Research Integrity - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

Research Integrity

Description:

Research Integrity & Ethics Training (RIET) for Engineering Faculty Postgraduate Research (PGR) Students Facilitator: Genevieve Gorrell g.gorrell_at_sheffield.ac.uk – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:183
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: Genev54
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Research Integrity


1
Research Integrity Ethics Training (RIET)for
Engineering Faculty Postgraduate Research (PGR)
Students
  • Facilitator Genevieve Gorrell
  • g.gorrell_at_sheffield.ac.uk

2
Summary of the Course
  • Opening lecture
  • 3 discussion-based seminars
  • Monday February 13th from 10am to 12pm
  • Monday March 5th from 10am to 12pm
  • Monday April 2nd from 10am to 12pm
  • There will be a final seminar (Faculty of
    Engineering RIET Day) with all departments
  • Then you will complete the assessment form.

3
About the Course
  • Ethics are a personal choice, and so this course
    is not about teaching ethics!
  • It is about developing our viewpoint through
    debating with othersso we can become thoughtful
    practicioners.
  • So this is not a taught courseI am here to
    facilitate only.
  • You must research and debate the topics yourself.
  • (That said, I will give a couple of slides today
    to try to help things along a bit!)

4
Why Behave Ethically?
  • People's perspectives on ethics vary, e.g.
  • Utilitarianthe greatest good for the greatest
    number
  • Human Rightseveryone is entitled to certain
    privileges
  • Justice and fairness
  • Personal virtueit benefits the individual to
    develop their integrity
  • Religious dictatesthe will of God.
  • Reasons for behaving ethically affect a person's
    perception of what is the right thing to do.

5
Kohlberg's Stages of Moral Development
  • Kohlberg postulates that morality falls into
    identifiable developmental stages
  • Level 1Pre-Conventional
  • 1How can I avoid punishment
  • 2Self-interestwhat's in it for me?
  • Level 2Conventional
  • 3I should conform to expectations
  • 4Others should conform to expectations
  • Level 3Post-Conventional
  • 5Social contractthe system is there to serve us
  • 6Universal ethical principlese.g. inner drive
    to treat others well, ethics grounded in
    compassion

6
KohlbergIllustrative example
  • It's not what you do but why you do it
  • Should I report false results in my thesis?
  • Stage 1--No because I might get caught
  • Stage 2--Yes because then I will pass
  • Stage 3--No because that would mean I am bad
  • Stage 4--No because it is against the rules
  • Stage 5--No because other people have a right to
    expect the truth in scientific publications or
    yes because I deserve to pass and this is only a
    small thing.
  • Stage 6--No because truth is integral to science

7
Seminar 1
  • In the first seminar we discussed a variety of
    ethical dilemmas
  • Use of personal data without consent
  • Data may be publicly availabledoes that make it
    okay to use it?
  • Data may be used for scientific advancedoes that
    make it okay to use it?
  • However, authorities may abuse the technology in
    the form of a police state
  • Misuse of scientific findingsto what extent are
    we responsible for how our work is used?
  • For example, media frequently misrepresent
    findings to create sensational stories or in
    order to simplify
  • This can cause damaging results

8
Seminar 2
  • In this seminar, we will form work groups to
    prepare topics in more depth
  • In the third seminar we will give presentations
    of our topics
  • A group will be chosen to represent us at the
    RIET day
  • At the RIET day, the chosen group will present
    their topic

9
Lets Introduce Ourselves
  • What is your name?
  • What do you work on?
  • What do you hope to get out of the course?
  • What ideas do you have about a topic you might
    like to focus on?

10
In this Session
  • We will split into groups who want to work on
    similar topic areas
  • Each group should define the central question of
    their topic choice
  • E.g. should the department accept military
    funding?
  • Discuss the salient aspects and possible
    viewpoints for the topic for the rest of the
    session. Take notes!
  • At the end of the session we will report back on
    our topic choices and how the discussion went.

11
Some Points to Consider
  • What is the central question in the topic?
  • What are the relevant aspects?
  • Argue both sides of the case
  • For each side of the case, who is hurt by it?
  • In what way might different moral standpoints
    dictate a different response?
  • In what way might different circumstances dictate
    a different response?

12
Seminar 3
  • Each group should prepare a 20 minute
    presentation of their topic for Seminar 3
  • Each group will take a turn to present and the
    rest of the group will comment on their
    presentation
  • A group will then be chosen to present a 10
    minute version of their presentation at the RIET
    day
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com