Title: Quantum Spin Systems from the point a view of Quantum Information Theory
1Quantum Spin Systems from the point a view of
Quantum Information Theory
- Frank Verstraete, Ignacio Cirac
- Max-Planck-Institut für Quantenoptik
2Overview
- Entanglement verus correlations in quantum spin
systems - Localizable entanglement
- Diverging entanglement length for gapped quantum
systems - Valence bond states / Projected entangled pair
states (PEPS) - In Spin chains
- In quantum information theory
- Coarse-graining (RG) of PEPS
- PEPS as variational ground states
- Illustration RG DMRG
- Extending DMRG to periodic boundary conditions,
time-evolution, finite-T - Using quantum parallelism for simulating 1-D
quantum spin glasses - Simulation of 2-D quantum spin systems
- Conclusion
3Motivation
- Many interesting phenomena in condensed matter
occur in regime with strong correlations (e.g.
quantum phase transitions) - Hard to describe ground states due to
exponentially large Hilbert space - Powerful tool study of 2-point correlation
functions (?length scale) - Central object of study in Quantum Information
Theory entanglement or quantum correlations - It is a resource that is the essential ingredient
for e.g. quantum cryptography and quantum
computing - Quantifies quantum nonlocality
- Can QIT shed new light on properties of strongly
correlated states as occurring in condensed
matter?
4Entanglement versus correlations
- Consider the ground state of e.g. a 1-D
quantum Heisenberg Hamiltonian - Natural question in Statistical Mechanics what
are the associated correlation functions? - correlation functions of the form
play central
role related to thermodynamic properties, to
cross sections, detect long-range order and
quantum phase transitions, define length scale - Natural question in QIT what is the amount of
entanglement between separated spins (qubits) in
function of their distance?
5Quantum Repeater
Briegel, Dür, Cirac, Zoller 98
- Spin Hamiltonians could also effectively describe
a set of e.g. coupled cavities used as a quantum
repeater - The operationally motivated measure is in this
case how much entanglement is there between the
first atom and the last one?
6Entanglement in spin systems
- Simplest notion of entanglement would be to study
mixed state entanglement between reduced density
operators of 2 spins
- Problem does not reveal long-range effect
(Osborne and Nielsen 02, Osterloch et al. 02) - Natural definition of entanglement in spin
systems from the resource point a view
localizable entanglement (LE) - Consider a state , then the LE
is variationally defined as the maximal amount of
entanglement that can be created / localized, on
average, between spins i and j by doing LOCAL
measurements on the other spins - Entanglement length
- quantifies the distance at which useful
entanglement can be created/localized, and
hence the quality of a spin chain if used as a
quantum repeater/channel
Verstraete, Popp, Cirac 04
7Entanglement versus correlations
- LE quantifies quantum correlations that can be
localized between different spins how is this
related to the classical correlations studied
in quantum statistical mechanics? - Theorem the localizable entanglement is always
larger than or equal to the connected 2-point
correlation functions - Consequences
- Correlation length is a lower bound to the
Entanglement length long-range correlations
imply long-range entanglement - Ent. Length is typically equal to Corr. Length
for spin ½ systems - LE can detect new phase transitions when the
entanglement length is diverging but correlation
length remains finite - When constructing a quantum repeater between e.g.
