Confirmatory and differential diagnostic tests after positive screening results - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 41
About This Presentation
Title:

Confirmatory and differential diagnostic tests after positive screening results

Description:

Title: 1. dia Author: Monostori P ter Last modified by: karg Created Date: 1/2/2005 4:05:12 PM Document presentation format: Diavet t s a k perny re – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:52
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 42
Provided by: Mono97
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Confirmatory and differential diagnostic tests after positive screening results


1
Confirmatory and differential diagnostic tests
after positive screening results
  • Péter Monostori, PhD
  • Neonatal Screening Laboratory, Department of
    Pediatrics, University of Szeged

2
Primary screening tests
  • Routine primary screening methods are designed to
    identify as many abnormal infants as possible.
  • Therefore, diagnostic sensitivity (low number of
    false-negative results) is more important than
    diagnostic specificity (to have few
    false-positive results)
  • This approach exponentially increases the number
    of false-positive test results as more disorders
    are included in screening.
  • Obtaining another blood sample to confirm/exclude
    the disorder is a valid choice but is not always
    necessary

3
The problem with repeated sampling
  • The newly obtained samples require additional
    work.
  • The cost of the screening program is increased.
  • Repeated sampling causes stress and anxiety in
    the families
  • infants with false-positive screening results are
    more often hospitalized than healthy children
    with normal screening results
  • families subjected to false-positive newborn
    screening results are at higher risk of
    developing dysfunctional parent-child
    relationships

4
How to address this issue?
  • The aim is therefore to improve diagnostic
    specificity (decrease the number of
    false-positive results) without reducing
    diagnostic sensitivity
  • Inclusion of secondary criteria, such as ratios
  • C3/C2 for propionic/methylmalonic acidemia etc.
  • Good interpretation of the results in view of
    the clinical status (prematurity etc.), drugs,
    nutrition
  • Second-tier tests

5
Second-tier tests What are these?
  • More specific for the diagnostic compound than
    the primary screening method and/or
  • Measure additional metabolites
  • Use the same sample (e.g. dried blood spot, DBS)
  • there is no need to obtain a new sample
  • Utility
  • support or exclude the diagnosis suggested by the
    primary test
  • differentiate between disorders (differential
    diagnosis)

6
Second-tier tests
  • Then why dont we use these as primary tests?
  • Limitations
  • lower sample throughput
  • greater complexity
  • longer analysis time
  • higher cost

7
Second-tier tests
  • Biochemical tests (mainly MS/MS)
  • Enzyme activity measurements
  • Molecular genetic tests

8
Second-tier tests Examples
  1. Congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH)
  2. Phenylketonuria (PKU)
  3. Propionic acidemia (PA), methylmalonic acidemia
    (MMA) with/without homocystinuria (HCYS)
  4. Tyrosinemia type I (Tyr I)
  5. Galactosemia
  6. Isovaleric acidemia (IVA)
  7. Maple syrup urine disease (MSUD)

9
1. Congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH)
10
First-tier tests for CAH
  • First-tier screening tests for CAH use
    immunoassays to measure 17-hydroxy-progesterone
    (17-OHP) levels in DBS
  • Dissociation-enhanced, lanthanide fluorescence
    immunoassay (DELFIA) is almost exclusively used
  • However, the positive predictive value for
    first-tier screening of CAH is generally about
    1.

11
Limitations of first-tier screening of CAH
  • First, the antibodies used in the immunoassays
    cross-react with other steroids, particularly
    17-hydroxypregnenolone.
  • Second, 17-OHP levels are normally high at birth
    and decrease rapidly during the first few days.
    By contrast, 17-OHP levels increase over time in
    newborn babies with CAH. Thus, diagnostic
    accuracy is poor in the first 2 days.
  • Third, newborn girls have lower 17-OHP levels
    than newborn boys (sensitivity of screening for
    CAH in girls is lower).
  • Fourth, premature, sick or stressed babies tend
    to have higher levels of 17-OHP.
  • most laboratories use a series of (birth weight-
    or) gestational age-adjusted threshold values
  • Fifth, antenatal corticosteroids administered to
    mothers at risk of preterm delivery might reduce
    17-OHP levels (false-negative test results ?).
  • Finally, neonatal screening identifies only few
    babies with mild, nonclassic CAH.

