Shirley Otis-Green, MSW, ACSW, LCSW, OSW-C - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 35
About This Presentation
Title:

Shirley Otis-Green, MSW, ACSW, LCSW, OSW-C

Description:

Enhancing the Social Work Role in Family Conferencing: Integrating Screening into Evidence-Informed Practice Shirley Otis-Green, MSW, ACSW, LCSW, OSW-C – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:127
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 36
Provided by: Kathy398
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Shirley Otis-Green, MSW, ACSW, LCSW, OSW-C


1
Enhancing the Social Work Role in Family
Conferencing Integrating Screening into
Evidence-Informed Practice
  • Shirley Otis-Green, MSW, ACSW, LCSW, OSW-C
  • Founder Consultant
  • CollaborativeCaring
  • Shirley_at_CollaborativeCaring.net

2
Presentation Goals
  • To Discuss Explore
  • Systemic Perspective as Related to Oncology Care
    An Invitation for Inter-Professional
    Collaboration
  • Strategies to Enhance Social Work Expertise
    Leadership in Family Conferencing
  • Role of Screening Assessment in Providing
    Evidence-Informed Culturally-Congruent Care

3
Shared Perspective
  • Whats in the best interests of the patients and
    families that we serve?

4
What is Distress Screening?
  • Distress A multifactoral unpleasant emotional
    experience of a psychological (cognitive,
    behavioral, emotional), social, and/or spiritual
    nature that may interfere with the ability to
    cope with cancer, its physical symptoms and its
    treatment.
  • National Comprehensive Cancer Network, 1999
  • An essential element of quality cancer care
  • 30-40 prevalence of clinically significant
    levels of distress across adult outpatients1-3
  • 1Trask P, Paterson A, Riba M, et al, 2002
    2Jacobsen PB, Donovan KA, Trask PC, et al, 2005
    3Zabora et al., 2001

5
5 -10
1IOM, 2008 2Zabora, et al., 20033Loscalzo
Clark, 2007 4Zabora, et al., 2001
Psychiatric or mental health disorders1
Need Referral Counseling1
Distress varies by cancer site4
6
Claim the Domain Create A Culture For Screening,
Assessment Family Conferencing
  • Get our psychosocial house in order (Loscalzo,
    2011)
  • Standardize your message Integrate your message
    into disease-directed care
  • Over-communicate about
  • The value positive outcomes
  • Improved processes and systems fewer
    disruptions in clinical services and flow
  • (administrators HATE disruption and lack of
    predictability)

7
Keeping, Tracking, Using Data
  • To document the extent of patient/family
    challenges
  • To provide your institution with data for
    enhancing care (Quality Improvement/Quality
    Assurance)
  • To inform development and implementation of
    practice, institutional programs, and policies
  • To demonstrate impact and raise profile of
    oncology social work
  • Make a case for additional staffing, based on
    home-based data

8
Data Analysis Example
  • 1. Count how many patients check an item in the
    problem checklist (e.g. Dealing with partner).
  • 2. Divide the number of patients who checked
    an item by the total number who completed DTs.
  • 3. The result is the RATE or PERCENTAGE of
    patients challenged by the item.
  • 4. Alternatively, add the number of checks within
    a category (e.g., Family Problems) for each
    patient.
  • 5. Divide this number by the total number of DTs.
  • 6. This number is the Average number of problems
    reported by patients seen in your unit.

9
What are your questions, concerns, challenges
around distress screening? How have you addressed
these challenges?
  • Instrument selection?
  • Implementation?
  • Turf Battles?
  • Social Works Competing Priorities? Other
    Obligations? Unclear Responsibility?
    Accountability? Limited Resources?

