Institutional Review Board for Human Subject Research: Does Your Research Need One? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

Institutional Review Board for Human Subject Research: Does Your Research Need One?

Description:

Institutional Review Board for Human Subject Research: Does Your Research Need One? Merle Rosenzweig oriley_at_umich.edu Michael Unsworth unsworth_at_msu.edu – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:419
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: Merl52
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Institutional Review Board for Human Subject Research: Does Your Research Need One?


1
Institutional Review Board for Human Subject
Research Does Your Research Need One?
  • Merle Rosenzweigoriley_at_umich.edu
  • Michael Unsworth
  • unsworth_at_msu.edu

2
OUTLINE
  • IRB Background
  • ?Definitions Concepts
  • ?History matter of ethics
  • ?IRB process
  • Case Studies

3
Definitions Concepts
4
Institutional Review Board (IRB)
  • A group that reviews and approves any type of
    research to protect the people who take part in
    it.
  • IRBs check to see that the research is well
    designed, legal, ethical, does not involve
    unneccesary risks, and includes safeguards for
    people taking part.

5
AS DEFINED BY FEDERAL REGULATIONS
6
  • A systematic investigation, including research
    development, testing and evaluation, designed to
    develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge.
  • Studies that involve interviews, follow-up
    contact to determine the effectiveness of a
    program.
  • Marketing surveys and surveys to assess user
    satisfaction often do not require IRB review and
    approval because contracts with member groups
    specifically allow members to be contacted
    without such approval and because these surveys
    do not contribute to generalizable knowledge.
  • If information from a project will be published
    in a scientific journal or presented at a
    scientific meeting, the project is considered
    research by the federal definition and requires
    IRB review and approval. Publication or
    presentation implies an intention to contribute
    to generalizable knowledge. Additionally, many
    medical journals require documentation of review
    by a human subjects committee as a condition of
    publication.

7
Human Subjects Research Involves
  • Wide variety of biomedical and clinical research
  • Behavioral research
  • Survey research

8
  • A fundamental ethical requirement in connection
    with research involving human subjects
  • A basic principle of respect for persons
  • Respect for persons requires that subjects, to
    the degree they are capable, be given the
    opportunity to choose what shall or shall not
    happen to them

9
Most Research Receiving Federal Funding Must
Follow The Common Rule.(45 CFR 46)
  • Elements
  • ? requirements for assuring compliance by
    research institutions
  • ? requirements for researchers obtaining and
    documenting informed consent
  • ? requirements for Institutional Review Board
    (IRB) membership, function, operations, review of
    research, and record keeping.
  • ? additional protections for certain vulnerable
    research subjects-- pregnant women, prisoners,
    and children

10
IRBs Are the Result of 20th Century Research
Misconduct or Dilemmas
11
The IRB Process
12
  • Title of the Study
  • Principle Investigator ,Study Team Members
    (Roles,Conflict of Interest information,
    Credentials)
  • Project Summary
  • Estimated start and end dates
  • Performance Site(s) and Details
  • Research Design Objective, Specific
    Aim(s)/Hypothesis, Background Information,
    Interactions (e.g., information gathering,
    survey, interview, focus groups), Statistical
    Design
  • Benefits and Risks
  • Subject participation (number and age)
  • Recruitment (may include screening)
  • Informed Consent
  • Confidentiality/Security
  • Retention of Data

13
An IRB then reviews the application to insure
that
  • Risks to subjects are minimized.
  • Risks to subjects are reasonable in relation to
    anticipated benefits, if any.
  • Selection of subjects is equitable.
  • Informed consent will be sought from each
    prospective subject.
  • The possibility of coercion or undue influence is
    minimized.
  • Require that additional information be given to
    subjects when in the IRB's judgment the
    information would meaningfully add to protection
    of the rights and welfare of subjects.

14
IRBs are also responsible for ensuring that
members who review research have no conflicting
interest.
15
Research that meets the categories set forth by
the federal regulations (45 CFR 46) that expose
participants to no more than minimal risk.
16
Research limited to the following activities may
qualify for an exemption determination by an IRB
  • Studying educational methods
  • Interviewing public figures
  • Use of publicly available data sets
  • Use of existing data and/or specimens stripped of
    identifiers

17
HOW AN IRB DETERMINES AN EXEMPTION
18
TO GET AN IRB EXEMPTION, ONE MUST STILL DO A LOT
OF PAPERWORK!
19
CONCLUSIONACCEPT THE IRP PROCEDURESAS PART OF
THE RESEARCH PROCESSAND FOLLOW THEM
20
CASE STUDIES
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com