edges Faces 2

Foley/VanDam, 1990/1994
37
Eulers Formula (Generalized)
  • Vertices - Edges Faces - Holes_in_faces 2
    (Components Genus)
  • Genus is the holes through the object
  • Euler Operators have been the basis of several
    modeling systems (Mantyla et al.)

Foley/VanDam, 1990/1994
38
Euler Operators
Loop L ? H, Shell S ? C
39
Steps to Creating a Polyhedral Solid Modeler
  • Representation
  • Points, Lines/Edges, Polygons
  • Modeling
  • Generalization of 3D clipping to non-convex
    polyhedra, enables implementation of booleans

40
State of the Art BRep Solid Modeling
  • but much more than polyhedra
  • Two main (commercial) alternatives
  • All NURBS, all the time
  • Pro/E, SDRC,
  • Analytic surfaces parametric surfaces NURBS
    . all stitched together at edges
  • Parasolid, ACIS,

41
BRep Data Structures
  • Winged-Edge Data Structure (Weiler)
  • Vertex
  • n edges
  • Edge
  • 2 vertices
  • 2 faces
  • Face
  • m edges

Pics/Math courtesy of Dave Mount _at_ UMD-CP
42
BRep Data Structure
  • Vertex structure
  • X,Y,Z point
  • Pointers to n coincident edges
  • Edge structure
  • 2 pointers to end-point vertices
  • 2 pointers to adjacent faces
  • Pointer to next edge
  • Pointer to previous edge
  • Face structure
  • Pointers to m edges

43
Issues in Boundary Representation Solid Modeling
  • Very complex data structures
  • NURBS-based winged-edges, etc
  • Complex algorithms
  • manipulation, booleans, collision detection
  • Robustness
  • Integrity
  • Translation
  • Features
  • Constraints and Parametrics

44
Other IssuesNon-Manifold Solids
  • There are cases where you may need to model
    entities that are not entirely 3D

Pics/Math courtesy of Dave Mount _at_ UMD-CP
45
Other Issues in Boundary Representation Solid
Modeling
  • Whats the surface?

Foley/VanDam, 1990/1994
46
Programming Assignment 5
  • Extend XPM to 60 different RGB colors
  • Read 3 models and assign each a color
  • Implement Z-buffer rendering
  • Implement front back cutting planes
  • Only render parts of models between planes
  • Implement linear depth-cueing
  • Color base_color?(z-far)/(near-far)
  • Re-use and extend 2D polygon filling
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com