TWENTIETH CENTURY PHILOSOPHY: Intellectual Heroes and Key Themes - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

TWENTIETH CENTURY PHILOSOPHY: Intellectual Heroes and Key Themes

Description:

Title: CONCEPTUAL ANALYSIS Author: Rene Gabriels Last modified by: r.gabriels Created Date: 4/7/2003 7:27:08 PM Document presentation format: On-screen Show – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:134
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: ReneG150
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: TWENTIETH CENTURY PHILOSOPHY: Intellectual Heroes and Key Themes


1
TWENTIETH CENTURY PHILOSOPHY Intellectual
Heroes and Key Themes

2
LECTURES
  1. The limits of language.
  2. Death and authenticity.
  3. The great society.
  4. Making differences.
  5. Social hope.
  6. Communicative rationality.

3
MAKING DIFFERENCES
4
  • 1. DECONSTRUCTIVISM
  • How to read this world?
  • 2. HEARING AND SEEING
  • Why should one make a difference?
  • 3. JUSTICE AND FORGIVENESS
  • Is there a match between the conditional and
    the unconditional?

5
1. DECONSTRUCTIVISM
6
PROPER NAMES AND METAPHORS
  • Ludwig Wittgenstein draws the attention on the
    fact that the meaning of a word depends on its
    use in specific language-games.
  • Especially if one focuses on the meaning of
    proper names and metaphors it is fruitful to
    study language-games.
  • Proper names gt words that seem to refer to a
    clear-cut object (for instance the word
    Auschwitz), but in fact dont pinpoint its
    meaning.
  • Metaphors gt literally they are not truth, but
    they have a meaning (for instance if someone says
    René is a turtle!).

7
FILTERS AND BRIDGES
  • A metaphor fulfills at least two functions
  • 1. The function of a filter gt due to a metaphor
    some things come to the fore and others will
    t ake a back seat.
  • 2. The function of a bridge gt a metaphor
    connects in a subtle way is and ought, i.e.
    facts and values.
  • Dead metaphors gt words wit a literal meaning.
  • Is it possible to reanimate them?
  • Or is it ridiculous to suppose that they can die?
  • Jacques Derrida raises these kind of questions.

8
JACQUES DERRIDA
  • BIOGRAPHICAL DATA
  • 1930 Born July 15, in El-Bia (Algeria).
  • 1942 As Jew expelled from school.
  • 1952-1954 École Normale Superiéure.
  • 1967 An annus mirabilis because of the
    publication of three influential books.
  • 1965-1984 Professor of the history of philosophy
    at the École Normale Superiéure.
  • 1982 One of the founders of the Collège
    Internationale de Philosophie.
  • 1983 Director of Studies at the École des Hautes
    Études et Sciences Sociales.
  • 2001 Theodor W. Adorno Award.
  • 2002 A documentary on Derrida.
  • 2004 Died October 8, in Paris.

9
MAJOR WORKS
  • De la grammatologie (1967).
  • La Voix et le phénomène (1967).
  • Lécriture et la différence (1967).
  • Marges de la philosophie (1972).
  • Glas (1974).
  • La Carte postale. De Socrate à Freud et au-delà
    (1980).
  • Limited Inc (1990).
  • Sauf le nom (1993).
  • Les spectres de Marx (1993).
  • Force de loi. Le Fondement mystique de
    lautorité (1994).
  • Cosmopolites de tous les pays, encore un effort!
    (1997).
  • De lhospitalité (1997).
  • Philosophy in a time of terror. Diaglogues with
    Jürgen Habermas and Jacques Derrida (2003).
  • Rogues (2003).

10
PHILOSOPHICAL STYLE
  • Derrida discusses a subject often indirectly and
    mixes genres.
  • His style is more evocative than argumentative
    and more circular than linear.
  • Examples
  • - Glas gt two columns (Hegel and Genet).
  • - La Carte postale gt starts with love letters
    with no address.
  • Derrida wants to show the equivocality of a text.

11
NOTHING OUTSIDE THE TEXT
  • One of the most famous sentences of Derrida
    There is nothing outside the text (Il ny pas
    de hors-texte).
  • Texts are in the broadest sense of the word
    meaningful units.
  • Derrida depicts paintings, buildings and
    institutions also as texts, i.e. as meaningful
    units.
  • The meaning is not inherent to the text, but the
    result of reading it.
  • If one reads a text anew, one puts it into
    another context.
  • By putting a text into new contexts Derrida wants
    to generate new meanings.
  • Dissemination (dissémination) gt the process of
    dispersion in the course of which reading a text
    generates new meanings.

12
REITERATION AND DECONSTRUCTION
  • Reiterate gt putting (old) texts into new
    contexts.
  • Deconstructivism gt a way of criticizing texts and
    institutions that is neither negative, nor
    positive.
  • Aim to open texts up to alternative readings,
    i.e. to look for neglected elements in texts
    (especially the aporias).
  • Moral drive to render justice and to prevent the
    use of violence.
  • A deconstruction is always an intervention that
    changes the one way or the other the object of
    research.
  • Derrida wants to subvert a text by showing its
    limits.

