Transformational Service Delivery in Kinship Foster Care: Influence of Casey - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Transformational Service Delivery in Kinship Foster Care: Influence of Casey

Description:

Transformational Service Delivery in Kinship Foster Care: Influence of Casey s Breakthrough Series Priscilla A. Gibson, PhD, LICSW Michaela Rinkel, LICSW – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:76
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: pgi64
Learn more at: https://cascw.umn.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Transformational Service Delivery in Kinship Foster Care: Influence of Casey


1
Transformational Service Delivery in Kinship
Foster Care Influence of Caseys Breakthrough
Series
  • Priscilla A. Gibson, PhD, LICSW
  • Michaela Rinkel, LICSW
  • Juliana Keen, BS

2
RESULTS
  • Five major changes in the kin search process
  • Earlier kin searches are better,
  • Widening the definition of kin,
  • Promotion of kinship care as important to
    families,
  • Biological fathers from invisible to a resource,
  • Hindrances to the search process.

3
Results
  • The following will explain results along with
    direct quotes that provide more detailed context.

4
1. Earlier searches are most effective.
  • There was recognition that the timing of the
    search process was important. A manger confirmed
    this by saying
  • I believe that we already had identified kinship
    searches as a weak area. We were doing them too
    late.

5
1. Earlier searches are most effective.
  • The earlier is better was also discussed by a
    worker
  • I was asked to do kinship searches for kids
    currently in foster care I would get them in all
    stages, sometimes after they had gone to the
    adoption unit. But, as the Collaborative actually
    began, it was more about finding right away when
    a child went into emergency foster care and
    finding family as quickly as possible.

6
2. Widening the definition of kin
  • The definition of kin, a blood relative or close
    family friend was expanded to include others who
    had any type of close relationship with the
    biological parents, which may not have been a
    close relationship

7
2. Widening the definition of kin
  • A worker shared an example about the children of
    the same father who was incarcerated but had
    different mothers
  • I called and said were you involved with
    so-and-so and did you have a child by him. And
    well he has another child by another woman and we
    were trying to find kin and she was more than
    willing to take this child because she knew the
    impact of this womans death on her own daughter,
    worried about what was going to happen to her
    half-brother. So this was really expanding the
    idea of kin. The mother of another child of this
    man, who would take this child in foster care.

8
3. Promotion of kinship care placements
  • Being placed with kin was supported. A manager
    provided an example of how the situation might
    occur
  • But they (relatives) know theres something
    going on and they call (CPS) and they say, you
    know, Im Johnny Joness grandma and I just
    wonder whats happening (with the case). And, see
    in the past I think we used to just say Im
    sorry we cant say anything about (the case).
    The same manager explained the change in practice
    that was friendlier to kin Now they take the
    information, put it into our data entry system
    and probably also give the information to the
    worker that grandma has called and heres
    grandmas phone number.

9
3. Promotion of kinship care placements
  • Explaining how some workers promoted kin
    searches a supervisor used the phrase took it a
    step further
  • I think social workers always ask families about
    relatives or kin, thats always been a part of
    their practice. However, I think once so many of
    us were involved in the kinship search, it
    emphasized even more so the importance of
    relatives. I think social workers took it a step
    further, rather than if relatives said, I dont,
    theres nobody and workers would just kinda take
    that at face value at that point. But now I think
    they probe more and ask for names, phone numbers,
    real specifics so that they could be contacted.

10
3. Promotion of kinship care placements
  • A worker provided excellent examples of how these
    workers assisted in the search process
  • Well Im only speaking from my perspective. A
    lot of the social workers went from Yes this is
    nice to This is imperative. We need to find
    family sooner rather than later. I think there
    were early adapters and some who were a little
    more reticent to adapt. But I think there was an
    attitude change where, this is a wonderful
    family member because when I first started
    (conducting kin searches), and Im quoting here,
    there was a lot of attitude where the apple
    doesnt fall far from the tree. I mean I used
    to hear that a lot. I mean just because one of
    the branches had a disease doesnt mean there
    arent suitable family caregivers. I mean there
    was a definite attitude shift during that time of
    the Collaborative (project).

11
4. Biological fathers from invisible to resources
  • Involving biological fathers in the search
    process was seen by a supervisor as the biggest
    change in service delivery during the project
  • I think that one of the biggest things that came
    out of the breakthrough series of kin was fathers
    that were so often somewhat, not considered as a
    resource and neglected if they were not initially
    part of that childs life.

12
4. Biological fathers from invisible to resources
  • An administrator said
  • I think that during the kinship care (project),
    one of the things we identified is that we
    werent really seeking out fathers, non-custodial
    fathers and using them as a resource, and we
    really dealt with that issue and we deal with
    fathers entirely differently today than we did
    three years ago.

13
5. Hindering the search process Worker factor
  • Worker factors described their status, attitudes
    and relationship with the biological parents that
    acted as barriers during the search process.
  • In discussing the many positive changes that
    occurred regarding the search, a manager stated
    That was a big challenge (workers attitude about
    kinship care placements). Im sure we didnt
    begin to get even halfway toward, changing this
    attitude thing toward relatives.

14
5. Hindering the search process Relative factor.
  • Certain past and present circumstances in the
    lives of relatives were seen as not conducive to
    being good caregivers
  • A worker described a situation in which family
    members had criminal records
  • The grandparent wasnt able to the fathers
    side of the family all had criminal records and
    werent able to care for the child and the same
    for the maternal family who all had a lot of
    issues.

15
5. Hindering the search process Custodial parent
factor
  • A supervisor connected the refusal to provide
    information on the father with there being an
    adversarial relationship
  • If the mothers of the children said, oh, hes
    no good, or hes not around or he doesnt
    have a relationship that would just be taken at
    face value and there were a lot of fathers that
    were very much around, very involved, wanted to
    have more involvement with their children but,
    because of the adversarial relationship between
    them and the childrens mother, they were kept
    out, and so they were sometimes just not even
    pursued as possible placement resource. I think
    that changed dramatically with the kinship
    series.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com