Life of a Non-Genius - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

Life of a Non-Genius

Description:

Robert Oppenheimer. Parent considered him a genius . Was doing lab experiments by the third grade an studying physics and chemistry by the fifth grade – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:84
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: ning670
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Life of a Non-Genius


1
Life of a Non-Genius
  • SaMyia Smith

2
Chris Langan
  • Mother was estranged from family
  • Had four brothers all with different fathers
  • His father disappeared before Chris was born he
    was said to have died in Mexico
  • To this day I havent met anybody who was as
    poor when they were kids as our family was,
    Chris Langan Says.
  • Offered two full scholarships to Reed an the
    University of Chicago
  • Went to reed for a whole school year but dropped
    out cause his mother was confused of the parents
    financial statement paper so his scholarship
    money was no more
  • Enrolled in Montana State University But only
    went for a semester because the transmission fell
    out of his car and he didnt have a way to school
  • Dropped out of Montana State cause he decided he
    could do without an higher level education

3
Robert Oppenheimer
  • Parent considered him a genius
  • Was doing lab experiments by the third grade an
    studying physics and chemistry by the fifth grade
  • Once when he was nine he told one of his cousins,
    Ask me a question in Latin and I will answer you
    in Greek.
  • Went to Harvard and then on to Cambridge
    University to pursue a doctorate in physics
  • Struggled depression his life, grew despondent
  • Had a gift for theoretical physics
  • His tutor Patrick Blackett forced him to attend
    to a minutiae of experimental physics which he
    hated
  • Grew more emotionally unstable and then in an act
    so strange oppenheimer took some chemicals from
    the laboratory and tried to poison his tutor

4
Whats the difference between these two?
  • Two brilliant young students each who runs into a
    problem that troubles his college career.
  • Langans mother has missed a deadline for his
    financial aid while oppenheimer has tried to
    poison his tutor.
  • To continue on they are required to plead each of
    their cases to authority
  • Langan gets his scholarship taken away and
    oppenheimer gets sent to a psychiatrist.
  • Both are geniuses but other ways could not be
    more different besides the way they were raised

5
Hes a Genius
  • Chris Oppenheimer
  • Chris Langan
  • Twenty years later he was appointed to be the
    director of the Manhattan Project that lead to
    the atomic bomb effort.
  • Married and now Lives in rural Missouri on a
    horse farm
  • On a typical day He gets up make a cup of coffee
    and sit in front of the computer then begin
    working on whatever he was working on the night
    before

6
  • Would Oppenheimer have lost his scholarship at
    Reed?
  • Would he have bee unable to convince his
    professors to move his classes to the afternoon?
  • Of course not.
  • And not because he was smarter than Chris Langan.
    Its because he possessed that kind of Savvy
    that allowed him to get what he wanted from the
    world.

7
Practical intelligence
  • -Knowing what to say to whom, knowing when to say
    it and knowing how to say it for maximum effect
  • (For Example)
  • The practical skill that allows you to talk your
    way out of a murder rap, or even convince your
    professor to move you from the morning to the
    afternoon section
  • Analytical Intelligence
  • Which is an ability measured by IQ you can either
    have lots of it and very little of practical
    intelligence or lots of Practical Intelligence
    and not much Analytical Intelligence
  • Which in a Lucky case someone like Robert
    Oppenheimer had both

8
Where does something like practical intelligence
come from?
  • We know were analytical intelligence comes from
    its something at least in part thats in your
    genes.
  • -Chris Langan started talking at six months and
    taught himself to read at three years of age. He
    was born smart.
  • But social savvy is knowledge. Its a set of
    skills that have to be learned where most people
    seem to get these kind of attitudes and skills
    from our families

9
  • Annette Lareau who is a sociologist who conducted
    a study of a group of third graders. She picked
    both black and whites and children from wealthy
    homes and poor homes. Lareau visited each family
    at least twenty times for hours at a stretch.
  • She found that there were only two parenting
    philosophies and they divide almost perfectly
    along class lines. The wealthier parents raised
    their kids one way and the poorer parents raised
    their kids another way.
  • The wealthier parents were heavily involved in
    their childrens free time. While the lower class
    parents saw as if it was their responsibility to
    care for their children but to let them grown and
    develop on their own.

10
in conclusion.
  • In Lareau study the working-class and poor
    children were characterized by They didnt know
    how to get there way, or how to customize while
    the Higher Class knew how to interact, and ask
    questions if they are curious.

11
  • This is the advantage that Oppenheimer had and
    that Chris Langan lacked. Oppenheimer was raised
    in one of the wealthiest neighborhoods in
    Manhattan, the son of an artist and successful
    garment manufacturer. His childhood was very
    exciting

12
  • While Chris had only the bleakness of where he
    lived and a home dominated by an angry, drunken
    stepfather. And that was the lesson Langan
    learned from his childhood distrust authority
    and be independent. He never had parents to teach
    him how to speak up for himself.
  • -If Langan had been born into a wealthy family,
    if he was the son of a doctor who was well
    connected in some major marked and if he was he
    would have been one of those guys you read about
    knocking back PhDs at seventeen.
  • Its the culture that he was in that determined
    that
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com