10
Screen to Intervene
  • Normalizes need for help and support
  • Establishes social workers professional role
  • Increases knowledge research base on psychosocial
    impacts of cancer
  • Efficacy of psychosocial support for cancer
    patients is well-established Faller, et al.,
    (2013), Journal of Clinical Oncology Jacobsen,
    et al., (2008), CA A Cancer Journal for
    Clinicians Gottlieb Wachala, (2007),
    Psycho-Oncology Cwikel, Behar, Zabora, (1997),
    Journal of Psychosocial Oncology, 1997 Meyer
    Mark (1995), Health Psychology

11
Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM)
  • Why do we do what we do when we do for whom we
    do? (Too often because thats they way its
    always been done).
  • Evidence-based medicine is the conscientious,
    explicit, judicious use of the best current
    evidence in making decisions about the care of
    individual patients.
  • (Sackett, et al., 1996 1971)

12
Five Steps of Evidence-Informed Care
  1. Ask focused questions Convert uncertainty into
    answerable questions
  2. Systematically retrieve the best evidence with
    which to answer the questions
  3. Critically appraise evidence for its validity,
    clinical relevance applicability
  4. Make a decision Apply the results of this
    appraisal in your practice
  5. Evaluating performance Auditing evidence-based
    decisions
    (http//www.cebm.net/index.as
    px?o1914)

13
Goal Evidence-Informed Practice
  • Critical thinking is key
  • Curiosity regarding outcomes
  • Commitment to explore options compare outcomes
  • Intentionality in selecting interventions
  • Professionalism requires contribution to build a
    strong evidence base

14
Tie Theory to Evidence to Bring Research to
Practice
  • Teams are intricate Systems with their own
    dynamics and lifespan
  • They exist within the larger healthcare system
    and interact with and respond to the dynamics
    of the larger system
  • Family Systems TheoryChanging anythingchanges
    everything!
  • Example Communication with Families Facing
    Life-Threatening Illness A Research-Based Model
    for Family Conferences (Fineberg,
    et al,(2011), Journal of Palliative Medicine)

Virginia Satir
15
  • What are some of the major challenges encountered
    with family conferences?
  • Lack of space to accommodate family
  • Difficulty establishing preconference meeting
    with the health care providers
  • Difficulty establishing off-hour meetings
    (weekends, outside 9am-5pm)
  • Difficulty communicating with family due to
    language barriers, lack of a translator
  • Lack of clear team to facilitate family
    meetings

16
Key Elements of a Highly Functioning Team
  • Consensual Goals (clarity of purpose)
  • Tendency to default on the side of trust vs.
    mistrust (dont assume the worst about others)
  • Willingness to roll up ones sleeves and do what
    needs to be done (functional nimbleness
    role flexibility)
  • Perspective of were all in this together
    (shared credit shared responsibility)
  • Conscious playing off peoples strengths and
    supporting others weaknesses (without focus on
    fault finding or blaming)
  • Informal dept. survey (2007) of what makes a team
    work

17
Goal Enhanced Team Functioning
  • Most health care professionals receive
    predominantly discipline-specific training yet
    are expected to translate this into effective
    team functioning(perhaps, not surprisingly this
    becomes a challenge!)
  • Inter-Professional/Transdisciplinary Care
    Integrative, holistic, innovative,
    hospice/anthropology concept.
  • Implies a revolution of the medical hierarchy.
  • Collaboration/communication/compassion amongst
    team members based upon team-training.

18
Transformation in Palliative Care
  • Traditional Multi-Disciplinary Practice
  • (Typically a reactive physician-led model with
    ad hoc membership using a consultative format)
  • Interdisciplinary Team
  • (More proactive model theoretically recognizes
    contributions of all, but typically MD-RN based
    and physician-led)
  • Transdisciplinary Team
  • (Shared team vision recognized role-overlap
    integrated responsibilities, training, leadership
    decision-making)
  • - Dale Larson, (1993), The Helpers
    Journey, Research Press.

19
1. What is Medically Appropriate
10 Steps of the Family Conference
  • Based on current medical information what current
    and future medical interventions does the team
    believe will improve and which will worsen or
    provide no benefit the patients current
    condition in terms of function/quality/time

(Adapted from EPERC Fast Facts Medical College
of Wisconsin, 2006)
20
Pre-Meeting with Patient/Family To Ensure
Culturally Congruent Decision-Making
  • Conducted by Social Worker? Chaplain? Nurse?
  • Obtain history assess the patient and familys
    needs understanding of the situation what are
    their goals, priorities, hopes, fears, cultural
    spiritual concerns?
  • Determine Who makes decisions in the family?
  • Who else should be included in the discussions
    (in person, via SKYPE, etc)?
  • Scheduling preferences?
  • Determine if full disclosure is desired?

