THEMATIC NETWORK LIFETIME - WP1: Best practice and knowledge of lifetime engineering final presentation

1
THEMATIC NETWORK LIFETIME - WP1 Best practice
and knowledge of lifetime engineeringfinal
presentation

•  WP 1 leader
• Universität Karlsruhe (TH), TMB/FM
• Prof. Dr.-Ing. Kunibert Lennerts
• Dipl.-Ing. Karin Diez

2
WP 1 Best practice and knowledge of lifetime
engineering

• Working steps
• Questionnaire sent out in August 2002
• Follow up questionnaire sent out in November 2002
• Design of a database on basis of results of
  questionnaires
• Second call for data in May 2004 to NDG Leaders
• Refinement of database
• Upload of database into Netspace for Members use
• Analysis and Benchmarking of data

3
WP 1 tasks
Task 1 Exploring and benchmarking of best
practices

Task 2 Listing of competencies and current
practices
Task 5 Concluding state of the art in RD,
dissemination, exploitation, education and
training
structured database
Task 3 identifying gaps in competence,
education and training
Task 6 Collecting and finishing Deliverable 1
Task 4 identifying gaps in transfer activities
Keywords
4
WP 1 2nd call for data research projects
example excel sheet
Sent out to all NDG leaders
 
5
WP 1 2nd call for data research projects
example completed data
Name of Project OPIK Participants Universitä
t Karlsruhe, TMB-FM several hospitals Start 2
000 End 2003 Short description processes
in hosptials, benchmarking Website www.facilit
y-management.uni-karlsruhe.de Keywords out of
list 3,5,7,23 Keyword own definition
(optional) benchmarking Area (Buildings,
Infrastructures, BI) Buildings Language Germ
an Partners from industry (Y/N) Y Product
development (Y/N) N ID-Country, member,
ID-Project Germany, 5, 1
 
6
WP 1 2nd call for data Educational courses
example excel sheet
Sent out to all NDG leaders
 
7
WP 1 2nd call for data Educational courses
example completed data
Name of Course Life cycle engineering of
buildings Member 64 Area (Buildings,
Infrastructures, BI) Buildings
Language Finnish ID-Country 8
Finland Institution giving course Helsinki
University of Technology/Structural
engineering and building physics Keywords out
of list 1, 3, 4, 7, 12, 13, 14, 15, 19, 20, 25,
29
 
8
WP 1 2nd call for data Training courses
example excel sheet
Sent out to all NDG leaders
 
9
WP 1 2nd call for data Training courses
example completed data
Name of Course Plumbing and Heating Institution
giving course FAS Training Centre, Baldoyle,
Dublin 13 Member 82 Area (Buildings,
Infrastructures, BI) Buildings
ID-Country Ireland Language English Ke
ywords out of list 8, 10, 15, 25, 31, 34
 
10
WP 1 2nd call for data ACCESS database
Why using ACCESS? challange - Complex data
from different sources - relationship of data
(11 nm) - need for a searching
function Access provides all possibilities for
the design of a well structured database.
 
11
Database Structure

• Structured searching routines can be executed in
  terms of
• research projects
• educational courses
• training courses
• standards, handbooks
•  All data is referenced to
• keyword
• country
• language
• member responsible for data / contact address

 
12
Database Queries
Example Query on educational courses for
language shall be German
 
13
Database Queries
Example Query on educational courses for
language shall be English
 
14
Database Queries
Example Query on educational courses for
language shall be German and keyword shall be 3
whole life costing.
 
15
Benchmarking

• The data collected in the database concerning
  research, education and training has been
  benchmarked under the following aspects
• competence (keywords and main topics)
• general
• national
• gaps (keywords and main topics)
• general
• national
• Transfer of research into praxis
• Procedure Each entry in the database is
  referenced to one or more keywords. In terms of
  benchmarking we are comparing how many times the
  keywords have been named to reference the
  entries.

