Presentation%20to%20the%20Portfolio%20Committee:%20Water%20 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Presentation%20to%20the%20Portfolio%20Committee:%20Water%20

Description:

Business Process, Risk Management ... SLA between VDM and MLM. ... Action plan to accelerate progress and make up for the time delays has been developed and will be ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:236
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 49
Provided by: Manyak9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Presentation%20to%20the%20Portfolio%20Committee:%20Water%20


1
Presentation to the Portfolio Committee Water
Environment
State of water infrastructure
Presentation byDr C RuitersDeputy
Director-General Water Resources Infrastructure
26 - 27 January 2011
2
Presentation overview
  • Background
  • Macro Planning Integrated Water Resources
    Planning
  • Infrastructure Developments
  • Condition of existing infrastructure
  • Dam Safety Rehabilitation and Refurbishment
    Programme (DSRP)
  • Strategy on Access to Water for Basic use from
    Dams
  • Regional Bulk Infrastructure

2
3
3
4
2. Macro Planning Integrated Water Resources
Planning
  • Policy and Regulation Branch (Chief Directorate
    Integrated Water Resources Planning) custodian
  • National Water Resource Strategy - 19 WMA
  • Interventions and various options to address
    deficits are continuously assessed (Option
    Analysis) e.g. reconciliation strategies, all
    town and city studies, planning requirement
    documents.
  • Infrastructure development informed by rigorous
    planning process

4
5
3. Infrastructure Development
6
1. Schemes completed since 2004
Scheme Province Year Completed Cost (R million)
1. Mooi Mgeni Transfer KZN 2004 100
2. Xikundu weir and WTW Limpopo 2005 315
3. Morgenston Jericho Pumpstation Mpumalanga 2005 28
4. Nandoni Dam Limpopo 2005 574
5. Raising Flag Boshielo Dam Limpopo 2006 235
6. Berg Water Project Western Cape 2008 2500
7. VRESAP pipeline GP and MP 2010 2600
8. Nandoni WTW Limpopo 2008 295
TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL 6647
6
7
Major water resource infrastructure development
projects
8
Augmentation projects (1)
Project Province completion date Beneficiaries Total cost R (billion) Available budget Shortfall R (bill) 2011/12 deliverables
Mokolo-Crocodile Water Augmentation Project ( Ph 1) Limpopo 2013 All citizens via Medupi PS Lephalale LM 2,0 0,5 1,5 (to be from loans) Commence construction in September 2011
Vaal River Eastern Sub-System Augmentation Project Mpumalanga 2011 All citizens via Eskom and Sasol jobs for local communities along the route of pipeline 2,7 2,7 ( all from loans) 0 Commission all components of project by July 2011
Raising of Hazelmere Dam Kwazulu-Natal 2012 Domestic industrial users of IlembeDM and Ethekwini 0,116 0,116 Prepare design and award tender for supply of crest gates
8
9
Augmentation projects (2)
Project Province completion date Beneficiaries Total cost R(bill) Available budget Shortfall R (bill) Deliverables in 2011/12
Raising of Clan William Dam Western Cape 2016 Existing and new (resource poor ) irrigat. farmers LM of Clan William, Klawer, Vredendal 1,994 0,139 1,855 Commence with design
Komati Water Scheme Augmentation Project Mpumalanga 2013 All citizens via Eskom 1,736 0 1,736 ( to be from loans) Commence with construction in quarter 1 of 2011
Mooi-Mgeni Transfer Scheme ( Spring Grove Dam and pipeline) Kwazulu-Natal 2013 Domestic and industrial users in Ethekwini uMgungundlovu, Msunduzi 1,667 0 1,667 ( from loans) Construction to commence in quarter 1 of 2011
Olifants River Water Resources Development Project 2A-H Limpopo De Hoop Dam by 2012 Bulk distribution system by 2015(?) Domestic users in Sekhukhune District Polokwane, Mogalakwena LM and mines 16,049 ( not including water services infrastructure requirements of 6,572) 3,074 12,975 Complete De Hoop Dam to 92 commence implementation of distribution system
9
10
ORWSDP WATER SERVICES DEVELOPMENT
Olifants-Sand RWS
POLOKWANE
MOKOPANE
STRYDPOORT MOUNTAINS
LEBOWAKGOMO
Lebalelo RWS
Olifantspoort South RWS
Mphahele and Groothoek RWS
BURGERSFORT
MOOIHOEK
Tubatse RWS
JANE FURSE
Flag Boshielo RWS
STEELPOORT TOWN
FLAG BOSHIELO DAM
Nebo Plateau RWS
DE HOOP DAM
MOTOTOLO
EPSS
10
11
5. Existing Infrastructure
11
11
12
Summary of extent and value of immoveable assets
controlled by the Department (Mar 2010 R
million)
Asset Class Extent Extent Asset Value Asset Value Carrying Value (prelim)
Asset Class Total Unit Current Replacement cost Depreciated Replacement cost Carrying Value (prelim)
Buildings 2 572 Number 2 301 898 803
Canals 8 036 km 29 073 10 773 9 339
Dams and weirs 359 Number 72 002 36 383 31 512
Measuring Facilities 3 011 Number 7 381 2 997 2 604
Pipelines 1 063 km 8 044 3 299 2 892
Pump stations 57 Number 1 673 818 713
Reservoirs 51 Number 631 264 229
Treatment works 62 Number 69 25 22
Tunnels 171 km 18 354 7 750 6 716
Other 77 Number 85 34 29
Sub-total (infrastructure) 139 612 63 241 54 859
State owned land 344 768 Ha 6 643 6 643 6 643
Servitudes 52 595 Ha 1 633 1 633 1 633
TOTAL 147 888 71 517 63 135

