EU environmental policy - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

EU environmental policy

Description:

EU environmental policy Prof. Gyula B ndi – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:114
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: Dr231255
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: EU environmental policy


1
EU environmental policy
  • Prof. Gyula Bándi

2
Paris summit 1972
  • Statement from the Paris Summit (19 to 21 October
    1972)
  • 3. Economic expansion is not an end in itself.
    Its first aim should be to enable disparities in
    living conditions to be reduced. It must take
    place with the participation of all the social
    partners. It should result in an improvement in
    the quality of life as well as in standards of
    living. As befits the genius of Europe,
    particular attention will be given to intangible
    values and to protecting the environment, so that
    progress may really be put at the service of
    mankind

3
Action programmes
  • Environmental Action Programmes
  • 1st Environmental Action Programme 1973-1976(OJ
    C 112, 20.12.73)
  • 2nd Environmental Action Programme 1977-1981(OJ
    C 139, 13.6.77)
  • 3rd Environmental Action Programme 1982-1986(OJ
    C 46, 17.2.83)
  • 4th Environmental Action Programme 1987-1992(OJ
    C 328, 7.12.87)
  • 5th Environmental Action Programme 1993-2002(OJ
    C 138, 17.5.93)
  • 6th Environmental Action Programme 2002-2012(OJ
    L242, 10.9.2002)
  • The action programmes are political declarations
    of intent which take all the measures planned for
    a certain period, place them in an overall
    context, set priorities and, if necessary,
    introduce or explain changes in due course. They
    do not constitute a legal basis for Community
    environment measures. Ludwig Krämer

4
Action programmes - summary
  • (1973 1976)European reaction to increasingly
    perceptible ecological damages these damages had
    to be detected and described/explained
    scientifically. Secondly technological progress
    had to be shaped according to ecological
    necessities use of immission principle and
    quality standards to environmental media.
  • 2nd Environmental Action Programme 1977 - 1981 In
    essence continuation of the first programme
    directives and regulations for different
    environmental media (air, water, and soil) early
    measures relating to the EC-wide harmonisation of
    procedural questions.
  • 3rd Environmental Action Programme 1982 - 1986
    Introduction of preventive principle and
    integration of environmental goals in other
    important sectors protection of the
    Mediterranean Sea, noise reduction regulation of
    transboundary emissions, hazardous substances,
    and the transboundary transport of hazardous
    substances. Shift to emission principle
    (industrial emissions) reduction of emission at
    its source obligatory use of best available
    technique (BAT).

5
Action programmes - summary
  1. 4th Environmental Action Programme 1987 - 1992
    Consolidation of environmental objectives in
    other policy areas of the Community (especially
    agriculture, industry, transportation, and
    energy) by offering economic incentives for
    ecologically friendly behaviour and introducing
    the standardised planning instrument
    Environmental Impact Assessment.
  2. 5th Environmental Action Programme 1993 - 2002
    Postulation of the principle of sustainable
    development in order to combine economic and
    ecological objectives decentralisation and
    participation relocation of competence to
    national governments and regional authorities
    (subsidiarity), integration of different actors
    with various interests into institutional
    dialogue structures (shared responsibilities)
    shift from emission standards to environmental
    quality standards.
  3. 6th Environmental Action Programme 2002 - 2012
    Implementation of the European Unions
    sustainable development strategy the 6th EAP
    (entitled Environment 2010 Our future, our
    choice) proposes five priority avenues of
    strategic action improving the implementation of
    existing legislation integrating environmental
    concerns into other policies working closer with
    the market empowering people as private citizens
    and helping them to change behaviour and taking
    account of the environment in landuse planning
    and management decisions.

6
1st 1973-1976
  • The most well-known part of the policy is title
    II of part I on principles of a Community
    environment policy (paragraphs 6 to 17)
  • 1. The best environment policy consists of
    preventing the creation of pollution and nuisance
    at source, rather than subsequently trying to
    counteract their effects.
  • 2. Effects on the environment should be taken
    into account at the earliest possible stage in
    all technical planning and decision-making
    progresses.
  • 3. Any exploitation of natural resources or of
    nature which causes significant damage to the
    ecological balance must be avoided.
  • 4. The standard of scientific and technological
    knowledge in the Community should be improved.
  • 5. The cost of preventing and eliminating
    nuisances must in principle be borne by the
    polluter.

7
1st 1973-1976
  • 6. Activities carried out in one state do not
    cause any degradation of the environment in
    another state.
  • 7. The Community and its Member States must take
    into account in their environment policy the
    interests of the developing countries.
  • 8. Global environmental policy and making an
    original contribution in the field of
    international cooperation.
  • 9. At all levels continuous and detailed
    educational activity should take place.
  • 10. It is necessary to define the level of action
    (local, regional, national, Community,
    international) that befits the type of pollution,
    and the geographical zone to be protected should
    be sought.
  • 11. National programmes in these fields on the
    environment should be co-ordinated, and national
    policies should be harmonized within the
    Community.

