????(Evasion) ????????????? ?? ?? ???? ????? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 67
About This Presentation
Title:

????(Evasion) ????????????? ?? ?? ???? ?????

Description:

... -dependent manner. d | Monocytes differentiate into tumor ... of the immune system. ... Bacterial Immune Evasion Infection Process ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:143
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 68
Provided by: Admin171
Category:
Tags: evasion | immune | system | tumor

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: ????(Evasion) ????????????? ?? ?? ???? ?????


1
??? ???? ?????? ??????
2
????? ????? ?? ???
  • ?????
  • ???? ????? ?? ????? ????? ????????????? ??
  • ????(Evasion) ????????????? ?? ?? ???? ?????
  • ???? ??? ???? ?? ???? ????? ?? ????? ?????
  • Immunopathology))

3
Immune response to infections
  • Bidirectional relationship between Immune system
    and infectious agents
  • Different layers
  • - Innate
  • - early Induced Response
  • - Specific

4
Innate Immunity
Innate immunity is responsible for the earliest
response by the body to potential
infection. Innate immunity precedes adaptive
immunity.
5
Innate Immunity
The Epithelium is an Important First Line of
Defense.
6
Defensins
Killing of Salmonella by human defensins secreted
by Paneth cells.   The small intestine is lined
by finger-like absorptive villi interspersed with
crypts narrow pits containing a cluster of
defensin-rich Paneth cells at the bottom. The
granules of Paneth cells have high concentrations
of prodefensin 5, consisting of a propiece
segment (blue circles) joined to the N-terminus
of mature human defensin 5 (red circles),
together with Paneth cell trypsin (green
triangles). After Paneth-cell degranulation,
induced by the entry of bacteria into the
intestinal lumen, trypsin activates defensin 5 by
cleaving off its propiece. This process might
function to protect the absorptive epithelium, as
well as the crypt, with its intestinal stem cells
that generate the absorptive enterocytes.
7
Pathogens are Recognized and Killed by Phagocytes
Phagocytes bear different receptors that
recognize microbial components and induce
phagocytosis. These include CD14 (LPS
Receptor) CD11b/CD18 (CR3 CR) Mannose
Receptor Glucan Receptor.
8
Comparison of Innate and Specific Receptors
The innate immune system lacks the specificity of
the adaptive (Specific) immune system. However,
the innate immune system can distinguish between
self and non-self.
9
Pattern Recognition Receptors (PRR)
Receptors with specificity for pathogen surfaces
recognize patterns of repeating structural
motifs. These receptors are designated
Pattern-Recognition Receptors (PRR). The
mannan-binding lectin that initiates the
MB-lectin pathway of complement activation is an
example of a PRR. Pathogen recognition and
discrimination from self is due to the
recognition of a particular of certain sugar
residues, as well as the spacing of these
residues, which is found only on pathogens and
not on normal host cells.
10
Pattern Recognition Receptors (PRR)
11
Innate Receptors can Signal the Presence of
Pathogens
The binding of pathogens to phagocytes can
trigger the innate response, acting as a signal
to the body. This Danger Signal precedes the
activation of the specific immune response. The
initiation of the innate mechanisms is mediated
by a family of evolutionarily conserved,
transmembrane receptors that function exclusively
as signaling receptors. These receptors are known
as the Toll receptors, because they are related
to the Toll receptor in the fruit fly,
Drosophila. In the fruit fly, the Toll receptor
triggers the synthesis of antifungal peptides in
response to fungal infection. A different member
of the family is involved in the production of
antibacterial peptides.
12
Innate Receptors can Signal the Presence of
Pathogens
.
13
(No Transcript)
14
TLR Ligands
15
Members of the TLR family
16
Function of TLRs
  • recognition of microbial components
  • Generation of defensive responses to pathogens in
    the organism
  • signal transduction causes transcriptional
    activation, synthesis and secretion of cytokines
  • Directs the adaptive immune responses against
    antigens of microbial origin

17
  • Activation of signal transduction pathways by
    TLRs leads to induction of various genes that
    function in host defence
  • Inflammatory cytokines
  • Chemokines
  • Major histokompatibility complex
  • Costimulatory molecules
  • Additionally mammalian TLRs can induce effector
    molecules that can destroy directly microbial
    pathogens
  • Inducible nitric oxide synthase
  • Antimicrobial peptides

