Modeling of Buoyant Plumes of Flammable Natural Gas - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Modeling of Buoyant Plumes of Flammable Natural Gas

Description:

Modeling of Buoyant Plumes of Flammable Natural Gas John Hargreaves Analyst Safety Basis Technical Services Group LA-UR-12-21161 – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:70
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: DanN183
Learn more at: https://www.lanl.gov
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Modeling of Buoyant Plumes of Flammable Natural Gas


1
Modeling of Buoyant Plumes of Flammable Natural
Gas
  • John Hargreaves
  • Analyst
  • Safety Basis Technical Services Group

LA-UR-12-21161
2
Calculation of Natural Gas (NG) Hazards
  • Analysis of natural gas (NG) explosions are
    required in support of safe nuclear operations
  • This presentation will be based on work done
    analyzing NG hazards near LANLs anticipated
    construction of a new TRU waste facility (TWF)

3
Analysis of the NG Hazard
  • Analysis of an NG hazard requires
  • Identification of suitable simplifying
    assumptions and the geometry of the problem
  • Selection of an analytical method or model
  • Determination of an NG source term
  • Characterization of a trajectory and flammable
    content of NG plume
  • Calculation of the hazard potential of
    deflagration or detonation of the NG plume

4
Assumptions and Limitations
  • The analysis of an NG hazard requires assumptions
    to define the problem
  • Modeling of natural gas
  • Definition of the NG source term
  • Modeling of plume, plume rise, and atmospheric
    conditions
  • Limitations of modeling an NG plume

5
Modeling Natural Gas
  • Natural Gas can be modeled as pure methane
  • NG is primarily methane (80 per cent or higher).
    The natural gas used at LANL averages between 96
    and 97 percent methane. Higher fractions, e.g.,
    butane, ethane, and propane, are separated by the
    vendor prior to delivery. Other constituents
    such as carbon dioxide, hydrogen sulfide, and
    nitrogen are also often removed, but may remain
    in trace quantities.
  • Comparatively small molecule allows use of the
    ideal gas law pv nRT

6
Definition of NG Source Term
  • Source can be a pipeline or a storage tank
  • Pipeline flow may be treated as compressible and
    friction-limited
  • Pipeline diameter, pipeline length, pressure,
    pipe roughness, and Fanning friction factor.
  • Assumption on ambient pipeline temperature
    required.
  • Determine conditions of flow, exit temperature,
    Mach number, flow density, total mass flux and
    volumetric flow

Existing NG Pipeline Adjacent to TWF
7
Definition of NG Source Term
  • Solve for Mach number and exit pressure of flow
    numerically
  • Determine flow condition i.e., choked or
    unchoked
  • Determine density of exit flow this indicates
    buoyancy


8
Modeling a Buoyant Plume
  • Plumes can be modeled as Gaussian, Top-Hat, or
    Non-Gaussian
  • A Gaussian model assumes plume properties follow
    a Gaussian distribution over the plume cross
    section
  • A Top-Hat model assumes properties are constant
    over the cross section
  • Models are based on equations for conservation of
    fuel mass, total mass, and momentum
  • Comparisons of these show top-hat and Gaussian
    models give very similar results

9
Modeling a Buoyant Plume
  • Briggs and Hanna developed theory for vertical
    and bent-over plumes
  • Plume rise divides into momentum- and
    buoyancy-dominated flow
  • Based on initial momentum flux and buoyancy flux
  • Plume rise is usually dominated early (up to 5 to
    10 seconds) by momentum
  • If advecting wind velocity is 1 m/s or less,
    plume assumed to be vertical
  • Vertical rise and bent-plume trajectories
    determined by the formulae
  • where u is the advecting wind velocity

10
Limitations Modeling a Buoyant Plume
  • Calculation of an exit velocity of the plume is
    geometry or constant dependent
  • Terrain surface roughness can not be taken into
    account
  • Gaussian distributions may not be accurate,
    especially in low wind velocities
  • Building wake effects are ignored
  • Localized air turbulence, aerosolization, gaseous
    depolymerization, water vapor reactions forming
    new products, or significant evaporation or
    condensation
  • These last effects are more typical of heavier
    species of gas and not natural gas (methane)

11
Plume Trajectory Plots30 m Standoff 3-Inch Line
12
3-D Plume Trajectory Plot (50 m)
13
Tying Together Pasquill Stability, Turner Air
Concentrations and Slade Power Law Approximations
14
Plotting Concentration, Wind Speed, and Pasquill
Stability Class Together (30 m)
15
30 m Standoff Distance a Problem
16
Plotting Concentration, Wind Speed, and Pasquill
Stability Class Together (50 m)
17
Determining Conservative Values for Explosive
Overpressures
  • Overpressure can be calculated using the
    TNT-equivalent method
  • Assume a cylindrical plume and assume a 9 v/o
    air/methane mix
  • Very conservative approach, but has value in
    possibly bounding the analysis
  • New theory by Epstein and Fauske allows more
    precise calculation of total mass of flammable
    gas released in a vertical plume
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com