12
12
13
5.1 Age Profile of Assets
13
14
5.2 Age profile of assets
14
15
5.3 Remaining Useful Life
RUL profile with capital renewal values
15
16
5. DAM SAFETY REHABILITATION PROGRAMME (DSRP)
  • 359 dams on the asset register (218 listed in the
    ICOLD world register of large dams)
  • Rehabilitation work on 22 dams complete
  • 36 dams in various stages feasibility study,
    detailed design or construction

17
Rehabilitation done due to
  • Insufficient spillway capacity 80
  • Slope stability problems 10
  • Inadequate maintenance eventually resulting in
    dam safety problems 60
  • Geological/foundation problems 10
  • Inadequate outlet systems 80

17
18
18
18
19
Progress
  • Total Expenditure till Sept 2010 R1 200m
  • Dams on programme 58

19
20
6. Strategy on Access to Water for Basic use from
Dams
20
21
Introduction
  • Communities in rural areas that live in close
    proximity to water sources and networks have been
    identified throughout South Africa that do not as
    yet have access to sufficient and safe water to
    fulfill their basic needs.
  • This issue is of serious concern for DWA who has
    decided that urgent action be taken in order to
    ensure that the basic constitutional rights of
    these communities are fulfilled.
  • This project is aimed at supporting the DWA to
    identify communities that live in close proximity
    to DWA dams that do not as yet have access to
    water for basic domestic use.
  • It is envisaged that the final output of this
    project will be a report identifying these
    communities without access to basic water for
    domestic use and providing potential solutions to
    the identified service delivery problem.

21
22
Scope of Work Envisaged by DWA
  • Conduct a survey of communities in close
    proximity to the dams as by DWA in the list below
    in order to ascertain which communities do not
    have access to a basic domestic water supply
  • Assess what water is available from these dams.
  • Determine impact of allocating some of the
    water from the relevant dam to communities
    without a basic domestic water supply. The
    National Water Act states that the provision of
    water for basic human needs is a priority issue.
  • Determine the level of service to be provided.

22
23
Scope of Work Envisaged by DWA
  • Ascertain existing infrastructure in the area.
  • Determine the possible infrastructure
    requirements to supply potable water to the
    community.
  • Determine the estimated capital and operational
    costs of this supply.
  • Determine the estimated timeframe required to
    supply the infrastructure.

23
24
Dams Identified by DWA
Central Operations Northern Operations Southern Operations Eastern Operations
Usutu Vaal Zaaihoek Taung Bospoort Molatedi Vaalkop Buffelspoort Koster Lindleyspoort Nooitgedacht Rust de Winter Blyderivierspoort Injaka Buffelskllf Ohrigstad Phiring Chuenniespoort Amabele Balura Bushmans Krantz Cata Dabi Debe Dimbaza Glenbrock Katrivier Lanti Lubisi Magwa Ncora Roxeni Sheshegu Tentergate Tsojana Umtata Pongola Poort Woodstock Goedertrouw Hluhluwe
24
24
25
Overview of Approach Followed
25
25
26
Approach
  • Phase 1 Determine Location of Dams and
    Communities
  • Phase 2 Consultations with Relevant WSAs
  • Phase 3 Identify Possible Infrastructure
    Solutions
  • Phase 4 Financial and Time Implications for
    Proposed Infrastructure per Dam
  • Phase 5 Institutional Issues

26
27
General Comments
  • Currently the provinces that are focused on is
  • Limpopo
  • North West
  • Eastern Cape
  • The full amount of funding indicated to conclude
    all activities was not available from inception
  • Therefore the aim is to conclude the full life
    cycle for them before commencing with the other
    regions to estimate what funding is remaining.
  • A time delay could occur if the All Town Study
    information is delayed due to some of the areas
    not yet concluded.

27
28
Regional Bulk Infrastructure
29
1- Overview Strategic purpose
  • Is to develop an oversight and support function
    that will ensure the development and operational
    and maintenance of regional bulk infrastructure
    in the water sector.

29
30
Objectives of Programme
  • Identify all regional bulk project requirements,
    through appropriate integrated planning
    processes.
  • Assist with the funding and implementation of
    regional bulk infrastructure projects through
    RBIG.
  • Facilitate the development of institutional
    arrangements and capacity to ensure the
    implementation and effective operations and
    maintenance of regional bulk infrastructure.

