Title: Portfolio Committee on Minerals and Energy Public Hearing on RED1 Progress, the current situation and the Way Forward
1Portfolio Committee on Minerals and Energy Public
Hearing on RED1 Progress, the current situation
and the Way Forward
- Presentation to Minerals and Energy Portfolio
Committee, Parliament, Cape Town - Wednesday, 14 February 2007
2Overview of presentation
- History of Restructuring
- Objectives of Restructuring
- RED1 Establishment
- RED1 Governance
- RED1 Strategic Goals and Strategies
- RED1 Supply Area Pre 25 October 2006
- RED1 Transition Agreements
- RED1 Planning for Transfer
3Overview of presentation cont.
- RED1 Stakeholder Engagement
- RED1 Stakeholder Engagement The City of Cape
Town position - Recent developments The City of Cape Towns
position - Recent developments Cabinets 25 October
decision Issues arising from recent developments
RED1s income - Issues arising from recent developments Special
Combined Company and Board Meeting - Challenges, Successes, Values and Lessons Learnt
- Conclusion
- Way Forward
4History of Restructuring
5History of Restructuring
- Background
- National Government decided in May 2001 to
restructure the Electricity Distribution Industry
(EDI) into six Regional Electricity Distributors
(REDs) - President Mbeki announced in 2004 that the first
RED would be established on 1 July 2005. - RED 1 was elected the first RED to be
established, with the City of Cape Town as core - RED 1 has now been operating for just over 18
months.
6Objectives of Restructuring
Energy White Paper Objectives EDI Restructuring Blueprint Objectives
Ensure electrification targets are met Achievement of governments electrification programme Universal access to electricity for all South Africans
Provide low-cost electricity Sustainable electricity supply to low-income consumers, regardless of location, at affordable prices
Facilitate better price equality Sustainable electricity supply to low-income consumers, regardless of location, at affordable prices
Improve the financial health of the industry Future REDs to operate on a sustained, financially viable basis as independent businesses
Foster proper co-ordination of operations and investment capital Future REDs to operate on a sustained, financially viable basis as independent businesses
Improve quality of service and supply Acceptable and sustainable levels of supply security and quality
Attract and retain competent employees Future REDs to provide secure employment to their employees, provide skills development and training consistent with a high technology, modern distribution business Transition to be done within the context of a comprehensive human resources strategy and an agreed social plan
Planned and managed transition
7RED 1 Establishment
8RED 1 Establishment
- Sponsors Committee, as project governance, and
RED Committee, as project implementer,
established by EDI Holdings, CCT and Eskom - City of Cape Town (CCT) followed required
legislative prescription prior to choosing the
RED as the vehicle of electricity service
provision - Municipal Systems Act (MSA) Sections 78 and 80
- Municipal Finance Management Act (MFMA) Section
84 - Registered by EDI Holdings as company 02
November 2004 - Established as a Municipal Entity by City of Cape
Town 31 May 2005 - Commenced Operations 01 July 2005
- First phase - transfer of CCT electricity
business and Eskom business within the Cape Town
metro area - Further phases were to follow pending final
decision by Cabinet on EDIR end-state - Licensed by NERSA
9RED 1 Establishment (continues)
- Various agreements concluded
- Service Delivery Agreement (SDA) between CCT and
RED 1 - Operating and Transitional Plan for Transfer
Agreements (OTPTAs) with both the Citys
Electricity Directorate and Eskom - RED 1 Board appointed
- Business Plan and Budget Approved (RED1 Board and
City) - Transfer of CCT Electricity Department and Eskom
Metro Portion planned for- - March 2006 June 2006
- November 2006 December 2006
- June 2007
- Date for transfer consistently moved by City
10RED 1 Governance
11RED 1 Governance
- Seven independent non-executive Board Members
- P Nzimande (Interim Chair) M Kalawe N Walaza L
Mayekiso J John Prof A - Eberhardt (resigned 08/2006)
- Four Board Committees
- Finance and Procurement
- Strategy and Operations
- Audit and Risk
- Human Capital and Remuneration
- Company Secretariat appointed
- Internal Audit functions sourced from Citys
Internal Audit Unit - External Audit Auditor General of SA
- Executive Management appointed
