FY 09 Mission/Program Support Sub-Goal Program Plan William F. Broglie November 16, 2006 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 124
About This Presentation
Title:

FY 09 Mission/Program Support Sub-Goal Program Plan William F. Broglie November 16, 2006

Description:

www.cio.noaa.gov – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:142
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 125
Provided by: kamos
Learn more at: https://www.noaa.gov
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: FY 09 Mission/Program Support Sub-Goal Program Plan William F. Broglie November 16, 2006


1
FY 09 Mission/Program Support Sub-GoalProgram
PlanWilliam F. BroglieNovember 16, 2006
Workforce Management
Administrative Services
Acquisition Grants
Financial Services
IT Services
Facilities
2
Overview
  • FY 09 Program Plan Vision for 2013
  • Cost effective, value-added service
    provider-of-choice for workforce management,
    acquisition and grants, facilities, financial, IT
    and administrative services.
  • Long range plans identifying future requirements
    for
  • Facilities
  • Information Technology
  • Workforce Management

NEP/NEC Guidance Requested Require IT
Long-Range Plan to be Developed for FY 10-14 PPBES
NEP/NEC Recommendation
3
Overview
  • FY09 FY13 Program Plan Objectives
  • Programs and services comply with legal,
    regulatory and departmental mandates and enable
    NOAA and its partners to efficiently accomplish
    NOAA mission objectives.
  • Process improvements enhance quality,
    cost-effectiveness and timeliness of services and
    reflect best management practices
  • Acquisition and Grants timely awards, aligned
    with NOAAs mission effective oversight and
    administration to maximize outcomes.
  • Financial and Administrative Services and
    systems compliance with legal/regulatory
    requirements enable informed management
    decision-making.
  • Facilities safe, sustainable, and modern with
    increased opportunities for collaboration and
    integration within NOAA and with NOAAs partners.
  • IT Secure, sound, and robust infrastructure and
    processes to advance NOAA mission leverages
    NOAA-wide economies of scale enhances workforce
    collaboration and sharing of data and knowledge.
  • Workforce Management value-added systems and
    processes promoting both a highly-skilled
    workforce and Merit System principles in support
    of NOAA mission goals.

4
Overview
  • FY09-FY13 Program Plan Achievements
  • Acquisition and Grants Integrated and sustained
    BPR improvements
  • Administrative Services Compliance with
    requirements HSPD-12, deemed exports,
    competitive sourcing, personal property.
  • Facilities Completion/occupancy of major
    facility projects (Pacific Region Center and La
    Jolla) facility condition index improved through
    targeted restoration investments long-range
    planning process.
  • Financial Services End-to-End Resource
    Management System implemented Budget BPR
    recommendations fully implemented/integrated.
  • Information Technology Security/Certification
    Accreditation services integrated across NOAA
    NOAA Enterprise MIS implemented.
  • Workforce Management WFM BPR recommendations
    partially implemented systems promote employee
    competency aligned with NOAA business
    requirements e-OPF implemented.

5
Overview
  • FY09-FY13 Program Plan Shortfalls/Excesses
  • NO EXCESSES!
  • Program-Specific Shortfalls
  • Administrative Services Unfunded/under-funded
    mandates with rising expectations/ requirements
    deemed exports, HSPD-12, personal property, and
    security/guard services.
  • Facilities Inadequate recapitalization funding
    stream to support sustained execution of facility
    long term plan.
  • Financial Services Unfunded requirements for
    Working Capital Fund full contribution and CBS
    system enhancements.
  • Information Technology Unfunded requirements
    for redundancy in critical infrastructure (e.g.,
    single points of failure, network
    infrastructure, public web services, and
    electronic mail services). Need for
    fully-compliant CA and IT Security program.
    Inadequate resources to develop and execute
    long-range IT recapitalization/modernization plan
    and transformation of NOAAs web.
  • Workforce Management Sustained funding stream
    for systems and programs (e.g., integrated human
    resources management system, learning management
    system and competency models).

6
Funding
  • NOTES
  • Fiscal and programming guidance concerning
    facility projects Pacific Region Center, La
    Jolla, Fairbanks BIGELOW homeporting
    improvements.
  • Fiscal and programming guidance concerning
    transfer of funding from Leadership Sub-Goal to
    the Program Support Sub-Goal (Information
    Technology Services Program).

7
Details
  • Strategy to Meet Sub-Goal Objectives and
    Fiscal/Programming Guidance
  • Funds allocated in accordance with fiscal and
    programming guidance and in consideration of
    Annual Guidance Memo and Strategic Plan.
  • Identified significant, extensive Gaps with no
    excess capacity and no capabilities that could be
    eliminated in out-years.
  • Utilized the Program Operating Plans (POPs) to
    evaluate to what extent priorities could be
    accomplished within the Current Program and
    Revised Program funding detailed in Serial 3.
  • Above Core requirements identified and
    prioritized.
  • Reallocate resources and funding from Line
    Offices and Mission Goals to support major
    projects PRC and La Jolla.
  • Maintain required programs and services to meet
    or exceed legal, regulatory and departmental
    mandates.
  • Implement BPR recommendations, and create a
    climate of continuous process assessments that
    supports end-to-end business process improvements.

8
Details Desired End State (FY 09 and FY 13)and
Ability to Meet
Acquisition/Grants FY 09 FY 13
Sustainment of Grants on Line and Grants BPR G G
Fully implemented Acquisitions BPR Y Y
Integrated planning processes for acquisitions and grants AGO and NOAA customers Y Y
Rational work environment for AGO employees R Y
Administrative Services
Implement competitive sourcing feasibility study plan G G
Comply with deemed exports requirements G Y
Comply with HSPD-12 requirements Y Y
Comply with personal property program requirements Y Y
9
Details Desired End State (FY 09 and FY 13)and
Ability to Meet
Facilities FY 09 FY 13
Integrated long-range facility modernization planning G G
Sustained funding strategy to support long-term facility modernization requirements R R
Pacific Region Center, La Jolla, BIGELOW homeporting completed G G
Complete Pribilofs cleanup ongoing monitoring G G
Initiate redevelopment of Beaufort, WRC, Montlake, Norfolk, Miami R R
Financial Services FY 09 FY 13
Maintain clean audit opinion, no material findings G G
Implementation of E2E resource mgmt system G Y
CBS enhancements supported R R
10