12
Second-tier tests for CAH Biochemical assays
  • Direct analysis of steroid levels by LC-MS/MS
    from DBS is used as second-tier tests.
  • This assay does not only determine 17-OHP as a
    direct substrate for 21-hydroxylase, but also
    cortisol (a downstream product of this enzymes
    reaction) and other steroids.
  • The run times for individual samples in most
    LC-MS/MS assays are generally 6-12 min, which
    would be too long for a first-tier screen.

13
Second-tier tests for CAH Biochemical assays
  • Appropriately selected ratios of the steroids can
    further improve the specificity of LC-MS/MS.
  • The rationale for using ratios with cortisol
  • newborns under stress have high cortisol levels
    with secondary accumulation of 17-OHP
  • in CAH patients, cortisol levels are relatively
    low
  • Ratio No. 1
  • (17-OHPandrostenedione)/cortisol
  • androstenedione is only secondarily increased in
    CAH (indirectly due to the deficiency of
    21-hydroxylase)
  • Ratio No. 2
  • (17-OHP21-deoxycortisol)/cortisol
  • 21-deoxycortisol is highly specific for
    21-hydroxylase deficiency

14
Second-tier tests for CAH Molecular genetic
assays
  • CYP21A2 mutations can be detected in DNA samples
    extracted from the same DBS used for primary
    screening.
  • However, this approach is not comprehensive
  • CAH is a genetically heterogenous disorder
  • not all mutations can be reliably detected in a
    screening setting
  • LC-MS/MS is less costly and time-consuming than
    genotyping

15
A novel biochemical assay as a first-tier test
for CAH
  • As shown earlier, the run times for individual
    samples in most LC-MS/MS assays are generally
    6-12 min, which would be too long for a
    first-tier screen.
  • Exception a US laboratory (Manitoba) developed
    an LC-MS/MS assay using a modified instrument for
    first-tier screening (turbo-?ow chromatography
    coupled to LC-MS/MS)
  • rapid determination of 17-OHP, androstenedione
    and cortisol
  • no false-positives so far

16
Improvement of the specificity for CAH screening
(Mayo Clinic, USA)
17
2. Phenylketonuria (PKU)
GTP cyclohydrolase (GTPCH)
6-Pyruvoyl-tetrahydrobiopterin synthase (PTPS)
Sepiapterin reductase (SR)
Dihydropteridine reductase (DHPR)
Phenylalanine hydroxylase (PAH)
q-Dihydrobiopterin
Pterin-4a-carbinolamine dehydratase (PCD)
18
First-tier tests for PKU
  • First-tier screening tests for PKU determine
    phenylalanine (Phe) levels in DBS. With MS/MS,
    tyrosine levels and Phe/Tyr ratios are also
    obtained.
  • A positive screening result is generally
    sufficient to conclude that some form of
    hyperphenylalaninemia (PKU, transient
    hyperphenylalaninemia or tetrahydrobiopterin
    (BH4) deficiency) is present.
  • For differential diagnosis
  • Phe and BH4 loading test,
  • pterin profile analysis (from urine or DBS),
  • dihydropteridine reductase (DHPR) activity
    measurement (from DBS) should be performed

19
Differential diagnosis of BH4 deficiencies
  • BH4 loading test
  • useful in all forms of BH4 deficiency
  • a 24 h Phe loading test is recommended
    previously, especially if the basal Phe level is
    low (e.g. lt 360 µM)
  • single Phe dose plus a single BH4 dose 3 h later
  • blood sampling -3 0 4 8 12 16 24 h
  • Pterin profile analysis (neopterin, biopterin and
    pterin)
  • sample DBS or urine (random urine specimen dried
    on filter paper is better than liquid urine, as
    pterins are very unstable)
  • HPLC plus fluorescent detection or MS/MS
  • DHPR activity measurement from DBS
  • spectrophotometry

