PHILOSOPHY 100 (Ted Stolze) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

PHILOSOPHY 100 (Ted Stolze)

Description:

PHILOSOPHY 100 (Ted Stolze) Notes on David Cunning, Everyday Examples, chapters 5,7 A Working Definition of the Concept God In the Abrahamic religious ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:99
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: Stol155
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: PHILOSOPHY 100 (Ted Stolze)


1
PHILOSOPHY 100 (Ted Stolze)
Notes on David Cunning, Everyday Examples,
chapters 5,7
2
A Working Definition of the Concept God
In the Abrahamic religious traditions (Judaism,
Christianity, Islam) believers usually regard God
as an all-powerful, all-knowing, all-loving
being.
3
NOTE Philosophical arguments for the existence
of God dont rely on sacred texts like the Bible
or Quran but primarily on human reason and
experience.
4
Arguments for the Existence of God
  • First Cause
  • Ontological Argument
  • Religious Experience ()
  • Moral Argument ()
  • Intelligent Design

Not covered by Cunning
5
The First Cause Argument
  • Everything that exists must have a cause.
  • The chain of causes cannot reach back
    indefinitely. At some point, we must come to a
    First Cause.
  • The First Cause we may call God.
  • Watch a brief video overview of the argument
    http//www.youtube.com/watch?v6CulBuMCLg0snsem

6
Objections to the First Cause Argument
  • Buddhists reject the idea of a First Cause and
    argue that the universe goes through innumerable
    cycles (the concept of conditioned genesis)
  • Why think that a First Cause would be all-good?
  • Why think that a First Cause would be a person,
    as opposed to a non-personal consciousness or
    force like Brahman or Dao?
  • Why worship a First Cause?

7
Anselms Ontological Argument
  • Define God as a being greater than which none
    can be thought.
  • Assume that God exists only in the imagination.
  • But it is greater for something to exist not only
    in the imagination but also in reality.
  • Therefore, God is not a being greater than which
    none can be thought.
  • But this contradicts 1.
  • Therefore, God exists not only in the imagination
    but also in reality.

8
Descartess Ontological Argument
  1. There must be as much reality in a cause as in
    the effect of that cause.
  2. I have an idea of God.
  3. But my idea of God is only the effect of a prior
    cause.
  4. Therefore, God exists not only as an idea but as
    a reality.

9
Objections to the Ontological Argument
  • God as a perfect being is not conceivable
  • The Perfect Island counter-analogy

10
The Argument from Religious Experience
  1. There are widespread reports by persons across
    time and culture who claim to have experienced a
    transcendent, divine reality.
  2. These persons couldnt all be mistaken or lying
    about their experiences.
  3. Therefore, there exists such a transcendent,
    divine reality.

11
Objections to the Argument from Religious
Experience
  • Religious experiences arent the same as
    perceptual experiences
  • Religious experiences have naturalistic
    explanations

12
The Hiddenness of God Objection
  • We live in a world in which people persist in
    disbelieving God or having cruel views of God.
  • God does not appear to correct these views.
  • An all-good God would never allow a creature to
    seek God without finding God in an obvious way.
  • Therefore, God does not exist.
  • (For a response, consider the plot of the 1950
    movie The Next Voice You Hear www.youtube.com/wat
    ch?vKRxf9qS5PUk)

13
The Moral Argument
  1. There is no guarantee of justice in this world.
  2. The virtuous are not necessarily rewarded with
    the happiness that ought to complement their
    virtue.
  3. But without some such future reward, there would
    be no motivation to act justlythe result would
    be a condition of moral futility.
  4. Therefore, there must be a God-given guarantee of
    justice in the next world.

14
Objections to the Moral Argument
  • But why would only a personal single God bring
    about such a reward for virtue? (Why couldnt it
    result from many deities or a nonpersonal cosmic
    moral law like karma?)
  • Perhaps virtue has simply evolved.
  • Perhaps virtue is its own reward.
  • Perhaps moral futility is correct.

15
Two Types of Intelligent Design Argument
  • Best-Explanation
  • Same-Evidence

William Paley (1743-1805)
16
The Best-Explanation Argument
  1. Either the wonders of nature occurred randomly,
    by chance, or they are the product of intelligent
    design.
  2. Intelligent design explains the existence of
    these things much better than blind chance does.
  3. Therefore, the wonders of nature are best
    explained as the products of intelligent design.