cavities, the effective Hamiltonian should be
tuned to correspond to a critical spin chain
Verstraete, Popp, Cirac 04
8Illustration the spin-1 AKLT-model
- All correlation functions decay exponentially
- The symmetric subspace is spanned by 3 Bell
states, and hence this ground state can be used
as a perfect quantum repeater - Diverging entanglement length but finite
correlation length - LE detects new kind of
- long range order
- Antiferromagnetic spin chain
- is a perfect quantum channel
Verstraete, Martin-Delgado, Cirac 04
9Generalizing the AKLT-state PEPS
- Every state can be represented as a Projected
Entangled Pair State (PEPS) as long as D is large
enough - Extension to mixed states take Completely
Positive Maps (CPM) instead of projectors - 1-D PEPS reduce to class of finitely correlated
states / matrix product states (MPS) in
thermodynamic limit (N!1) when P1P2L P1 - Systematic way of constructing translational
invariant states - MPS become dense in space of all states when D!1
- yield a very good description of ground states of
1-D systems (DMRG)
Ex. 5 qubit state
Fannes, Nachtergaele, Werner 92
10- PEPS in higher dimensions
Verstraete, Cirac 04
11Basic properties of PEPS
- Correlation functions for 1-D PEPS can easily be
calculated by multiplying transfer
matrices of dimension D2 - Number of parameters grows linearly in number of
particles (NdDc) with c coordination number of
lattice - 2-point correlations decay exponentially
- Area law entropy of a block of spins is
proportional to its surface
12Localizable Entanglement of VBS
- Optimal measurement basis in context of LE is
determined by the basis that maximizes the
entanglement of assistance of the operator - This is indeed the measurement that will
optimize the quality of entanglement swapping
Proj. P in phys. subspace
DiVincenzo, Fuchs, Mabuchi, Smolin, Thapliyal,
Uhlmann 98
(LE with more common entanglement measures can be
calculated using combined DMRG/Monte Carlo method
)
13VBS in QIT
- VBS play a crucial role in QIT all
stabilizer/graph/cluster states are simple VBS
with qubit bonds - Gives insight in their decoherence properties,
entropy of blocks of spins ... - Examples
- GHZ
- 5-qubit ECC
14Measurement/Teleportation based quantum
computation
- Implementing local unitary U
- Implementing phase gate
- As Pauli operators can be pulled through Uph ,
this proves that 2- and 3-qubit measurements on a
distributed set of singlets allows for universal
QC
Gottesman and Chuang 99 Verstraete and Cirac 03
15Measurement based quantum computation
- Can joint measurements be turned into local ones
at the expense of initially
preparing a highly entangled state? - Yes interpret logical qubits and singlets as
virtual qubits and bonds of a 2-D VBS - Local measurements on physical qubits correspond
to Bell/GHZ-measurements on virtual ones needed
to implement universal QC - This corresponds exactly to the cluster-state
based 1-way computer of Raussendorf and Briegel,
hence unifying the different proposals for
measurement based QC
Raussendorf and Briegel 01 Verstraete and Cirac
03 Leung, Nielsen et al. 04
16Spin systems basic properties
- Hilbert space scales exponentially in number of
spins - Universal ground state properties
- Entropy of block of spins / surface of block
(holographic principle) - Correlations of spins decay typically
exponentially with distance (correlation length) - The N-particle states with these properties form
a tiny subspace of the exponentially large
Hilbert space
17- Ground states are extreme points of a convex set
- Problem of finding ground state energy of all
nearest-neighbor transl. invariant Hamiltonians
is equivalent to characterizing the convex set of
n.n. density operators arising from transl.
invariant states - Finitely Correlated States / Matrix Product
States / Projected Entangled Pair States provide
parameterization that only grows linearly with
number of particles but captures these desired
essential features very well
The Hamiltonian defines a hyperplane in
(2s1)2 dim. space
18PEPS as variational trial states for ground
states of spin systems
- All expectation values and hence the energy
are multi-quadratic in
the variables Pk - Strategy for minimizing energy for N-spin state
- Fix all projectors Pi except the jth
- Both the energy and the norm
are quadratic functions of the variable Pj and
hence the minimal energy by varying Pi can be
obtained by a simple generalized eigenvalue
problem - Heff and N are function of the Hamiltonian
and all other projectors, and can efficiently be
calculated by the transfer matrix method - Move on to the (j1)th particle and repeat
previous steps (sweep) until convergence -
Verstraete, Porras, Cirac 04
19Illustration 1
- Wilsons Renormalization Group (RG) for
Kondo-effect - RG calculates effective Hamiltonian by projecting
out high energy modes the effective Hamiltonian
is spanned by a set of PEPS - Very successful for impurity problems,
demonstrating validity of PEPS-ansatz -
L
20Illustration 2 DMRG
White 92
- Most accurate method for determining ground
states properties of 1-D spin chains (e.g.