- CEO, COO and CFO
12RED 1 Business Plan
13Mission, Vision Values
- Mission
- "To enhance the lives of our people and drive our
economy by providing affordable electricity and
related services in an efficient, reliable, safe
and sustainable manner" - Vision
- "To lead the South African journey towards the
provision of world class consolidated electricity
distribution and related services" - Values
- To effect sound corporate governance
- To excel in customer relations
- To lead decisively but with humility and
resilience - To encourage and value learning, initiative and
creativity - To be committed to the transformation of our
society - To embrace diversity, recognise strengths and
develop potential and skills
14Strategic Goals
Goal 1 Reliability of Supply at Affordable Cost
Goal 2 Protection of Lower Income Earners
Goal 3 Developing Human Capital
Goal 4 Sustained Financial Viability
Goal 5 Planned Managed Transition
Goal 6 Branded Customer Service
- Operational Strategy and Budget to drive
achievement of goals
15RED 1 Operational Strategies
- Strategic Operational Plan
- Business Re-engineering
- Network refurbishment and growth
- Maintenance plans
- Rationalised tariff for CCT customers
- FBE Agreements signed with both CCT and Eskom
- 2010 Energy requirements
- Operational Accountability and Monitoring System
- Quality of supply measurement
- Business process monitoring
- Integrated Recovery Plan (Outages)
- 90 day plan
- Demand Side Management Campaign
- NERSA Audits - March 2006
- State of the network and assets
- Power outages
16RED 1 Other Business Strategies
- Human Capital Strategy
- Compensation Framework
- Harmonised Conditions of Service
- HR policies
- Employment Equity Plan
- Performance Management
- Due diligence on CCT staff
- No Eskom due diligence to be undertaken until
suspensive conditions met - Systems Strategy
- Blueprint developed
- Implementation approved by RED 1 Board and CCT
- Benefit For first time CCT Electricity
Department fully ring-fenced - - Finance
- - Human Resources
- - IT
- - Legal
- - Business Operations
17RED1 Supply Area Prior to 25 Oct 06
- Initial area of supply is the area of
jurisdiction of the City of Cape Town - Final area of supply to include abutting
municipalities? - MOU with Drakenstein
18Transactional Nature of RED1
- SDA signed between the RED CCT
- Operating agreements (OTPTA) in place between the
RED1, City of Cape Town and Eskom whilst
finalising transfer of business arrangements - License issued by NERSA
19RED 1 Transaction Agreements
CCT
All Agreements and Nersa Licences expired on 31
December 2006
SDA
RED 1(Municipal Entity of CCT) Control over CCT
geographic area and all customers
NERSA Licence
OTPTA
OTPTA
CCT Electricity Department
Eskom Distribution Portion within Metro Area of
jurisdiction
20Transaction agreement linkages
- All agreements were subject to resolutive
conditions - Conditional to ensure transfer of businesses
- Agreements were inter-linked
- Agreements expired 31 December 2006
21SDA OTPTA LICENCE Conditions
- OTPTA Conditions
- (31 Dec 06)
- NT Asset Transfer Framework
- Electricity Act approval
- Competition Act approval
- Regulatory provisions for staff transfer
- Eskom Suspensive Conditions (to be resolved by
DME)
- Licence Conditions
- (31 Dec 06)
- City Transfer (City OTPTA)
- Eskom Transfer (Eskom OTPTA)
- SDAs with other municipalities
- SDA Conditions
- (31 Dec 06)
- OTPTA Conditions
- RED1 Tariff Harmonization Plan
- FBE agreements
Fulfilling conditions is dependent on number of
parties NT, DME, DPE,DPLG, SALGA CCT, RED1, Eskom
22Planning for Transfer
23RED1 preparations for transfer
- Draft Asset Transfer Framework developed
- Principles for Wires and Retail transfer
developed - RED1 SAP solution and systems strategy
- Human Capital Strategy
- Regulatory provisions for staff transfer
- Transfer, Placement migration strategy
- New Conditions of Service developed
- Retirement Fund arrangements
- Engagements with regulatory and other state
agencies - Nersa
- National Treasury, DME, DPE, DPLG, etc
- Stakeholder engagements
24Retirement Fund arrangements for RED1 employees
- RED1 Pension Fund registered
- All City of Cape Town and Eskom staff to join
Pension Fund on date to transfer - Defined Contribution Fund
- Rules allow for other 6 REDS to be participating
employers - Fund is suitable for either ME or PE RED (no rule
changes needed) - Rule amendment to make the fund dormant given
RED1 uncertainty - Municipal Category (a) tax status needs Income
