Title: Presented at the Second Suomi NPP Applications Workshop
1Flood Detection with S-NPP and JPSSIn the
context of the CEOS Disaster Risk Management
Flood Pilotthe GEO Regional End-to-End Disaster
Systems Task and the NOAA JPSS Proving Ground
Flood Project
- Presented at the Second Suomi NPP Applications
Workshop - Hosted by the University of Alabama at the Westin
Huntsville - Stu Frye NASA/GSFC/SGT (stuart.frye_at_nasa.gov)
- Mitch Goldberg NOAA/JPSS (mitch.goldberg_at_noaa.gov)
- 19 November 2014
Thanks to Pat Cappelaere (Vightel Inc.) and
Sanmei Li (George Mason University) for their
assistance in preparing this presentation
2Agenda
- Context/Overview
- Why create flood maps
- Modeling (forecasts) versus monitoring (nowcasts)
- Flood monitoring from satellites
- Flood event overview (daily, global, low-moderate
resolution, can capture entire event and detect
flood maximum extent) - Flood detail maps (periodic, targeted, high
resolution, cover much smaller areas of interest
over widely spaced moments in time - International setting for implementation of
satellites maps - NOAA NWS Flood Applications
2
3Context/Overview
- Purpose to improve delivery of satellite data
and products for societal benefit in
local/regional settings, but on a global scale - Method - develop and infuse Earth Observation
(EO) science applications for monitoring and
modeling combined with advanced technology for
data acquisition, processing, and product
distribution for disaster applications - Sensor Webs technology compatible with Global
Earth Observation System of Systems architecture - Experience NASA/NOAA collaboration built into
Committee on Earth Observation Satellites (CEOS)
and Group on Earth Observations (GEO) activities - CEOS Actions and GEO Tasks address ground
validation, crowd sourcing, and hand-held clients
to validate disaster products and services - Capacity building to infuse standardized web
servers and clients that provide open access to
critical disaster management information, data,
and maps via the internet using common, open
desktop tools - Status - task objectives, PIs for each product,
end user identification, team members, and
accomplishments to date are contained herein - Upcoming venues for showcasing USA satellite
disaster applications UNISDR World Conference
on Disaster Risk Reduction (WCDRR), World Bank
Understanding Risk forum, AGU/EGU, IGARSS, ISPRS
3
4Why Create Flood Maps
- Damaging flood events occur both over very large
areas (e.g., major river valleys) and, for damage
assessment purposes, small areas (e.g., urban
flooding). - After Hurricane Katrina (2005) along the southern
Gulf Coast, USA, there was a need for very
detailed, neighbourhood-level mapping in New
Orleans of still-standing water over weeks of
time. - Yet also there was a need for an overview of the
entire central Gulf coastline, as the storm had
caused flooding of many small communities that
were difficult to access by local authorities. - NASA/NOAA collaboration producing Global Products
for Regional Consumption - demonstrating how new
flood data products can be generated, used, and
validated through cooperation with regional and
national agencies in international settings
4
5Model Forecasts vs. Monitoring Nowcasts
- Typically models predict the amount of flooding
that will occur, when it will occur, and where - Run daily to produce outputs that are
low/moderate resolution - Based on geophysical parameters and inputs from
satellite and ground measurements - Satellite monitoring products are moderate/high
resolution from imagery - We need both cross-strapped, openly available,
with legends imprinted - Graphs/histograms of whats happening at a
particular point can be produced from both for
comparison with gauge data and crowd sourced
validation inputs
5
6Monitoring with Moderate Resolution
- Sensors such as MODIS and, potentially, SUOMI-NPP
VIIRS can provide a kind of flood (and surface
water resources) data "infrastructure", whose
strengths are temporal and spatial coverage that
are a useful base for higher spatial resolution
sensors. They are always on, and public the data
distribution obstacles that are sometimes present
for other high resolution sensors are in this
case absent. - It would be very productive if VIIRS-sourced and
Landsat 8-sourced surface water information could
be added as services in addition to detection of
surface water extent. VIIRS would add continuity
and backup (the MODIS sensors are aging) Landsat
increases spatial resolution about two orders of
magnitude (100 - 30 m pixels per single MODIS or
VIIRS 300 m pixel), at cost of temporal and
spatial coverage. - The strength of VIIRS is that
- The swath is 3000km with additional overlap
between orbits (no gaps) even at the equator and
with nearly constant spatial resolution across
the scan (375m nadir 750m edge of scan) - It provides daily coverage and will become the
primary afternoon instrument once Aqua MODIS is
retired - The problem is the mapping capability is one-off
in response to individual requests from higher
upsthey are not routine and are not created with
end user input except in very narrow settings
6
7Comparison of MODIS and VIIRS Flood Products
- Issues with clouds and cloud shadows on single
images - Clouds can be detected and removed, but MODIS
cloud mask is 1km resolution for corresponding
flood images at 250m - Composites over multiple days show better water
detection - Cloud shadows still problematic, shadows are
detected as open water, but approaches exist such
as height above nearest drainage (HAND) using DEM
(e.g., Hydrosheds 90m SRTM) in addition to other
geometric (height vs. sun angle) techniques - VIIRS NOAA GMU (VNG) Flood Algorithm (VNGFLOOD)
resolves most of the cloud shadowing issues
(better resolution cloud mask plus combination of
geometric and HAND approaches) - VIIRS products are being proven more recently in
a data rich environment (e.g. USA) where ground
truth matching is being demonstrated - then we
purvey them to our international partners and
enlist them in ground truthing exercises in local
settings
While great strides have been made, do not take
away that were done, the amount of the problems
we are facing and the urgency with which they
need to be dealt are still daunting if we want to
be serious about providing societal benefits to
humanity at large in the near future.