18
(No Transcript)
19
Toll-like Receptors (TLR) Function in Higher
Organisms
A Toll-like receptor, TLR-4, signals the presence
of bacterial LPS in mammals. It requires the
interaction with another protein, LPS binding
protein (LBP).
20
The Immune Response to Extracellular Bacteria
21
Extracellular Bacteria Commonly Associated with
Diseases
Species Diseases Mechanisms of
Pathogenicity Staphylococcus aureus Skin and
soft tissue infections Acute inflammation induced
by toxins lung abscess cell death from
pore-forming toxins toxic shock
syndrome Superantigen-induced cytokine
production food poisoning skin necrosis, shock,
diarrhea. Streptococcus pyogenes Pharyngitis Tox
in-induced acute inflammation (Group A) Skin
infections impetigo e.g. Streptolysin O damage
of cell membranes erysipelas,
cellulitis Anti-phagocytic actions of capsule
polysaccharides Scarlet Fever Streptococcus
pneumoniae Pneumonia Cell wall constituent-induced
acute inflammation meningitis Toxin
(pneumolysin, similar to streptolysin) Escherich
ia coli Urinary tract infections Toxins acts on
intestinal epithelium gastroenteritis Increased
chloride and water secretion septic
shock Endotoxin (LPS) stimulates cytokine
synthesis Vibrio cholerae Diarrhea Cholera
toxin ADP ribosylates G protein
subunit Leads to increased cAMP in intestinal
epithelial cells Results in chloride secretion
and water loss Clostridium tetani Tetanus Tetanu
s toxin binds to motor endplate at
neuromuscular junction Causes irreversible
muscle contraction Neisseria meningitis Meningit
is Potent endotoxin causing acute inflammation
and systemic disease Corynebacterium
diphtheriae Diphtheria Diphtheria toxin ADP
ribosylates elongation factor 2 Inhibits
protein synthesis
22
Immune Responses to Extracellular Bacteria
  • Infection by extracellular bacteria induces
    production of humoral antibodies.
  • Antibodies are secreted by plasma cells in the
    regional lymph nodes and the submucosa of the
    respiratory and gastrointestinal tracts.
  • Antibodies act in several ways
  • Prevention of bacterial attachment.
  • Opsonization and removal of bacteria.
  • Neutralization of toxins.
  • Extracellular bacteria are pathogenic because
    they induce a localized inflammatory response or
    through toxin formation.
  • The toxins (endotoxins and exotoxins) can be
    cytotoxic.
  • Toxins may act in other ways diphtheria toxin
    blocks protein synthesis through the
    ADP-ribosylation of the translation elongation
    factor EF-2.
  • Endotoxins are components of bacterial cell
    walls.
  • Exotoxins are secreted.

23
Immune Responses to Extracellular Bacteria
  • Antibody functions as an opsonin by binding to
    specific antigenic structures on the bacterial
    cell wall or capsule.
  • Complement component C3b, deposited on the
    bacterial cell surface, is an additional opsonin.
  • Opsonization increases phagocytosis and clearance
    of the bacterium.
  • For certain Gram-negative bacteria (e.g.,
    Neisseria species), the formation of the membrane
    attack complex following complement activation
    can lead to direct bacterial lysis.
  • Antibody-mediated complement activation can
    induce the localized production of inflammatory
    mediators that further amplify the inflammatory
    response.
  • C3a, C4a and C5a act as anaphylotoxins, inducing
    local mast cell degranulation, which results in
    vasodilation.
  • Neutrophils, monocytes and lymphocytes are
    recruited to the site of inflammation by C5a, and
    various chemokines.

