Instructor: Dr. Amer al-Sarayreh - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 94
About This Presentation
Title:

Instructor: Dr. Amer al-Sarayreh

Description:

Instructor: Dr. Amer al-Sarayreh Engineering Ethics Bhopal Disaster In solving ethical problems, we don t have to choose from the theories. Rather, we can use all ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:181
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 95
Provided by: Owne31150
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Instructor: Dr. Amer al-Sarayreh


1
Instructor Dr. Amer al-Sarayreh
  • Engineering Ethics

Bhopal Disaster
2
(No Transcript)
3
(No Transcript)
4
chapter ((3))
  • UnderstandingEthical Problems

5
Instructor Dr. Amer al-Sarayreh
  • Sara al Hayek (3.1 Introduction. 3.2 A brief
    history of ethical thought.)
  • Bilal al Dweik(3.3 Ethical theories. 3.3.1 What
    is moral theory?) Alaa mohiemeed(3.3.2
    Utilitarianism.) Mustafa Shilbaya (3.3.3
    Cost-Benefit analysis.) Fares al aan (3.3.4
    Duty ethics and rights ethics.) Salem Abdullah
    (3.3.5 Virtue Ethics. 3.3.6 Personal Vs.
    Corporate Morality.) Amjad Alnaami (3.3.7 Which
    theory to use? 3.3.8 Non-Western ethical
    thinking.) Muhannad Imad (application
    cases.) Mohammed Samreen (application The
    Aberdeen Three.)

6
Sara al Hayek Civil engineer
  • Introduction Bhopal Disaster A brief
    history of ethical thought

7
Introduction Bhopal Disaster
8
  • The Bhopal disaster brings up many questions of
    balancing risk to the local community with the
    economic benefits to the larger community of the
    state or nation.

VS
9
  • How can we decide if on balance the economic
    benefit brought by any plant outweighed the
    potential safety hazards ?
  • To answer this question and analyze engineering
    ethics cases.
  • We need a framework for analyzing ethical
    problems.

10
  • We will examine moral theories and see how they
    can also be used as a means for analyzing ethical
    cases. We will Develop some moral theories that
    can be applied to ethical problems confronted by
    engineers. Knowing and understanding the
    basics To know how to build something or to
    solve problem, you must learn the basics and
    understand them.

11
  • This also include solving ethical problems, some
    knowledge of ethical theory is needed to provide
    a framework for understanding and reaching
    solution ethical problems.

12
(No Transcript)
13
The moral and ethical theories in engineering
ethics
Western moral
Western cultural tradition
Ancient Religion
philosopher
Ancient Greeks
14
  • Ancient Religion
  • Religion ethics started with Judaism and it's
    foundation.
  • The written sources of Jewish
  • 1. Torah.
  • 2. The old testament of the Bible.

15
  • As Islamic and Arabs community, from where they
    derive its moral theories and ethics?
  • The Quran.
  • The Sunnah of Muhammad.
  • Islamic jurists.
  • The pre-Islamic Arabian tradition.
  • Non-Arabic elements (including Persian and Greek
    ideas).

16
  • Ancient Greeks
  • Greeks ethics originated from it's famous Greek
    philosopher
  • Socrates.
  • Aristotle, who discussed ethics at great length
    in his Nichomachean ethics.

Aristotle
17
  • Philosophers
  • They did not rely on religion to underpin their
    moral thinking, they acknowledged that moral
    principles are universal and applicable, Like
  • John Locke.
  • Immanuel Kant.
  • John Stuart Mill.

Immanuel Kant
18
(No Transcript)
19
Bilal al Dweik Electrical Engineer
  • Ethical theories
  • Whats a moral theory?

20
Ethical theories
21
Ethical theories
  • In order to develop workable ethical
    problem-solving techniques, we must know ethical
    theories.
  • But ethical theories arent like theories in
    engineering classes where theres one general
    theory to solve a problem.

22
  • In engineering ethics we have several theories we
    need to consider when having a problem, and
    thats actually a good thing because were
    going to have more than one approach to every
    problem then we can analyze these approaches and
    determine which theory has the best solution.

