Antinuclear Antibody, Rheumatoid Factor, and Cyclic-Citrullinated Peptide Testing for the Evaluation of Musculoskeletal Complaints in Children - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Antinuclear Antibody, Rheumatoid Factor, and Cyclic-Citrullinated Peptide Testing for the Evaluation of Musculoskeletal Complaints in Children

Description:

Antinuclear Antibody, Rheumatoid Factor, and Cyclic-Citrullinated Peptide Testing for the Evaluation of Musculoskeletal Complaints in Children – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:82
Avg rating:3.0/5.0

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Antinuclear Antibody, Rheumatoid Factor, and Cyclic-Citrullinated Peptide Testing for the Evaluation of Musculoskeletal Complaints in Children


1
Antinuclear Antibody, Rheumatoid Factor, and
Cyclic-Citrullinated Peptide Testing for the
Evaluation of Musculoskeletal Complaintsin
Children
  • Prepared for
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
  • www.ahrq.gov

2
Outline of Material
  • Background
  • Comparative Effectiveness Review (CER)
    Development
  • Clinical Questions Addressed by the CER
  • Report Findings
  • Conclusion Statements
  • Gaps in Knowledge
  • What To Discuss With Your Patients

3
Background Musculoskeletal Pain
  • Musculoskeletal (MSK) pain is pain that affects
    muscles, bones, ligaments, tendons, or nerves.
  • MSK pain is common in childhood.
  • Published prevalence estimates range from 2 up to
    50 percent.
  • Assessment is based on patient history and
    physical examination. Assessment may be
    complicated by children having difficulty
    characterizing their symptoms.
  • The presence of specific clinical characteristics
    such as morning stiffness, joint swelling, malar
    rash, and cytopenias may lead to a high suspicion
    of a pediatric rheumatic condition.

Wong KO, Bond K, Homik J, et al. Comparative
Effectiveness Review No. 50. Available at
www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/anatest.cfm.
4
Background Causes of Musculoskeletal Pain
  • Nonrheumatic Causes
  • Account for nearly all childhood musculoskeletal
    (MSK) pain.
  • Generally attributable to sprains, strains,
    overuse, and normal body growth.
  • Rheumatic Causes
  • Rheumatic MSK pain is much less prevalent than
    nonrheumatic MSK pain.
  • Generally chronic and requires early diagnosis
    and treatment to prevent progression and
    long-term disability.
  • Rheumatic causes may include juvenile idiopathic
    arthritis (JIA), pediatric systemic lupus
    erythematosus (pSLE), spondyloarthropathies
    (including enthesitis-related arthritis, juvenile
    ankylosing spondylitis, or reactive arthritis),
    acute rheumatic fever, or Henoch-Schönlein
    purpura.

Wong KO, Bond K, Homik J, et al. Comparative
Effectiveness Review No. 50. Available at
www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/anatest.cfm.
5
Background Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis
  • Most common chronic inflammatory disease of
    children, with a prevalence of 1 per 1,000
    children.
  • Musculoskeletal pain is not universally present
    in children with JIA. Sixteen percent of children
    with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) do not
    report pain.
  • Without effective treatment, JIA can progress and
    cause damage to cartilage, bone, and soft tissues
    and may lead to severe disability and functional
    loss and, in rare cases, to organ failure and
    death.
  • Early diagnosis and treatment may reduce the
    progression of the disease and induce remission.
  • Only a minority of patients will experience
    complete resolution of JIA symptoms before
    adulthood.

Wong KO, Bond K, Homik J, et al. Comparative
Effectiveness Review No. 50. Available at
www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/anatest.cfm.
6
Background Pediatric Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • An episodic, multisystem, autoimmune disease.
  • Widespread inflammation of blood vessels,
    connective tissues, and organs.
  • Estimated incidence of 0.30.9 per 100,000
    children per year estimated prevalence of
    3.38.8 per 100,000 children.
  • Onset is rare before 5 years of age and uncommon
    before adolescence.
  • Left untreated, pediatric systemic lupus
    erythematosis is often progressive and can be
    fatal.
  • Early diagnosis and rapid introduction of
    effective immunosuppressive treatment have led to
    improved outcomes.