24
Immune Responses to Extracellular Bacteria
25
Immune Responses to Extracellular Bacteria
26
Antibody Functions Against Extracellular Bacteria
27
Antibody Functions Against Extracellular Bacteria
28
Anti-Adhesin Antibodies Block Bacterial
Colonization
29
Mechanisms of Extracellular Bacterial Immune
Evasion
Infection Process Host Defense Evasion
Mechanism Attachment to Host Cell Blockage of
attachment Secretion of proteases that by
secretory IgA molecules cleave secretory IgA
dimers (Neisseria, Hemophilus) Antigenic
variation in attachment structures (pili of N.
gonorrheae) Proliferation Phagocytosis Productio
n of surface structures (Antibody- and
Complement- (polysaccharide capsules, mediated
opsonization) M protein, fibrin
coat) Induction of apoptosis in
macrophages (Shigella) Complement-mediated
lysis Generalized resistance of
Gram-positive and localized inflammation bacteri
a to complement-mediated lysis Insertion of
MAC prevented by long side chain in cell wall
LPS Invasion of Host Cells Antibody-mediated Sec
retion of elastase inactivates C3a and
C5a agglutination Toxin-induced
damage Neutralization of toxin Secretion of
hyaluronidase by antibody (enhances
invasiveness) Survival in phagocytes Generation
of Reactive Oxygen Production of
catalase Intermediates by Staphylococcus
30
Evasion Through Antigenic Variability
The different strains of S. pneumoniae have
antigenically distinct capsular polysaccharides.
The capsule prevents effective phagocytosis until
the bacterium is opsonized by specific antibody
and complement, allowing phagocytes to destroy
it. Antibody to one type of S. pneumoniae does
not cross-react with the other types, so an
individual immune to one type has no protective
immunity to a subsequent infection with a
different type. An individual must generate a new
adaptive immune response each time he or she is
infected with a different type of S. pneumoniae.
31
The Immune Response to Intracellular Bacteria
32
Hallmarks of Idealized Intracellular Bacterium
Hallmark 1
  • Intracellular lifestyle is the distinguishing
    feature.
  • Not all bacteria entering cells are
    intracellular transition through epithelial
    cells is a common invasion mechanism of both
    intracellular and extracellular bacterial
    pathogens.

33
Hallmarks of Idealized Intracellular Bacterium
Hallmark 2
  • T lymphocytes are the central mediators of
    protection against intracellular bacterial
    pathogens.
  • T cells do not interact directly with pathogens.
  • T cells interact with infected host cells and
    implement antibacterial mechanisms.

34
Hallmarks of Idealized Intracellular Bacterium
Hallmark 3
  • Infections with intracellular bacteria are
    accompanied by delayed-type hypersensitivity
    (DTH, Type IV hypersensitivity) reactions.
  • Tissue reaction mediated by T cells and effected
    by macrophages.

35
Hallmarks of Idealized Intracellular Bacterium
Hallmark 4
  • Tissue reactions against intracellular bacteria
    are granulomatous.
  • Protection and pathology are centered in these
    lesions.
  • Rupture of granuloma promotes bacterial
    dissemination and formation of additional lesions.

36
Hallmarks of Idealized Intracellular Bacterium
Hallmark 5
  • Intracellular bacteria present little or no
    toxicity to the host cells themselves.
  • Pathology is due primarily to the T cell-mediated
    immune response.

37
Hallmarks of Idealized Intracellular Bacterium
Hallmark 6
  • Intracellular bacteria coexist with their
    cellular habitat for a long period.
  • There is a balance between persistent infection
    and protective immunity results in long
    incubation times and chronic diseases.

