Persuasion - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

Persuasion

Description:

Chapter 14 Persuasion Persuasive Speaking Persuasive speaking is a process in which a speaker presents a message intended to affect an audience in specific ways. – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:79
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: Strong83
Learn more at: http://www.strongnet.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Persuasion


1
Chapter 14
  • Persuasion

2
Persuasive Speaking
  • Persuasive speaking is a process in which a
    speaker presents a message intended to affect an
    audience in specific ways.
  • The speaker communicates their position and tries
    to motivate someone to change their beliefs,
    attitudes and behaviors.

3
Two types of P.S.
  • Direct The purpose of the persuasion is not
    disguised in any way.
  • Indirect The speaker disguises or de-emphasizes
    the speakers purpose in some way. True purpose
    is not known until the end of the speech.

4
Aristotles Rhetorical Proofs
  • Logos lo-, gäs -,gos
  • Logical support in a speech
  • This is your logic, reasoning, and evidence

5
Evidence
  • anything that establishes a fact or gives us
    reasons to believe something
  • Specific examples, illustrations
  • Comparisons/contrasts
  • Statistics
  • Statements from authority Quotes
  • Definitions

6
Reasoning
  • The mental process by which humans reach
    conclusions concerning what to believe or what
    course of action to take.
  • Popular forms of reasoning are induction and
    deduction.

7
Induction
  • The process of reasoning from specific instances
    to make a general conclusion about something.
  • Patterns such as Criteria-Satisfaction, Negative
    Method, and Monroes Motivated Sequence.
  • Also sign and analogy are inductive.

8
Inductive-Examples
  • Criteria-Satisfaction Method
  • I. Most of us are likely to agree on the criteria
    for class president.
  • II. Jon Medlock meets all three of these
    criteria.III. Therefore, you should vote for
    Jon Medlock for senior class president.

9
Inductive-Examples
  • Negative Method
  • I. Joe Camel has no real leadership experience.
  • II. Crazy Carrie has no real leadership
    experience.
  • III. Farmer Bob has little experience but not has
    shown an inclination to be willing to pitch in
    with the work.
  • IV. Jon Medlock has leadership experience, has
    proven himself to be a hard worker, and has fresh
    ideas.
  • V. Therefore, you should vote for Jon Medlock
    for senior class president.

10
Deduction
  • Reasoning from general to specific what is true
    of an entire class of things applies to a
    specific member of that class.
  • Syllogism
  • All teachers have a college degree
  • Mrs. Bartel is a teacher.
  • Therefore, Mrs. Bartel has college degree.
  • Patterns such as statement of reasons approach,
    problem-solution method, and comparative
    advantage method.

11
Examples-Deductive
  • Statement of Reasons Approach
  • Thesis Vote for Jon Medlock for senior class
    president.
  • I. Jon has proven leadership skills.
  • II. Jon is a hard worker who will work for
  • you!
  • III. Jon has fresh ideal that will benefit
  • you!

12
Examples-Deductive
  • Problem-Solution
  • Thesis Vote for Jon Medlock for senior class
    president.
  • I. Our senior class members face several
    problems.
  • A. Students do not feel they have any
  • input.
  • B. Teachers do not respect student
  • opinion.

13
Examples-Deductive
  • Problem-Solution
  • II. Jon Medlock can solve these problems.
  • A. Jon can generate student interest.
  • B. Jon is respected by faculty.

14
Examples-Deductive
  • Comparative Advantage Method
  • Thesis Vote for Jon Medlock for senior class
    president.
  • Jon has more experience than any other candidate.
  • Jon has shown the ability to work harder than any
    other candidate.
  • Jons fresh ideas will benefit you more than any
    other candidates ideas will.

15
Fallacies
  • Hasty Generalization
  • False Premise
  • False sign (circumstantial evidence)
  • False cause
  • False analogy
  • Begging the question (circular reasoning)

16
Aristotles Rhetorical Proofs
  • Ethos e- thäs Speaker Credibility
  • This includes honesty, sincerity, competency,
    credentials, composure, image, dynamism, and
    goodwill
  • In your speech this means?
  • Prior Ethos vs. Demonstrative Ethos

17
Aristotles Rhetorical Proofs
  • Pathos pa-thäs, -tho?s, -thos
  • Emotional Appeal
  • Arousal of fear, anger, pity, joy, sadness, etc.

18
Audience Analysis
  • Favorable/Supportive Audience Tips
  • -Use Emotional appeals to intensify your
  • listeners support.
  • -Get your audience to make a public
  • commitment.
  • -Provide several specific alternatives for
    action.
  • -Prepare your audience to carry your message
  • to others.

19
Audience Analysis
  • Uncommitted or Neutral Audience Tips
  • -Stress attention factors! Why?
  • -Stress material that clarifies and
  • illuminates your information
  • -establish strong credibility
  • -use strong logical and emotional
  • appeals

20
Audience Analysis
  • Indifferent/Apathetic audience
  • -captive audiences like this class!
  • -Stress attention factors! Why?
  • -Stress relevancy factors! Why?
  • -Dynamism!

21
Audience Analysis
  • Hostile/Opposed Audience Tips
  • -Set realistic goals one speech most
  • likely will not change everyones
  • attitudes/beliefs
  • -Stress Common Ground!
  • -Extensive logos and establish strong
  • ethos
  • -DO NOT USE EMOTIONAL APPEALS!

22
Goals of Persuasive Speaking
  • Change attitudes-state of mind or emotion toward
    a person or situation (opinion-verbal expression
    of attitude)
  • Change beliefs-an unwavering conviction in the
    truth of a statement or in the existence of
    something, especially when supported by evidence
  • Change in behavior-call to action

23
Propositions of Persuasion
  • Proposition of fact speaker and listener differ
    over the alleged validity of a fact
  • Proposition of value Speaker and listener differ
    the validity of a value judgement such as good
    or bad, right or wrong, better or worse,
    justified or unjustified
  • Proposition of policy
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com