Details Desired End State (FY 09 and FY 13)and
Ability to Meet
Information Technology FY 09 FY 13
Integrated Enterprise-level IT Security, including CA Y Y
Phased implementation/development of MIS G G
Sound, secure (and redundant) network/infrastructure R R
Long-range IT capital planning process R R
Implemented OneNOAA Web presence R R
Workforce Management
Robust workforce planning (including competency development) capabilities Y Y
Implementation of BPR recommendations (hiring training development) Y Y
Fully implemented HSPD-12 and e-OPF Y Y
11
Details
  • How Program Capabilities Were Prioritized
  • Priorities identified in NOAA 2006-2011 Strategic
    Plan, April 2005
  • Recognized AGM and Fiscal/Program Guidance
    Priorities
  • Emphasized need to sustain/maintain current
    capacities (assumes inflation increases to
    sustain capacities will be budgeted separately).
  • Utilized POPs to evaluate capabilities and
    capacities across Mission Support at current and
    100 level.
  • Items eliminated in FY08 DOC Passback
    re-evaluated.
  • Evolving program requirements (Deemed Exports,
    HSPD-12, competitive sourcing feasibility
    studies) addressed.
  • Integrated Priority Lists items evaluated for (a)
    applicability to Program Support and (b) priority
    against current program.

12
Details
  • How Program Capabilities Were Integrated Across
    Programs
  • Program capabilities analyzed for duplication,
    low priority services and/or availability of more
    cost effective methods of providing services.
  • Integration across Program Support programs for
    select initiatives HSPD-12, personal
    property/Laptops/PII
  • Facility requirements integrated with other
    program directions (fleet modernization, etc.)
    and balanced against other competing program
    priorities to ensure integration.

13
Compliance with Guidance
ISSUE Compliance
Provide recommendation for annual funding level for real property recapitalization. Include analysis and rationale for proposed level. Based on recommended funding level, develop recommendation for projects with start dates, to be funded ?
In coordination with Weather and Water and the National Weather Service, fund Weather Forecast Office (WFO) lease costs. Provide a plan for the WFO Facilities Management Staff. ?
Working with the Satellite sub-goal, provide plan for permanent solution to facility requirements for Fairbanks Command and Data Acquisition Station (CDAS). ?
Fund homeporting requirement for the Bigelow. ?
Provide details on impact of not implementing and cost to eliminate single points of failure for network infrastructure (ITS) ?
Mission Support goal to provide recommendation on the Commerce Business System (CBS) funding shortfall. ?
Various technical adjustments (inter-program realignments) ?
14
Compliance with Guidance
ISSUE Compliance
Working with all goals and subgoals who fund personnel who will occupy the PRC and La Jolla, transfer funding consistent with the proportion of the requirement generated by the goal from that goal to Mission support for the revised requirements. (Climate Goal is Above Core Satellite not discussed) ?
Fund IT Security Centralized Certification Accreditation (CA) (Listed in Above Core) ?
Complete implementation of e-OPF as mandated by OPM. (Listed in Above Core) ?
Implement Homeland Security Presidential Directive-12. (Listed in Above Core) ?
Develop competency models to develop/validate competencies in NOAA mission-critical occupations. (Listed in Above Core) ?
15
Compliance with Guidance Facility
Recapitalization Level
  • Background Previous recommendation for
    sustained funding strategy for facility
    recapitalization/modernization was supported by
    NEP/NEC and reflected in Program Guidance.
  • Serial 3 Guidance requires recommendation of (1)
    annual funding level, with rationale and
    analysis and (2) specific projects to be funded
    under this level (projects listed in backup).
  • Recommendation of Methodology
  • Adjusted Facility Recapitalization Rate (FRR)
    methodology Annual funding requirements
    calculated as aggregate Current Replacement Value
    (CRV) of NOAA owned facility portfolio divided by
    facility life.
  • Research indicates 50 years average facility life
    as an accepted target---used by DoD and NASA.
  • NOAA aggregate CRV (for owned facilities) is
    approximately 1.77B based on 2005 portfolio
    valuation.
  • FRR (CRV) / 50 (years average facility life)
    35M for 2005.
  • FRR must be adjusted annually based on
    re-valuation of aggregate CRV of NOAA-owned
    facility portfolio.
  • Design and Engineering (DE) requirements also
    must be included to yield adjusted FRR.

16
Compliance with Guidance Facility
Recapitalization Level
  • Total Facility Recapitalization Rate for program
    years


Phased implementation recommended FY 09 10.
See next slide
  • Recapitalization methodology assumes that there
    is adequate funding available to address the
    sustainment and restoration requirements.
    Inadequate sustainment and restoration reduces
    facility life, accelerating need for
    recapitalization.

NEP/NEC Guidance Requested Accept Adjusted
Facility Recapitalization Rate (FRR) as
methodology for calculating recapitalization
requirements.
NEP/NEC Recommendation
17
Compliance with Guidance Facility
Recapitalization Projects
  • Phased Implementation of Recapitalization
    Funding FY 09-10
  • Projects previously identified in NOAA Facility
    Modernization Plan--Long-Range Facility Plan FY
    2008-2017

NEP/NEC Guidance Requested Approve phased
funding strategy and recommended projects to be
funded under strategy.
NEP/NEC Recommendation
18
Compliance with Guidance Single Points of
Failure
  • Elimination of Single Points of Failure
  • The elimination of single points of failure will
    improve NOAAs Silver Spring Metro Center (SSMC)
    network infrastructure, public web services
    (PWS), and electronic mail services.
  • Not implementing will negatively impact NOAAs
    ability to accomplish its corporate priorities.
    Reduction of key services will impact NOAAs
    ability to deliver data products resulting in the
    inability for programs to meet their goals.
  • Lack of or reduced Internet service will impact
    NOAAs ability to deliver its data products to
    all customers and the general public. This
    includes, but is not limited to, Life and
    Property data made available to the public via
    the Internet. For example, Hurricane Xs
    tracking data would not be available to the
    public.
  • The reduction in tier 3 support will impact the
    Line Office local area networks (LANs) and
    increase the IT security risk to all NOAA
    systems, including networks.

