Welcome to the California ACDIS Chapter - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 33
About This Presentation
Title:

Welcome to the California ACDIS Chapter

Description:

WELCOME TO THE CALIFORNIA ACDIS CHAPTER Move Donna to here?? Cheryl comment # * PEPPER BASICS Cheryl Ericson, MS, RN, CCDS, CDIP Associate Director of Education ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:95
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 34
Provided by: AnnMa46
Learn more at: https://acdis.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Welcome to the California ACDIS Chapter


1
Welcome to the California ACDIS Chapter
2
PEPPER Basics
  • Cheryl Ericson, MS, RN, CCDS, CDIP
  • Associate Director of Education, ACDIS
  • CDI Education Director, HCPro
  • cericson_at_hcpro.com

3
Hot Topics for Organizations
  • Although there are many different government
    audits Program for Evaluating Payment Patterns
    Electronic Report (PEPPER) provides an
    organization with foresight into potential
    vulnerabilities that can result in denied claims
    and recoupment
  • The data is based on paid Medicare claims for a
    particular organization
  • Allows STAC version is a comparison across all
    paid MS-DRGs for a particular period of time

4
Hospital Vulnerability/Accountability
  • An article in Healthcare Highlights quotes Asst.
    U.S. Attorney Robert Trusiak
  • If hospitals receive PEPPER data information
    that their billing is way out of line, the
    government expects them to act on it. . . When
    hospitals are outliers in a risk area, they are
    expected to audit medical records and find out if
    theres a compliance problem or a reasonable
    explanation. . .
  • Failure to review PEPPER data can be interpreted
    as reckless disregard or deliberate ignorance in
    a False Claims Act case
  • Some Compliance Programs May Fail to Reduce the
    Risk of False Claims, Sept. 27, 2011 Wolters
    Kluwer Law Businesses

5
What is PEPPER?
  • A free resource released quarterly for short-term
    acute care hospitals through QualityNet
  • Access is restricted to QualityNet
  • Identify your facilitys administrator
  • An annual version is available for other
    healthcare entities that may be direct mailed
  • Long term acute care hospitals (LTAC)
  • Critical access hospitals
  • Inpatient psychiatric facilities
  • Inpatient rehabilitation facilities

6
6
PEPPER Basics
  • Provides a quarterly analysis of
    hospital-specific Medicare inpatient claims
    (MS-DRG) that are vulnerable to improper payment
  • Potential overpayments
  • Potential underpayments
  • Official website for information, training and
    support
  • http//www.pepperresources.org/

7
Definitions Page
  • The MS-DRG target areas included in PEPPER are
    defined on this page and generally fall into one
    of two categories
  • Coding-focused
  • MS-DRG assignment
  • CC/MCC capture rates
  • Medical Necessity
  • Short stay (one or two days) admissions
  • Readmissions
  • Top one day stays medical DRGs
  • Top one day stays surgical DRGs

8
Our Focus is Coding Targets
  • Reported as percentages ()
  • The numerator (top number) consists of those
    discharges prone to MS-DRG coding errors
  • The denominator (bottom number) includes the
    numerator MS-DRGs as well as the MS-DRGs to which
    the claim is often reassigned
  • Numerator
  • Denominator

9
Target Area Definition
  • Are cases being inaccurately assigned to the
    higher weighted respiratory infections (MS-DRG
    177 178) compared to simple pneumonia (MS-DRG
    193, 194, 195)?
  • MS-DRG 177 178
  • MS-DRG 177, 178, 179 193, 194, 195

10
PEPPER Interpretation
  • The percentage of cases and/or volume of cases
    within each target area are the basis for
    comparison across organizations within . . .
  • Medicare Administrative Contractor (MAC)
  • The same state as the organization
  • The United States
  • The value of these comparisons will vary with the
    type of organization
  • State comparison may not be as relevant to
    flagship organizations as community hospitals

11
Percentile by Comparison Group
12
Compare Page Data
  • The volume of discharges for each target
  • The percent () of cases for each target based on
    the target definition
  • How each target ranks by percentile in comparison
    to other organizations
  • Jurisdiction, state and the Nation
  • A percentile is not the same as percentage as
    it is a ranking value not on a scale of 0 to 100
  • Associated total value () of the paid claims
    (sum of payments)

13
Vulnerability
  • Best practice is to review a sample of claims
    whenever the organization is a high outlier or
    when there is a sudden spike in the volume of
    cases within a particular target area
  • Verify the accuracy of DRG assignment
  • Rebill overpayments whenever they are discovered
  • Not limited to 60 days to rebill and overpayment

14
PEPPER Basics
  • Identification of outliers
  • Comparison with other facilities in the U.S. with
    paid MS-DRGs for the same time period
  • Thresholds at the 80th and 20th percentile
  • High outliers are above the 80th percentile
  • May result in overpayments
  • Low outliers are below the 20th percentile
  • May result in underpayments
  • May benefit from CDI implementation or refresh

15
Identifying Risk Areas at a Glance
16
High Outlier Ranking Report
17
Basic PEPPER Review for CDI
  • A common metric of success for CDI departments is
    CC/MCC capture rate
  • One of the basic reviews using PEPPER data is
    monitoring the trends associated with CC/MCC
    capture rates
  • The measure of single CC or MCC can also be
    significant depending on the mission of the CDI
    department
  • A high volume of cases with a single CC or MCC
    can impact mortality index and increase
    vulnerability to denials

18
Basic PEPPER Review for CDI
19
CC/MCC Capture for Medical DRGs
This is a positive trend and potentially shows
the positive impact of a CDI department
20
CC/MCC Capture for Surgical DRGs
  • This is a flat or potentially negative trend,
    but is very low compared to the medical capture
    rate
  • Suggests opportunities for CDI

21
Evaluating Specific Targets
  • A more in-depth review of PEPPER data from a CDI
    perspective would involve analysis within
    specific coding target areas
  • If multiple high outliers the sum of payment
    column can be used to prioritize target areas
    based upon amount of money at risk of recoupment

22
Sum of Payments within a Target
23
Sum of Payments within a Target
  • To prioritize cases focus on the cost per case at
    risk rather than the total dollars at risk
  • Both stroke and simple pneumonia are high
    outliers the value of each is as follows
  • Stroke 308,646/35 cases 8,818 each
  • Simple pneumonia 224,829/29 7,753 each

24
Evaluating Specific Targets
  • Can indicate opportunities of improvement
  • Pneumonia can be the principal diagnosis in two
    different MS-DRGs
  • Simple pneumonia cases can often be treated in
    the outpatient setting
  • A high volume of simple pneumonia cases is often
    a documentation issue
  • Pneumonia, unspecified (486) as the Pdx

25
Sum of Payments within a Target
26
Respiratory Infections
27
Simple Pneumonia
28
Evaluating Specific Targets
  • Can indicate areas of vulnerabilities
  • Perform internal monitoring of the accuracy of
    coding
  • Compare to volume of TIA cases
  • Is the organization a destination for stoke
    patients?

29
Stroke Graph
30
(No Transcript)
31
Not Enough Cases to Graph
32
Summary
  • PEPPER data can indicate possible opportunities
    or vulnerabilities
  • CDI can demonstrate impact by influencing coding
    targets beyond CC/MCC capture
  • Conduct internal audits to ensure
    coding/documentation accuracy when a high outlier
    and/or approaching high outlier status
  • Ignorance is not a defense to false claims charges

33
Thank you. Questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com