30
31
2 Progress to date
  • 109 projects were started since 07/08 financial
    year.
  • 50 implementation projects have been initiated
    and are in construction, design or tender phase
    of which 36 are in construction and 14 are in
    design / tender phase
  • 42 feasibility / implementation ready studies are
    ongoing.
  • 17 projects have been completed.

31
31
32
Projects completed
  • 2009/10
  • Mbhashe North BWS
  • Mathulini BWS
  • Greater Mthonjaneni BWS Phase 1
  • Van Wyksvlei Interim Solutions
  • Van Der Kloof/Petrusville BWS
  • Mjejane BWS
  • 2007/08
  • Chris Hani Tsomo RDP2 BWS
  • Delmas Phase 1 Emergency
  • Thaba Chweu BWS
  • 2008/09
  • Delmas Phase 2
  • Maqwassi Hills RWS
  •  

32
32
33
Projects completed (continue)
  • 2010/11
  • Mthatha Bulk Water Intervention
  • Malangeni Waste Water Treatment Plant
  • Greytown BWS
  • Mbombela Water Supply
  • Hoxani BWS
  • Kenhardt BWS

33
33
34
Budget allocated categories
  1. 85-90 for project implementation
  2. 10-15 for feasibility studies and
    Implementation Ready studies
  3. R 20 R 30 million for project and programme
    management

34
35
Budget allocation
  • Previous financial years 2007/08 and 2008/09
  • 2007/08 R 300.0 million
  • 2008/09 R 443.4 million
  • 2009/10 R 618.2 million
  • 2010/11 MTEF Allocation
  • 2010/11 R 893.0 million
  • 2011/12 R 1 675.3 million
  • 2012/13 R 1 849.1 million

35
35
36
3 Allocations needs
  • of benefiting municipalities to date
  • Eastern Cape - 13
  • Free State - 4
  • Gauteng - 2
  • KwaZulu-Natal - 11
  • Limpopo - 7
  • Mpumalanga - 5
  • Northern Cape - 9
  • North West - 4
  • Western Cape - 6

36
37
2010 MTEF allocations (old)
37
37
38
New MTEF 2011
  • 2011/12 MTEF Allocation
  • 11/12 R 1 775.3 m increase by R 100 m
  • 12/13 R 2 233.1 m increase by R 384 m
  • 13/14 R 2 418.8 m increase by R 468 m
  • Total R 6 427.2 million
  • There is an increase of approximately R 952
    million

38
39
Comparison backlog and RBIG funding
Urban metro areas given less priority
Housing and water scarcity
sanitation and water scarcity
39
40
4 Alignment / Transparency
  • CoGTA requires DWA to align RBIG with needs and
    all water related projects
  • Dep. of Human settlement is blaming other
    departments responsible for bulk of been
    responsible for constraints to service delivery
  • Cape Time Nov 25 th 2010, p6
  • Problems with the provision of bulk
    infrastructure are stifling housing delivery
    across the country, says Human settlements
    Minister, Tokyo Sexwale.. Thus the need for a
    more integrated, planned and coordinated approach
    across various departments

40
41
Alignment
  • Projects are motivated by WSA, therefore how can
    there be misalignment ?
  • The problem is that due to limited funds, RBIG
  • Has not initiated any new projects in the last 2
    yrs
  • (policy is to complete existing projects before
    new ones are initiated)
  • A significant gap exists between bulk
    infrastructure needs and budget available.

41
42
Alignment with other programmes
  • The following alignment between RBIG and MIG are
    required and therefore proposed
  • Scope of projects by each programme
  • Overlapping budgets and co-funding
  • Criteria / conditions for project approval
  • Integration of planning needs
  • Monitoring and evaluation procedures of project
    implementation

42
43
Successes
  1. The programme was expanded from a 3 year term to
    a long term programme
  2. The programme has expanded from R 300 million /
    annum in 2007/08 to R 2 418 million / annum in
    2013/14
  3. A consolidated list of all bulk needs / projects
    has been developed and is been updated through 9
    Regional bulk Master plans.
  4. New innovative projects implemented (i.e
    desalination and Waste Water recycling)
  5. Significant amount of new jobs created (6017
    jobs).
  6. Inter governmental co-operation (particularly
    WC, FS)

43
44
Regional Bulk Expenditure 20 January 2011
44
45
6 Expenditure
With invoices not yet processes R 490 m.
45
46
New project management priorities
  • DWA to take greater/direct control for
    implementing new RBIG projects in weak WSA
    utilising
  • Project management capacity from DWA
  • Utilising the capacity of Water Boards
  • Utilising DWA construction
  • Private service providers (i.e BoTT)
  • Identify new institutional arrangements and
    models
  • Focus on sustainability of projects and O M
  • Ensure conditions of IRS are followed through
  • Focus on improving agreements with WSA and DWA

46
47
Conclusion
  • Most RBIG projects are large projects that
    require, appropriate water sector expertise for
    planning and implementation, they should not be
    entrusted to officials and institutions with
    limited expertise and capacity
  • Although expenditure is slow , most funds will be
    utilised by the end of the financial year
  • RBIG has been successful but not without
    problems

47
48
  • THANK YOU

48
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com