The Role of IR in Supporting the Accreditation Process: A Chair - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

The Role of IR in Supporting the Accreditation Process: A Chair

Description:

The Role of IR in Supporting the Accreditation Process: A Chair s Perspective Dr. Barbara R. Sadowski Chief Planning Officer Marywood University – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:88
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: pinr6
Learn more at: http://www.marywood.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Role of IR in Supporting the Accreditation Process: A Chair


1
The Role of IR in Supporting the Accreditation
Process A Chairs Perspective
  • Dr. Barbara R. Sadowski
  • Chief Planning Officer
  • Marywood University
  • http//www.marywood.edu

2
Two Distinct Roles for IR
  • Support for the self-study process
  • Preparing for the self-study (Year 1)
  • During the self-study (Year 2)
  • Preparing for the campus visit (Year 3)
  • Documenting Institutional Effectiveness
  • Critical Success Factors/benchmarks
  • Developing a plan

3
Preparing for the Self-study
  • Start early at least three years before
    expected visit (2003 summer for spring 2006
    visit)
  • Activities (Year 1)
  • Determine what accreditation process and
    standards require as evidence MSA Website
  • Inventory current survey coverage
  • Conduct surveys where necessary plan for
    funding
  • Sign up for surveys where needed, e.g., faculty,
    CLA, alumni
  • Scan important documents, e.g., accreditation
    reports

4
Preparing for the Self-Study
  • Make survey data readily accessible to campus
    users
  • Provide campus with organized and easily
    interpreted data
  • Suggestions that worked
  • Intranet IR site for campus users
  • Scanned documents as PDF files
  • Survey reports across years
  • Survey data in easily interpreted format, e.g,
    Excel files with multiple years, use conditional
    formatting for significant differences

5
Preparing for the Self-Study
  • Link accreditation standards to survey results
  • Cross-walk between MSA elements and NSSE items
  • Organize list of IR resources by MSA standards
  • Table of Resources for Self-study Design
  • Organize resources by study group
  • Relate items from surveys, e.g., SSI, CSS to MSA
    elements
  • Special topics self-study requires a roadmap
    relating documentation evidence to elements of
    MSA standards

6
Example of Cross-walk betweenSurvey data and
Standards
  • NSSE Item
  • Worked on a research project with faculty outside
    of course
  • Quality of relationships w/ faculty
  • Community Service
  • Attending campus events and activities
  • MSA Standards
  • 10, 13, 14
  • 6, 9, 10
  • 6, 13, 14
  • 1, 11

7
During the Self-Study
  • Use on-line surveys to handle ad hoc requests for
    data, e.g., Survey Monkey
  • Refer requests for survey data to website with
    resources for self-study accreditation
  • Check initial drafts of self-study for correct
    interpretation of survey data
  • IR staff serve on relevant study groups as
    resource person(s)

8
Preparing for the Team Visit
  • Two distinct aspects to supporting evidence
  • Charts and graphs in appendices to self-study
    document
  • Evidence for documentation room
  • Assemble the documentation room evidence
  • Create a CD with self-study text and links to
    supporting material
  • If a special topics self-study, then a roadmap
    linking elements and evidence needs to be
    developed

9
Documenting Institutional Effectiveness
  • MSA standard on assessment of institutional
    effectiveness
  • Role of IR is not as support for accreditation
    process but rather as the primary source for
    documentation of institutional effectiveness
  • Mission statement including goals and objectives
    determines what needs to be documented as
    evidence of institutional effectiveness

10
Documenting Institutional Effectiveness
  • Institutional Assessment is more comprehensive
    than Student Learning Outcomes Assessment
  • A distinction between direct and indirect
    evidence of outcomes needs to be clear
  • NSSE data provide direct evidence of
    institutional environment for learning, not
    evidence of learning outcomes.

11
Documenting Institutional Effectiveness
  • Benchmarks comparing institution indicators
    against a peer group
  • Dashboard indicators track self-referenced
    critical success factors
  • Selection of no more than 10 indicators - very
    important
  • Across institution finance, enrollment, quality,
    advancement
  • Relate to both institutional goals and strategic
    goals

12
Documenting Institutional Effectiveness
  • Dashboard indicators
  • Provide 5 years worth of data (hidden graph)
  • Indicate high and low points
  • Indicate current years value and assessment of
    change from previous year (color-coded)
  • Positive
  • Negative
  • Stable
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com