Title: Welcome to the California ACDIS Chapter
1Welcome to the California ACDIS Chapter
2PEPPER Basics
- Cheryl Ericson, MS, RN, CCDS, CDIP
- Associate Director of Education, ACDIS
- CDI Education Director, HCPro
- cericson_at_hcpro.com
3Hot Topics for Organizations
- Although there are many different government
audits Program for Evaluating Payment Patterns
Electronic Report (PEPPER) provides an
organization with foresight into potential
vulnerabilities that can result in denied claims
and recoupment - The data is based on paid Medicare claims for a
particular organization - Allows STAC version is a comparison across all
paid MS-DRGs for a particular period of time
4Hospital Vulnerability/Accountability
- An article in Healthcare Highlights quotes Asst.
U.S. Attorney Robert Trusiak - If hospitals receive PEPPER data information
that their billing is way out of line, the
government expects them to act on it. . . When
hospitals are outliers in a risk area, they are
expected to audit medical records and find out if
theres a compliance problem or a reasonable
explanation. . . - Failure to review PEPPER data can be interpreted
as reckless disregard or deliberate ignorance in
a False Claims Act case - Some Compliance Programs May Fail to Reduce the
Risk of False Claims, Sept. 27, 2011 Wolters
Kluwer Law Businesses
5What is PEPPER?
- A free resource released quarterly for short-term
acute care hospitals through QualityNet - Access is restricted to QualityNet
- Identify your facilitys administrator
- An annual version is available for other
healthcare entities that may be direct mailed - Long term acute care hospitals (LTAC)
- Critical access hospitals
- Inpatient psychiatric facilities
- Inpatient rehabilitation facilities
6
6PEPPER Basics
- Provides a quarterly analysis of
hospital-specific Medicare inpatient claims
(MS-DRG) that are vulnerable to improper payment - Potential overpayments
- Potential underpayments
- Official website for information, training and
support - http//www.pepperresources.org/
7Definitions Page
- The MS-DRG target areas included in PEPPER are
defined on this page and generally fall into one
of two categories - Coding-focused
- MS-DRG assignment
- CC/MCC capture rates
- Medical Necessity
- Short stay (one or two days) admissions
- Readmissions
- Top one day stays medical DRGs
- Top one day stays surgical DRGs
8Our Focus is Coding Targets
- Reported as percentages ()
- The numerator (top number) consists of those
discharges prone to MS-DRG coding errors - The denominator (bottom number) includes the
numerator MS-DRGs as well as the MS-DRGs to which
the claim is often reassigned - Numerator
- Denominator
9Target Area Definition
- Are cases being inaccurately assigned to the
higher weighted respiratory infections (MS-DRG
177 178) compared to simple pneumonia (MS-DRG
193, 194, 195)? - MS-DRG 177 178
- MS-DRG 177, 178, 179 193, 194, 195
10PEPPER Interpretation
- The percentage of cases and/or volume of cases
within each target area are the basis for
comparison across organizations within . . . - Medicare Administrative Contractor (MAC)
- The same state as the organization
- The United States
- The value of these comparisons will vary with the
type of organization - State comparison may not be as relevant to
flagship organizations as community hospitals
11Percentile by Comparison Group
12Compare Page Data
- The volume of discharges for each target
- The percent () of cases for each target based on
the target definition - How each target ranks by percentile in comparison
to other organizations - Jurisdiction, state and the Nation
- A percentile is not the same as percentage as
it is a ranking value not on a scale of 0 to 100 - Associated total value () of the paid claims
(sum of payments)
13Vulnerability
- Best practice is to review a sample of claims
whenever the organization is a high outlier or
when there is a sudden spike in the volume of
cases within a particular target area - Verify the accuracy of DRG assignment
- Rebill overpayments whenever they are discovered
- Not limited to 60 days to rebill and overpayment
14PEPPER Basics
- Identification of outliers
- Comparison with other facilities in the U.S. with
paid MS-DRGs for the same time period - Thresholds at the 80th and 20th percentile
- High outliers are above the 80th percentile
- May result in overpayments
- Low outliers are below the 20th percentile
- May result in underpayments
- May benefit from CDI implementation or refresh
15Identifying Risk Areas at a Glance
16High Outlier Ranking Report
17Basic PEPPER Review for CDI
- A common metric of success for CDI departments is
CC/MCC capture rate - One of the basic reviews using PEPPER data is
monitoring the trends associated with CC/MCC
capture rates - The measure of single CC or MCC can also be
significant depending on the mission of the CDI
department - A high volume of cases with a single CC or MCC
can impact mortality index and increase
vulnerability to denials
18Basic PEPPER Review for CDI
19CC/MCC Capture for Medical DRGs
This is a positive trend and potentially shows
the positive impact of a CDI department
20CC/MCC Capture for Surgical DRGs
- This is a flat or potentially negative trend,
but is very low compared to the medical capture
rate - Suggests opportunities for CDI
21Evaluating Specific Targets
- A more in-depth review of PEPPER data from a CDI
perspective would involve analysis within
specific coding target areas - If multiple high outliers the sum of payment
column can be used to prioritize target areas
based upon amount of money at risk of recoupment
22Sum of Payments within a Target
23Sum of Payments within a Target
- To prioritize cases focus on the cost per case at
risk rather than the total dollars at risk - Both stroke and simple pneumonia are high
outliers the value of each is as follows - Stroke 308,646/35 cases 8,818 each
- Simple pneumonia 224,829/29 7,753 each
24Evaluating Specific Targets
- Can indicate opportunities of improvement
- Pneumonia can be the principal diagnosis in two
different MS-DRGs - Simple pneumonia cases can often be treated in
the outpatient setting - A high volume of simple pneumonia cases is often
a documentation issue - Pneumonia, unspecified (486) as the Pdx
25Sum of Payments within a Target
26Respiratory Infections
27Simple Pneumonia
28Evaluating Specific Targets
- Can indicate areas of vulnerabilities
- Perform internal monitoring of the accuracy of
coding - Compare to volume of TIA cases
- Is the organization a destination for stoke
patients?
29Stroke Graph
30(No Transcript)
31Not Enough Cases to Graph
32Summary
- PEPPER data can indicate possible opportunities
or vulnerabilities - CDI can demonstrate impact by influencing coding
targets beyond CC/MCC capture - Conduct internal audits to ensure
coding/documentation accuracy when a high outlier
and/or approaching high outlier status - Ignorance is not a defense to false claims charges
33Thank you. Questions?