20
Pterin levels and DHPR activity in variants of
BH4 deficiency
Phe (plasma) Biopterin (urine) Neopterin (urine) DHPR activity (blood) Homovanillic acid (HVA, liquor) 5-hydroxy-indoleacetic acid (5-HIAA, liquor)
GTPCH1 (recessive) ? ? ? N ? ?
GTPCH1 (dominant) N N (? in liquor) N (? in liquor) N ? N/?
PTPS ? ? ? N ? ?
PCD ? ? N/ ? primapterin N N N
DHPR ? ? N ? ? ?
SR N N (? in liquor) N (? liquor sepiapterin) N ? ?
21
3. Propionic acidemia (PA), methylmalonic
acidemia (MMA) with/without homocystinuria (HCYS)
22
First-tier tests for PA, MMA and MMAHCYS
  • First-tier screening tests for PA and MMA measure
    propionylcarnitine (C3) levels and C3/C2 ratios
    in DBS with MS/MS (in MMA, C4DC may also be
    increased). For MMAHCYS (caused by defective
    cobalamine metabolism Cbl C, Cbl D), elevated C3
    and C3/C2, plus decreased methionine levels may
    be suggestive.
  • C3 is frequently responsible for false-positive
    results in newborn screening
  • dietary deficiency of vitamin B12 (newborn or
    mother), prematurity, jaundice (hyperbilirubinemia
    )
  • ratios and/or second-tier tests are used

23
Second-tier tests for PA, MMA and MMAHCYS
  • The simultaneous determination of methylmalonate,
    methylcitrate and homocysteine in DBS by means of
    LC-MS/MS allows confirmation and differential
    diagnosis of the disorders (in some laboratories,
    3-hydroxypropionate is assayed instead of
    methylcitrate)

Initial screening Initial screening Second-tier test Second-tier test Second-tier test
C3 Met methyl-malonate methyl-citrate homo-cysteine
PA ?? N N ?? N
MMA ?-?? N ?? ? N
MMAHCYS ? ? ? N ?
24
Testing algorithm for PA, MMA and MMAHCYS (Mayo
Clinic, USA)
25
4. Tyrosinemia type I (Tyr I)
26
First-tier tests for Tyr I
  • First-tier screening tests for tyrosinemias
    detect tyrosine levels in DBS with MS/MS.
  • Tyrosine elevation is not specific for Tyr I (in
    fact, tyrosine is generally higher in Tyr II and
    III).
  • Tyrosine levels in babies with Tyr I can be
    relatively low during the first few days of life.
  • Tyrosine elevation is most often associated with
    benign transient tyrosinemia or an increased
    protein uptake.

27
Second-tier test for Tyr I
  • Succinylacetone (SA, SUAC) is a specific marker
    for Tyr I.
  • Succinylacetone in DBS can be measured in a
    second-tier test or as a routine primary screen,
    both by means of MS/MS.

28
Testing algorithm for Tyr I (Mayo Clinic, USA)
29
5. Galactosemia
30
Galactosemia
  • First-tier screening tests for galactosemia
    generally use assays to measure galactose plus
    galactose-1-phosphate levels in DBS (enzymatic
    test)
  • the microbiological (Guthrie-)test measures
    galactose only.
  • However, a positive screening result can also be
    caused by a portosystemic (liver) shunt or liver
    dysfunction.
  • Therefore, newborns with abnormal screening
    results should be further tested with
    confirmatory assays.

31
Second-tier tests for galactosemia
  • Beutler-test enzymatic assay for confirmation of
    galactose-1-phosphate uridyltransferase
    deficiency (GALT, classic galactosemia) in whole
    blood
  • Multiplex enzyme assay using UPLC-MS/MS in DBS
    simultaneous determination of all three enzymes
    in galactose degradation