Tax Act amendment employer, not fund issue - RED1 Pension Fund to be deregistered if entity
wound-up
25Wires Assets to be Transferred to RED1
- Total value of assets to be transferred - RAll
distribution network assets 132 kV and below to
be transferred - Dedicated, and
- Non-dedicated lines
- All fibre optic networks used for operation of
RED1 infrastructure - Systems data (including SCADA) supporting these
networks - Technical service depots within RED1 boundaries
- Staff currently employed in supporting these
networks - Stock pro rata relative to assets transferred
- Mechanical plant, fleet and technical support
elements pro-rata basis
26Finalizing the transfer
- RED 1 Due Diligence
- Asset Schedule
- Staff Liability Schedule
- Contracts to be ceded
- No Eskom due diligence until Eskom suspensive
conditions met - National Treasury Asset Transfer approval (still
not finalised and approved) - Eskom Suspensive Conditions (no longer valid
given 25 October 2006 cabinet decision) - All conditions precedent in all transaction
agreements to be met before transfer
27Stakeholder Engagements
28Stakeholder Engagements
- Parliament
- National Departments
- Provincial Government
- City of Cape Town
- Abutting Municipalities
- SALGA
- Metropolitan Forum
- Eskom
- NERSA
- Business
- Organised Labour
- Customers
- Eskom
- CCT
29Recent developments The City of Cape Towns
position 1 August 2006
- Background the City of Cape Towns August 2006
preconditions to transfer included - That Cabinet must approve the 61 model
- Promulgation of asset transfer framework in terms
of the MFMA - As an implicit precondition, that RED1s status
as a municipal entity must not change - Staff consultation and consent by each member of
staff
30Recent developments The City of Cape Towns
position 2 September 2006
- Agreement with City, in September 2006, that,
- Transaction agreements be extended
- RED1 apply for licence extension
- EDIR licence condition dates be extended
- Extension contemplated from 31 Dec 2006 to 1 July
2008 - Planned City transfer - 1 July 2007
31Recent developments Cabinets 25 October
decision
- Key points
- End-state structure for the restructured EDI is
the six wall-to-wall RED model - REDs should be public entities, not municipal
entities - Nersa should have regulatory jurisdiction over
the whole of the Electricity Supply Industry
(including municipal supply areas)
32Recent developments The City of Cape Towns
Council position 3 - 08 November 2006
- City change of mandate
- City Mayco resolutions of 08 November 2006
- City requests licence to be transferred back to
it - SDA and OTPTA be allowed to lapse
- City to engage with EDIH about future of RED1
- Senior Counsel opinionto be sought
- Mayco mandate confirmed by Council on 7 December
2006
33Recent developments The City of Cape Towns
Council position 4 04 December 2006
- The Citys position
- As contracting party The Council meeting on 07
December 2006 resolved to allow the agreements
between RED1 and the City to lapse - As service authority The City applied to Nersa
to have the distribution licence transferred from
RED1 back to the City and opposed RED1s
application for an extension of the licence - Nersa Public hearings held on 07 December 2006
- On 14 December 2006 NERSA awarded licence to the
City for period of 6 months - As shareholder The City will need to decide
what to do with RED1 as a company
34Recent developments The City of Cape Towns
position
- Citys key objective is to run the Electricity
Service as a department of the City Council. - This will take the EDIR 10 years back
- The future of RED1
- Agreements with the City lapsed on 31 December
2006 - Licence issued to City on 14 December 2006 City
as the sole shareholder to wind up RED1 - City may use RED1 as a vehicle for its own
corporatisation strategy (divorced from the
nationally-driven EDIR project) - City may offer its shares in RED1 to EDI Holdings
as a potential buyer - The RED1 Board must approve the transfer in terms
of article 26 of the Companys Act - EDI Holdings must consider commercial risks of
taking over RED1
35Issues arising from recent developments RED1s
income 1
- Past income
- There are management fees owing to RED1 by the
City of Cape Town - RED1 (or its liquidator, if it is wound-up) has
the power to recover payment of those fees - Likely outcome is that the City will have to
provide security for RED1s debts as part of a
voluntary winding-up process, rather than pay
funds over to RED1 - RED1s Board has still not been paid since their
