Prof. Dr. A. Walkolbinger and HD Dr. J.Geiger Seminary about Probablity Theory and related fields Reporter: Mounir Balghouthi - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Prof. Dr. A. Walkolbinger and HD Dr. J.Geiger Seminary about Probablity Theory and related fields Reporter: Mounir Balghouthi

Description:

Prof. Dr. A. Walkolbinger and HD Dr. J.Geiger Seminary about Probablity Theory and related fields Reporter: Mounir Balghouthi Biased random walks on Galton-Watson trees – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:244
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: oem313
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Prof. Dr. A. Walkolbinger and HD Dr. J.Geiger Seminary about Probablity Theory and related fields Reporter: Mounir Balghouthi


1
Prof. Dr. A. Walkolbinger and HD Dr. J.Geiger
Seminary about Probablity Theory and related
fieldsReporter Mounir Balghouthi
  • Biased random walks on Galton-Watson trees

2
Introduction
  • We consider random walks with a bias toward the
    root on the family of tree T of a supercritical
    galton-watson branching process and we show that
    the SPEED is POSITIVE whenever the walk is
    transient, which is not the case if the bias is
    directed away from the root, the SPEED may be
    ZERO.

3
Fig.1
  • Choose some ? gt 1, with probability proportional
    to ?, the walker tries to walk in direction of
    the root

4
The path of the walker
5
On a different scale
6
Expected number of visits to a point
  • Conditioned on having visited a point x , the
    number of visits to x is distributed geometrically

7
Fresh epoch
  • Given a path ltX0,X1,gt, we call ngt0
  • a fresh epoch if Xn?Xk for all kltn.

8
Regeneration epoch
  • We call ngt0 a regeneration epoch if n is a fresh
    epoch and Xnj ?X0,,Xn-1 for all j0.

9
Regeneration epochs
10
Regeneration epochs on a different scale
11
Differences between successive regeneration
epochs
12
Idea of the proof
  1. Label the edges from each vertex y to its
    children by 1,,d(y) so each vertex is identified
    with the sequence of labels leading to it from
    the root.
  2. T is identified with a set T of finite
    sequences of positive integers.
  3. T(y) (the tree of descendants of y) is identified
    with the set T(y).
  4. A path Y( Ykk0) is descibed by the sequence
    of non negative integers?(?kk1), where ?k is
    0 if Yk is the parent of Yk-1and is otherwise the
    label on the edge from Yk-1 to Yk .
  5. Conditional on the event of non extinction, the
    sequence of fresh trees T(Y?n) seen at
    regeneration epochs is stationary! But not i.i.d.
    however, the part of tree between regeneration
    epochs, together with the path taken through this
    part of tree is independent of the rest of tree
    and the rest of walk. Call this part Slabn.
  6. The stationarity of the sequence of fresh trees
    seen at regeneration epochs implies that the
    rs.vs. Slabn are identically distributed.

13
References
  • http//citeseer.ist.psu.edu/lyons96biased.html
  • Russell Lyons, Rubin Pemantle Yuval Peres.
  • http//www.its.caltech.edu/berger/biasedslides.pd
    f
  • Noam Berger, Nina Gantert Yuval Peres.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com