Wong KO, Bond K, Homik J, et al. Comparative
Effectiveness Review No. 50. Available at
www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/anatest.cfm.
7
Background Using Serological Tests To Diagnose
Musculoskeletal Pain
  • The diagnosis of inflammatory arthritis is based
    solely on a patient history and physical
    examination.
  • An accurate diagnosis of pediatric
    musculoskeletal (MSK) pain may be complicated by
    a nonspecific pain pattern or lack of confidence
    in the MSK physical examination.
  • Serological tests such as antinuclear antibody,
    rheumatoid factor, and cyclic-citrullinated
    peptide may be ordered when children and
    adolescents are suspected of having a rheumatic
    cause for their MSK despite uncertainties about
  • their diagnostic performance,
  • their usefulness, and
  • their proper interpretation for pediatric
    populations.

Wong KO, Bond K, Homik J, et al. Comparative
Effectiveness Review No. 50. Available at
www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/anatest.cfm.
8
Background Antinuclear Antibody Test
  • Can be used to screen for specific autoimmune
    conditions, such as systemic lupus erythematosus,
    Sjögrens syndrome, and systemic sclerosis.
  • Techniques used for antinuclear antibody (ANA)
    testing include indirect immunofluorescence (IIF)
    and enzyme immunoassay (EIA, ELISA).
  • Neither test has been standardized in children
    methods and interpretation vary by manufacturer
    and testing laboratory.
  • Results of studies that compare the use of IIF
    and EIA for ANA testing have been inconsistent,
    with some showing poor correlation and others
    demonstrating consistency.

Wong KO, Bond K, Homik J, et al. Comparative
Effectiveness Review No. 50. Available at
www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/anatest.cfm.
9
Background Rheumatoid Factor Test
  • Rheumatoid factors (RFs) are specific
    autoantibodies that react with the Fc fragment of
    the immunoglobulin (Ig)G molecule.
  • RFs serve as the basis of sensitive and specific
    tests for adult rheumatoid arthritis.
  • 19S IgM-RF is the isotope most frequently used to
    test for rheumatoid arthritis.
  • The presence of RF is typically detected by
    agglutination assays, nephelometry, or enzyme
    immunoassay.
  • RFs are not prevalent in pediatric juvenile
    idiopathic arthritis (lt10 of children with
    juvenile idiopathic arthritis have a positive RF
    test result).

Wong KO, Bond K, Homik J, et al. Comparative
Effectiveness Review No. 50. Available at
www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/anatest.cfm.
10
Background Cyclic-Citrullinated Peptide Antibody
Test
  • This test detects the presence of autoantibodies
    to citrullinated peptides in serum.
  • Formation of antibodies to cyclic-citrullinated
    peptide (CCP) seems to be specific for adult
    patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
  • In adults, a CCP antibody test is usually ordered
    along with a rheumatoid factor test when
    evaluating a patient with inflammatory arthritis.
  • The prevalence and utility of a positive CCP
    antibody test in children with juvenile
    idiopathic arthritis or with associated rheumatic
    conditions is not clear.

Wong KO, Bond K, Homik J, et al. Comparative
Effectiveness Review No. 50. Available at
www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/anatest.cfm.
11
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
Comparative Effectiveness Review (CER)
Development
  • Topics are nominated through a public process,
    which includes submissions from health care
    professionals, professional organizations, the
    private sector, policymakers, members of the
    public, and others.
  • A systematic review of all relevant clinical
    studies is conducted by independent researchers,
    funded by AHRQ, to synthesize the evidence in a
    report summarizing what is known and not known
    about the select clinical issue. The research
    questions and the results of the report are
    subject to expert input, peer review, and public
    comment.
  • The results of these reviews are summarized into
    Clinician Research Summaries and Consumer
    Research Summaries for use in decisionmaking and
    in discussions with patients. The Clinician
    Research Summary and the full report, with
    references for included and excluded studies, are
    available at www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.
    gov/anatest.cfm.