19
Major Program Adjustments
  • Major Program Adjustments (Compliance with
    Fiscal/Program Guidance)

20
Major Program AdjustmentsFunding for PRC
LaJolla Projects
  • Program Guidance
  • transfer funding consistent with the proportion
    of the requirement generated by the goal from
    that goal to Mission support for the revised
    requirements
  • Benefit/Risk PRC Consolidates programs and
    replaces inadequate facilities large
    requirement impacts Mission Goal capability.
  • La Jolla Provides safe facility,
    sustains programs and strategic program
    relationships large requirement impacts Mission
    Goal capability.
  • Transfers from Mission Goals and satellite
    sub-goal based on planned occupancy (people) of
    facilities by Goal/Program

21
Major Program AdjustmentsFunding for PRC
LaJolla Projects (contd)
  • Transfers to Program Support for PRC and La Jolla
    projects

PROPOSED ADJUSTMENTS
(M) FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13
Pacific Regional Center (PRC) (6.0) 61.3 68.9
La Jolla SW Fisheries Science Ctr (31.0) 50.0
TOTAL (37.0) 111.3 68.9
NEP/NEC Guidance Requested Accept proposed
adjustments to fund PRC and La Jolla projects as
approved by NEP/NEC.
NEP/NEC Recommendation
22
Major Program AdjustmentsFairbanks CDAS
  • Fairbanks Command and Data Acquisition Station
  • Background DoC Passback eliminated funding,
    based on no long-term primary use for facility
    beyond 2013. Alternative solution approved by
    NEP/NEC Temporary, modular buildings with
    shorter life span.
  • Benefit/Risk Alternative most likely to get DoC
    support, but is only a temporary solution.
  • Out-year costs (current estimate 20M-25M)
    beyond 2013 to shut down and dispose facility.
  • Fund development of detailed implementation plan
    and refined cost estimates in FY07 through NESDIS
    PAC funding.
  • PROPOSED ADJUSTMENT

(M) FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13
Fairbanks CDAS (10.0) 15.0
NEP/NEC Guidance Requested Accept proposed
adjustment to fund Fairbanks temporary solution.
NEP/NEC Recommendation
23
Major Program AdjustmentsBIGELOW Homeporting
  • BIGELOW Homeporting
  • Background BIGELOW commissioned in FY2006
    larger vessellonger, wider, and with a deeper
    draftthan ship replaced. Deeper draft requires
    dredging of the existing Woods Hole berthing area
    and channel. Existing pier and bulkhead need to
    be replaced to safely support ship operations.
  • Benefit/Risk Leverages existing facilities and
    collaboration opportunities will require
    out-year, periodic dredging (1.5M every 10
    yrs.).
  • PROPOSED ADJUSTMENT

(M) FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13
BIGELOW Homeporting 6.3 8.2
NEP/NEC Guidance Requested Accept proposed
adjustment to fund BIGELOW homeport improvements
(dredging and pier replacement).
NEP/NEC Recommendation
24
Above Core
  • Rationale for Prioritization of Above Core
    Requirements
  • Responsiveness to fiscal and program guidance
  • Impact on accomplishment of program mission
    sustainment of capabilities vs. enhancement
  • Current clarity of requirements
  • Methodology for Prioritization
  • Segregated ORF vs. PAC
  • ORF 4 Tiers (1) Required to Comply with
    Fiscal/Program Guidance (2) - (4) based on
    mission impact and clarity of requirements
  • PAC 2 Tiers based on mission impact and
    requirements clarity
  • Impact and Risk of Not Funding Above Core
    Requirements Addressed in Individual Quad
    Charts in Backup Information
  • Potential Unfunded Requirements (Not Currently
    Fully Defined)
  • HSPD-12 (IT and Facility impacts)
  • IT Recapitalization

25
Above Core RequirementsPrioritized ListORF
  1. TIER ONE Compliance with Fiscal and Programming
    Guidance

NEP/NEC Guidance Requested Fund Tier One Above
Core items required for Compliance with
Fiscal/Programming Guidance.
NEP/NEC Recommendation
26
Above Core RequirementsPrioritized ListORF
  1. TIER TWO Sustain Current Program Capabilities

NEP/NEC Guidance Requested Fund Tier Two Above
Core items required to sustain current program
capabilities.
NEP/NEC Recommendation
27
Above Core RequirementsPrioritized ListORF
  1. TIER THREE Improve Current Program Capabilities

28
Above Core RequirementsPrioritized ListORF
  • TIER FOUR Priorities

NOTE Requirements identified in this tier do
not necessarily mean the requirement itself is
lower priority, but may indicate additional
analysis is required, or other alternatives to
support capability exist.
29
Above Core RequirementsPrioritized ListPAC
  • TIER ONE
  1. TIER TWO

NEP/NEC Guidance Requested Fund Tier One (PAC)
Above Core level to support Facility
Recapitalization requirements.
NEP/NEC Recommendation
30
Backup Information
31
Above Core Quads Tier OneORF
Investments Required to Comply with Fiscal and
Programming Guidance
32
Compliance with Guidance -- ABOVE CORE
Electronic Official Personnel Files (e-OPF)
PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT FUNDING
  • GOAL Program Support
  • PROGRAM Workforce Management
  • CAPABILITY HR Programs
  • REQUIREMENT OPM (e-Gov Initiative)
  • DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT
  • Funding for annual licensing fees
  • PERFORMANCE MEASURES
  • Compliance with OPM milestones

BENEFITS AND RISKS
  • If Adjustment made, employees have immediate
    access to personal data from any web browser
    NOAA has superior retrieval capability for COOP
    time for transfer of records reduced from weeks
    or months to near real time potential to free up
    FTE for higher priority HR activities.
  • If Adjustment not made, e-OPF has no consistent
    funding source which could result in OPFs being
    inaccessible to HR staff and other NOAA
    employees. Funding would then be needed to print
    and reestablish paper OPFs to meet legal
    requirements and conduct HR operations.
  • Risk LOs may not fund 100 back-file
    conversions prior to FY 2009 this would require
    Programs to make up the difference to meet OPM
    timeline of 50 by FY 08, 20 in FY 09-10, and
    10 in out years

ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE MILESTONES
  • Annual licensing fee (272K) requires consistent
    funding source
  • FY 06 Infrastructure established for e-OPF from
    01/01/06 forward
  • FY 06 funds contributed by LO/SOs are sufficient
    to scan 44 of existing folders during FY 07-08
  • US, COs, PPI, OAR, NMAO fully funded
  • NMFS is 73 funded (56K needed to fully fund)
  • NOS (79K), NWS (317K) (or appropriate Programs)
    must provide funding to meet OPM requirements
    between FY 07 and FY 11

33
Compliance with Guidance -- ABOVE
CORECentralized Certification Accreditation
(CA) Services
PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT FUNDING
  • GOAL Program Support
  • PROGRAM Information Technology Services
  • CAPABILITY IT Security
  • REQUIREMENT Centralized Certification
    Accreditation (CA) Services
  • DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT Implement centralized
    CA team to ensure consistency in the review of
    CA packages, complete certification, and provide
    controls testing for each system prior to
    submission to Commerce
  • PERFORMANCE MEASURES IT Security Incidents


