FM Guidance for Design Teams MEFMA Focus Group - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

FM Guidance for Design Teams MEFMA Focus Group

Description:

FM Guidance for Design Teams MEFMA Focus Group Team Members Neil Blakey FM Consultant, Mace Macro Stuart Clayton Project Manager, Serco Middle East Ryan Darnell ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:85
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: chre153
Learn more at: https://mefma.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: FM Guidance for Design Teams MEFMA Focus Group


1
FM Guidance for Design TeamsMEFMA Focus Group
2
Team Members
  • Neil Blakey
  • FM Consultant, Mace Macro
  • Stuart Clayton
  • Project Manager, Serco Middle East
  • Ryan Darnell
  • Senior Services Manager, Khidmah
  • Brad Robbins
  • Director of Services, Khidmah

3
Focus Group Goals
To provide an FM Guidance for Design Teams
briefing document to inform design teams, at all
stages of the design construction process, of
the issues they should address to enable
effective and sustainable FM operations to be
undertaken. To identify those recommendations
that are critical to effective operations and
those that are simply beneficial to FM
operations. To be published by MEFMA to the
benefit of members

4
Setting the Scene
  • Why should and FM be involved in the design
    stages of a development?
  • With the increased cost in building operations
    there is a renewed focus on cost reductions with
    Facility Managers at the forefront.
  • Many of the operational reductions would be made
    in a more cost effective manner in the design
    stages of a development rather than post
    handover.

Davis Langdon Strategic Consulting Effect on
Whole Life Cycle
5
Setting the Scene Current Market
  • Developer reluctance due to value vs. cost and
    limited understanding
  • Late engagement of FM expertise leading
    operational difficulties
  • Issues at Handover too little to late to attempt
    to rectify
  • Lack of Life Cycle Consideration or value in cost
  • HS risks to operations valued in leasehold
    properties more and more
  • Additional operational costs due to lack of
    efficient operational methodologies which now has
    an impact with more educated owners and buyers
    comparing total cost of occupancy
  • Sophisticated Developers do this though should
    we outline if this has better placed them in the
    market or the downturn with better products or
    not

6
Literature Review
  • Developer Project Structures in developed
    countries
  • FM Design Activities in Industry guides and
    standards
  • Existing FM/Developer Processes

7
Project Structure
  • From the literature review the Royal Institute
    of British Architects (RIBA) plan of work was
    chosen as most comprehensive and is followed by
    many leading developers.

8
Project Structure
  • Most organizations follow the RIBA project
    stages A to L

9
Project Structure
10
Project Structure
11
Challenges
  • Defining the user/s of the report
  • Focus Group members Experience Not Diverse and
    all aligned
  • Restrictions on organizations Intellectual
    Property
  • Limited strata specific literature for design
    guidelines

12
Progress
  • The team is developing outline guidance for the
    Design stages
  • Appraisal
  • Design Brief
  • Concept
  • Design Development
  • Technical Design
  • Team is now developing actions for the
    Pre-Construction Stage

13
Example of FM Design Guide Considerations
  • RIBA STAGE A APPRAISAL
  • FM should be involved in Identifying the
    Stakeholders expectations and will consider the
    following from an FM perspective
  • Use of the site by the Client
  • Site location
  • Infrastructure
  • Roads, Utilities, Public transport
    infrastructure, What is already in place
  • What options are available
  • Accessibility
  • Restrictions
  • Zoning, Industry use, Freezone areas
  • Prestige associated with location
  • Environmental considerations
  • Location
  • Client desire e.g LEED/PEARL ratings
  • Site Procurement e.g. Leasehold/Freehold
  • End user, sale or return, what are the drivers
    e.g. Lifecycle considerations
  • Political and regulatory influences e.g.
    Anticipated code changes

14
Survey Development
  • Why produce a survey?
  • Narrow range of experience
  • Test our concepts
  • The survey is designed to
  • Gauge the industry importance placed on FM
    involvement in the design stage
  • Gauge level of FM involvement at present in
    projects
  • Discover any new processes being utilized in the
    industry
  • Develop trends on current review processes
  • Determine if special considerations are given to
    Strata developments
  • Expand upon our literature review findings.
  • The data will be key to determining further the
    audience for the report
  • The survey data will be presented in the final
    report

15
Survey Content
16
Survey Content
17
Survey Content
18
Project Timeline
  • Timeline
  • 26th September Focus Group formed
  • 3rd of October - Review of Objectives
  • 3rd of October to 24th October - Literature
    Review
  • 24th October to 1st November - Compile Design
    Review Activities
  • 1st November to 14th November Actions for
    Preparation
  • 14th November to 30th November Actions for
    Design
  • 21st November to 4th December Survey
  • 1st December to 21st December Actions for
    Pre-Construction
  • 2nd January to 8th January Actions for
    Construction
  • 9th January to 15th January Actions for Use
  • 15th January to 26th January Draft Report
  • 26th January Submit draft to MEFMA Board for
    Review

19
Forward Actions
  • Collate Surveys and review the implication of the
    survey results
  • Review remaining RIBA plan sections F-L
  • Review Focus Group structure and seek
    Developer/Project involvement
  • Involve additional representatives from Strata
    and Developer backgrounds
  • Group is presenting at Arabian Build and
    Construction Expo, taking place from 22 25
    April 2012 with Cityscape

20
  • Questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com