Title: Automatic classification of the seismic monitoring data at the Aaknes rock slope, Norway
1Automatic classification of the seismic
monitoring dataat the Aaknes rock slope, Norway
- T. Fischer1,2, M. Roth3, D. Kuehn3
- (1) Institute of Geophysics, Czech Academy of
Sciences - (2) Faculty of Science, Charles University in
Prague - (3) NORSAR
2Outline
- Site characterization
- Seismic network
- Data examples
- Ongoing work
- Spike removal
- Event classification
3Åknes rock slide location
Rock-avalanche hazard zones in Møre Romsdal
4Åknes fjord landscape
Åknes
Large rockslide deposits
5Åknes rock slope
6Seismic monitoring
Seismic network 8 3-C geophones
Broadband station AKN
7Back-fracture and seismic network
8Seismic network
8
9Network
- 8 three-component geophones
- Network size 250 x 150 m
- Central data acquisition in upper bunker
- Radio link to Hellesylt (13 km distance)
- Internet connection to NORSAR
- Operational since October 2005
- Realtime data transfer and processing
10Data examples
Rockfalls
Blasts
Lightning/Generator
Earthquakes
Microseismic
Distant
Spikes, noise
Distant
Local short
Local long
ftp//ftp.norsar.no/pub/outgoing/aaknesplot/latest
waveforms/
11Data examples
Gudvangen rock avalanche 15 June 2010, 0422
GMT 2000 5000 m3 Equivalent to M 2 earthquake
150 km South of Åknes
12Real-time processing (existing)
http//www.norsar.no/ pc-47-48-Latest-Data.aspx
4 geophones 5 geophones 6 geophones 7 geophones 8
geophones
Last 30 days
12
13Automatic classification
- Goals
- Remove EM noise (lightnings etc.) - spikes
- Distinguish among 4 event types
- Local short (slip events, locatable) single
pulse, steep onset, lt1s - Local long (rockfalls) multiple pulses,
emergent onset, gt2s - Distant very long signals with onset
- Noise no clear onset
141. Remove spikes
- Spikes detection
- EM spikes synchronous on traces
- Simple stacking of normalized absolute amplitudes
OK - Measure maximum amplitude and half-width of the
pulse
spike
event
151. Remove spikes
- Criteria for spikes
- Amax gt 60 NumTr
- Duration lt 10 smpl
162. Distinguish event types
- Calculate the signal envelope, sum the envelope
over traces - Measured parameters of the stacked signal
envelope - Maximum amplitude
- Left and right width at two levels, 33 and 67
- Number of local maxima
- Interval btw. outer maxima
- Training on manually classified data set incl.
780 events during 2011 - 119 local short
- 526 local long
- 109 distant
- 28 noise
17Event types - examples
18Event types - examples
19Distinguish event types - statistical analysis
- Choice of the statistics
- Aim get the P that the analyzed event belongs to
one of the event types - How calculate the P of each studied parameter
- Which statistics
- pdf too discontinuous
- cdf not suitable, P(Xltx)
- folded cdf peaked function
- Plt0.5 -gt P(Xltx)
- Pgt0.5 -gt P(Xltx)
20Distinguish event types - statistical analysis
- Folded cumulative distribution of the parameters
- Shows maximum at median
- Each type characterized by a typical distribution
Maximum amplitude
Training evaluate the mean distribution of the
six parameters of all five event types for the
manually classified training data set
21Results of distinguishing events
- Automatic characterization applied to 4300
triggers in 2011 - Success rate
- 81 local short events (slip events)
- 73 local long events (rockfalls, avalanches)
- 80 distant noise events
22Summary
- Aaknes rock slide is continuously monitored
- Automatic classification of events in progress
- EM spikes successfully removed by stacking traces
- Event classification based on characterization of
the shape of signal envelope - Success rate about 80 achived in classifying
slip events, rockfalls and distant events/noise - Outlook approximate event localization
231. Remove spikes
- Statistical analysis of amplitudes quantile
ratios - Stationary signal normal distribution,
Q99/Q95 1.5 - Spiky signal dominance of high amplitudes high
Q99/Q95 ratio
241. Remove spikes
- Q99/Q95 measured on 917 manually classified
events gt