Quality of Life in Pediatric VAD- - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

Quality of Life in Pediatric VAD-

Description:

... in Children Bridged to Transplant with VADs No significant difference in QOL between 21 ... mobilization/ambulation, enteral nutrition, and ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:89
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: CHM71
Learn more at: https://www.uab.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Quality of Life in Pediatric VAD-


1
  • Quality of Life in Pediatric VAD-
  • How are we doing?
  • INTERMACS Eighth Annual Meeting
  • May 5, 2014

Karen Uzark, PhD, CPNP University of Michigan
Congenital Heart Center
2
Definitions
  • HEALTH not only the absence of disease and
    infirmity, but the presence of physical, mental,
    and social well-being
  • QUALITY OF LIFE the individuals perception
    of their position in life, in the context of
    culture and value systems in which they live and
    in relation to their goals, expectations,
    standards and concerns
  • Quality of Life ? Physical Health Status or
    Abilities
  • Quality of life cannot be simply inferred from
    clinical and laboratory findings or objective
    criteria.

1948 WHO
1991 WHO
3
Dimensions of Quality of Life
  • Physical functioning
  • (Disease state and physical symptoms)
  • Psychological/Emotional functioning
  • Social functioning
  • School/role functioning
  • (Neurodevelopmental functioning)

4
Ventricular Assist Devices Goals
  • Survival to Transplant or Recovery
  • Improved cardiac output
  • ? improvement in end-organ function
  • Physical rehabilitation
  • Extubation
  • Mobilization/Ambulation
  • Enteral nutrition
  • Neurological evaluation-rehabilitation
  • ? Improved psychosocial quality of life

5
Quality of Life (QOL) in Children Bridged to
Transplant with VADs
  • No significant difference in QOL between 21
    children who had VAD and 42 without VAD at a
    median of 4.2 years post-transplant (Ezon et
    al, J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014)
  • Limitations small sample size, wide age range,
    parent survey only, type of VAD support varied,
    survivor bias
  • Children who required VAD/ECMO (n26) reported
    QOL similar to children without MCS (n58) at a
    median of 3 years post transplant (Wray et al,
    J Heart Lung Transplant 2012)
  • Limitations small sample size, wide age range,
    CHD dx exclusion, type of support varied, parent
    survey in younger patients, survivor bias
  • Longer period of heart failure in MCS was
    associated with poorer child ratings of social
    QOL.

6
Experience of Children with VAD as Bridge to
Transplant
  • Qualitative study with semi-structured interviews
    with children (n4) over 13 years old.
  • Child responses Frightened, scared of clots and
    strokes, appreciative/relieved (would die
    without it)
  • Not prepared for big washing machine, big
    hoses.
  • Gilmore and Newall, Pediatr Cardiol 2011.

7

PediMACS QOL indicators
8
PedsQL
9
VAD-specific QOL
10
Peds QL and VAD Qol Completion Statusfor
Parents/Children by Patient Age
Pre-Implant
  N PedsQL - Child PedsQL - Child PedsQL - Parent PedsQL - Parent PedsOL - either PedsOL - either
  N Completed Completed Completed
Age at Follow-Up (24) N/A N/A 0 0.0 0 0.0
lt2 years (24) N/A N/A 0 0.0 0 0.0
2-4 years 11 N/A N/A 1 9.1 1 9.1
5-7 years 9 0 0.0 1 11 1 11
8-12 years 31 2 6.5 7 23 7 23
13-18 years 38 6 16 10 26 10 26
TOTAL 113 8/78 (10) 19 17 19 17
21 excluding lt2 years
11
Peds QL and VAD Qol Completion Statusfor
Parents/Children by Patient Age
3 month Follow-up
  N Peds QL - Child Peds QL - Child PedsQL - Parent PedsQL - Parent PedsQL - either PedsQL - either VAD QOL - Child VAD QOL - Child VAD QOL - Parent VAD QOL - Parent VAD QOL - either VAD QOL - either
  N Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete
Age at Follow-Up (9) N/A N/A 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 11 1 11
lt2 years (9) N/A N/A 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 11 1 11
2-4 years 4 N/A N/A 1 25 1 25 0 0.0 1 25 1 25
5-7 years 3 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
8-12 years 10 2 20 2 20 2 20 2 20 1 10 2 20
13-18 years 20 7 35 5 25 7 35 4 20 3 15 4 20
19 years 2 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
TOTAL 48 9/30 (30)_ 8 17 10 21 6 13 6 13 8 17
21 excluding lt2 years
12
Peds QL Reasons For Incompletion
Pre-implant
3 month Follow-up
Reasons for Peds QoL Incompletion Parent Parent Child Child
Reasons for Peds QoL Incompletion N N
Too Sick 18 21.2 39 40.6
Urgent Implant, No Time 13 15.3 6 6.3
Coordinator Too Busy or Forgot 3 3.5 2 2.1
Unable to Contact Patient 2 2.4 . .
Other Reason, Specify 49 57.6 49 51.0
TOTAL 85 100 96 100
Reasons for Peds QoL Incompletion Parent Parent Child Child
Reasons for Peds QoL Incompletion N N
Too Sick 3 12 3 11.5
Urgent Implant, No Time 1 4 1 3.8
Coordinator Too Busy or Forgot 8 32 8 30.8
Other Reason, Specify 13 52 14 53.8
TOTAL 25 100 26 100
13
OTHER Reasons Form Incomplete
  • Pre-implant (n43)
  • Post-implant (n13)
  • Forms/IRB -4 (31)
  • Age -2 (15)
  • No Consent -3 (23)
  • Transplanted -2 (15)
  • Reason Missing -35
  • Forms/IRB not approved -17 (40)
  • (? license pending -2)
  • Age too young -10 1 too old (26)
  • Not consented -12 (28)
  • Other
  • Patient autistic -1
  • No coordinator -2

14
VAD QOL Parent Reportn4-6
15
VAD QOL Parent Report (continued)(n4-6)
16
VAD QOL Child Self-Report(n6)
17
VAD QOL Child Self-Report (continued)(n6)
18
VAD QOL Child Self-ReportDifferences between 3
and 6 months(n6 at 3 mos, 5 at 6 mos)
19
  • THANK YOU!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com