8
2nd 1977-1981
  • In title IV the Second Action programme
    summarizes those general actions that should
    protect and improve the environment. These are
    specific measures, namely
  • environmental impact assessment,
  • economic aspects,
  • dissemination of information relating to
    environmental protection,
  • research projects concerning the protection of
    the environment,
  • promotion of awareness of environmental problems
    and education,
  • the setting up of a European Foundation for the
    Improvement of living and working conditions,
  • improvement of the working environment,
  • ensuring compliance with environmental protection
    regulations.

9
3d -1982-86
  • The Third Action programme
  • There are four groups of new elements in the
    programme
  • harmonizing and even integrating the interests of
    different policies
  • underlining the preventive character of
    environmental policy
  • setting new priority areas
  • listing numbers of considerations environmental
    policy should take into account.

10
4th 1987-1992
  • The Fourth Action programme represents an
    important stage of development within the
    Community Environmental Policy.
  • The main characteristic of the fourth is to
    consider environmental protection interests as
    basic conditions for economic decision-making.
    The programme therefore develops new ideas and
    principles.
  • The preamble of the programme again highlights
    the most important priority areas. The widest
    priorities are
  • a) pollution prevention,
  • b) improvement in management of resources,
  • c) international activities, and
  • d) development of appropriate instruments.

11
5th 1992-2002
  • The Fifth Action Programme, Maastricht Treaty and
    the UNCED process Towards Sustainability
  • As practical requirements for achieving
    sustainable development the programme mentions
  • the encouragement of reuse and recycling, thereby
    avoiding wastage and preventing the natural
    resource stock
  • production and consumption of energy should be
    rationalized and
  • consumption and behaviour patterns of society
    itself should be altered.

12
5th
  • The document is divided into three parts
  • Part I speaks about a policy and strategy for the
    environment and sustainable development within
    the European Community.
  • Part II covers the Communitys role in the wider
    international arena, referring to the close
    correlation between the internal and external
    dimensions of the Communitys policy on the
    environment
  • Part III gives priorities, costs and review in a
    short and very general way.
  • The target sectors are industry, energy,
    transport, agriculture, and tourism.

13
5th
  • The programme states, that There will be a
    continuing need for legislative measures at
    Community level, particularly in respect of
  • the establishment of fundamental levels of
    environmental care and protection
  • Community commitments to wider international
    agreements and
  • common standards and/or controls which may be
    deemed necessary or expedient to preserve the
    integrity of the Internal Market.

14
5th
  • There should also be a broad mix of instruments
    that contains
  • a) improvement of environmental data,
  • b) scientific research and technological
    development,
  • c) sectoral and spatial planning,
  • d) economic instruments in order to get the
    prices right,
  • e) public information and education,
  • f) professional education and training,
  • g) financial support mechanisms.

15
5th
  • The Fifth Action programme wants to promote
    practical reforms in the following subject areas
  • improvement of legislation,
  • implementation,
  • integration of policies,
  • involvement of the public,
  • environmental liability,
  • involvement of the European Environment Agency,
  • reports on implementation.

16
5th Progress report
  • 1998 Progress Report marks in particular
  • improved and more regular contacts with a broader
    range of partners, including industry
  • emphasis on framework legislation water and air
    instead of detailed legislation modification
    and simplification of existing legislation and
    codification
  • emphasis on market-based and fiscal measures,
    voluntary agreements. The broadening of the range
    of instruments has proved more difficult than
    envisaged and the real issue for the future is
    how to build on experience to date and to get the
    mix right.

17
6th 2002-2012
  • The Sixth Action Programme
  • Four priority areas for action.
  • Tackling climate change
  • Nature and Bio-diversity - protecting a unique
    resource
  • Environment and Health
  • Sustainable use of natural resources and
    management of wastes

18
6th
  • 10 subject areas of developing the instrumental
    setting, grouped in five
  • Implementation of existing environmental
    legislation needs to be improved.
  • Integration of environmental concerns into other
    policies must be deepened,
  • Working with the market through business and
    consumer interests will contribute to more
    sustainable production and consumption patterns.
  • Individual citizens make daily decisions that
    directly or indirectly impact the environment.
    Public participation!
  • Land use planning and management decisions in the
    Member States can have a major influence on the
    environment

19
6th
  • Thematic strategies adopted by the Commission in
    seven areas
  • air pollution,
  • waste prevention and recycling,
  • preserving marine environment,
  • soil,
  • sustainable use of pesticides,
  • sustainable use of natural resources,
  • urban environment.