38
Facultative Intracellular Bacteria
Pathogens That Do Not Depend on Intracellular
Environment For Survival
Mycobacterium tuberculosis Mycobacterium
leprae Salmonella enterica Brucella
species Legionella pneumophila Listeria
monocytogenes Francisella tularensis
39
Obligate Intracellular Bacteria
Pathogens Depend Absolutely on Intracellular
Environment For Survival Bacteria prefer
non-phagocytic cells as host cells, including
epithelial and endothelial cells.
Rickettsia prowazekii Rickettsia
rickettsii Rickettsia typhi Rickettsia
tsutsugamushi Coxiella burnetii Chlamydia
trachomatis Chlamydia psittaci Chlamydia
pneumoniae
40
Innate immunity Against L.monocytogenes
Innate immune activation by virulent Listeria
monocytogenes is a multistep process.   a
Bacteria in the bloodstream are bound by
macrophages and internalized. In the macrophage
vacuoles, bacteria secrete listeriolysin O (LLO),
which lyses the vacuolar membrane and activates
nuclear factor-kB (NF-kB)-mediated transcription
of innate immune-response genes, such as
CC-chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2). b The CCL2 that
is produced then induces the recruitment of
circulating monocytes that express CC-chemokine
receptor 2 (CCR2). c Microbial products are
released by infected macrophages, and these
activate recruited monocytes through Toll-like
receptors (TLRs) in a MyD88 (myeloid
differentiation primary-response protein
88)-dependent manner. d Monocytes differentiate
into tumor-necrosis factor (TNF-a)- and inducible
nitric-oxide (NO) synthase (iNOS)-producing
dendritic cells (TipDCs), which promote bacterial
killing.
41
Delayed-type Hypersensitivity (Type IV
Hypersensitivity)
42
Delayed-type Hypersensitivity (Type IV
Hypersensitivity)
43
Activation of Macrophages
44
Functions of Activated Macrophages In
Anti-bacterial Immunity
Macrophage Response Role in Cell-mediated
Immunity
Production of reactive oxygen intermediates, Kill
ing of microbes in phagolysomes nitric oxide
increased lysosomal enzymes (effector function of
macrophages) Secretion of Cytokines TNF-a,
IL-1 leukocyte recruitment (TNF-a, IL-1,
IL-12) (Inflammation) IL-12 TH-1
differentiation, IFN-g production (induction of
response) Increased expression of Increased T
cell activation CD80, CD86 (amplification) Class
I, Class II MHC
These macrophage responses are induced by CD40
ligation to CD154 (CD40L) and T cell-derived
IFN-g in cell-mediated immunity similar
responses are induced by microbial products,
particularly LPS, and NK cell-derived IFN-g in
innate immunity.
45
Intracellular Bacterial Evasion of Killing in
Phagocytes
Intracellular bacteria have evolved strategies to
evade killing by the mechanisms available to the
phagocyte.
Macrophage effector capacity Microbial evasion
mechanism
Phagosome acidification Phagosome
neutralization Phagosomelysosome
fusion Inhibition of phagosomelysosome
fusion Lysosomal enzymes Resistance against
enzymes Intraphagolysosomal killing Evasion into
cytosol Robust cell wall C3b
receptor-mediated uptake, ROI ROI detoxifiers,
ROI scavengers RNI Unknown (ROI detoxifiers
probably interfere with RNI) Iron
starvation Microbial iron scavengers (e.g.,
siderophores)
46
Intracellular Bacterial Evasion of Killing in
Phagocytes
47
Evasion into the Cytoplasm
48
Three Stages of the Immune Response to
Intracellular Bacteria
49
The Central Role of T Lymphocytes
  • Acquisition of resistance against intracellular
    bacteria crucially depends on T-lymphocytes,
    which, ideally, accomplish sterile bacterial
    eradication.
  • When a normal immune status is provided,
    bacterial clearance is rapidly achieved in the
    case of susceptible bacteria, such as L.
    monocytogenes.
  • In the case of resistant pathogens, such as M.
    tuberculosis, clearance frequently remains
    incomplete and is arrested at the stage of
    bacterial containment to, and growth control at,
    distinct foci.
  • Bacterial containment and eradication occur in
    granulomatous lesions.
  • The longer the struggle between host and
    microbial pathogen continues, the more essential
    the granuloma becomes.
  • Granuloma formation and perpetuation are
    orchestrated by T-lymphocytes.
  • The cross-talk in the granuloma between
    T-lymphocytes, MPs, and the other cells is
    promoted by cytokines.
  • T-lymphocytes are an unavoidable element of the
    pathogenesis of intracellular bacterial
    infections.
  • Expanding granulomas impair tissue functions by
    occupying space and affecting surrounding cells.