23
Whats a moral theory?
  • A moral theory defines terms in uniform ways and
    links ideas and problems together in contestant
    ways, and thats exactly what a scientific theory
    dose so we will use moral theories in the same
    way of scientific theories.
  • Scientific theories concept1- organize ideas
    2- define terms 3- facilitate
    problem solving.

24
There are four ethical theories to consider
  • 1. utilitarianism it seeks to produce the most
    gain, defined as a balance between good and bad
    consequences of an action, considering the
    consequences of everyone affected.

25
  • 2. duty ethics there are duties that should be
    performed like treating others fairly or not
    injuring others, regardless of whether these acts
    lead to the most good.3. rights ethics we all
    have moral rights, and any action that violates
    these rights is ethically unacceptable.

26
  • 4. virtue ethics there are right actions we
    have to do, and wrong actions we have to avoid,
    this theory focuses on the type of person we
    should want to be.

27
(No Transcript)
28
Alaa mohiemeed industrial engineer
  • utilitarianism

29
Utilitarianism
  • Utilitarianism holds that those actions are good
    that serve to maximize human well-being.
  • Utilitarianism do what is well-being for the
    society as whole regardless the individual.

30
  • Utilitarianism tries to balance the needs of
    society with the need of individual. The best
    known proponent was John Stuart Mill.

31
  • In general, it tries to balance good and bad
    consequences of an action, with an emphasis on
    what will provide the most benefit to the most
    people.
  • Utilitarianism is fundamental to many types of
    engineering analysis such as
  • 1- Risk-benefit analysis.
  • 2- Cost benefit analysis.

32
An example of this theory is the building of dam.
33
  • Problems with this theory
  • Sometimes what is best for everyone may be
    bad for a particular individual or group of
    individuals, as seen in the example of the dam.
  • Another example
  • The proposed Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP)
    in New Mexico City.

34
Waste Isolation Pilot Plant. WIPP is designed to
be a permanent repository for nuclear waste
generated in the United States.
35
  • Analysis of WIPP by using utilitarianism.
  • Good effect the disposal of nuclear wastes is a
    major problem hindering the implementation of
    many useful technologies, such as1. medicinal
    uses of radioisotopes. 2. nuclear generation of
    electricity. So it will benefit society by
    providing improved health care and more
    electricity.

36
  • Bad effectHealth effect if the individuals
    living near the transportation routes.
  • So utilitarianism theory sees that the WIPP
    should be allowed to open.

37
(No Transcript)
38
  • Types of Utilitarianism
  • 1 ) Act Utilitarianism focuses on individual
    actions rather than on rules.
  • 2 ) Rule Utilitarianism moral rules are most
    important, these rules include "do not harm
    others" and "do not steal".

39
The idea of Utilitarianism
40
(No Transcript)
41
Mustafa Shilbaya Civil engineer
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis

42
Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • It is a tool used in engineering analysis
    especially when trying to determine whether a
    project makes sense.
  • This type of analysis is just an application of
    utilitarianism in cost-benefit analysis, the
    cost of a project assessed as are the benefits.

43
  • The benefits that are derived from them are often
    harder to predict and to assign a dollar value.
  • Once dollar amounts for the costs and benefits
    are determined, calculating a mathematical ratio
    may seem very objective and therefore may appear
    to be the best way to make a decision.

44
  • Only those projects with the highest ratio of
    benefits to cost will be implemented.
  • This principle is similar to the utilitarian goal
    of maximizing the overall good.
  • It is often easy to predict the costs for most
    projects.

45
  • The aim of a cost-benefit analysis is
  • To determine the feasibility of a project
    based on costs. When looking at an ethical
    problem, the first step should be determine what
    the right course of action is, and then factor in
    the financial cost in choosing between ethical
    alternatives.

46
  • Finally, it is also important to determine
    whether those who stand to reap the benefits are
    also those who will pay the costs. It is unfair
    to place all of the costs on one group while
    another reaps the benefits.
  • Example
  • from a pure cost-benefit discussion, it might
    seem that the building of a dam is an excellent
    idea.

47
  • But this analysis won't include other issues such
    as whether the benefits outweigh the loss of a
    scenic wilderness area or the loss of an
    endangered species with no current economic value.

