Presented at the Second Suomi NPP Applications Workshop - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Presented at the Second Suomi NPP Applications Workshop

Description:

Title: DI0609 definition Subject: GEO Author: Andrew Eddy Last modified by: loaner Created Date: 7/8/1997 3:16:20 PM Document presentation format: On ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:84
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: Andrew1418
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Presented at the Second Suomi NPP Applications Workshop


1
Flood Detection with S-NPP and JPSSIn the
context of the CEOS Disaster Risk Management
Flood Pilotthe GEO Regional End-to-End Disaster
Systems Task and the NOAA JPSS Proving Ground
Flood Project
  • Presented at the Second Suomi NPP Applications
    Workshop
  • Hosted by the University of Alabama at the Westin
    Huntsville
  • Stu Frye NASA/GSFC/SGT (stuart.frye_at_nasa.gov)
  • Mitch Goldberg NOAA/JPSS (mitch.goldberg_at_noaa.gov)
  • 19 November 2014

Thanks to Pat Cappelaere (Vightel Inc.) and
Sanmei Li (George Mason University) for their
assistance in preparing this presentation
2
Agenda
  • Context/Overview
  • Why create flood maps
  • Modeling (forecasts) versus monitoring (nowcasts)
  • Flood monitoring from satellites
  • Flood event overview (daily, global, low-moderate
    resolution, can capture entire event and detect
    flood maximum extent)
  • Flood detail maps (periodic, targeted, high
    resolution, cover much smaller areas of interest
    over widely spaced moments in time
  • International setting for implementation of
    satellites maps
  • NOAA NWS Flood Applications

2
3
Context/Overview
  • Purpose to improve delivery of satellite data
    and products for societal benefit in
    local/regional settings, but on a global scale
  • Method - develop and infuse Earth Observation
    (EO) science applications for monitoring and
    modeling combined with advanced technology for
    data acquisition, processing, and product
    distribution for disaster applications
  • Sensor Webs technology compatible with Global
    Earth Observation System of Systems architecture
  • Experience NASA/NOAA collaboration built into
    Committee on Earth Observation Satellites (CEOS)
    and Group on Earth Observations (GEO) activities
  • CEOS Actions and GEO Tasks address ground
    validation, crowd sourcing, and hand-held clients
    to validate disaster products and services
  • Capacity building to infuse standardized web
    servers and clients that provide open access to
    critical disaster management information, data,
    and maps via the internet using common, open
    desktop tools
  • Status - task objectives, PIs for each product,
    end user identification, team members, and
    accomplishments to date are contained herein
  • Upcoming venues for showcasing USA satellite
    disaster applications UNISDR World Conference
    on Disaster Risk Reduction (WCDRR), World Bank
    Understanding Risk forum, AGU/EGU, IGARSS, ISPRS

3
4
Why Create Flood Maps
  • Damaging flood events occur both over very large
    areas (e.g., major river valleys) and, for damage
    assessment purposes, small areas (e.g., urban
    flooding).
  • After Hurricane Katrina (2005) along the southern
    Gulf Coast, USA, there was a need for very
    detailed, neighbourhood-level mapping in New
    Orleans of still-standing water over weeks of
    time.
  • Yet also there was a need for an overview of the
    entire central Gulf coastline, as the storm had
    caused flooding of many small communities that
    were difficult to access by local authorities.
  • NASA/NOAA collaboration producing Global Products
    for Regional Consumption - demonstrating how new
    flood data products can be generated, used, and
    validated through cooperation with regional and
    national agencies in international settings

4
5
Model Forecasts vs. Monitoring Nowcasts
  • Typically models predict the amount of flooding
    that will occur, when it will occur, and where
  • Run daily to produce outputs that are
    low/moderate resolution
  • Based on geophysical parameters and inputs from
    satellite and ground measurements
  • Satellite monitoring products are moderate/high
    resolution from imagery
  • We need both cross-strapped, openly available,
    with legends imprinted
  • Graphs/histograms of whats happening at a
    particular point can be produced from both for
    comparison with gauge data and crowd sourced
    validation inputs