50
Cytokines in Antibacterial Immunity
Cytokine Contribution to Major cellular source
Major function antibacterial protection in
bacterial infection in bacterial infection
Chemokines Likely Epithelial cell Leukocyte
recruitment and activation endothelial
cell macrophage IL-1 Important role
proven Macrophage Leukocyte recruitment and
stimulation IL-6 Essential role
proven Macrophage, T cell Leukocyte
recruitment T-cell differentiation TNF-a Esse
ntial role proven Macrophage Leukocyte
recruitment mast cell NK-cell
activation granuloma formation IFN-g
costimulation IFN-g Essential role proven Th 1
cell Macrophage activation NK
cell granuloma IL-12 Important role
proven Macrophage Th 1-cell, NK-cell
stimulation IL-18 Likely, not proven Macrophage T
h 1-cell stimulation IL-4 Exacerbation NK T
cell, Th2 cell Th 1-cell inhibition basophil
(?) Eosinophil (?) IL-10 Exacerbation Macroph
age Macrophage inhibition TGF-b Exacerbation
likely, not proven Macrophage Macrophage
inhibition
51
Granuloma Formation
  • Recirculating T-lymphocytes passing by the
    inflammatory lesion are recruited by
    pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines.
  • Gradually, infiltrating cells become organized
    and form a granuloma predominantly consisting of
    MPs.
  • TNF-a and IFN-g appear to be of crucial
    importance for this event.
  • ab T cells are the dominant T-lymphocyte
    population throughout all stages of granuloma
    formation
  • A significant proportion of gd T cells has been
    observed in the initial phase. These gd T cells
    apparently play an important role in the
    organization of a tight and well-structured
    granulomatous lesion.
  • Granulomas are at the forefront of protection by
    restricting bacterial replication at, as well as
    confining pathogens to, discrete foci. This is
    achieved by the following
  • Activated MPs capable of inhibiting bacterial
    growth
  • Encapsulation promoted by fibrosis and
    calcification
  • Necrosis leading to a reduced nutrient and oxygen
    supply
  • Yet, frequently, microbial pathogens are not
    fully eradicated, and some organisms survive in a
    dormant form. A labile balance between microbial
    persistence and antibacterial defense develops
    that lasts for long periods.

52
Granuloma Formation
53
The Immune Response to Viral Infections
54
Overview
  • Immunity to viral infections is a broad subject
    that touches upon all aspects of cellular and
    humoral immune mechanisms.
  • This reflects the strong selective pressure
    viruses have exerted upon the evolutionary
    development of the immune system.
  • The immune system fights a ceaseless battle
    against infectious agents and both of these
    forces have been shaped by the constant conflict
    - microbe/immunology/survival.
  • Viruses are by definition obligate intracellular
    parasites therefore effective immunity is often
    directed against the infected cell rather than
    against the invading virus itself.
  • The type of immune response most effective
    against a particular virus is heavily dependent
    upon the life cycle of that virus.

55
Patterns of Viral Infection
  • Viral infections can be divided into three
    general categories.
  • Acute infection followed by viral clearance due
    to the host immune response.
  • Acute infection followed by latent infection.
  • Acute infection followed by persistent infection
    in which infectious virus is continuously shed.

(polio,
influenza, rotavirus, mumps, yellow fever, RSV,
etc.)
(herpesviruses, etc.)
(HIV, HBV, HCV, etc.)
56
Patterns of Viral Infection
Cont.
1.
2.
3.
57
Patterns of Viral Infection
Cont.
  • What does this mean immunologically?
  • Acute -
  • Latent -
  • Persistent -
  • Immune response completely destroys the virus and
    long term memory prevents reinfection.

Immune response only destroys most of the
infectious virus (the virus hides and
periodically reactivates) and long term immunity
(mostly cell-mediated) must remain ever watchful.
  • Immune response destroys most but not all
    of the infected cells (no viral clearance and the
    remaining infected cells continuously shed virus)
    and long term immunity is ever vigilant but can
    never completely remove the virus.

58
Host Response to Viral Infection
  • The immune response to viral infections can be
    broken down into two broad categories.

1. Innate
2. Adaptive
59
Innate Immunity
  • Cytokines
  • Interferons (a, b, g)
  • Others
  • Cells
  • NK cells
  • Monocytes/Macrophages
  • Complement

60
Host Response to Viral Infection
61
Cell-Mediated Effector Mechanisms
  • Bottom line CD8 T cells rock. They are the
    predominant effector cell in the adaptive arm of
    the immune system in defense of viral infections.

62
The Immune Response to Parasites
63
Parasites and the Immune System
  • Parasite applies to all infectious agents.
  • Usually understood to be protozoan and metazoan
    pathogens
  • Characterized by chronicity in host and
    metamorphosis through multiple, usually
    antigenically distinct, life-cycle stages.
  • Most express highly evolved immune evasion
    mechanisms.
  • As a group, parasitic diseases remain a
    significant global human health problem.