32
6. Isovaleric acidemia (IVA)
33
First-tier tests for IVA
  • First-tier screening tests for IVA measure
    isovalerylcarnitine (C5) levels in DBS with
    MS/MS.
  • However, a positive screening result may also be
    caused by increased 2-methylbutyrylcarnitine,
    valerylcarnitine and pivaloylcarnitine levels
    (these are not determined separately in routine
    MS/MS assays)
  • 2-methylbutyrylcarnitine may be indicative for
    Short/branched-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase
    (SBCAD) deficiency 2-methylbutyryl-CoA
    dehydrogenase deficiency
  • pivaloylcarnitine may be derived from
    pivalate-generating antibiotics (pivampicillin,
    pivmecillinam, cefditoren pivoxil, cefcapene
    pivoxil, cefteram pivoxil etc.) (pivalate
    esterification is used to improve absorption and
    oral bioavailability)

34
Second-tier tests for IVA
  • LC-MS/MS-based assay for the quantitative
    analysis of isovalerylglycine in DBS
  • the number of false-positive results is reduced

35
7. Maple syrup urine disease (MSUD)
36
First-tier tests for MSUD
  • Deficiency of the Branched-chain alfa-ketoacid
    dehydrogenase complex results in elevated levels
    of isoleucine (Ile), leucine (Leu), valine (Val),
    and allo-isoleucine (allo-Ile, a characteristic
    biomarker for MSUD).
  • However, first-tier screening tests with MS/MS
    cannot differentiate between the isomers of Leu,
    Ile, allo-Ile and hydroxyproline (OH-Pro).
  • Elevated levels may also be caused by parenteral
    nutrition.

37
Second-tier tests for MSUD
  • LC-MS/MS-based assay for the quantitative
    analysis of Val, Leu, Ile, allo-Ile and OH-Pro
  • the number of false-positive results is reduced

38
Testing algorithm for MSUD (Mayo Clinic, USA)
39
Summary
  • Second-tier tests support or exclude the
    diagnosis suggested by the primary screening
    test, and can help to differentiate between
    disorders.
  • They offer higher specificity than the primary
    test without the need to obtain a new sample,
    which
  • lowers the overall cost of the screening program
    and
  • decreases stress and anxiety caused by repeated
    sampling.
  • Second-tier tests are expected to become an
    essential part of the routine screening
    procedure.

40
Thank you for your attention!
41
References
  1. Matern D, Tortorelli S, Oglesbee D, Gavrilov D,
    Rinaldo P. Reduction of the false-positive rate
    in newborn screening by implementation of
    MS/MS-based second-tier tests the Mayo Clinic
    experience (2004-2007). J Inherit Metab Dis.
    2007 30 585-592.
  2. Lehotay DC, Hall P, Lepage J, Eichhorst JC, Etter
    ML, Greenberg CR. LC-MS/MS progress in newborn
    screening. Clin Biochem. 2011 44 21-31.
  3. Chace DH, Hannon WH. Impact of second-tier
    testing on the effectiveness of newborn
    screening. Clin Chem. 2010 56 1653-1655.
  4. Ko DH, Jun SH, Park KU, Song SH, Kim JQ, Song J.
    Newborn screening for galactosemia by a
    second-tier multiplex enzyme assay using
    UPLC-MS/MS in dried blood spots. J Inherit Metab
    Dis. 2011 34 409-414.
  5. Turgeon CT, Magera MJ, Cuthbert CD, Loken PR,
    Gavrilov DK, Tortorelli S, Raymond KM, Oglesbee
    D, Rinaldo P, Matern D. Determination of total
    homocysteine, methylmalonic acid, and
    2-methylcitric acid in dried blood spots by
    tandem mass spectrometry. Clin Chem. 2010 56
    1686-1695.
  6. Oglesbee D, Sanders KA, Lacey JM, Magera MJ,
    Casetta B, Strauss KA, Tortorelli S, Rinaldo P,
    Matern D. Second-tier test for quantification of
    alloisoleucine and branched-chain amino acids in
    dried blood spots to improve newborn screening
    for maple syrup urine disease (MSUD). Clin Chem.
    2008 54 542-549.
  1. Shigematsu Y, Hata I, Tajima G. Useful
    second-tier tests in expanded newborn screening
    of isovaleric acidemia and methylmalonic
    aciduria. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2010 33 (Suppl
    2) S283-288.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com