5
6
Monitoring with Moderate Resolution
  • Sensors such as MODIS and, potentially, SUOMI-NPP
    VIIRS can provide a kind of flood (and surface
    water resources) data "infrastructure", whose
    strengths are temporal and spatial coverage that
    are a useful base for higher spatial resolution
    sensors. They are always on, and public the data
    distribution obstacles that are sometimes present
    for other high resolution sensors are in this
    case absent.
  • It would be very productive if VIIRS-sourced and
    Landsat 8-sourced surface water information could
    be added as services in addition to detection of
    surface water extent. VIIRS would add continuity
    and backup (the MODIS sensors are aging) Landsat
    increases spatial resolution about two orders of
    magnitude (100 - 30 m pixels per single MODIS or
    VIIRS 300 m pixel), at cost of temporal and
    spatial coverage.
  • The strength of VIIRS is that
  • The swath is 3000km with additional overlap
    between orbits (no gaps) even at the equator and
    with nearly constant spatial resolution across
    the scan (375m nadir 750m edge of scan)
  • It provides daily coverage and will become the
    primary afternoon instrument once Aqua MODIS is
    retired
  • The problem is the mapping capability is one-off
    in response to individual requests from higher
    upsthey are not routine and are not created with
    end user input except in very narrow settings

6
7
Comparison of MODIS and VIIRS Flood Products
  • Issues with clouds and cloud shadows on single
    images
  • Clouds can be detected and removed, but MODIS
    cloud mask is 1km resolution for corresponding
    flood images at 250m
  • Composites over multiple days show better water
    detection
  • Cloud shadows still problematic, shadows are
    detected as open water, but approaches exist such
    as height above nearest drainage (HAND) using DEM
    (e.g., Hydrosheds 90m SRTM) in addition to other
    geometric (height vs. sun angle) techniques
  • VIIRS NOAA GMU (VNG) Flood Algorithm (VNGFLOOD)
    resolves most of the cloud shadowing issues
    (better resolution cloud mask plus combination of
    geometric and HAND approaches)
  • VIIRS products are being proven more recently in
    a data rich environment (e.g. USA) where ground
    truth matching is being demonstrated - then we
    purvey them to our international partners and
    enlist them in ground truthing exercises in local
    settings

While great strides have been made, do not take
away that were done, the amount of the problems
we are facing and the urgency with which they
need to be dealt are still daunting if we want to
be serious about providing societal benefits to
humanity at large in the near future.
7
8
Higher spatial resolution VIIRS and better
handling of cloud shadows provides better
coverage than MODIS
Bangladesh, August 29, 2014, Left VIIRS, right
MODIS
8
9
VIIRS Flood Map from Namibia May 20 2014TIF
format, 9.5Mbytes
9
10
Example of Vectorized VIIRS Flood Map
  • https//api.tiles.mapbox.com/v4/cappelaere.9bf9435
    4/page.html?access_tokenpk.eyJ1IjoiY2FwcGVsYWVyZS
    IsImEiOiJxSjM5MEt3In0.9PYNJ8PzRclvtEh1jkqBuA8/-16
    .093/23.898 (from Namibia May 20 2014 image)
  • The compressed topojson file is only 161KB
    published on Mapbox using a simplistic base map.
    But you get a better idea of impact of flood on
    zoomable map.
  • A real publisher would publish the data on
    request against a terrain map and with a legend
    and embedded tags to enable the sharing on
    Facebook/Twitter

10
11
MODIS Composite Namibia 19-20 May 2014
11
12
Landsat-8 Surface Water
  • Also Northwestern Namibia (Zambezi River) May 20
    2014

12
13
Geo-Social Sharing of Science Data
Easy data dissemination, visualization and sharing
Facebook
Twitter
13
14
Example of Vectorized Frost Product for Kenya
  • This data set comes from MODIS night time land
    surface temperature (LST)
  • https//api.tiles.mapbox.com/v4/cappelaere.3107bfe
    3/page.html?access_tokenpk.eyJ1IjoiY2FwcGVsYWVyZS
    IsImEiOiJxSjM5MEt3In0.9PYNJ8PzRclvtEh1jkqBuA8/1.3
    68/38.276