BENEFITS AND RISKS
ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE MILESTONES
  • If program adjustment is made
  • Compliance with Federal Information Security
    Management Act (FISMA) and Commerce IT Security
    Policy
  • Maintain 100 of NOAA IT systems that have a
    current CA
  • If program adjustment is not made
  • Out of compliance with July 12, 2006 OMB memo
    M-06-19 from Karen Evans (Ofc of E-Gov IT) that
    requires agencies to meet existing security
    requirements (e.g., correct security weaknesses
    in stead-state investments) before new funds are
    spent on system development, modernization, or
    enhancement
  • Restrict public access to hazardous weather
    warnings and hurricane tracking information
    during peak demand periods when capability of
    enterprise security systems is exceeded
  • Retain IT Security material weakness (DOC OIG)
  • Delay implementation of IT Security Architecture
    by 2 to 3 years
  • Standardize CA process throughout NOAA
    Oct 2007
  • Capability of providing a suite of CA services
    Oct 2007
  • Automate CA process Oct 2008
  • Provide CA dashboard capability
    Mar 2009

34
Compliance with Guidance -- ABOVE CORE Develop
Competency Models
PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT FUNDING
  • GOAL Program Support
  • PROGRAM Workforce Management
  • CAPABILITY Strategic Management of Human Capital
  • REQUIREMENT 5 U.S.C. 1103(c) Human Capital
    Initiative of PMA E.O. 13352 (Cooperative
    Conservation)
  • DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT
  • Fund development of competency models for 25 of
    NOAAs highest priority and/or most populous job
    series and work roles to support workforce
    planning
  • PERFORMANCE MEASURES
  • Number of valid competency models developed


ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE MILESTONES
  • FY 07- 08 WFMO works with contractor and LO/COs
    to develop/validate NOAA foundational competency
    model, DOC-assigned competency models, and other
    high-priority models using existing interagency
    agreement with OPM complete skills gap
    assessments for priority models
  • FY 09 WFMO works with contractor and LO/COs to
    validate competency model for Cooperative
    Conservation Competencies and develop/validate an
    additional 5 competency models complete skills
    gap assessments for priority models
  • FY 10-13 WFMO works with contractor and LO/COs
    to develop/validate an additional 5 competency
    models each year complete skills gap assessments
    for priority models
  • Ease of using models for skills gap assessments
    and workforce planning dependent on nature of
    automated competency management system available

BENEFITS AND RISKS
  • If Adjustment made, NOAA will be able to add 26
    validated competency models to those developed in
    FY 07 FY 08 increasing our ability to determine
    skills gaps and develop workforce plans to fill
    those gaps
  • Filling skills gaps helps meet the AGM guidance
    for A more flexible, diverse and mobile
    workforce with minimal skill gaps
  • Validated competency models can serve as a basis
    for valid QuickHire and interview questions,
    training needs assessments, succession planning,
    and other HR processes.
  • If Adjustment not made, NOAA not having valid
    data to use for workforce planning (closing
    skills gaps), recruitment, training, other HR
    processes
  • Barriers to implementation include the time
    resources required of NOAA managers employees
    to develop and validate models

35

Compliance with Guidance -- ABOVE CORE HSPD-12
(Workforce Management)
PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT FUNDING
  • GOAL Program Support
  • PROGRAM Workforce Management
  • CAPABILITY Human Resources Programs
  • REQUIREMENT Homeland Security Presidential
    Directive (HSPD)-12
  • DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT
  • 5 FTE and funding to support the human resource
    requirements created by HSPD-12
  • PERFORMANCE MEASURES
  • Timely security clearances
  • Error rates
  • Hiring cycle time


ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE MILESTONES
  • FY09, Q2 Fill 5 ZS-IV personnel security
    positions
  • Positions will
  • Initiate and monitor process for all levels of
    security clearance requests for new employees
  • Review and adjudicate pre-employment suitability
    investigation results with LO hiring officials
    (new with HSPD-12 post-employment suitability
    has been an on-going responsibility)
  • Serve as PIV sponsor for all new hire actions
  • Ensure that the appropriate on-line training is
    completed
  • Complete appropriate activities related to
    badging and re-badging
  • Other NOAA players include the IT Services,
    Administrative Services, and Facilities Programs

BENEFITS AND RISKS
  • If adjustment made, MS-WMP able to process 100
    of new security requirements timely while
    carrying out on-going workload
  • If adjustment not made, security-related work
    likely to be delayed while current staff works to
    keep up with volume and still carry out other HR
    activities quality and accuracy of all work
    suffers other HR activities (e.g., hiring)
    already being delayed to focus on security
  • New employees may not be able to enter on duty in
    a timely fashion until all required security
    clearances are completed. High potential to lose
    candidates to other positions or agencies if
    process too slow
  • In mid-1990s, MS-WMP gave up 6 FTE to DOC for
    security-related work. Work has returned with
    HSPD-12, but not the FTEs
  • No direct dependencies on other programs

36
Compliance with Guidance -- ABOVE CORE HSPD-12
(Administrative Services)
PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT FUNDING
  • GOAL Program Support
  • PROGRAM Administrative Services
  • CAPABILITY Logistics
  • REQUIREMENT HSPD-12 Credentialing
  • DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT Implementation of a
    new standardized credentialing process to comply
    with OMB-05-24
  • PERFORMANCE MEASURES
  • Number/percentage of employees and equipment
    processed annually to remain compliant


BENEFITS AND RISKS
ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE MILESTONES
  • The program is designed to enhance security,
    reduce identity fraud, and protect personal
    privacy
  • Personnel security at risk, identity fraud not
    deterred
  • Risks/barriers to implementation interfaces to
    legacy systems
  • DOC has selected the GSA Managed Service Office
    to implement the Program NOAA retains specific
    abjudication responsibilities
  • Smartcards, background checks, card readers,
    servers, installation and maintenance, training
  • Card implementation begins in October 2006 full
    implementation by October 2008
  • FY09-FY13 primarily for ongoing maintenance,
    annual employee rebadging, logical access for
    computers, and equipment replacement and upgrades

37
Above Core QuadsTier OnePAC
  • Investments
  • Required to Fund Facility Recapitalization
    Requirements
  • (using Facility Recapitalization Rate)

38
ABOVE CORE (PAC T-1) Facility Recapitalization
Requirements
PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT FUNDING
  • GOAL Program Support
  • PROGRAM Facilities
  • CAPABILITY Construction
  • REQUIREMENT Facility Recapitalization
  • DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT Implementation of a
    sustained funding strategy to address NOAA
    facility recapitalization requirements
  • PERFORMANCE MEASURES
  • Improved portfolio facility condition index
  • Elimination of substantial backlog of repair
    projects (50-60M)


BENEFITS AND RISKS
ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE MILESTONES
  • Enables NOAA to replace owned facilities that
    have reached the end of their useful life.
  • Provides modern, state-of-the-art, and safe
    working conditions
  • Risks
  • Funding level is substantial and will face severe
    budget challenge.
  • Unclear where possible offsets would come, and at
    what expense.
  • Phased implementation of funding level in FY
    09-10.
  • Initial years funding supports (1) delineation
    of program of requirements and analysis of
    alternatives, and (2) design.
  • Specific schedules and milestones for each
    project still need to be developed. High level
    implementation schedule reflected on next slide.