term of office commenced 18 months ago on 01 July
2006 - RED1 Staff salaries have not been paid since
January 2007 (even through staff have valid
contracts) - City thus in breach of employment contracts
- Potential constructive dismissal claims by RED1
staff
36Issues arising from recent developments RED1s
income 2
- Future income
- with the SDA and OTPTA lapsing on 31 December
2006, RED1 will not be paid a management fee
beyond that date (all outstanding claims prior to
31 December 2006 are still owed to RED1 by the
City) - These amount to R5.2m as verified independently
by the Citys own Internal Audit Unit - RED1 continues to have obligations beyond that
date (eg in respect of creditors, salaries and
rental) - If RED1 is wound-up through a voluntary
winding-up, then its shareholder will be required
to put up security for continuing obligations for
a 12 month period
37Issues arising from recent developments Special
Combined Company and Board Meeting
- The Executive Mayor requested the RED1 Board to
convene a Special Combined Company and Board
meeting on 25 January 2007 to obtain - Directors statement on the affairs of RED1
- Impact of Cabinets decision on EDI
restructuring - Way forward for RED1
- The RED1 Board presented an
- Overview of RED1s establishment and its
activities over the past 18 months - Steps taken to effect the transfer of assets and
staff - Recent developments
- Current financial position of RED1
- Future of RED1
- The RED1 Board requested the City to review its
decision to wind up RED1 - The City negotiate with national government,
through EDI Holdings an alternative solution
within the broader EDI Restructuring context.
38Issues arising from recent developments Combined
Special Board and Company Meeting 25 January
2007
- The RED1 Special Combined Company and Board
meeting resolved that - The City-
- pay RED1 the amount owing to RED1 ito the OTPTA
over the past 18 months pending an independent
verification exercise by the Citys Internal
Audit Unit - continues to process all payments on behalf of
RED1, including staff salaries and outstanding
creditors - inform RED1 by no later than 28 February 2007 as
to the outcome of the discussions between EDI
Holdings and the City regarding the future of
RED1 - discussions between the City and EDI Holdings
have deadlocked therefore no longer an option - option is now to wind-up RED1
39Issues arising from recent developments Combined
Special Board and Company Meeting 25 January
2007
- In light of the above, RED1 to-
- Commence retrenchment consultations with staff
- Terminate all contractual obligations of RED1
- The RED1 Board submit a further report to the CCT
on options to the City in deciding on the future
of RED1 - The options are-
- (1) Transfer of shares to EDI Holdings on terms
to be agreed - (2) (a) Voluntary winding-up in solvent
circumstances - (b) Voluntary winding-up in insolvent
circumstances - (3) Winding up by court order in solvent
circumstances - (4) City retains RED1 as a shell company
40Current position of RED1
- RED1 has no ongoing source of income
- RED1 has no operational basis for continuing
- Staff salaries for January 2007 have still not
been paid despite an undertaking from the
Executive Mayor on 23 January 2007 that the
salaries be paid and any other amount owed to
RED1 be paid over once verified - Both these directives from the Executive Mayor
and the City manager have been ignored - The only option now is to wind up RED1
- This can be done on a solvent basis if the City
pays RED1 the money it owes the company or
insolvent basis if the City does not pay what is
owing - RED1 has requested an urgent meeting with the
City to resolve the impasse on non-payment of
salaries and outstanding creditors
41Challenges, Successes and Lessons to date
42Challenges
- RED 1 has in many respects been the pioneer of
the EDIR process as the Presidential pilot - RED 1 created with enabling legislation not in
existence - RED 1 has worked within a stringent regulatory
legislative regime. - MSA MFMA Electricity Regulation Act Companies
Act King 2. - City of Cape Town learning curve to work with a
company as municipal service provider - Eskom Suspensive Conditions not being met (no
longer relevant in light of Cabinets decision on
the EDI Restructuring) and the OTPTA having
lapsed on 31/12 2006
43Successes
- Being able to meet the target set by the State
President in very strenuous circumstances - Being able to create the start of RED 1 without
the necessary enabling legislation and within the
