The unfolded protein response signals through high-order assembly of Ire1 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

The unfolded protein response signals through high-order assembly of Ire1

Description:

The unfolded protein response signals through high-order assembly of Ire1 Alexei V. Korennykh1,3, Pascal F. Egea1, Andrei A. Korostelev4, Janet Finer-Moore1, Chao ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:307
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: Alys102
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The unfolded protein response signals through high-order assembly of Ire1


1
The unfolded protein response signals through
high-order assembly of Ire1
  • Alexei V. Korennykh1,3, Pascal F. Egea1, Andrei
    A. Korostelev4, Janet Finer-Moore1, Chao
    Zhang2,3, Kevan M. Shokat2,3, Robert M. Stroud1
    Peter Walter1,3
  • Alysia Birkholz
  • 1.15.2010

2
  • 33 of proteins fold in the ER
  • Need a mechanism to detect misfolded proteins
  • UPR
  • Ire1 is the crucial factor
  • Has been shown to dimerize
  • Organized into UPR induced foci
  • RNase
  • Trans-autophosphorylation
  • Binding of ADP

3
Ire1
This pathway is really a sort of duckbilled
platypus. There have been so many surprises. -
Feroz Papa UCSF
  • Inositol-requiring protein-1
  • ER-membrane-resident kinase/RNase
  • a non-spliceosomal mRNA splicing reaction
  • In yeast HAC1 mRNA
  • HAC1p proteins are then translated
  • In metazoans, Xbp1 mRNA
  • Xbp1 proteins are then translated
  • These proteins adjust protein folding

4
In stressed cells, IRE-1 binds to unfolded
proteins, dimerizes and trans-autophosphorylates
in kinase domain This activates the RNase domain
which splices XBP1 or HAC1 The spliced form of
these genes leads to activation of the UPR
BIOC/MCB 568 -- University of Arizona
5
Activation of Ire1 by self-association.
Oligomerization has been suggested to promote the
activation the kinase and RNase domains
Binding sites of Ire1 in metazoans (right) and
yeast (left)
6
Aim
  • Authors didnt like the proposed model that had
    the activation loops too far away for
    trans-autophosphorylation
  • Previous model had no linker component
  • A different Ire1 dimer is needed for the
    trans-autophosphorylation

7
RNase activity assay Construct cleaved is
labeled with P32 and is derived from Xbp1 mRNA
8
Linker controls the oligomerization
Oligomerization is inhibited by increasing salt
concentrations- repressing RNase activity
9
Ire1KR32 shows fold increase in speed of cleavage
10
Structure of the oligomer
  • Difficult to crystalize
  • ADP association wasnt working
  • Tried using kinase inhibitors insert into ADP
    binding site

Kinase inhibitors actually activated the RNase
activity
11
Resolution of crystals
Resolution (Å) Structural features observable in a good map
5.5 Overall shape of the molecule. Helices as rods of strong intensity.
3.5 The main chain (usually with some ambiguities).
3.0 The side chains partly resolved.
2.5 Side chains well resolved. The plane of the peptide bond resolved. Atoms located to about 0.4 Å.
1.5 Atoms located to about 0.1 Å (the limit of protein crystallography as of 1985--it's a little bit lower now)
0.77 Bond lengths in small crystals measured to 0.005 Å.
12
  • Initially got a Ire1- APY29 complex of 3.9 A
  • When they deleted 28 amino acids forming a loop,
    got a resolution of 3.2 A

13
Electron density map for APY29 bound to
IRE1KR32?28 3 possible hydrogen bonds formed
Although APY29 fits in the ADP site reasonably
well, it doesnt have the divalent Mg 2
RNase activity of APY29 doesnt change with
addition of EDTA
14
14 Ire molecules formed a crystal lattice with
back to back dimers
15
(No Transcript)
16
Double Helix
17
Why is this model attractive?
  • Kinase dimers are side by side, making
    trans-autophosphorylation more logical
  • Kinase inactivating mutant caused no
    phosphorylation to occur, indicating
    phosphorylation activity is regulated through
    self
  • Phosphorylation sites are on activation loops
    which face IF3c
  • IF3c proposed to transfer phosphates

18
Do all three interfaces control RNase activity?
Four monomers combined
Contacts within the different interfaces
Single monomer
19
The mechanism
  • Initially showed that the IreKR32 seemed to show
    preference for double stem loop mRNA
  • To look at this, generated a 354 ntd RNA with a
    single stem loop, and a 58 ntd RNA with a double
    stem loop

20
The mechanism
Ire1 has no preference for single or double loops
21
Localization of Helix loop helix near IF2
interface (dimerization interface) may control
RNase activity
Cavity is created that is characteristic for
substrate binding pockets of enzymes
22
Model
23
Conclusions
  • Old model is incomplete
  • Ire1 kinase, Rnase, and partial linker forms a
    supermolecular structure
  • Co-factor binding and phosphorylation enhance
    self-association of Ire1 but neither is required
  • Linkers are necessary for oligomerization

24
Future work
  • Although the authors used an increased structure
    for crystallization, we are still missing the
    full structure
  • Need to have evidence that these supermolecular
    structures are actually present in in vitro/ in
    vivo models

?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com