39
ABOVE CORE (PAC T-1) Facility Recapitalization
Requirements
  • Projects Recommended Under Recapitalization
    Funding Projects previously identified in NOAA
    Facility Modernization Plan--Long-Range Facility
    Plan FY 2008-2017

Background
40
Above Core Quads Tier TwoORF
Investments Required to Sustain Current
Services/Capabilities
41
Sustain Current Capabilities--Above Core Guard
Service Contract
PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT FUNDING
  • GOAL Program Support
  • PROGRAM Administrative Services
  • CAPABILITY Logistics
  • REQUIREMENT NOAA-wide Guard Services Contracts
  • DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT
  • Funding to pay for three Guard Service contracts
    covering NCR, Boulder and Seattle
  • PERFORMANCE MEASURES
  • Proper physical security for NOAA facilities and
    staff
  • Timely payment of contracts


BENEFITS AND RISKS
ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE MILESTONES
  • Actual funding was previously provided through
    the Working Capital Fund, and was first requested
    in FY07. FY06 funding came via a reprogramming
    and a DOC subsidy. FY07 funding will be short
    by over 2.0M.
  • Services to NOAA Programs will be reduced or
    Direct Billed, causing unacceptable loss of
    capability
  • Required payments produce a shortfall for other
    critical Program Support requirements
  • Contracts require funding in first quarter each
    year
  • Guard Service is Must Pay for NOAA

42
Sustain Current Capabilities--Above Core
Working Capital Fund (Financial)
PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT FUNDING
  • GOAL Program Support
  • PROGRAM Financial Services
  • CAPABILITY NOAA Centralized Payments
  • REQUIREMENT Centralized Payments/WCF
  • DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT
  • Funding mechanism to process NOAA centralized
    payments
  • PERFORMANCE MEASURES
  • Accurate on-time end of year close out
  • Timely allocation of appropriation


BENEFITS AND RISKS
ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE MILESTONES
  • Actual funding for assessments have not kept pace
    with the bill
  • Services to NOAA Programs will be reduced or
    Direct Billed, causing loss of capability
  • Required payments produces a shortfall for other
    Common Services requirements as well
  • DOC requires funding in first quarter each year
  • WCF is Must Pay for NOAA

43
Sustain Current Capabilities--Above Core
Learning Management System
PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT FUNDING
  • GOAL Program Support
  • PROGRAM Workforce Management
  • CAPABILITY Strategic Management of Human
    Capital
  • REQUIREMENT 5 CFR BPR implementation
  • DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT
  • Fund the NOAA portion of the DOC Learning
    Management System including a competency
    management functionality
  • PERFORMANCE MEASURES
  • Compliance with OPM reporting requirements


BENEFITS AND RISKS
ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE MILESTONES
  • If Adjustment made, NOAA will be able to fully
    support the new Training and Development business
    process to meet new OPM training data reporting
    requirements, provide cost-effective training to
    employees, and support the competency assessment
    and skills gap analysis required for workforce
    planning.
  • If Adjustment not made, NOAA will not be assured
    of a having a business process and system to meet
    OPM data reporting requirements or to efficiently
    support workforce planning via competency
    management functionality funding would be
    dependent on direct bill.
  • No dependencies on other programs
  • FY 2007 Q1-Q2 DOC competition for LMS develop
    requirements for competency management module
  • FY 2007 Q3-Q4 Implement new LMS
  • FY 2008 Implement competency management module
  • FY 09-13 Maintain LMS licenses

44
Program Support Above Core Commerce Business
SystemOracle Licenses
PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT FUNDING
  • GOAL Program Support
  • PROGRAM Financial Services
  • CAPABILITY Accounting Services and Funds
    Management
  • REQUIREMENT Commerce Business System
  • DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT
  • Oracle license renewal
  • PERFORMANCE MEASURES
  • Improved funds control
  • Accurate and timely financial information


BENEFITS AND RISKS
ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE MILESTONES
  • Supports new DOC Web Enabled CBS Application to
    NOAA
  • Enables term purchases of Oracle Internet
    Application Server Licenses
  • System at risk with obsolete software
  • Above Core request serves as place holder until
    accurate costing is received from OCIO
  • FY 2009 - 2013
  • Two year term purchase of Oracle internet
    application server licenses to support NOAA users
    of CBS and Grants On Line

45
Sustain Current Capabilities--Above Core End to
End Resource Management System
PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT FUNDING
  • GOAL Program Support
  • PROGRAM Financial Services
  • CAPABILITY PPBES Management Information System
  • REQUIREMENT End to End Resource Management
    System
  • DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT
  • Maintenance and sustainment costs
  • PERFORMANCE MEASURES
  • Accurate and timely financial information for
    program managers


BENEFITS AND RISKS
ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE MILESTONES
  • Provides improved budget development and
    production including budget justification and
    all necessary exhibits
  • Enables interface with Commerce Business System
    and consolidates Reporting System
  • Eliminates separate system inefficiency and
    costly labor-intensive processes
  • Leverages integrated investment by connecting to
    mission support system support architecture for
    NOAAs planning, programming, budgeting and
    execution processes
  • Fewer unlinked systems support all phases of
    PPBES
  • FY 2009-FY 2013
  • System Maintenance
  • Implementation of operational system
  • Improves the availability and quality of data
    available for PPBES

46
Sustain Current Capabilities--Above Core
Elimination of Single Points of Failure (SSMC
Network Infrastructure Public Web Services)
PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT FUNDING
  • GOAL Program Support
  • PROGRAM Information Technology Services
  • CAPABILITY Enterprise Network Operations
  • REQUIREMENT Elimination of Single Points of
    Failure in Silver Spring Metro Center (SSMC)
    Network Infrastructure and Public Web Services
    (PWS)
  • DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT Implement
    fully-redundant SSMC network backbone with
    built-in failover, and mirrored web clusters at 7
    U.S. locations
  • PERFORMANCE MEASURES Network and Application
    Services Availability

