Information for Accountability - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

Information for Accountability

Description:

Information for Accountability Quality assurance, data, and planning capacity: Keys to assessing performance of tertiary institutions and systems – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:115
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: JohnL273
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Information for Accountability


1
Information for Accountability
Quality assurance, data, and planning capacity
Keys to assessing performance of tertiary
institutions and systems
  • Workshop on Tertiary Education
  • Tbilisi, Georgia
  • December 14, 2009
  • Richard Hopper
  • Senior Education Specialist
  • Europe and Central Asia Region
  • The World Bank

2
Launch of Quality Assurance
  • QA steps in Georgia remarkable
  • Reduced from 217 institutions to 39 in 2005
  • A consumer protection tool to start
  • Protect students and families who invest
  • Protect employers who seek skilled labor
  • Rationalize the value of tertiary education

3
Bold, yet not uncommon
  • Important and brave step
  • Similar to other countries with rapid growth in
    private sector
  • Chile, South Africa, etc.
  • Also responding to Bologna Process
  • Moving from institutional to program
    accreditation (anticipated 2011)

4
What next?
  • Avoid the mistakes of others
  • Move forward from a traditional system
  • Regulatory, punitive
  • Transition to satisfy Bologna
  • Accountability, outcomes
  • Yet continue the evolution to be strategic
  • Integrate quality into organizational cultures
  • Generate data for wide-ranging purposes

5
Cart before the horse
  • Quality assurance systems are emerging/reforming
  • Institutions are adapting to rapid change
  • Financing systems are linking to performance
    measures
  • Institutions undertaking strategic planning
    exercises
  • International benchmarking is increasing in
    importance
  • ?Often occur in the absence of any systematic
    data-collection and analysis systems within each
    institution
  • Causes frustration as staff struggle to satisfy
    multiple requests
  • Causes frustration as consumers get inconsistent
    data
  • Causes sub-optimal analysis, conclusions,
    directions

6
Demand for information
  • Strategies are key to develop tertiary education
    institutions and systems in a competitive
    environment
  • Comprehensive data and analysis underpin
    institutional and system planning processes
  • Focus on rapid development of human capital
  • requires rapid assessment of institution and
    system dynamics
  • Emphasis on quality assurance, value-for-money,
    and evidence-based decision making
  • demands accurate, transparent, timely,
    publicly-available data
  • ?Data exist, so why not extract value from the
    data?
  • Best accomplished with a systematic, bottom-up
    approach

7
Forewarned is forearmed
  • Most institutions develop data and analysis
    systems late
  • They respond to overwhelming requests for
    information
  • They respond to the introduction of HEMIS
  • Developing such systems under pressure is not fun
  • Institutional systems often start with a narrow
    mandates
  • Admissions, registrar, financial officer, human
    resources, academic departments, etc.
  • Recording data for a narrow purpose without
    extracting value for wider use is short-sighted
  • ?Why not anticipate the growing need for
    institution-wide information and encourage your
    universities now?

8
When institution-level data are not readily
available
  • Unable to clearly define problems
  • Unable to indentify quality factors
  • Unable to calculate costs, inefficiencies
  • Unable to properly strategize, plan
  • Unable to react quickly
  • Unable to implement MIS, respond to accreditation
  • Management decisions made without evidence
  • ?Ad hoc information from multiple sources
  • costly, inefficient, and prevents longitudinal
    analysis
  • often prevents verification, corroboration
  • diffuse data holders have undue power and
    potential weakness for corrupt practices

9
When institution-level data are not comparable
  • Unable to clearly define common problems
  • Unable to indentify system trends and deviations
  • Unable to compare costs, inefficiencies
  • Unable to properly strategize, plan at system
    level
  • Unable to react with sensitivity to variation
  • Unable to benchmark institutional performance
  • Unable to describe system characteristics to
    outsiders
  • Unable to design fair, performance-based
    incentives
  • ?Data variability easily misused and manipulated
  • can cause confusion, misunderstanding, poor
    judgments
  • generally raises more questions than answers

10
Institutional research and planning office
  • Curious name
  • Institutional research means research about the
    institution itself
  • Formally organized institutional function
  • Inward looking
  • Self reflective
  • ?Surprisingly widespread practice
  • USA (1950s), Western Europe (1970s), South
    Africa, and now Latin America

11
What is it?
  • Collects data on institutional operations
  • Analyzes and interprets the data
  • Transforms data into useful information
  • Supports
  • institutional planning, policy making, decision
    making, quality assurance, and assessment
  • Makes information readily available

12
What does it do?
  • External internal reporting
  • official numbers, accountability reporting
  • Planning special projects
  • Studies on institutional effectiveness,
    benchmarking, enrolment projections
  • Data management technical support
  • student database, personnel database, financial
    database, data warehousing
  • Surveys
  • Graduate tracer studies

13
Unique data
  • Finance
  • Physical resources
  • Human resources
  • Student body
  • Student activities and performance
  • Academic research activity
  • Data bound by local culture, needs

14
Yet comparable data
  • Collects data that are comparable
  • across institutions
  • across countries
  • US common data set of shared items
  • Agreed among institutions
  • Common definitions
  • Common reporting

15
Linkage with financing
  • Higher Education Funding Council of England
    (HEFCE) established in 1992
  • To fund higher education institutions in the UK
    to ensure financing is linked to institutional
    performance
  • UK Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)
    established in 1993
  • Central source of higher education statistics
  • Standardized data collection
  • Information for HEFCE, QAA, and others

16
Linkage with quality assurance
  • Irish universities underwent quality review by
    European Universities Association (EUA) 2005
  • Irelands performance could not be adequately
    benchmarked against European competitors
  • first step in benchmarking exercise was to
    develop complete and reliable data about the
    sector
  • Irish universities were urged to strengthen
    capacity for institutional analysis

17
Institutional research now part of all Irish
universities
18
Other countries
  • Australia
  • Chile
  • India
  • South Africa

19
Widespread professional associations
  • Association for Institutional Research (AIR)
  • www.airweb.org
  • European Association for Institutional Research
    (EAIR)
  • www.eair.nl
  • Australasian Association for Institutional
    Research (AAIR)
  • www.aair.org.au
  • Southeast Asian Association for Institutional
    Research
  • www.seaair.au.edu
  • Southern African Association for Institutional
    Research (SAAIR)

20
Formalized training
  • Post-masters certificates in institutional
    research in the US
  • Some have on-line option
  • Penn State University
  • Indiana University
  • Florida State University
  • Missouri State University
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com