A WDM Passive Optical Network Architecture for Multicasting Services - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 38
About This Presentation
Title:

A WDM Passive Optical Network Architecture for Multicasting Services

Description:

A WDM Passive Optical Network Architecture for Multicasting Services – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:136
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 39
Provided by: Richard1838
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: A WDM Passive Optical Network Architecture for Multicasting Services


1
A WDM Passive Optical Network Architecture for
Multicasting Services
??????????????????????
  • ? ? ????
  • ??????? ??

2
Outline
  • Motivations
  • Backgrounds
  • A novel WDM Passive Optical Network Architecture
  • The Proposed Multicast Algorithm
  • Simulation results
  • Scalability problem
  • Conclusions
  • Future works

3
Motivations
  • Network Environments
  • Combined PSC and AWG
  • WDM Passive Optical Network
  • Downstream
  • Multicast Transmission
  • Unicast Transmission
  • To Design a Multicast Scheduling Algorithm
  • Simple
  • Efficient

4
Backgrounds
  • Optical Devices
  • PSC
  • AWG
  • Passive Optical Networks
  • TDM PON
  • WDM PON
  • SUCCESS-DWA PON

5
Optical Device-PSC
  • The Passive Star Couple is a passive multiport
    device
  • Wavelengths launched onto any input port are
    broadcast to every output port

6
Optical Device-PSC
  • The PSC is the preferred device to single-hop WDM
    networks
  • broadcast-and-select single-hop WDM network
  • TDM PON
  • Advantages
  • Broadcast signal
  • Low cost
  • Disadvantages
  • Power loss
  • Do not wavelength spatial reused

7
Optical Device-AWG
  • The AWG is passive wavelength routing device
  • The same wavelength into any input port are
    routed to different output port
  • This period of the wavelength response is called
    free spectral range (FSR)

8
The application of AWG device
9
Optical Device-AWG
  • Advantages
  • Static wavelength routing
  • Wavelength spatial reused
  • No power loss
  • Disadvantages
  • No broadcast channel

10
Passive Optical Network
  • In a PON, all components between the end users
    and the central office (CO) are passive, such as
    optical fibers and couplers
  • TDM PON
  • WDM PON
  • SUCCESS-DWA PON

11
The TDM PON
  • In a Time-Division-Multiplexing PON, end users
    share the bandwidth in time domain
  • In the CO, an optical line terminal (OLT)
    transmits the downstream traffic to optical
    network unit (ONU) and manages the upstream
    traffic flows from the ONUs

12
The TDM PON
13
The WDM PON
  • Whats is Wavelength-Division-Multiplexing
  • At the same time, a single fiber can carry
    Independent data streams on different wavelengths
  • WDM PONs create point-to-point links between the
    CO and end user, no shared wavelength
  • Advantages
  • High Capacity
  • Scalable

14
SUCCESS-DWA PON Architecture
15
Functional diagrams of the OLT and ONU
16
Proposed WDM Passive Optical Network Architecture
  • Downstream Splitter
  • Upstream Combiner

17
Downstream mode
  • OLT use four tunable lasers to transmit control
    message on control channel or data packet on any
    wavelength
  • Each ONU consists of a tunable receiver which
    allow them to receive control message on a
    control channel (or data on any wavelength)
  • The multicast packet is received by the ONUs
    attached to the corresponding splitter
  • Each splitter equally distributes all incoming
    wavelengths to all attached receivers.

18
Downstream mode
19
TL Timing Structure
  • Each TL transmits control message which
    corresponded to the ONUs of the same AWG output
    port in the control time
  • Each TL transmits data packet to reach all ONUs
    attached to the same AWG output port in the data
    time
  • A control packet consists of three fields,
    destination address, wavelength, and offset time

20
TL Timing Structure
21
Functional Diagrams of the OLT and ONU -
Downstream mode
22
Functional Diagrams of the OLT and ONU -
Downstream mode
  • Dispatch Mechanism
  • Sequential
  • Random
  • Short Queue First
  • The Criteria for whether to Partition Multicast
    Packets depend on
  • Multiple AWG Outputs ?
  • Receiver Collision ?