BENEFITS AND RISKS
  • If program adjustment is not made
  • NOAA data products (provided via SSMC and/or
    other locations) will become unavailable during a
    power failure or when construction/utility
    equipment (e.g., backhoe) severs the SSMC
    internet connection. For example, Hurricane Xs
    tracking data would not be available to the
    public during the time of need.
  • Customers and the general public will become
    displeased with the data unavailability, which in
    turn becomes front-page, above-the-fold news in
    the Washington Post for weeks. Can NOAA afford
    the bad press and management of the resulting
    triage?
  • Lack of or reduced Internet service will impact
    NOAAs ability to deliver its data products to
    all customers and the general public. This
    includes, but is not limited to, Life and
    Property data made available to the public via
    the Internet. Reduction of key services will
    impact NOAAs ability to deliver data products
    resulting in the inability for programs to meet
    their GPRA or corporate performance targets.
  • IT security risks will increase on all NOAA
    systems, including networks.
  • Dependency Public Web Services within the
    Weather Water Goal (via the Web Consolidation
    Initiative in NWS)

ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE MILESTONES
  • Complete implementation of a 10 Gigabit Ethernet
    SSMC backbone 10 Gigabit Ethernet Wash DC
    metropolitan area network (MAN) 2011
  • Complete hardening of the SSMC backbone in order
    to produce a 99.99 uptime network 2013

47
Supplemental Information
Information Relevant to Fiscal/Programming
Guidance
48
Compliance with Guidance -- ABOVE CORE HSPD-12
Proposed Five-Year Budget
HSPD-12 Proposed Five-Year Budget HSPD-12 Proposed Five-Year Budget HSPD-12 Proposed Five-Year Budget HSPD-12 Proposed Five-Year Budget HSPD-12 Proposed Five-Year Budget HSPD-12 Proposed Five-Year Budget HSPD-12 Proposed Five-Year Budget HSPD-12 Proposed Five-Year Budget HSPD-12 Proposed Five-Year Budget
ITEM Unit Cost FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Comments
Smartcard w/ PKI Credential - 17,600 (card replacement) Direct Bill? 110 0 0 1,936,000 0 0 Assumes initial issuance of all cards in FY2008 full replacement in FY2011 on 3-year refresh cycle
Smartcard w/ PKI Credential - 17,600 (card maintenance fee) Direct Bill? 51 897,600 897,600 897,600 897,600 897,600 NOAA Employee count (Feds, Commissioned Contractors) changed to 17,600 based on 10/17/06 MOC figures
Reissued cards Direct Bill? (10 of 17,600 per year 1,760) 110 193,600 193,600 0 193,600 193,600 10 employee turnover / lost cards
System Certification and Accreditation (ea) Required once every 3 years 250,000 250,000 0 0 250,000 0 CA on 3 year cycle. FY09 Initial CA 300,000. FY2010-2011 no CA costs. FY2012 Re-CA 200,000 (i.e., 67 of initial CA). FY2013 no CA costs.
49
Compliance with Guidance -- ABOVE CORE HSPD-12
Proposed Five-Year Budget
HSPD-12 Proposed Five-Year Budget (Continued) HSPD-12 Proposed Five-Year Budget (Continued) HSPD-12 Proposed Five-Year Budget (Continued) HSPD-12 Proposed Five-Year Budget (Continued) HSPD-12 Proposed Five-Year Budget (Continued) HSPD-12 Proposed Five-Year Budget (Continued) HSPD-12 Proposed Five-Year Budget (Continued) HSPD-12 Proposed Five-Year Budget (Continued) HSPD-12 Proposed Five-Year Budget (Continued)
ITEM Unit Cost FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Comments
Additional FTEs Administrative Services 144,000 432,000 432,000 432,000 432,000 432,000 3 additional FTEs needed for HSPD-12 support - NCR, Seattle and KC.
Additional FTEs - WFM 75,000 375,000 375,000 375,000 375,000 375,000 5 additional WFM FTEs will be required
TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS   2,148,200 1,898,200 3,640,600 2,148,200 1,898,200  
Cost per NOAA/ Contractor Employee   122 108 207 122 108
50
Compliance with GuidanceFacility
Recapitalization Level
Also measure and use facility utilization, OM
costs, and mission dependency.
51
Compliance with GuidanceFacility
Recapitalization Level
  • Other budget development methods researched.
    Most are more applicable for estimating
    sustainment and restoration requirements rather
    than recapitalization.
  • National Research Council (NRC) Recommended
    Percentage (2-4 of CRV)
  • Facility Condition Index (FCI) (can lead to a
    recapitalization estimate)
  • Deferred Maintenance/Repair Backlog
  • Validated Repair Needs
  • Facility Sustainment Model (FSM)
  • Life Cycle Component Management (can lead to a
    recapitalization estimate)
  • Other methods primarily used for project
    prioritization

52
Compliance with GuidanceElimination of Single
Points of Failure
  • Action Item Eliminate Single Points of Failure
    Provide details on the impact of not
    implementing and cost to eliminate single points
    of failure
  • Scope The elimination of single points of
    failure will improve NOAAs Silver Spring Metro
    Center (SSMC) network infrastructure, public web
    services (PWS), and electronic mail services.
  • Impact of Not Implementing
  • It will negatively impact NOAAs ability to
    accomplish its corporate priorities. Reduction of
    key services will impact NOAAs ability to
    deliver data products resulting in the inability
    for programs to meet their goals.
  • The IT Services Program will be forced to
  • Reduce the plans for email system redundancy and
    provide replication of email only for priority
    users
  • Reduce the hardening of the SSMC backbone
  • Abandon the optimal solution of providing a
    common infrastructure, redundancy, and diversity
  • Extend the project timelines and scale back the
    functional requirements for current projects
  • Extend system lifecycle refresh periods, thereby,
    limiting our ability to implement the 10 Gigabit
    Ethernet SSMC backbone and MAN networks or new
    requirements
  • Reduce the implementation of PWS hardware and
    staff supporting the NOAA Continuity of
    Operations (COOP) Plan requirements
  • Abandon the implementation of mirrored clusters
    (i.e., consolidated set of servers and storage
    devices) at 7 locations throughout the U.S.
  • Lack of or reduced Internet service will impact
    NOAAs ability to deliver its data products to
    all customers and the general public. This
    includes, but is not limited to, Life and
    Property data made available to the public via
    the Internet. For example, Hurricane Xs
    tracking data would not be available to the
    public.
  • The reduction in tier 3 support will impact the
    Line Office local area networks (LANs) and
    increase the IT security risk to all NOAA
    systems, including networks.
  • Cost