7
8Higher spatial resolution VIIRS and better
handling of cloud shadows provides better
coverage than MODIS
Bangladesh, August 29, 2014, Left VIIRS, right
MODIS
8
9VIIRS Flood Map from Namibia May 20 2014TIF
format, 9.5Mbytes
9
10Example of Vectorized VIIRS Flood Map
- https//api.tiles.mapbox.com/v4/cappelaere.9bf9435
4/page.html?access_tokenpk.eyJ1IjoiY2FwcGVsYWVyZS
IsImEiOiJxSjM5MEt3In0.9PYNJ8PzRclvtEh1jkqBuA8/-16
.093/23.898 (from Namibia May 20 2014 image) - The compressed topojson file is only 161KB
published on Mapbox using a simplistic base map.
But you get a better idea of impact of flood on
zoomable map. - A real publisher would publish the data on
request against a terrain map and with a legend
and embedded tags to enable the sharing on
Facebook/Twitter
10
11MODIS Composite Namibia 19-20 May 2014
11
12Landsat-8 Surface Water
- Also Northwestern Namibia (Zambezi River) May 20
2014
12
13Geo-Social Sharing of Science Data
Easy data dissemination, visualization and sharing
Facebook
Twitter
13
14Example of Vectorized Frost Product for Kenya
- This data set comes from MODIS night time land
surface temperature (LST) - https//api.tiles.mapbox.com/v4/cappelaere.3107bfe
3/page.html?access_tokenpk.eyJ1IjoiY2FwcGVsYWVyZS
IsImEiOiJxSjM5MEt3In0.9PYNJ8PzRclvtEh1jkqBuA8/1.3
68/38.276
15NOAA JPSS Satellite ApplicationsRiver Ice and
Flooding Application for NWS
- JPSS Capabilities River Ice and Flooding Product
- Floods are one of the most common hazards in the
U.S. - Coast-to-coast threat to the U.S. and its
territories year round. - More than 8 million people live in areas at risk
of coastal flooding - Strong need for near-real-time monitoring the
evolution and dynamics of ice cover due to - High frequency of river ice related events
- Significant risk of damages
- Accurate and detailed information on ice
conditions is necessary for - Better flood risk assessment
- Timely issuance of flood warnings
- Faster preventive or mitigation measures
- Frequent passes at high risk polar latitudes
- High VIIRS spatial resolution (375m)
- Near real time flood detection at regional scale
in the USA - Event-driven flood detection at global scale
- Case-driven high spatial resolution (from 10m to
30m) flood map generation using digital elevation
models - Effective algorithms available in direct broadcast
VIIRS ice-jam flood detection in Galena, AK
during May, 2013
Capabilities Needed
- Evaluate state of river ice to prepare for
break-up - Identify flooding caused by ice jam or rainfall
in remote and urban areas - Estimate extent and depth of flooding waters
16River Ice and Flooding Initiative
- NOAA JPSS River Ice and Flood Project Initiative
began in Nov 2013 - Initiative Objectives
- Test new VIIRS River Ice and Flooding Products in
operational River Forecast Center (RFC)
environments - Algorithms developed by NOAA JPSS Proving Ground
Program - Determine the value of these products in their
use in response to real-world ice jam and
flooding events - Implement procedures to transition these research
capabilities to operations - Initiative has high interest in NWS River
Forecast Centers (RFCs) - Alaska-Pacific and North Central RFCs partners in
initial actions - Northeast and Missouri Basin RFCs new 2014
partners - Two more RFCs considering joining the initiative
- Products available from Direct Broadcast data
through The Community Satellite Processing
Package (CSPP) from direct readout in Univ.
Alaska Fairbanks and University of Wisconsin, to
RFC AWIP Systems - Products evaluated during Winter 2013-14 Project
- Flooding Product has been applied year-round to
US and international river basins (Paraguay
request)
17River Ice and Flooding InitiativeNWS RFC Partners
18Chena River Flooding 4 Jul 2014
A significant flood occurred in the eastern
Tanana basin, including the Chena River near
Fairbanks AK Alaska Pacific RFC Validation of GMU
River Flooding Product
Heavy Precipitation
Rise in the River
Flooding Verification
GMU River Flood Product
19Summary
- Flood maps are useful to disaster managers, civil
protection, and the public at large, but are
still not being provided routinely or made
available from open repositories - We can brag about the accomplishments, but need
to emphasize the problems and why they are
significant. - We do need near realtime flood extents but we
also need to composite the results with other
products and models. - We need automation for that... which means we
need to have an API in place to generate those
products on-demand - We need to address product delivery to
"disadvantaged" end-users (and not just
scientists with high-end software) - We need to address mobile platforms access and
visualization with common open tools that users
already have - We need to figure out a way to fund incorporation
of new capabilities (better DEMs, new radar
satellites, high res optical, etc) into a
seamless stream of delivery that can inform
situational awareness for affected users
19
20Conclusion
- NASA/NOAA collaboration has worked well and been
demonstrated with both national and international
flooding events - That collaboration needs to be nurtured with
further interactions on national and
international fronts exploiting in-roads made
through CEOS, GEO, SERVIR, and other foreign,
regional, and international agencies to expand
access to and use of products, return of
validation results, and implementation of further
product improvements - Thank You
20