48
(No Transcript)
49
Fares al aan industrial engineer
  • Duty Ethics and Rights Ethics

50
Duty ethics and right ethics
  • These are theories similar to each other and
    considered together.These theories are good
    respect of the rights of individual.
  •  Ethical actions (actions could be written down a
    list)
  • Be honest.
  • Dont cause suffering to other people.
  • Be fair to others.

51
  •  Duty Ethics
  •   Are actions which
  • Express an unqualified regard for autonomous
    moral agents.
  • Express respect for persons.
  • Are universal principles.
  •  
  • Immanuel Kant (German Philosopher)
  •  
  • A major proponent of duty ethics.
  • Held that moral duties fundamental.

52
  • Right Ethics
  • People have fundamental rights that other ones
    have a duty to respect.
  • Was formulated by John Locke who said that humans
    have the right to life, liberty, and was
    paraphrased in the declaration of independence of
    the soon-to-be U.S.A.

53
  •  
  • The problems of Duty Ethics and Right Ethics.
  •   
  • The basic rights of a person (or group) may
    conflict with the basic rights of another group.
  • These theories dont always account for the
    overall good of society very well.

54
(No Transcript)
55
Salem Abdullah engineer
  • Virtue Ethics Corporate vs.
    Personal Morality

56
Virtue Ethics
  • Virtue ethics is interested in determining what
    kind of people we should be.
  • Virtue is often defined as moral distinction and
    goodness.
  • In virtue ethics, actions are considered right
    if they support good character traits (virtues)
    and wrong if they support bad character traits.

57
  • Virtue ethics focuses on words such as
    responsibility, honestly, competence, and loyalty
    which are virtues.
  • Virtue ethics is closely tied to personal
    character. We do things because we are virtuous
    people and seek to enhance these character traits
    in ourselves and in others.

58
  • Theory may seem to be mostly personal ethics and
    not particularly applicable to engineering or
    business ethics, however, personal morality
    cannot be separated from business morality so, if
    a behavior is virtuous in the individuals life,
    the behavior is virtuous in his business life as
    well.

59
  • How can virtue ethics be applied?
  • We can use virtue ethics in our engineering
    career by answering question such as Is this
    action honest?
  • Will this action demonstrate loyalty to my
    community or my employer?
  • To use virtue ethics in an analysis of an
    ethical problem, you should first identify the
    virtues or vice that are applicable to the
    situation. Then, determine what course of action
    each of these suggests.

60
  • It is important to be careful in applying virtue
    ethics, problem can arise with words that on the
    face seem to be virtues, but can actually leads
    to vice. For example the word honor.

61
Personal vs. Corporate Morality
  • An important question that we need to answer, is
    there a distinction between the ethics practiced
    by an individual and the ethics practiced by a
    corporation?

62
  • If a corporation has no moral agency, then it
    cannot be held accountable for its actions.
  • To solve the problem, corporations should be
    considered pseudo moral agents and should be held
    accountable in the same way that individuals are,
    even if the ability to do this within the legal
    system is limited.

63
(No Transcript)
64
Amjad Alnaami industrial engineer
  • Which Theory to Use? Non-Western Ethical
    Thinking

65
Which Theory to Use?
Right ethics, utilitarian, cost-benefit, or
Virtue ?
66
  • In solving ethical problems, we dont have to
    choose from the theories.Rather, we can use all
    of them to analyze the problem from different
    angles and see what result each of the theories
    give us. Theories maybe 1- Give us the same
    results.2- Give us different answers.

67
How theories give us the same results
Hazardous Waste
68
  • Right ethics indicated that transporting wastes
    through communities is not a good idea.The
    utilitarianism concluded the (WIPP) as a
    beneficial to society as a whole.The rights of
    individuals should receive relatively stronger
    weight than the needs of society as a whole.

69
If theories give us different answers about a
problem, we will make a comparative.
WIPP
70
Non-Western Ethical Thinking
  • It is much the same as western ethical thinking.
  • Ethics is not geographic or cultural.
  • Indeed, ethical thinking has developed similarly
    around the word and is not dependent on a western
    cultural or religious.
  • Ethical standards are similar worldwide.