Activity Project Managers or Subject Matter Experts Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Each Outyear
Elimination of Single Points of Failure in NOAAs Silver Spring Metro Center (SSMC) Network Infrastructure John Kyler, Bob Brunner 0.8M 0.8M 1.0M 1.0M 1.0M 1.0M
Elimination of Single Points of Failure in Public Web Services John Unekis, John Kyler, Chi Kang 1.2M 1.4M 0.9M 0.9M 0.9M 0.9M
Elimination of Single Points of Failure in Electronic Mail Services (including migration to Commerce-wide common email system) John Unekis, Don Holtzer 13.0M 4.8M 4.8M 4.8M 4.8M 4.8M
53
Compliance with GuidanceTransfer of LO CIO
Operating Funds
PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT FUNDING
  • GOAL Program Support
  • PROGRAM Information Technology Services
  • CAPABILITIES IT Security, Enterprise Network
    Operations, Enterprise Architecture, IT Support
    for Administrative Systems, IT Administration and
    Regulation
  • REQUIREMENT Transfer of Line Office (LO) CIO
    Operating Budgets from LO Headquarters Program to
    IT Services Program
  • DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT Transfer of funding
    will allow the IT Services Program to improve
    performance through the IT Administration and
    Regulation, IT Security, Enterprise Network
    Operations, Enterprise Architecture, and IT
    Support for Administrative Systems capabilities.
  • PERFORMANCE MEASURES IT Security Incidents
    Network and Application Services Availability,
    Capability Maturity Model Score


ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE MILESTONES
BENEFITS AND RISKS
  • Provide CA dashboard capability 2009
  • NEMIS data storage acquisition, product
    inventories, analysis, Suite 2 dashboard
    instruments 2009
  • Complete phase 2 of the consolidated electronic
    mail system, including complete redundancy and
    replication of data for all users 2010
  • Complete hardening of the SSMC backbone and
    NOAAnet in order to produce a 99.99 uptime
    network 2013
  • If program adjustment is made Provide
    centralized administration and management of IT
    Services across NOAA

54
Compliance with GuidanceTransfer of Funding
from OCIO to PS/ITS
Information Technology Services Program (MS-ITS) CURRENT PROGRAM - FUNDING (K)including Transfer of LO CIO Operating Funds CURRENT PROGRAM - FUNDING (K)including Transfer of LO CIO Operating Funds CURRENT PROGRAM - FUNDING (K)including Transfer of LO CIO Operating Funds CURRENT PROGRAM - FUNDING (K)including Transfer of LO CIO Operating Funds CURRENT PROGRAM - FUNDING (K)including Transfer of LO CIO Operating Funds CURRENT PROGRAM - FUNDING (K)including Transfer of LO CIO Operating Funds CURRENT PROGRAM - FUNDING (K)including Transfer of LO CIO Operating Funds CURRENT PROGRAM - FUNDING (K)including Transfer of LO CIO Operating Funds Amount from LO CIO
Capability FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 Amount from LO CIO
MS-ITS-ADI IT Administration and Regulation 1650 1650 1650 4052 4052 4052 4052 4052 2402
MS-ITS-SEI IT Security 1000 3050 3050 7637 7637 7637 7637 7637 2587
MS-ITS-NET Enterprise Network Operations 5123 5123 5123 9760 9760 9760 9760 9760 4637
MS-ITS-ARC Enterprise Architecture 216 216 216 2263 2263 2263 2263 2263 1047
MS-ITS-SPT IT Support for Administrative Systems 15961 16132 16132 20515 20515 19661 19661 19661 4201
TOTAL FUNDING 23950 26171 26171 44227 44227 43373 43373 43373 14874
55
Compliance with GuidanceRecommendation on CBS
Funding Shortfall
  • CBS Current Shortfall

CBS Requirements ( in millions) FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Comments
Server Consolidation 2.4 2.4 2.5 2.5 0.0 - Supports NOAA contribution to Census - Cost of software license maintenance - Telecommunication cost to Census
New Accounting System .9 .9 5.9 27.0 34.0 - Supports study for new system - Conversion of Data Training - Implementation of new system
Enhancements to System 3.5 2.0 2.0 1.3 1.3 -HS-PD12 (modifying CBS, Data warehouse, Travel Manager, etc to accept authorization from this card) - NOAA Integration and Data Storage - Full implementation of Commitment Accounting - Migration to DOC web portal
Total CBS Shortfall 6.8 5.3 10.4 30.8 35.3
56
Compliance with GuidanceRecommendation on CBS
Funding Shortfall
  • Recommendations for Funding CBS Shortfall

CBS Requirement Alternatives for Funding Shortfall
Server Consolidation Reduce services to NOAA customers Reduce funding to the Information Technology Center (ITC)
New Accounting System CBS Base Funding Increase -Transitional cost associated with moving to new DOC consolidated accounting system exceed the current CBS base funding Eliminate current services to NOAA customers - Stop funding for all maintenance and administrative efforts, help desk support, system testing and training efforts on the current system
Enhancements to System Eliminate support for HS-PD12 within CBS suite of applications - Suspend modification to accommodate security verification Reduce services to NOAA customer - Decrease access to timely financial data
57
Compliance with GuidanceUpdate Capabilities
ProfileFinancial Services
Current Capabilities Profile
ITEM FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 TOTALS
MS-FIN Accounting Services and Funds Management 23,347 23,347 23,347 23,347 23,347 23,347
MS-FIN Develop and Defend Budget 1,638 1,638 1,638 1,638 1,638 1,638
MS-FIN NMA Resource Management 9,831 9,831 9,796 9,796 9,796 9,796
MS-FIN PPBES Management Information System 4,380 4,380 4,380 4,380 4,380 4,380
MS-FIN NOAA Centralized Payments 34,425 34,425 34,425 34,425 34,425 34,425
Total Current Program 73,621 73,621 73,586 73,586 73,586 73,586
Updated Current Capabilities Profile
ITEM FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 TOTALS
MS-FIN Accounting Services and Funds Management 26,411 26,411 26,411 26,411 26,411 26,411
MS-FIN Develop and Defend Budget 1,743 1,743 1,743 1,743 1,743 1,743
MS-FIN NMA Resource Management 9,040 9,040 9,040 9,005 9,005 9,005
MS-FIN PPBES Management Information System 2,002 2,002 2,002 2,002 2,002 2,002
MS-FIN NOAA Centralized Payments 34,425 34,425 34,425 34,425 34,425 34,425
Total Current Program 73,621 73,621 73,586 73,586 73,586 73,586
58
Above Core QuadsTier 3 4 (ORF) Tier 2 (PAC)
59
Program Support Above Core (T-3) Business
Process Reengineering
PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT FUNDING
  • GOAL Program Support
  • PROGRAM Administrative Services
  • CAPABILITY Office of the NOAA Chief
    Administrative Officer
  • REQUIREMENT Business Process Reengineering (BPR)
  • DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT Designate continuing
    direct funding for the Business Process
    Reengineering effort. BPR depends on personnel
    detailed from the Line and Staff Offices, and
    direct billing of the LO/SO programs for staffing
    and funding. This adjustment would provide direct
    funding for contract support. 
  • PERFORMANCE MEASURES
  • As Is evaluations completed
  • To Be evaluations completed
  • Recommendations implemented


