The Supreme Court - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 29
About This Presentation
Title:

The Supreme Court

Description:

The Supreme Court & The Constitution The Living Constitution The Road to the Bill of Rights The Amendment Process The Supreme Court & the Amendment Process – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:103
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: P417
Learn more at: http://www.compton.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Supreme Court


1
The Supreme Court The Constitution
  • The Living Constitution
  • The Road to the Bill of Rights
  • The Amendment Process
  • The Supreme Court the Amendment Process

2
The Living Constitution
3
In the U.S. the ultimate keeper of the
constitutional conscience is the
  1. president
  2. Congress
  3. Supreme Court
  4. politicians

4
The major tool of the courts in checking the
power of other government branches has been
  1. impeachment
  2. habeas corpus
  3. judicial review
  4. common law

5
The court case that established the practice of
judicial review was
  1. Marbury v. Madison
  2. McCulloch v. Maryland
  3. Lochner v. New York
  4. Printz v. United States

6
Law that are higher than human law is referred to
as
  1. statutory law
  2. universal law
  3. natural law
  4. constitutional law

7
The Bill of Rights refers to the first ____
amendments to the U.S. Constitution.
  1. two
  2. ten
  3. seven
  4. twelve

8
The Road to the Bill of Rights
9
The Articles of Confederation The First
Constitution
  • Provisions of the Articles
  • A loose confederation of independent states
  • Weak central government
  • Shortcomings of the Articles
  • Indebtedness and inability to finance its
    activities
  • Inability to defend American interests in foreign
    affairs
  • Commercial warfare among the states

10
Convening the Constitutional Convention
  • Consensus that a new Constitution was desperately
    needed
  • Yet, growing concern by influential citizens
    about democratizing and egalitarian tendencies

11
Why the Founders Were Worried
  • An Excess of Democracy in the States
  • In the mid-1780s, popular conventions were
    established to monitor and control the actions of
    state legislators.
  • The Pennsylvania state constitution replaced the
    property qualifications as a requirement to vote
    with a very small tax.
  • The Threat to Property Rights in the States
  • Popular opinion
  • Stay acts
  • Shays Rebellion

12
The Constitutional Convention
  • By 1787, most of Americas leaders were convinced
    that the new nation was in great danger of
    failing.
  • Delegates to the Constitutional Convention
  • Wealthy men, well-educated
  • Young, but with broad experience in American
    politics
  • Familiar with the great works of Western
    philosophy and political science

13
Debate Over the Intentions of the Framers
  • Historian Charles Beard The framers were engaged
    in a conspiracy to protect their personal
    economic interests.
  • Although the reality is surely more complex,
    broad economic and social-class motives were
    likely important.

14
Consensus Among the 55 Delegates
  • Agreement that a new constitution must replace
    the the Articles of Confederation
  • Support for a substantially strengthened national
    government
  • Concern that a strong national government is
    potentially tyrannical
  • Belief in a republican form of government based
    on popular consent
  • Desire to insulate government from public opinion
    and popular democracy

15
The Changing Constitution, Democracy, and
American Politics
  • The Constitution is the basic rule book for the
    game of American politics.
  • Constitutional rules
  • Apportion power and responsibility among
    governmental branches
  • Define the fundamental nature of relationships
    between governmental institutions
  • Specify how individuals are to be selected for
    office
  • Tell how the rules themselves may be changed

16
The Struggle to Ratify the Constitution
  • Delegates had been instructed to propose
    alterations to the Articles of Confederation, but
    they wrote an entirely new Constitution instead.
  • Ratification was a difficult process.
  • Federalists favored ratification
  • Anti-Federalists opposed ratification
  • The Compromise with Ratification

17
Ratification of the U.S. Constitution
  • State Date Vote
  • Delaware December 7, 1787 30 - 0
  • Pennsylvania December 12, 1787 46 - 23
  • New Jersey December 18, 1787 38 - 0
  • Georgia January 2, 1788 26 - 0
  • Connecticut January 9, 1788 128 - 0
  • Massachusetts February 6, 1788 187 - 168
  • Maryland April 28, 1788 63 - 11
  • South Carolina May 23, 1788 149 - 73
  • New Hampshire June 21, 1788 57 - 46
  • Virginia June 25, 1788 89 - 79
  • New York July 26, 1788 30 - 27
  • North Carolina November 21, 1789 194 - 77
  • Rhode Island May 29, 1790 34 - 32