15
NOAA JPSS Satellite ApplicationsRiver Ice and
Flooding Application for NWS
  • JPSS Capabilities River Ice and Flooding Product
  • Societal Impacts
  • Floods are one of the most common hazards in the
    U.S.
  • Coast-to-coast threat to the U.S. and its
    territories year round.
  • More than 8 million people live in areas at risk
    of coastal flooding
  • Strong need for near-real-time monitoring the
    evolution and dynamics of ice cover due to
  • High frequency of river ice related events
  • Significant risk of damages
  • Accurate and detailed information on ice
    conditions is necessary for
  • Better flood risk assessment
  • Timely issuance of flood warnings
  • Faster preventive or mitigation measures
  • Frequent passes at high risk polar latitudes
  • High VIIRS spatial resolution (375m)
  • Near real time flood detection at regional scale
    in the USA
  • Event-driven flood detection at global scale
  • Case-driven high spatial resolution (from 10m to
    30m) flood map generation using digital elevation
    models
  • Effective algorithms available in direct broadcast

VIIRS ice-jam flood detection in Galena, AK
during May, 2013
Capabilities Needed
  • Evaluate state of river ice to prepare for
    break-up
  • Identify flooding caused by ice jam or rainfall
    in remote and urban areas
  • Estimate extent and depth of flooding waters

16
River Ice and Flooding Initiative
  • NOAA JPSS River Ice and Flood Project Initiative
    began in Nov 2013
  • Initiative Objectives
  • Test new VIIRS River Ice and Flooding Products in
    operational River Forecast Center (RFC)
    environments
  • Algorithms developed by NOAA JPSS Proving Ground
    Program
  • Determine the value of these products in their
    use in response to real-world ice jam and
    flooding events
  • Implement procedures to transition these research
    capabilities to operations
  • Initiative has high interest in NWS River
    Forecast Centers (RFCs)
  • Alaska-Pacific and North Central RFCs partners in
    initial actions
  • Northeast and Missouri Basin RFCs new 2014
    partners
  • Two more RFCs considering joining the initiative
  • Products available from Direct Broadcast data
    through The Community Satellite Processing
    Package (CSPP) from direct readout in Univ.
    Alaska Fairbanks and University of Wisconsin, to
    RFC AWIP Systems
  • Products evaluated during Winter 2013-14 Project
  • Flooding Product has been applied year-round to
    US and international river basins (Paraguay
    request)

17
River Ice and Flooding InitiativeNWS RFC Partners
18
Chena River Flooding 4 Jul 2014
A significant flood occurred in the eastern
Tanana basin, including the Chena River near
Fairbanks AK Alaska Pacific RFC Validation of GMU
River Flooding Product
Heavy Precipitation
Rise in the River
Flooding Verification
GMU River Flood Product
19
Summary
  • Flood maps are useful to disaster managers, civil
    protection, and the public at large, but are
    still not being provided routinely or made
    available from open repositories
  • We can brag about the accomplishments, but need
    to emphasize the problems and why they are
    significant.
  • We do need near realtime flood extents but we
    also need to composite the results with other
    products and models.
  • We need automation for that... which means we
    need to have an API in place to generate those
    products on-demand
  • We need to address product delivery to
    "disadvantaged" end-users (and not just
    scientists with high-end software)
  • We need to address mobile platforms access and
    visualization with common open tools that users
    already have
  • We need to figure out a way to fund incorporation
    of new capabilities (better DEMs, new radar
    satellites, high res optical, etc) into a
    seamless stream of delivery that can inform
    situational awareness for affected users

19
20
Conclusion
  • NASA/NOAA collaboration has worked well and been
    demonstrated with both national and international
    flooding events
  • That collaboration needs to be nurtured with
    further interactions on national and
    international fronts exploiting in-roads made
    through CEOS, GEO, SERVIR, and other foreign,
    regional, and international agencies to expand
    access to and use of products, return of
    validation results, and implementation of further
    product improvements
  • Thank You

20
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com