BENEFITS AND RISKS
ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE MILESTONES
  • Would provide the ability to
  • Complete the reengineering effort on any
    remaining financial and administrative service
    areas
  • Conduct continuous improvement for financial and
    administrative processes already reengineered.
  • BPR activities risk delay during Government
    Continuing Resolution due to reliance on
    contractor funding in 1st quarter
  • FY09 Financial Services Phase 3
    Information Technology Phase 4
  • FY10 Financial Services Phase 4
  • FY11-FY13 No projects scheduled
  • The assumption is that the Safety and Facilities
    Programs have already completed internal BPR
    activities.

60
Program Support Above Core (T-3) Commerce
Business System (CBS)Server Consolidation
PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT FUNDING
  • GOAL Program Support
  • PROGRAM Financial Services
  • CAPABILITY Accounting Services and Funds
    Management
  • REQUIREMENT Commerce Business System
  • DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT
  • Server Consolidation Project
  • PERFORMANCE MEASURES
  • Improved funds control
  • Accurate and timely financial information


BENEFITS AND RISKS
ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE MILESTONES
  • FY 2008
  • Commerce Business System moves from IT Services
    to Census Data Center
  • FY 2009
  • Consolidation of CBS technology architecture
  • Supports NOAA contribution to Census facility
  • Ensure software license maintenance for software
    installed at Census
  • Ensures software license maintenance for software
    installed at Census location
  • Consolidates CBS technology architecture
  • Without enhancements to the current CBS system,
    NOAA managers will not have access to timely
    financial data necessary to make informed
    programmatic decisions
  • Supports the NOAA contribution to Census facility
    and includes telecommunications cost for
    developers and administrators

61
Program Support Above Core (T-3) Commerce
Business System Funds Control Enhancements
PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT FUNDING
  • GOAL Program Support
  • PROGRAM Financial Services
  • CAPABILITY Accounting Services and Funds
    Management
  • REQUIREMENT Commerce Business System
  • DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT
  • Enhancement to Commerce Business System
  • PERFORMANCE MEASURES
  • Improved funds control
  • Accurate and timely financial information


BENEFITS AND RISKS
ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE MILESTONES
  • To improve management of funding, NOAA needs to
    implement commitment accounting
  • Implementation of E-Travel will enable NOAA to
    meet the PMA requirement, which will simplify
    Federal travel management
  • Without enhancements to the current CBS system,
    NOAA managers will not have access to timely
    financial data necessary to make informed
    programmatic decisions
  • FY 2009 FY 2013
  • Implementation of commitment accounting
  • Staffing will be increased to meet accelerating
    reporting requirements
  • Migration to DOC Business web portal
  • Implementation of Reimbursable module to monitor
    and control Reimbursable funding
  • Development of an automated accounting module

62
Program Support Above Core (T-3) Technology
Refresh Desktop Management
PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT FUNDING
  • GOAL Program Support
  • PROGRAM Information Technology Services
  • CAPABILITIES IT Security, Enterprise Network
    Operations, Enterprise Architecture, IT Support
    for Administrative Systems, IT Administration and
    Regulation
  • REQUIREMENT Technology Refresh Desktop
    Management
  • DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT Technology Refresh
    Desktop Management for NOAA Computer Incident
    Response Team, Information Technology Center,
    Network Operations Center, Web Operations Center,
    Messaging Operations Center, OS LAN / Systems
    Support, and OCIO
  • PERFORMANCE MEASURES IT Security Incidents,
    Network and Application Services Availability,
    Capability Maturity Model Score


BENEFITS AND RISKS
ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE MILESTONES
  • If program adjustment is made Meet recommended
    system lifecycle refresh requirements
  • If program adjustment is not made
  • Extend system lifecycle refresh period from 3
    years to 5 years
  • Extend timelines and scale back functional
    requirements for current projects
  • Technology Refresh Oct 2008 Sep 2013
  • Desktop Management Oct 2008 Sep 2013

63
Program Support Above Core (T-3) Human
Resources Information System
PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT FUNDING
  • GOAL Program Support
  • PROGRAM Workforce Management
  • CAPABILITY HR Programs
  • REQUIREMENT BPR recommendation e-Gov
    Initiative
  • DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT
  • HRIS is an enhancement to the current NFC payroll
    system that supports automated processing of HR
    actions (e.g., SF-52-s)
  • PERFORMANCE MEASURES
  • of actions resulting in processing errors
  • Hiring cycle time


BENEFITS AND RISKS
ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE MILESTONES
  • If Adjustment made, HR actions can be initiated
    in LO/COs, automatically routed for approval and
    action, and automatically fed into the NFC
    system. This will reduce hiring cycle time, lost
    paperwork, processing errors due to rekeying and
    use of drop-down menus.
  • If Adjustment not made, BPR recommendations will
    not be maximized and current situation will
    continue.
  • No dependencies on other programs
  • FY 07-08 Work with DOC and NFC on systems
    requirements and develop implementation plan
  • FY 09 Implement HRIS
  • FY 10-13 Maintain system license

64
Program Support Above Core (T-3) Mandated
Administrative Services
PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT FUNDING
  • GOAL Program Support
  • PROGRAM Administrative Services
  • CAPABILITY CAO, AICIM, LOG
  • REQUIREMENT Mandated Administrative Services
  • DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT A number of unfunded
    mandates have been imposed on MS-ADS that have
    strained existing resources to the point where
    other critical services are being degraded.
    Dedicated funding and FTE for these activities
    are required 
  • PERFORMANCE MEASURES
  • Deemed Export requirements are met.
  • Personal Property program and audit requirements
    are met.
  • FOIA requirements are met.
  • Audit Liaison requirements are met.


BENEFITS AND RISKS
ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE MILESTONES
  • Failure to provide additional FTE and funding
    will result in continued degradation of existing
    services, many of which are critical.
  • Dedicated FTE and resources will ensure NOAAs
    ability to meet legal and regulatory mandates,
    both timely and effectively, and achieve clean
    audits.
  • Contracts requir
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com