71
  • Islam is one of the three major monotheistic
    religions, along with Christianity and Judaism.
  • Cultural practices may very when dealing with
    the many Islamic nations that stretch from Africa
    and the Middle East to Southeast Asia.

72
  • Moreover, personal ethics are not determined by
    geography. Personal and business behavior should
    be the same regardless of where you happen to be
    on a given day.

73
  • An exception.
  • In some societies, bribes are a standard part of
    doing business.
  • The U.S. has a law against its citizens paying
    bribes, even in other countries.

74
(No Transcript)
75
Muhannad Imad industrial engineer
  • CASES

76
CASES
77
The Disaster at Bhopal
  • Happened on December 2, 1984, in Union Carbide
    Plant in Bhopal, India.resulted from a leak in a
    storage tank contained 10,000 gallons of methyl
    isocyanate (MIC) at a Union Carbide chemical
    plant.The leak sent a toxic cloud of gas over
    the surrounding slums of Bhopal, resulting in the
    death of over 2,000 people, and injuries to over
    200,000 more.

78
The Disaster at Bhopal
79
  • The cause of the leakThe accidental pouring of
    water into the tank.The mixing of water with MIC
    increased temperature of the liquid in the tank
    which caused the MIC to vaporize. The main
    factor which led to the disastercurtailment of
    plant maintenance as part of a cost-cutting
    effort.

80
  • The parts of the plant which was needed
    maintenance
  • The refrigerating unit.
  • The alarm of dangerous temperatures.
  • The flare tower.
  • The scrubber.

81
  • An internal Union Carbide memo from three months
    before the Bhopal accident warned of the
    potential for a runaway reaction in MIC storage
    tanks in West Virginia and called into question
    the adequacy of emergency plans at the
    plants.Apparently, these warnings had not been
    transmitted to the plant in India

82
The Disaster at Bhopal (cont.)
who is to blame??
The management of the plant?
Plant designer?
Indian government?
Union Carbide?
83
(No Transcript)
84
Mohammed Samreen industrial engineer
  • The Aberdeen Three

85
The Aberdeen Three
  • Is one of the classic cases often used in
    engineering ethics classes and texts to
    illustrate the important of

Environmental protection
The safety of worker exposed to hazardous and
toxic chemicals
86
  • The Aberdeen proving ground is a U.S.Army weapons
    development and test center located on a military
    base in Maryland, so there are people live in it.
  • Since world war II Aberdeen used for the storage
    and disposal of some of these chemicals.
  • This cases involves three civilian manager at the
    pilot plant at the proving grounds Carl Gepp,
    William Dee, and Robert Lentz.

87
  • NOTE

The manager development chemical weapons on hand
the chemical weapons allowable but on the other
hand there are limited to it you should have some
ethic to do it
88
  • Between 1983 and 1986 , inspection at the pilot
    plant indicated that there were serious safety
    hazards.

Flammable substances left in open containers
chemicals
These hazards Included
carcinogenic
That can become lethal when mixed together being
stored in same room but we can prevent this by
many things
89
  • In June,1988 the three engineer were indicated
    for violation RCRA, the Resource Conservation and
    Recovery Act.It was intended to provided
    incentive for the recovery of important
    resources, and the control of the disposal of
    hazardous wastes.

90
  • In 1989 ,the three managers tried and convicted
    of illegally storing, and disposing of hazardous
    wastes.
  • Note the responsibility returns to the manager,
    although he has not do the work.
  • But because he is manager.
  • Finally, the manager treaded of 1000 hours of
    community service.

91
  • TeamworkEthical issues can
    arise when working in groups and many of
    engineering classes are designed to be performed
    in groups.
  • In order to have a successful project you should
    have cooperation among team members.

92
(No Transcript)
93
  • Problems can arise when a team member1) doesn't
    do his part well.2) doesn't make
    contribution.3) doesn't do his part on time.4)
    tries to do everything. So ethical teamwork
    includes your  assigned work, keeping to
    schedules, sharing information and help having a
    supportive atmosphere so everyone can contribute.

94
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com