17
The Same-Evidence Argument
  1. We conclude that watches were made by intelligent
    designers because they have parts that work
    together to serve a purpose.
  2. We have the same evidence that the universe, and
    some of the natural objects in it, were made by
    an intelligent designer they are also composed
    of parts that work together to serve a purpose.
  3. Therefore, we are entitled to conclude that the
    universe was made by an intelligent designer.

18
Objections to Arguments for Intelligent Design
  • Could there be multiple designers (a polytheistic
    objection)?
  • How orderly, harmonious, and beautiful is the
    universe really? (a Humean objection)
  • Why think that a designer would be all-good?
    (another Humean objection)
  • There is an alternative explanation for the
    emergence of natural order and complexity. (a
    Darwinian objection)

19
Darwin on Paley and Intelligent Design
  • Although I did not think much about the
    existence of a personal God until a considerably
    later period of my life, I will here give the
    vague conclusions to which I have been driven.
    The old argument of design in nature, as given by
    Paley, which formerly seemed to me so conclusive,
    fails, now that the law of natural selection has
    been discovered. We can no longer argue that, for
    instance, the beautiful hinge of a bivalve shell
    must have been made by an intelligent being, like
    the hinge of a door by man. There seems to be no
    more design in the variability of organic beings
    and in the action of natural selection, than in
    the course the wind blows. Everything in nature
    is the result of fixed laws.
  • (The Autobiography of Charles Darwin, edited by
    Nora Barlow NY Norton, 2005 (1958), p. 73.)

20
Darwins Argument for Natural Selection
  1. There is a geometrical increase in organisms.
  2. The struggle for existence over survival leads
    to the emergence of variations in characteristics
    of members of a species.
  3. There exists a heritability of characteristics.
  4. Characteristics with survival value will be
    passed on to future generations.
  5. Therefore, there exists a variation among and
    modification of species.

21
A Darwinian Best-Explanation Argument
  1. The wonders of nature occurred (a) by chance, (b)
    as the product of intelligent design, or (c) as
    the result of evolution by natural selection.
  2. Evolution by natural selection explains the
    existence of these things much better than either
    chance or intelligent design does.
  3. Therefore, the wonders of nature are best
    explained as the products of evolution by natural
    selection.

22
Evolutionary Theism
  • Everything that exists within the
    universeincluding evolution by natural
    selectionis part of a vast system of causes and
    effects
  • But the universe itself requires an
    explanationwhy does it exist?
  • The only plausible explanation is that God
    created it.
  • Therefore, to explain the existence of the
    universe, it is reasonable to believe in God.
  • Therefore, to explain the existence of evolution
    by natural selection, it is also reasonable to
    believe in God.

23
Darwins Conclusion to On the Origin of Species
  • It is interesting to contemplate an entangled
    bank, clothed with many plants of many kinds,
    with birds singing on the bushes, with various
    insects flitting about, and with worms crawling
    through the damp earth, and to reflect that these
    elaborately constructed forms, so different from
    each other, and dependent on each other in so
    complex a manner, have all been produced by laws
    acting around us. These laws, taken in the
    largest sense, being Growth with Reproduction
    Inheritance which is almost implied by
    reproduction Variability from the indirect and
    direct action of the external conditions of life,
    and from use and disuse a Ratio of Increase so
    high as to lead to a Struggle for Life, and as a
    consequence to Natural Selection, entailing
    Divergence of Character and the Extinction of
    less-improved forms. Thus, from the war of
    nature, from famine and death, the most exalted
    object which we are capable of conceiving,
    namely, the production of the higher animals,
    directly follows. There is grandeur in this view
    of life, with its several powers, having been
    originally breathed by the Creator into a few
    forms or into one and that, whilst this planet
    has gone cycling on according to the fixed law of
    gravity, from so simple a beginning endless forms
    most beautiful and most wonderful have been, and
    are being, evolved. (From Charles Darwin, On the
    Origin of Species 1859, pp. 489-90)
  • A phrase Darwin added to the 2nd edition (1860)
    and maintained through the 6th edition (1876).
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com