Wong KO, Bond K, Homik J, et al. Comparative
Effectiveness Review No. 50. Available at
www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/anatest.cfm.
12
Clinical Questions Addressed by the CER (1 of 3)
  • Key Question 1 Prevalence and incidence
  • In children and adolescents aged 18 years or
    younger, what is the incidence and prevalence of
    undiagnosed musculoskeletal (MSK) complaints?
  • In healthy children and adolescents aged 18 years
    or younger, what is the incidence of positive
    test results for antinuclear antibody, rheumatoid
    factor, and cyclic-citrullinated peptide?
  • Key Question 2 Natural history
  • What proportion of children and adolescents aged
    18 years or younger with undiagnosed MSK pain
    have pain due to noninflammatory etiologies?
  • What proportion of children and adolescents aged
    18 years or younger with undiagnosed MSK pain
    have pain due to inflammatory etiologies?
  • What proportion of children and adolescents aged
    18 years or younger experience symptom resolution
    or recurrence?

Wong KO, Bond K, Homik J, et al. Comparative
Effectiveness Review No. 50. Available at
www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/anatest.cfm.
13
Clinical Questions Addressed by the CER (2 of 3)
  • Key Question 3 Diagnostic Performance
  • In children and adolescents aged 18 years or
    younger with undiagnosed musculoskeletal pain,
    what is the test performance (sensitivity,
    specificity, and positive and negative predictive
    values) of
  • ANA for JIA when compared with a clinical
    diagnosis?
  • ANA for pSLE when compared with a clinical
    diagnosis?
  • RF for pSLE when compared with a clinical
    diagnosis?
  • RF for JIA when compared with a clinical
    diagnosis?
  • CCP for pSLE when compared with a clinical
    diagnosis?
  • CCP for JIA when compared with a clinical
    diagnosis?

Wong KO, Bond K, Homik J, et al. Comparative
Effectiveness Review No. 50. Available at
www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/anatest.cfm.
14
Clinical Questions Addressed by the CER (3 of 3)
  • Key Question 4. Accuracy Modifiers
  • In children and adolescents aged 18 years or
    younger with undiagnosed MSK pain, do age, sex,
    race/ethnicity, comorbidities, and recent
    infections modify the diagnostic performance
    (sensitivity, specificity, and positive and
    negative predictive values) of ANA, RF, and CCP
    for pSLE or JIA when compared with a clinical
    diagnosis?
  • Key Question 5. Clinical Impacts of Test Results
  • In children and adolescents aged 18 years or
    younger with undiagnosed MSK pain, do ANA, RF,
    and CCP test results affect referral decisions,
    additional tests ordered, clinical management,
    and patient and parent anxiety due to the
    clinical uncertainty and additional tests?

Wong KO, Bond K, Homik J, et al. Comparative
Effectiveness Review No. 50. Available at
www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/anatest.cfm.
15
Rating the Strength of Evidence From the
Comparative Effectiveness Review
  • The strength of evidence was classified into four
    broad categories

High Further research is very unlikely to change the confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate Further research may change the confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low Further research is likely to change the confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Insufficient Evidence either is unavailable or does not permit estimation of an effect.
Wong KO, Bond K, Homik J, et al. Comparative
Effectiveness Review No. 50. Available at
www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/anatest.cfm.
16
Report Findings Prevalence of Musculoskeletal
Pain Among Healthy Children
  • Prevalence estimates of musculoskeletal (MSK)
    pain ranged from 2 to 52 percent, varying with
    age and sex.
  • Up to 30 percent of children and adolescents
    report episodes of pain lasting more than 6
    months.
  • In childhood, the prevalence of JIA was 1 per
    1,000, and the prevalence of pSLE was 8.8 per
    100,000.
  • In children with MSK pain, 97 percent of cases
    result from noninflammatory causes.
  • Of the 3.3 percent of pediatric cases of MSK pain
    that result from inflammatory causes 2.5 percent
    result from toxic synovitis and 0.8 percent
    result from inflammatory arthritides.
  • Recurrence rates of pediatric MSK pain are high
    and vary by body site. Age, sex, headache,
    abdominal pain, and combined pain are predictors
    of recurrence for nontraumatic MSK pain.

