Automatic classification of the seismic monitoring data at the Aaknes rock slope, Norway - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

Automatic classification of the seismic monitoring data at the Aaknes rock slope, Norway

Description:

Automatic classification of the seismic monitoring data at the Aaknes rock slope, Norway T. Fischer1,2, M. Roth3, D. Kuehn3 (1) Institute of Geophysics, Czech Academy ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:177
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: Tomas174
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Automatic classification of the seismic monitoring data at the Aaknes rock slope, Norway


1
Automatic classification of the seismic
monitoring dataat the Aaknes rock slope, Norway
  • T. Fischer1,2, M. Roth3, D. Kuehn3
  • (1) Institute of Geophysics, Czech Academy of
    Sciences
  • (2) Faculty of Science, Charles University in
    Prague
  • (3) NORSAR

2
Outline
  • Site characterization
  • Seismic network
  • Data examples
  • Ongoing work
  • Spike removal
  • Event classification

3
Åknes rock slide location
Rock-avalanche hazard zones in Møre Romsdal
4
Åknes fjord landscape
Åknes
Large rockslide deposits
5
Åknes rock slope
6
Seismic monitoring
Seismic network 8 3-C geophones
Broadband station AKN
7
Back-fracture and seismic network
8
Seismic network
8
9
Network
  • 8 three-component geophones
  • Network size 250 x 150 m
  • Central data acquisition in upper bunker
  • Radio link to Hellesylt (13 km distance)
  • Internet connection to NORSAR
  • Operational since October 2005
  • Realtime data transfer and processing

10
Data examples
Rockfalls
Blasts
Lightning/Generator
Earthquakes
Microseismic
Distant
Spikes, noise
Distant
Local short
Local long
ftp//ftp.norsar.no/pub/outgoing/aaknesplot/latest
waveforms/
11
Data examples
Gudvangen rock avalanche 15 June 2010, 0422
GMT 2000 5000 m3 Equivalent to M 2 earthquake
150 km South of Åknes
12
Real-time processing (existing)
http//www.norsar.no/ pc-47-48-Latest-Data.aspx
4 geophones 5 geophones 6 geophones 7 geophones 8
geophones
Last 30 days
12
13
Automatic classification
  • Goals
  • Remove EM noise (lightnings etc.) - spikes
  • Distinguish among 4 event types
  • Local short (slip events, locatable) single
    pulse, steep onset, lt1s
  • Local long (rockfalls) multiple pulses,
    emergent onset, gt2s
  • Distant very long signals with onset
  • Noise no clear onset

14
1. Remove spikes
  • Spikes detection
  • EM spikes synchronous on traces
  • Simple stacking of normalized absolute amplitudes
    OK
  • Measure maximum amplitude and half-width of the
    pulse

spike
event
15
1. Remove spikes
  • Criteria for spikes
  • Amax gt 60 NumTr
  • Duration lt 10 smpl

16
2. Distinguish event types
  • Calculate the signal envelope, sum the envelope
    over traces
  • Measured parameters of the stacked signal
    envelope
  • Maximum amplitude
  • Left and right width at two levels, 33 and 67
  • Number of local maxima
  • Interval btw. outer maxima
  • Training on manually classified data set incl.
    780 events during 2011
  • 119 local short
  • 526 local long
  • 109 distant
  • 28 noise

17
Event types - examples
18
Event types - examples
19
Distinguish event types - statistical analysis
  • Choice of the statistics
  • Aim get the P that the analyzed event belongs to
    one of the event types
  • How calculate the P of each studied parameter
  • Which statistics
  • pdf too discontinuous
  • cdf not suitable, P(Xltx)
  • folded cdf peaked function
  • Plt0.5 -gt P(Xltx)
  • Pgt0.5 -gt P(Xltx)

20
Distinguish event types - statistical analysis
  • Folded cumulative distribution of the parameters
  • Shows maximum at median
  • Each type characterized by a typical distribution

Maximum amplitude
Training evaluate the mean distribution of the
six parameters of all five event types for the
manually classified training data set
21
Results of distinguishing events
  • Automatic characterization applied to 4300
    triggers in 2011
  • Success rate
  • 81 local short events (slip events)
  • 73 local long events (rockfalls, avalanches)
  • 80 distant noise events

22
Summary
  • Aaknes rock slide is continuously monitored
  • Automatic classification of events in progress
  • EM spikes successfully removed by stacking traces
  • Event classification based on characterization of
    the shape of signal envelope
  • Success rate about 80 achived in classifying
    slip events, rockfalls and distant events/noise
  • Outlook approximate event localization

23
1. Remove spikes
  • Statistical analysis of amplitudes quantile
    ratios
  • Stationary signal normal distribution,
    Q99/Q95  1.5
  • Spiky signal dominance of high amplitudes high
    Q99/Q95 ratio

24
1. Remove spikes
  • Q99/Q95 measured on 917 manually classified
    events gt
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com