Heisenberg chains, Hubbard, ) - PEPS-approach proves the variational nature of
DMRG - Numerical effort to find ground state is related
to the amount of entanglement in a block of spins
(Osborne and Nielsen 02, Vidal et al. 03)
21DMRG and periodic boundary conditions
- DMRG with periodic instead of open boundary
conditions
Exactly translational invariant states are
obtained, which seems to be important for
describing dynamics Computational cost ND5
versus ND3 (OBC)
22- Further extensions
- Variational way of Calculating Excitations and
dynamical correlation functions / structure
factors using PEPS - Variational time evolution algorithms (see also
Vidal et al.)
- Basic trick variational dimensional reduction of
PEPS - Given a PEPS yDi of dimension D, find the one
cDi of dimension Dlt D such that yDi-cDi
2 is minimized - This can again be done efficiently in a similar
iterative way, yielding a variational and hence
optimal way of treating time-evolution within the
class of PEPS
23Variational Dimensional Reduction of PEPS
- Given a PEPS yDi parameterized by the DD
matrices Ai, find the one cDi parameterized by
DDmatrices Bi (Dlt D) such as to minimize - Fixing all Bi but one to be optimized, this leads
to an optimization of the form xy
Heffx-xy y , with solution Heffxy/2
iterating this leads to global optimum - The error of the truncation can exactly be
calculated at each step! - In case of OBC more efficient due to
orthonormalization - In the case of OBC, the algorithms of Vidal,
Daley et al., White et al. are suboptimal but a
factor of 2-3 times faster a detailed comparison
should be made
24- Finite-T DMRG imaginary/real time evolution of a
PEPS-purification - Ancillas can also be used to describe quantum
spin-glasses due to quantum parallelism, one
simulation run allows to simulate an exponential
amount of different realizations the ancillas
encode the randomness
25Simulation of 2-D quantum systems
- Standard DMRG approach trial state of the form
Problems with this approach dimension of bonds
must be exponentially large - area theorem -
only possibility to get large correlations
between vertical nearest neighbors
We propose trial PEPS states that have bonds
between all nearest neighbors, such that the area
theorem is fulfilled by construction and all
neighbors are treated on equal footing
26- The energy of such a state is still a
multi-quadratic function of all variable, and
hence the same iterative variational principle
can be used - The big difference the determination of Heff
and N is not obtained by multiplying matrices,
but contracting tensors - This can be done using the variational
dimensional reduction discussed before note that
the error in the truncation is completely
controlled
No (sign) problem with frustrated
systems! Possible to devise an infinite
dimensional variant
27- Alternatively, the ground state can be found by
imaginary time evolution on a pure 2-D PEPS - This can be implemented by Trotterization the
crucial ingredient is again the variational
dimensional reduction the computational cost
scales linearly in the number of spins D10 - The same algorithm can of course be used for
real-time evolution and for finding thermal
states. - Dynamical correlation functions can be calculated
as in the 1-D PEPS case - We have done simulations with the Heisenberg
antiferromagnetic interaction and a frustrated
version of it on 44, 1010 and 2020 - We used bonds of dimension 2,3,4 the error seems
to decay exponentially in D - Note that we get mean field if D1
- The number of variational parameters scales as
ND4 and we expect the same accuracy as 1-D DMRG
with dimension of bonds D2
2810x10
20x20
4x4
4x4 36.623 10x10 2.353 (D2) 2.473
(D3) 20x20 2.440 (D2) 2.560 (D3)
29Wilsons RG on the level of states
Coarse-graining PEPS
- Goal coarse-graining of PEPS-ground states
- This can be done exactly, and leads to a fixed
point exponentially fast the fixed points are
scale-invariant. This procedure is equivalent to
Wilsons numerical RG procedure - The fixed point of the generic case consists of
the virtual subsystems becoming real, and where
the ME-states are replaced with states with some
entropy determined by the eigenvectors of the
transfer matrix note that no correlations are
present - A complete classification of fixed points in case
of qubit bonds has been made special cases
correspond to GHZ, W, cluster and some other
exotic states in QIT
30Conclusion
- PEPS give a simple parameterization of
multiparticle entanglement in terms of bipartite
entanglement and projectors - Examples of PEPS Stabilizer, cluster, GHZ-states
- QIT-approach allows to generalize numerical RG
and DMRG methods to different settings, most
notably to higher dimensions