23
The Proposed Multicast Algorithm
  • An All-Out Packet Is Defined to Be a Queued HOL
    Packet with All of Its Intended Recipients Free
    and at the same AWG output port in the Scheduling
    Time

24
The scenario of multicast algorithm
  • The HOL packet of Queue 1 is all-out packet

25
Simulation Parameters (Unicast)
  • The parameters are N 64 ONUs
  • The Tunable laser TLs 4
  • Packet generation follows the Poisson arrival
    process
  • Mean arrival rate 0.484.32 packets/slot
  • Bandwidth 1Gbps
  • Packet Size 1518 bytes
  • Time slot 12 us
  • The Simulation during 1000000 slot time
  • TDM ? Four-TDM-PON
  • DWA ? SUCCESS-DWA PON

26
Unicast Average Packet Delay
  • Average packet delay defined as the average time
    from the generation of a packet until the
    completion of the multicast transmission

27
Simulation Parameters (Multicast)
  • Packet generation follows the Poisson arrival
    process
  • Mean arrival rate 0.122.28 packets/slot
  • Bandwidth 1Gbps
  • The time slot 12us
  • Packet size 1518 bytes
  • The destination nodes of a multicast packet are
    randomly selected among all ONU
  • Mean multicast throughput is defined to be the
    mean number of All-Out packets in the average
    time slot

28
Simulation Parameters
???? ?? ????
Number of TLs OLT????????? TL
Number of ONUs ONU??? ONU
Mean Multicast Size ????????? ES
D x D AWG AWG?????????? AWG
???? ??
DWA SUCCESS-DWA PON
PON Short Queue First of WDM PON
29
Simulation Results (Multicast)
  • Comparison with different PON

30
Simulation Results (Multicast)
  • Comparison with different Mean multicast size ES

31
Scalability Problem
  • Expanding ONUs
  • Expanding TLs of the OLT
  • Comparisons with different AWG ports
  • 4 x 4 AWG port
  • 8 x 8 AWG port

32
Expanding ONU
33
Expand TL of the OLT (1/2)
34
Expand TL of the OLT (2/2)
35
Simulation results
36
Conclusions
  • Proposed The Multicast Scheduling Mechanism for
    WDM Passive Optical Network
  • Compare our proposed WDM PON with SUCCESS-DWA PON
  • Scalability problem Study
  • ONU
  • FSR

37
Future works
  • Keep solving the scalability problem
  • The upstream issue
  • Compare with the AWG based Single-Hop WDM network
    and our proposed WDM network architecture

38
  • THE END

39
Reference
  • Ho-Ting Wu, Po-Hsin Hong, and Kai-Wei Ke, On the
    Multicast Scheduling Mechanisms for
    Interconnected WDM Optical Network, IEEE
    GLOBECOM 2003
  • Martin Maiser, Michael Scheutzow, and Martin
    Reisslein, The Arrayed-Waveguide Grating-Based
    Single-Hop WDM Network An Architecture for
    Efficient Multicasting, Select Areas in
    Communications, IEEE Journal , November 2003
  • Yu-Li Hsueh, Matthew S. Rogge, Wei-Tao Shaw, and
    Leonid G. Kazovsky, SUCCESS-DWA A Highly
    Scalable and Cost-Effective Optical Access
    Network, IEEE Optical Communication August 2004
  • Glen Kramer and Gerry Pesavento, Ethernet
    Passive Optical Access Network (EPON) Building a
    Next-Generation Optical Access Network, IEEE
    Communications Magazine February 2002

40
(No Transcript)
41
(No Transcript)
42
TL Timing Structure
43
Unicast Average Queue length
  • Average Queue length defined as the average queue
    size of the queues in the average time slot

44
Introduction
  • Optical devices
  • Passive star couple vs. Arrayed-waveguide grating
  • Passive Optical Network
  • TDM PON vs. WDM PON
  • SUCCESS-DWA PON
  • Our proposed WDM PON
  • The proposed downstream multicast algorithm
  • Receiver collision
  • Partition
  • Scalability problem
  • Expand ONUs
  • Expand TLs and AWG
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com