20
6th -review
  • A review in 2007
  • Underlines that the EU is still not on the way to
    sustainable development
  • It states that the domestic legislation of the
    MSs is influenced by the EU law at least to an
    extent of 80
  • The major conclusion is that there is an urgent
    need for better integration, and environmental
    policy must be revised in 2012

21
Seventh "Living well, within the limits of our
planet"
  • At the end of 2012 the proposal for a new,
    seventh environmental action programme, lasting
    till 2020 has been presented, with some
    additional elements which point out till 2050.
  • The 7th EAP has been adopted by the Decision
    No 1386/2013/EU, 20 November 2013 Official
    Journal L 354 , 28/12/2013 P. 0171 - 0200
  • The wording of the Final Report for the
    Assessment of the 6th Environment Action
    Programme
  • When assessing the effects of the overall
    Programme, rather than progress on individual
    parts of it, one can see the added value of the
    6EAP in providing strategic direction and policy
    orientation and generating support for, and
    engagement with, EU environmental policy.
  • 5. However, many environmental trends in the EU
    remain worrying, not least due to insufficient
    implementation of existing EU environment
    legislation.
  • Proposal for a Decision of the European
    Parliament and of the Council on a General Union
    Environment Action Programme to 2020 "Living
    well, within the limits of our planet", Brussels,
    2012.11.29. COM(2012) 710 final, 2012/0337 (COD)
  • Commission Staff Working Document, Impact
    Assessment - Accompanying the document Proposal
    for a Decision of the European Parliament and of
    the Council on a General Union Environment Action
    Programme to 2020 "Living well, within the limits
    of our planet", SWD(2012) 398 final, Brussels,
    29.11.2012
  • Final Report for the Assessment of the 6th
    Environment Action Programme, DG
    ENV.1/SER/2009/0044,

22
Seventh
  • Art. 2 of the proposal presents the directory of
    the priority objectives
  • to protect, conserve and enhance the Unions
    natural capital
  • to turn the Union into a resource-efficient,
    green and competitive low-carbon business and
    technology
  • to safeguard the Union's citizens from
    environment-related pressures and risks to health
    and wellbeing
  • to maximise the benefits of the Union's
    environment legislation
  • to improve the evidence base for environment
    policy
  • to secure investment for environment and climate
    policy and get the prices right
  • to improve environmental integration and policy
    coherence
  • to enhance the sustainability of the Union's
    cities
  • to increase the Unions effectiveness in
    confronting regional and global environmental
    challenges.

23
(No Transcript)
24
Seventh
  • Priority objective 4 To maximise the benefits of
    EU environment legislation
  • 63. In order to maximise the benefits of EU
    environment legislation, the programme shall
    ensure that by 2020
  • (a) EU citizens have access to clear information
    showing how EU environment law is being
    implemented.
  • (b) The implementation of specific environment
    legislation is improved.
  • (c) Respect for EU environmental law at all
    administrative levels is reinforced and a level
    playing field in the internal market is
    guaranteed.
  • (d) Citizens trust and confidence in EU
    environment law is enhanced.
  • (e) The principle of effective legal protection
    for citizens and their organisations is
    facilitated.

25
Seventh
  • Green economy, according to Annex 2 means The
    concept of a green economy recognises that
    ecosystems, the economybusiness and human
    wellbeing (and the respective types of natural,
    produced, social and human capital) are
    intrinsically linked.
  • the Rio20 documents need to be referred to1
    56. ... we consider green economy in the context
    of sustainable development and poverty
    eradication as one of the important tools
    available for achieving sustainable development
    and that it could provide options for
    policymaking but should not be a rigid set of
    rules...
  • 1 The Future We Want, United Nations
    A/CONF.216/L.1, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 20-22
    June 2012, Distr. Limited, 19 June 2012, Agenda
    item 10, point 56

26
Seventh
  • This requires, in particular
  • (a) Establishing systems at national level which
    actively disseminate information about how EU
    environment legislation is being implemented,
    coupled with an EU-level overview of individual
    Member States performance.
  • (b) Drawing up partnership implementation
    agreements between Member States and the
    Commission.
  • (c) Extending binding criteria for effective
    Member State inspections and surveillance to the
    wider body of EU environment law, and developing
    a complementary capacity at EU level to address
    situations where there is due reason for concern,
    backed up by support for networks of
    professionals.
  • (d) Setting up consistent and effective
    mechanisms at national level for the handling of
    complaints about implementation of EU environment
    law.
  • (e) Ensuring that national provisions on access
    to justice reflect the case law of the Court of
    Justice of the European Union, and promoting
    non-judicial conflict resolution as a means of
    finding amicable solutions for conflicts in the
    environmental field.

27
Seventh
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com