 
16
Definition Competence Centres - Gaps

• We define competence within the Lifetime Network
  on basis of the following aspects
• A search in the database to one of those topics
  will give a good starting point and contacts for
  further investigation
• new research can build on published work
• Education / Training can be derived
• We define gaps within the Lifetime Network on
  basis of the following aspects
• A search in the database to one of those topics
  gives very little or none results
• education or training is (nearly) not available

 
17
Benchmarking to Use of keywords for Research
Projects
At this state of the project there are 293
entries listed in the database. The middle value
of the Use of keyword of all keywords is 19.
The standard deviation is 14 where the minimal
value is 3 and the maximal value is 60. We take a
closer look at all keywords where the Use of
keyword is over 30 or under 8.
 
18
Competence Centres

• Keywords named more often than 30 times (Use of
  keyword gt30)
• 1 investment planning (50)
• 100 lifetime design (48)
• 14 economy of nature, environmental impact
  assessment technology (45)
• 300 recycling technology (43)
• 400 lifetime management and maintenance (60)
• 24 modernisation planning and execution (32)
• 21 maintenance planning and execution (32)
• 45 optimisation of materials and components (35)
  
•  

 
19
Gaps

• Keywords that are underrepresented (Use of
  keyword lt8)
• 13 multiple attribute decision making (e. g.
  MADA) (5)
• 18 selective demolition for recycling (7)
• 23 Infrastructural management (security,
  cleaning) (4)
• 25 analysis of the requirements of owner/user
  (e. g. QFD method) (5)
• 28 network (total sample of the managed
  objects) planning (5)
• 500 Culture (5)
• 31 Building traditions (5)
• 32 Life style (5)
• 33 Business culture (5)
• 34 Aesthetics (6)
• 35 Architectural styles and trends (3)
• 36 Image (5)
• 39 sustainable city/regional planning (5)

 
20
Benchmarking to use of keywords per country
Amount of data for each country available in the
database
 
21
Use of keywords for all countries
Use of keywords for each countrys research
projects at the same time the summed up use of
keywords for all countries. We can derive for
which keywords there seem to be existing
competence centres and at the same time we can
allocate them. Further investigation is
possible via searching routine in database
 
22
Transfer from research into praxis
From 293 projects in total we have information
about involvement of industry partners only for
98 projects. The share of projects where
industry partners are involved is 65.
 
23
Benchmarking to Use of keywords for Education
At this state of the project 109 educational
courses are listed in the database. The middle
value of the Use of keyword of all keywords is
5,9. The standard deviation is 4,2 where the
minimal value is 0 and the maximal value is 20.
We take a closer look at all keywords where the
Use of keyword is over 10 or under 2.
 
24
Competence Centres

• Keywords named more often than 10 times (Use of
  keyword gt10)
• 1 Investment planning (12)
•  3 Whole life costing (11)
• 6 Performance data of materials and products
  (13)
• 7 Service life planning (11)
• 8 Durability limit states and service life
  design (12)
• 13 Energy efficiency in use (15)
• 21 maintenance planning and execution (20)
• 24 modernisation planning and execution (14)
•  

 
25
Gaps

• Keywords that are underrepresented (Use of
  keyword lt2)
• 500 Culture (1)
• 31 Building traditions (1)
• 32 Life style (1)
• 33 Business culture (1)
• 37 thematic network (0)

 
26
Benchmarking to Use of keywords for Training
At this state of the project 83 training courses
are listed in the database. The middle value of
the Use of keyword of all keywords is 4,5. The
standard deviation is 4,4 where the minimal value
is 0 and the maximal value is 16. We take a
closer look at all keywords where the Use of
keyword is over 9 or under 1.
 
27
Competence Centres

• Keywords named more often than 9 times (Use of
  keyword gt9)
• 1 Investment planning (15)
• 7 Service life planning (12)
• 14 Economy of nature, environmental impact
  assessment technology (12)
• 15 Energy efficiency in use (15)
• 21 Maintenance planning and execution (16)
• 23 Infrastructural management (security,
  cleaning) (10)
•  

 
28
Gaps

• Keywords that are underrepresented (Use of
  keyword lt1)
• 4 usability, functionality and obsolescence
  analysis and design (0)
• 12 design for reuse (0)
• 28 network planning (0)
• 29 multiple attribute decision making (0)
• 32 Life style (0)
• 33 Business culture (0)
• 35 Architectural styles and trends (0)
• 36 Image (0)
• 37 thematic network (0)