Wong KO, Bond K, Homik J, et al. Comparative
Effectiveness Review No. 50. Available at
www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/anatest.cfm.
17
Report Findings Etiology of Musculoskeletal Pain
Among Healthy Children
Cause Prevalence ()a
Physical trauma 44
Overuse 24
Osteochondroses 10
Hypermobility 3
Growing pain 4
Viral infection 4
a Prevalence of these etiologies vary with age.
Wong KO, Bond K, Homik J, et al. Comparative
Effectiveness Review No. 50. Available at
www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/anatest.cfm.
18
Report Findings Prevalence of Positive
Serological Test Results Among Healthy Children
  • The prevalence of positive tests results in
    healthy children was as follows
  • Antinuclear antibody 018 percent (median 3)
  • Rheumatoid factor approximately 3 percent
    (median 0)
  • Cyclic-citrullinated peptide antibody 00.6
    percent (median lt1)

Wong KO, Bond K, Homik J, et al. Comparative
Effectiveness Review No. 50. Available at
www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/anatest.cfm.
19
Report Findings Clinical Bottom Line Regarding
the Utility of Clinical Testing
  • The RF test may have a potential application only
    in confirming a suspected clinical diagnosis of
    JIA (i.e., a diagnosis based on a comprehensive
    patient history and physical examination).
  • One retrospective cohort study examined records
    of 437 pediatric hospital patients with MSK pain
    who had an RF test. They found very limited
    utility of the RF test for diagnosing JIA with a
    positive predictive value of 45 percent and a
    negative predictive value of 77 percent
    (sensitivity 4.8 specificity 98).
  • Strength of Evidence Low
  • The evidence is insufficient to evaluate the
    sensitivity and specificity of most test-disease
    combinations.
  • Thus, the test performance of the ANA or CCP
    antibody tests in children with undiagnosed MSK
    pain is unknown, as is the performance of the RF
    test for diagnosing pSLE.
  • Strength of Evidence Insufficient

Wong KO, Bond K, Homik J, et al. Comparative
Effectiveness Review No. 50. Available at
www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/anatest.cfm.
20
Conclusions (1 of 2)
  • The prevalence of MSK pain varies with age and
    sex.
  • Nearly all MSK pain in children (97) results
    from noninflammatory causes.
  • A review of the patients history and performance
    of an MSK examination remain the most appropriate
    methods for diagnosing rheumatic etiologies of
    pediatric MSK pain in a timely fashion.
  • There is low-strength evidence for the utility of
    RF in diagnosing JIA in children with undiagnosed
    MSK pain (sensitivity 4.8, specificity 98).
  • The low sensitivity suggests that diagnosis of
    JIA should not rely on serological tests alone,
    but may be combined with thorough clinical
    assessment that suggests the presence of
    inflammatory arthritis.
  • The use of laboratory tests as diagnostic
    measures or for broad screening of pediatric
    rheumatic conditions remains unsupported.

Wong KO, Bond K, Homik J, et al. Comparative
Effectiveness Review No. 50. Available at
www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/anatest.cfm.
21
Conclusions (2 of 2)
  • Methodological limitations of existing studies
    prevent further assessment of the sensitivity and
    specificity of the ANA, RF, and CCP serological
    tests.
  • These serological tests have potential use only
    as an adjunct to a clinical assessment that
    suggests the presence of an inflammatory
    arthritis or connective tissue disease.

Wong KO, Bond K, Homik J, et al. Comparative
Effectiveness Review No. 50. Available at
www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/anatest.cfm.
22
Gaps in Knowledge
  • No studies examined clinically important outcomes
    that may affect quality of life and psychosocial
    well-being.
  • The impact of the ANA, RF, and CCP test results
    on referrals, ordering of additional tests, and
    patient management.
  • Increase in family anxiety levels due to positive
    test results, faulty diagnosis of a rheumatic
    condition, and referral to a pediatric
    subspecialist.
  • Studies examined children with known disease
    status rather than a spectrum of children with
    undiagnosed MSK symptoms, thus providing evidence
    regarding test performance that likely
    overestimates both sensitivity and specificity
    values.
  • No studies addressed the patient or clinical
    characteristics that could modify the accuracy of
    these serological tests including age, sex, race,
    history of recent infections, and presence of
    other characteristics other than MSK pain.

Wong KO, Bond K, Homik J, et al. Comparative
Effectiveness Review No. 50. Available at
www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/anatest.cfm.
23
What To Discuss With Your Patients
  • That musculoskeletal pain is common and may recur
  • That inflammatory causes are found in only 3
    percent of children
  • The important role of a complete patient history
    and physical examination in diagnosing a
    rheumatic cause of musculoskeletal pain

Wong KO, Bond K, Homik J, et al. Comparative
Effectiveness Review No. 50. Available at
www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/anatest.cfm.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com