13
A CRITIQUE OF WESTERN PHILOSOPHY
  • Metaphysics is one of the main objects of
    Derridas criticism.
  • Philosophical activity to subvert various binary
    oppositions that dominate different ways of
    thinking.
  • Binary oppositions reproduce hierarchies and
    forms of subordination.
  • An insistence upon the importance of the other,
    the marginal, that what is different.

14
HEURISTIC VALUE
  • Literary theory (Paul de Man amongst others).
  • Feminism (Judith Butler amongst others).
  • Architecture (Frank Gehry amongst others).
  • Cultural studies (Stuart Hall amongst others).
  • Philosophy (Christophe Menke amongst others).

15
2. HEARING AND SEEING
16
THE WRITTEN AND SPOKEN WORD
  • The most famous founding fathers of Christianity
    (Jezus) and philosophy (Socrates) have one thing
    in common gt they have never written a single
    word.
  • Western culture gt the denigration of the written
    word and the valorisation of the spoken word.
  • The spoken word gt purity and authenticity.
  • Whereas the spoken word directly refers to mental
    experiences, the written word does that
    indirectly.
  • Presupposition of the Western culture gt the
    spoken word is a symbol of mental experience and
    the written word is a symbol of the already
    existing symbol.

17
SIGNS OF SIGNS
  • Derrida criticizes the metaphysical idea that
    symbols that are part of the written language are
    parasitic to the symbols that are part of the
    spoken language.
  • Logocentrism metaphysics of the presence to
    oneself.
  • The written word is not a derivate of the spoken
    word.
  • Writing is not a sign of a sign, except if one
    says it of all signs, which would be more
    profoundly true.
  • Metaphysics freezes identities and doesnt do
    justice to differences.

18
IDENTITY AND DIFFERENCE
  • The difference between différance and différence
    is inaudible.
  • If one wants distinguish différance and
    différence one needs the written world.
  • In order to do justice to the ambiguity that is
    inherent to the spoken word one has to analyze
    the written word.
  • That implies reading texts in different
    directions, i.e. looking for their traces.

19
TRACES
  • Traces gt signs that are present, but refer at the
    same time to what is not present.
  • Derrida The (pure) trace is the différance.
  • Deconstructivism traces the relations between
    signs that are present and those that are not.
  • To trace something means showing the aporias gt
    irresolvable contradictions that cannot be
    reconciled.
  • Example the aporia of love.
  • If a person asks why he or she loves someone, he
    or she can give two kinds of answers that are not
    compatible.

20
THE APORIA OF LOVE
Central question Who do I love? What do I love?
Answer I love you because you are you I love you because of your qualities
Focus The singularity of a person The particular aspects of a person
Language Proper name Predicate
21
3. JUSTICE AND FORGIVENESS
22
THE DECONSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE
  • Justice can not be grasped, i.e. objectified.
  • One can only speak in an indirect way about
    justice.
  • The aporia of law and justice gt fixed rules
    versus unfixed morality.
  • The general and the particular gt application of
    the law to concrete issues.
  • Justice as a deconstruction of law gt show what
    particularly cannot be subsumed under a general
    judicial norm.

23
MESSIANISM
  • Messianism gt stories about the arrival of a hero
    (the Messiah) in the future.
  • The transfiguration of utopia.
  • There is often no clear description of the hero
    that will come.
  • Central question does the hero really comes?
  • Deconstruct various messianisms.
  • There is no identifiable other.

24
THE UNFORGIVABLE
  • Truth and reconciliation commissions gt about
    forgiveness.
  • Derrida argues that forgiveness isnt and
    shouldnt be normal.
  • The impossibility forgiving something that
    cannot be forgiven.
  • Derrida If one is only prepared to forgive what
    appears forgivable, what the church calls venial
    sin, then the very idea of forgiveness would
    disappear. If there is something to forgive, it
    would be what in religious language is called
    mortal sin, the worst, the unforgivable crime or
    harm. From which comes the aporia, which can be
    described in its dry and implacable formality,
    without mercy forgiveness forgives only the
    unforgivable.
  • The state cannot organize in a proper way the
    reconciliation.

25
PLURALITY
  • Because of globalisation and migration more
    people live in a plural world with different
    lifestyles and religions.
  • Two reactions
  • 1. Intolerance, xenophobia, racism.
  • 2. Tolerance, xenophilia, respectful
    integration of the other.

26
ANTISEMITISM
  • Derrida was a victim of anti-Semitism.
  • He lost his citizenship rights during the Second
    World War and had to leave the public school.
  • Relation between anti-Semitism and
    deconstructivism gt the fixation of a collective
    identity trigger people to oversee differences.
  • A deconstruction of such a collective identity
    creates space for the non-identical.

27
HOSPITALITY
  • The fixation of a collective identity frustrates
    the hospitality towards strangers.
  • Derrida gt hospitality is only possible when
    strangers are recognized in their irreducible
    difference.
  • Two forms of hospitality.
  • 1. Pure form of hospitality unconditional
    acceptance of the stranger.
  • 2. Impure form of hospitality the stranger is
    only welcome when he accepts certain conditions.
  • Hospitality has to be realized.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com