18
Proposed Amendments not passed with the Bill of
Rights
  • Article I Apportionment
  • After the first enumeration required by the first
    article of the Constitution, there shall be one
    representative for every thirty thousand, until
    the number shall amount to one hundred, after
    which the proportion shall be so regulated by
    Congress, that there shall be not less than one
    hundred representatives, nor less than one
    representative for every forty thousand persons,
    until the number of representatives shall amount
    to two hundred after which the proportion shall
    be so regulated by Congress, that there shall be
    not less than two hundred representatives, nor
    more than one representative for every fifty
    thousand persons.
  • Article II Congressional pay raises
  • No law varying the compensation for the services
    of the Senators and Representatives, shall take
    effect, until an election of Representatives
    shall have intervened.
  • (ratified in 1992 as Twenty-seventh Amendment)

19
The Amendment Process
20
Proposing Amendments
21
Ratifying Amendments
The Time for Ratification of the 27 Amendments to
the Constitution
22
Unsuccessful Amendment Proposals
  • Over 10,000 considered
  • 33 were sent to States for ratification,
    including
  • Child labor amendment in 1924
  • Equal rights amendment in 1972
  • Others in consideration include
  • A balanced budget amendment
  • Term limits for House of Reps. And Senators
  • Presidential Line item veto power
  • Prohibit flag desecration

23
The Supreme Court The Amendment Process
24
Instigator and Interpreter
  • Five Amendments that overturned Supreme Court
    Decisions
  • 11th overturned Chisholm v. Georgia (1793)
  • 13th overturned Scott v. Sandford (1857)
  • 14th overturned Scott v. Sandford (1857)
  • 16th overturned Pollock v. Farmers Loan Trust
    Co. (1895)
  • 26th overturned Oregon v. Mitchell (1970)

25
Instigator and Interpreter
  • Proposals to overturn Supreme Court Decisions
  • A human life amendment to overturn Roe v. Wade
    (1973)
  • A school prayer amendment to overturn Engel v.
    Vitale (1962) School District of Abington
    Township v. Schempp (1963)
  • A flag desecration amendment to overturn Texas v.
    Johnson (1989)
  • A term limit amendment to overturn U.S. Term
    Limits v. Thornton (1994)

26
Courts Interpretation of Article V
  • Coleman v. Miller (1939)
  • Now v. Idaho (1982)
  • Other issue Constitutional Conventions
  • Are delegates limited to the amendment under
    consideration? OR
  • Are they free to deliberate on any part of the
    Constitution?

27
Coleman v. MillerDocket 7Citation 307 U.S.
433 (1939) Petitioner ColemanRespondent Miller
Advocates
Abstract Oral Argument April 17-18, 1939
Decision Monday, June 5, 1939 Issues the
"political question doctrine" Categories
Article V of the Constitution, Judicial Review
28
Facts of the Case
  • In June, 1924, the Congress proposed an amendment
    to the Constitution, known as the Child Labor
    Amendment.
  • In January, 1925, the Legislature of Kansas
    adopted a resolution rejecting the proposed
    amendment and a certified copy of the resolution
    was sent to the Secretary of State of the United
    States.
  • In January, 1937, a resolution was introduced in
    the Senate of Kansas ratifying the proposed
    amendment.
  • When the resolution came up for consideration,
    there was a 20-20 tie vote. The Lieutenant
    Governor, the presiding officer of the Senate,
    cast the tie breaking vote.
  • The resolution was later adopted by the House of
    Representatives on the vote of a majority of its
    members.

29
QuestionDoes the Congress of the United
Stateswhen proposing for ratification an
amendment to the United States Constitution
pursuant to Article Vhave to specify a deadline
within which the state legislatures (or
conventions held in the states) must act upon the
proposed amendment?
Conclusion
  • All amendments to the Federal Constitution are
    considered pending before the states indefinitely
    unless Congress establishes a deadline within
    which the states must act. Further, Congressnot
    the courtsis responsible for deciding if an
    amendment has been validly ratified.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com