Using%20RUSLE2%20and%20the%20SCI%20in%20the%20Conservation%20Security%20Program - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Using%20RUSLE2%20and%20the%20SCI%20in%20the%20Conservation%20Security%20Program

Description:

Using RUSLE2 and the SCI in the Conservation Security Program Dave Lightle Agronomist National Soil Survey Center Lincoln, Nebraska Get Ready Ahead of Signup and Work ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:178
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 32
Provided by: dave3220
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Using%20RUSLE2%20and%20the%20SCI%20in%20the%20Conservation%20Security%20Program


1
Using RUSLE2 and the SCI in the Conservation
Security Program
  • Dave Lightle
  • Agronomist
  • National Soil Survey Center
  • Lincoln, Nebraska

2
Get Ready Ahead of Signup and Work Smart
  • We cannot do specific field by field analysis
    with the limited TA we have.
  • We cannot run analysis on a lot of fields to help
    the producer decide what to offer.
  • Require the producer to have what he needs and to
    know what fields he is offering so one visit and
    one interview will do it.

3
Analyze the Watershed
  • Identify several natural types of landscapes and
    develop treatment groups i.e.,
  • Flat bottomland
  • Nearly level uplands
  • Gently sloping uplands
  • Moderately sloping uplands
  • Steeply sloping uplands

4
(No Transcript)
5
Look at several soil properties such as
  • Slope ranges
  • Soil Erodibility factor
  • Soil Loss tolerance
  • Yield potential
  • Soil Texture
  • Etc.

6
(No Transcript)
7
(No Transcript)
8
(No Transcript)
9
(No Transcript)
10
Decide on the typical treatment groupings for
example
  • Flat bottomland and Nearly level uplands
  • Gently sloping with Kf 0.20 to 0.28
  • Gently sloping with Kf 0.32 to 0.43
  • Moderately sloping uplands w/ Kf 0.2 to 0.28
  • Moderately sloping uplands w/Kf 0.32 to 0.43
  • Steeply sloping uplands w/Kf 0.32 to 0.43

11
Build and save the most common local cropping and
tillage systems as local management files
12
Check management files for errors, for example
  • Trying to grow two crops at the same time. (The
    last one in rules)
  • Adding manure or compost operations but
    neglecting to choose residue type or failing to
    enter amount of dry basis material or to adjust
    for 0.5 effectiveness of liquid and slurry
    materials.
  • Entering field cultivators or harrows soon after
    planting that, in effect, kill the crop before
    it grows thus contributing no biomass.

13
(No Transcript)
14
(No Transcript)
15
Other common errors
  • Entering incorrect yields, especially with cover
    crops.
  • Choosing the wrong planter, seeder or drill.
  • Choosing the wrong harvest machine.
  • Neglecting to check operation dates to insure
    they match the length of the rotation

16
Create and save RUSLE2 runs using the RUSLE2
Worksheet and utilize as template runs for each
common treatment group
  • This presets the following items in the heading
    to eliminate redundant key strokes and
    duplication
  • Climate station
  • Indicator soil
  • Representative slope
  • Each line represents a common management system
    combining
  • Crop rotation
  • Tillage system
  • Supporting practices

17
(No Transcript)
18
At the producer interview
  • Producer provides information about rotation and
    tillage system used, and etc.
  • Producer indicates which fields are being
    offered.
  • We locate the fields and review the maps and
    identify which treatment groups are involved.
  • We group fields into management units having
    similar conditions.

19
(No Transcript)
20
W.L.
5. Crop
2. Crop
F.S.
W.L.
4. Crop
1, Crop
6. Crop
W.L.
7. Crop
8. Crop
w.L.
3. Crop
9. Crop
10. Crop
11. Crop
13. Crop
14. Crop
W. L.
21

At the producer interview
  • Use Dominant Critical soil selection approach
  • In this case, fields 3, 5, and 9 are in the
    Gently sloping group and all others are in the
    moderately sloping group or steeply sloping group.

22
Dominant Critical Area Determination
  • Fields rarely are comprised of a single soil map
    unit with uniform topography. To insure that the
    treatment system is adequate for the significant
    parts of the field or conservation management
    unit, the "dominant critical area" needs to be
    identified.
  • The dominant critical area is used to represent
    the entire field or Conservation Management Unit
    CMU for the purpose of managing that field or
    CMU.
  • The erosion estimate, Soil Conditioning Index and
    STIR values and decisions are based on this
    "dominant critical area".

23
(No Transcript)
24
Dominant Critical Area
This dominant critical area is nether the average
of the site or landscape characteristics of the
field, nor the worst case scenario, unless it is
significantly large enough on which to base the
management of the field.
25
271C3
26
(No Transcript)
27
Dominant Critical Area
  • It is improper to base determinations on the
    largest common (dominant by extent) landscape in
    cases where it is the flattest and least erosive
    or has the highest SCI. 
  • If one chose this landscape, the more sloping
    areas will be over rated (under treated). 
  • Additionally, basing the determination on
    weighted average slope in the field is improper
    since it also over rates more limiting areas. 

28
271C3
29
Dominant Critical Area
  • Some fields may have small insignificant areas of
    10 or less of the field or less than a couple of
    acres that is much steeper and more erosive or
    have other resource issues.
  • Such areas are critical but not dominant and it
    would be improper to base the eligibility
    determination for this area and apply it to the
    whole field. This would significantly under rate
    the field and would be impractical to the
    producer if we used this in Conservation
    Planning.

30
Dominant Critical Area
  • In Conservation Planning, opportunities may exist
    to split out this area as a different
    conservation management unit and develop it as a
    wildlife area or recreation area with permanent
    cover or to apply additional supporting practices
    to the cropping and tillage practices planned for
    the critical significant area. (An enhancement
    opportunity)

31
2.
1.
32
(No Transcript)
33
(No Transcript)
34
At the producer interview
  • We select the closest matching management system
    and supporting practice(s) for the landscape
    group(s) in which the land falls and use the SCI
    and STIR values directly.
  • (Optional for limited special cases or uncommon
    systems)
  • We boot RUSLE2 and load the worksheets for the
    treatment groups on the farm in question.
  • We tweak any necessary information
  • select different crop
  • adjust yield
  • fine tune management
  • Fine tune practices
  • Run, save, and print

35
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com