constraints of highly regulatory environment - Being able to create the first RED in the face of
these massive challenges. - RED1 has achieved the following-
- Electrification into Eskom areas in support of
the Citys electrification objectives and targets - Biggest-ever capital budget spend (95.4)
- Provision of free basic electricity in Eskom
areas
44Successes
- Progress towards the harmonisation of conditions
of service - The establishment of the REDS Pension Fund
- The development of a harmonised tariff framework
- The development of change management programmes
to ensure that the people, systems and culture of
the entity are service and delivery orientated - Negotiated national government support and
funding for crucial projects such as the 2010
world cup, electrification and green energy
projects - Demonstration model for the restructuring process
which up until 2005 was at a conceptual phase
45Lessons learnt
- Negotiation between parent entities must be at
advanced stage before creation of the company,
thereby enabling much smoother transfer of
businesses - Strategy to be aligned between National
Government Departments as well as with Local
Government entities and Eskom prior to start of
restructuring process - Negotiations with ESKOM at National level (and
not at Eskom Regional level) - Creation of an entity such as RED 1 should not be
done close to either National or Local Government
elections - Restructuring time should minimised to contain
the strain on budgets and staff morale.
46Lessons learnt 2
- Implement a more effective communication strategy
to staff and other stakeholders - Challenge of dual authority between
municipalities NERSA needs to be resolved - Clarify mechanisms for municipal regulation via
SDA - Municipal control of budget growth, revenue,
tariffs could undermine the objectives of
restructuring - EDIR legislation must be in place if
restructuring is to succeed
47Lessons from RED1 as a municipal entity
- Valuable lessons can be learnt from RED1 as a
Municipal Entity - The City exercised its sole shareholder status by
prevailing in the following - RED1 budget
- Non payment of the RED1 management fee to RED1
ito the OTPTA (Operating Agreement) - Not approving the tariff proposals determined by
the RED1 Board - Not submitting the Framework for the transfer of
staff and assets - Non payment of RED1 staff salaries for January
2007 - Non payment to RED1 creditors
- Non payment of RED1 Board of Directors fees
- Informing RED1s lessor that the City will take
over RED1s lease and pay the rental - Reduction of RED1s office space to 3 offices and
charging RED1 a rental - Non processing of RED1s PAYE
- All these activities were done in contravention
of the MFMA and the Municipal Systems Act
48Conclusion
- The City of Cape Town has resolved not to
participate in the EDI Restructuring because- - It does not support 6 wall-to-wall REDs as Public
Entities - The negative financial impact the REDs process
will have on the Citys Finances, even though a
surcharge (surpluses) have been guaranteed - Below is an illustration of the surcharges and
shared services costs guaranteed to the City of
Cape Town - Surpluses guaranteed over the next 3 years-
-
49Surcharge and Shared Services Costsguaranteed to
the City of Cape Town
City Surcharge City Shared Services Cost CITY TOTAL Eskom Surcharge Eskom Shared Services Cost ESKOM TOTAL TOTAL
2006/2007 R296 896 666 R133 399 468 R430 296 134 R45 533 840 R2 979 000 R48 512 840
2007/2008 R335 695 000 R144 872 000 R480 567 000
2008/2009 R359 193 650 R152 115 600 R511 309 250
50The Way Forward
- RED1 has laid a solid foundation for the transfer
of the City and Eskoms electricity businesses
into RED1 - The EDI restructuring will only succeed if
municipalities and Eskom are compelled to
participate - EDI restructuring bill must be legislated
urgently to govern the restructuring process - The EDIR process will only succeed with a
constitutional amendment - In relation to RED1
- RED1 be converted and/or established into a
public entity amalgamating Eskom and non-Metro
Municipalities - Though not optimal, it is financially viable
- National Government, via EDI Holdings continue to
engage the City of Cape Town to participate in
the EDIR - DME together with EDI Holdings and the RED1 Board
intervene to resolve the current impasse with the
City of Cape Town
51- RED1 thanks the Parliamentary Portfolio
Committee, our National Government, Parliament
and our strategic partners for the support and
encouragement over the past 18 months!