21
  • Culture/Spirituality Provides the Lens Through
    Which We View Our Experiences

22
2. Pre-Meeting Planning
  • Coordinate medical opinions between consultants
    and primary MD
  • Obtain patient/family psychosocial data
  • Review Advance Care Planning Documents
  • Is patient decisional
  • Is there a power of attorney
  • Review medical history/treatment
    options/prognostic information

23
3. Environment
  • Choose a proper environment
  • Quiet, comfortable, chairs in a circle
  • Invite participants to sit down
  • Check your appearance, turn off pagers,

24
4. Introductions
  • Identify legal decision maker or family
    designated decision maker
  • Introduce self and have others introduce
    themselves and relationship to patient
  • Review your goals ask family if these are the
    same or different than their goals
  • Establish ground rules
  • Everyone can talk, but only one at a time
  • No interruptions

25
Build Rapport
  • Build a relationship
  • Ask the family to tell you something about the
    patient
  • I know about the patients illness but I was
    wondering if you could tell me something about
    her as a person, her hobbies or interests?

26
5. What does the patient know?
  • Make no assumptions Find out what the
    patient/family already knows
  • What do you understand about your condition?
  • What have the doctors told you?
  • How do you feel things are going with your
    treatment?
  • Chronic Illness tell me how things have been
    going for the past 3-6 mos. what changes have you
    noticed?

27
6. Medical Review
  • Physician presents medical information succinctly
  • Present the Big Picture
  • Current condition Expected Course
  • Speak slowly, deliberately, clearly
  • No medical jargon

28
Semantics Matter
  • Avoid depersonalizing labels
  • The breast in room 603
  • The DNR in ICU
  • Lack of common language to discuss illness,
    planning and options
  • Artificial Nutrition and Hydration vs. providing
    food and water
  • Do not or withhold vs. allow (DNR vs. AND)
  • Avoid Do everything or there is nothing more
    we can do

29
7. Reactions, Questions
  • Allow silence, give patient/family time to react
    and ask questions
  • Acknowledge and validate reactions prior to any
    further discussion
  • Invite questions

30
  • For most patients, two fundamental facts ensure
    that the transition to death will remain
    difficult.
  • First is the widespread and deeply held desire
    not to be dead.
  • Second is medicines inability to predict the
    future to give patients a precise and reliable
    prognosis
  • When death is the alternative, many patients who
    have only a small amount of hope will pay a high
    price to continue the struggle.
  • (Finucane, T.E. 1999)

31
8. Review Care Options
  • Allow for pushback from patient and family
  • Consider that recommendations for treatment might
    be on a trial basis
  • Check again for clarity and consensus
  • Ask for more questions
  • Confirm plan of care Goal is to identify Shared
    Goals of Care that are tailored for this
    particular patient/family at this particular
    point in time
  • Consider all options and repercussions of these
    options and provide recommendations based upon
    mutual understanding of situation.

32
9. Confirm Plan of Care
  • Based on the decision what do they want/need in
    the time remaining
  • Confirm Goals- so what you are saying is
  • Establish a Plan
  • Decide on steps to achieve plans
  • Usually involves discussion of CPR, ICU,
    artificial nutrition/hydration, home hospice
  • If test or treatment wont meet goals its best
    not to start it
  • Confirm plan summarize to ensure that everyone
    shares understanding of plan

33
10. Conclusion
  • Summarize areas of consensus and any
    disagreements
  • Caution against unexpected outcomes
  • Provide continuity
  • Document in the medical record provide summary
    documents to family
  • Who was present, what was decided, next steps
  • Discuss results with other concerned healthcare
    professionals not present

34
Implications for Your Institution?
35
Summary
  • A Commitment to Excellence is Needed if We are to
    Transform the Delivery of Care toThose We Serve
  • Importance of Screening Assessment in
    Determining Evidence-Informed Interventions
  • Family Conferencing Offers Leadership Advocacy
    Opportunities for Oncology Social Workers
  • Our Skills in Understanding Systems can be Useful
    to Enhance Team Dynamics and Improve Family
    Functioning
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com