Title: Using%20RUSLE2%20and%20the%20SCI%20in%20the%20Conservation%20Security%20Program
1Using RUSLE2 and the SCI in the Conservation
Security Program
- Dave Lightle
- Agronomist
- National Soil Survey Center
- Lincoln, Nebraska
2Get Ready Ahead of Signup and Work Smart
- We cannot do specific field by field analysis
with the limited TA we have. - We cannot run analysis on a lot of fields to help
the producer decide what to offer. - Require the producer to have what he needs and to
know what fields he is offering so one visit and
one interview will do it.
3Analyze the Watershed
- Identify several natural types of landscapes and
develop treatment groups i.e., - Flat bottomland
- Nearly level uplands
- Gently sloping uplands
- Moderately sloping uplands
- Steeply sloping uplands
4(No Transcript)
5Look at several soil properties such as
- Slope ranges
- Soil Erodibility factor
- Soil Loss tolerance
- Yield potential
- Soil Texture
- Etc.
6(No Transcript)
7(No Transcript)
8(No Transcript)
9(No Transcript)
10Decide on the typical treatment groupings for
example
- Flat bottomland and Nearly level uplands
- Gently sloping with Kf 0.20 to 0.28
- Gently sloping with Kf 0.32 to 0.43
- Moderately sloping uplands w/ Kf 0.2 to 0.28
- Moderately sloping uplands w/Kf 0.32 to 0.43
- Steeply sloping uplands w/Kf 0.32 to 0.43
11Build and save the most common local cropping and
tillage systems as local management files
12Check management files for errors, for example
- Trying to grow two crops at the same time. (The
last one in rules) - Adding manure or compost operations but
neglecting to choose residue type or failing to
enter amount of dry basis material or to adjust
for 0.5 effectiveness of liquid and slurry
materials. - Entering field cultivators or harrows soon after
planting that, in effect, kill the crop before
it grows thus contributing no biomass.
13(No Transcript)
14(No Transcript)
15Other common errors
- Entering incorrect yields, especially with cover
crops. - Choosing the wrong planter, seeder or drill.
- Choosing the wrong harvest machine.
- Neglecting to check operation dates to insure
they match the length of the rotation
16Create and save RUSLE2 runs using the RUSLE2
Worksheet and utilize as template runs for each
common treatment group
- This presets the following items in the heading
to eliminate redundant key strokes and
duplication - Climate station
- Indicator soil
- Representative slope
- Each line represents a common management system
combining - Crop rotation
- Tillage system
- Supporting practices
17(No Transcript)
18At the producer interview
- Producer provides information about rotation and
tillage system used, and etc. - Producer indicates which fields are being
offered. - We locate the fields and review the maps and
identify which treatment groups are involved. - We group fields into management units having
similar conditions.
19(No Transcript)
20W.L.
5. Crop
2. Crop
F.S.
W.L.
4. Crop
1, Crop
6. Crop
W.L.
7. Crop
8. Crop
w.L.
3. Crop
9. Crop
10. Crop
11. Crop
13. Crop
14. Crop
W. L.
21At the producer interview
- Use Dominant Critical soil selection approach
- In this case, fields 3, 5, and 9 are in the
Gently sloping group and all others are in the
moderately sloping group or steeply sloping group.
22Dominant Critical Area Determination
- Fields rarely are comprised of a single soil map
unit with uniform topography. To insure that the
treatment system is adequate for the significant
parts of the field or conservation management
unit, the "dominant critical area" needs to be
identified. - The dominant critical area is used to represent
the entire field or Conservation Management Unit
CMU for the purpose of managing that field or
CMU. - The erosion estimate, Soil Conditioning Index and
STIR values and decisions are based on this
"dominant critical area".
23(No Transcript)
24Dominant Critical Area
This dominant critical area is nether the average
of the site or landscape characteristics of the
field, nor the worst case scenario, unless it is
significantly large enough on which to base the
management of the field.
25271C3
26(No Transcript)
27Dominant Critical Area
- It is improper to base determinations on the
largest common (dominant by extent) landscape in
cases where it is the flattest and least erosive
or has the highest SCI. - If one chose this landscape, the more sloping
areas will be over rated (under treated). - Additionally, basing the determination on
weighted average slope in the field is improper
since it also over rates more limiting areas.
28271C3
29Dominant Critical Area
- Some fields may have small insignificant areas of
10 or less of the field or less than a couple of
acres that is much steeper and more erosive or
have other resource issues. - Such areas are critical but not dominant and it
would be improper to base the eligibility
determination for this area and apply it to the
whole field. This would significantly under rate
the field and would be impractical to the
producer if we used this in Conservation
Planning.
30Dominant Critical Area
- In Conservation Planning, opportunities may exist
to split out this area as a different
conservation management unit and develop it as a
wildlife area or recreation area with permanent
cover or to apply additional supporting practices
to the cropping and tillage practices planned for
the critical significant area. (An enhancement
opportunity)
312.
1.
32(No Transcript)
33(No Transcript)
34At the producer interview
- We select the closest matching management system
and supporting practice(s) for the landscape
group(s) in which the land falls and use the SCI
and STIR values directly. - (Optional for limited special cases or uncommon
systems) - We boot RUSLE2 and load the worksheets for the
treatment groups on the farm in question. - We tweak any necessary information
- select different crop
- adjust yield
- fine tune management
- Fine tune practices
- Run, save, and print
35(No Transcript)