64
The Role of T Lymphocyte Subsets in the Response
to Parasites
  • CD4 T cells are divided into two distinct
    subsets Th1 cells synthesize predominantly IL-2
    and IFN-g, while Th2 synthesize predominantly
    IL-4, IL-5 and IL-10.
  • The cytokines produced by the two subsets
    cross-inhibit each others development and
    function this leads to a polarization towards
    Th1 or Th2 responses in many infectious diseases.
  • Because other cells, including CD8 T cells, NK
    cells and gd T cells also synthesize cytokines,
    immune responses are now classified as Type 1
    or Type 2 responses rather than Th1 or Th2
    responses.

65
Leishmania
66
Protective Type 1 Responses
Protozoa Leishmania major
  • Prototype of a protective type 1 response is
    resistance to L. major in resistant mice.
  • L. major causes an early lesion of varying
    magnitude in resistant mice, the lesion
    resolves.
  • Resolution of the lesion is due to the activation
    of macrophages by IFN-g produced initially by NK
    cells, and subsequently by Th1 CD4 T cells.
  • CD4 T cells play a central role class II MHC0/0
    mice are unable to control infection b2m0/0
    (class I MHC-deficient) mice heal with equivalent
    kinetics to wild-type mice.

67
Protective Type 1 Responses
Protozoa Leishmania major
  • The ultimate effector molecule controlling L.
    major infection is the production of nitric oxide
    (NO) and other reactive nitrogen intermediates in
    response to macrophage activation by IFN-g.
  • IFN-g is essential neither IFN-g0/0 nor
    IFN-gR0/0 mice can control parasite replication.
  • Inhibition of iNOS also results in susceptibility
    the use of inhibitors after the lesion had
    resolved resulted in lesion reactivation and
    parasite overgrowth suggests that the immune
    response does not result in complete removal of
    the parasite, but instead suggests continued
    control by iNOS-dependent mechanisms.

68
Trypanosoma
69
Protective Type 1 Responses
Protozoa Trypanosoma cruzi
  • T. cruzi is able to invade many different
    nucleated cell types, forming a parasitophorous
    vacuole.
  • Once inside the cell, the parasite leaves the
    vacuole and enters the cytoplasm entry into the
    cytoplasm makes the T. cruzi antigens available
    to processing by the class I MHC pathway.
  • CD8 T cells play a crucial role in controlling
    T. cruzi b2m0/0 and class I MHC0/0 mice are
    extremely susceptible to infection.
  • IFN-g synthesis rather than classical perforin-
    or granzyme-mediated cytotoxicity is likely to be
    the major protective mechanism.

70
Plasmodium
71
Protective Type 1 Responses
Protozoa Plasmodium
  • Malaria, caused by Plasmodia species, is
    undoubtedly the most important parasitic disease
    of humans.
  • Plasmodia have a complex life-cycle.
  • Complex life-cycle involves two distinct cell
    types hepatocyte (expresses class I MHC) and the
    erythrocyte (no MHC expression).
  • Also involves several distinct extracellular
    forms of the parasite.
  • This implies that more than one form of immune
    response is required to control infection.

72
Protective Type 1 Responses
Protozoa Plasmodium
  • Antibodies are effective against the sporozoite
    and erythrocytic stages.
  • Type 1 cytokines are effective against the
    intrahepatic stage the injection of IL-12 into
    mice 2 days prior to infection with P. yoelli
    completely prevents infection.
  • The effect of IL-12 in the mouse model, this was
    shown to be due to the production of IFN-g by NK
    cells and the upregulation in the liver of iNOS
    NO is the assumed effector mechanism against the
    intracellular parasite.
  • Hepatocytes can express iNOS presumably IFN-g
    works directly on these cells to induce the
    parasite-directed effector response.

73
Protective Type 1 Responses
Protozoa Plasmodium
  • The injection of IL-12 into susceptible A/J mice,
    prior to and following exposure to P.
    chabaudi-infected erythrocytes results in
    decreased parasitemia and increased survival
    Th1 cells, IFN-g, TNF-a, and NO are implicated in
    this process.

74
(No Transcript)
75
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com