Neural Correlates of Consciousness - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Neural Correlates of Consciousness

Description:

Neural Correlates of Consciousness By Charlene Campbell Different Correlates of Consciousness to be Addressed Audition Neural Correlates of Novel sound gating ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:148
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 39
Provided by: wesl67
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Neural Correlates of Consciousness


1
Neural Correlates of Consciousness
  • By Charlene Campbell

2
Different Correlates of Consciousness to be
Addressed
  • Audition
  • Neural Correlates of Novel sound gating
  • Jaaskelainen
  • Perspective taking
  • Neural Correlates of human self-consciousness
  • Vogeley et al.
  • Vision
  • Neural Correlates of the attentional blink
  • Feinstein et al, Kranczioch et al
  • Neural Correlates of Conscious Vision
  • Pins and ffytche

3
Neural Correlates Constituting Novel Sounds to
Consciousness
  • Jaaskelainen et al

4
Jaaskelainen et al
  • Purpose
  • Find the neural mechanisms that underlie
    preattentive gating awareness of novel sounds

5
Jaaskelainen et al
  • Methods
  • Use fMRI, EEG, and MEG to show brain activity
    when auditory stimulation occurs
  • auditory stimuli
  • Novel stimuli
  • Give novel stimuli alone
  • Standard stimuli
  • Give standard stimuli alone
  • Novel Standard stimuli
  • Give novel stimuli after standard stimulus

6
Jaaskelainen et al
7
Jaaskelainen et al
  • Conclusion
  • Neurons in posterior auditory cortex are more
    broadly tuned on sound frequency then that of
    anterior auditory cortex
  • Processing of low-novel sounds is significantly
    delayed in the anterior auditory cortex
  • High-novel sounds are processed quickly and enter
    consciousness soon through stimulation of
    un-adapted feature-specific neurons within
    posterior auditory cortex

8
Vogeley et al
  • Neural Correlates of First Person Perspective as
    One Constituent of Human Self-Consciousness
  • Purpose
  • To find the neural mechanisms associated with
    perspective taking

9
Vogeley
  • Methods
  • A virtual seen consisting of an avatar and red
    balls in a room was presented by different camera
    viewpoints
  • View points were either 3PP vs 1PP or a ground
    view (gv) vs. an aerial view (av)
  • Camera viewpoints presented to normal viewers in
    an fMRI experiment
  • Task of subjects
  • Count objects as seen either from avatars
    perspective (3pp) or from their own perspective
    (1pp)

10
Vogeley et al
11
Vogeley et al
  • Results
  • When taking a 3PP, there was increased activity
    in the precuneus, the frontal cortex bilaterally,
    the cerebellum bilaterally, the left temporal
    cortex, and the occipitoparietal cortex on the
    left side.
  • When taking a 1PP, there was increased activity
    in the lateral superior temporal cortex
    bilaterally including the insula, mesial cortical
    areas (both frontal and parietal), left frontal
    coretex and the right postcentral gyrus

12
Vogeley et al
  • Conclusion
  • Even though there are joint neural mechanisms,
    decision making 3PP and 1PP rely on differential
    neural processes.

13
First Neurobiological Accounts of Visual
Consciousness
  • View 1
  • Visual consciousness is a localized event
  • Zeki and ffytche showed that the difference in
    seeing or not seeing was dependent on the
    activity of a single visual area area V5
  • View 2
  • Visual consciousness is a network of
    inter-related activity
  • Lumer et al showed that perceptual transitions
    between 2 constant stimuli correlated with
    activity in a fronto-parietal network of areas.

14
Consciousness as a Network
  • Neural Correlates of the Attentional Blink
  • Feinstein et al
  • Kranczioch et al

15
Feinstein et al
  • Purpose
  • To understand the path from sensory processes to
    conscious perception

16
Feinstein et al
  • Methods
  • RSVP of numbers and letters
  • Embedded in RSVP are T1 and T2
  • T1 ? either odd or even string of numbers (ex.
    11111 or 22222)
  • T2 ? either a neutral or aversive word
  • Subjects told to focus on RSVP and then state
    whether T1 was odd or even, and whether T2 was
    seen
  • fMRIs were taken though out experiment

17
Feinstein et al
18
Feinstein et al
  • Results
  • (a) chart depicting the areas of the brain that
    showed greater activity when T2 was identified
  • (b) is another representation of an increase in
    activity when T2 was detected
  • (c) Shows how the anterior cingulate, frontopolar
    cortex, and the medial prefrontal cortex increase
    in activity and thus consciously perceived T2

19
Feinstein et al
  • Conclusions
  • Activation of the anterior cingulate, medial
    prefrontal cortex, and frontopolar cortex is
    involved in the conscious perception of T2
  • Results support theory that consciousness is a
    product of interactions between many parts of the
    brain

20
Kranczioch et al
  • Purpose
  • Identify brain regions assumed to be involved in
    controlling the access of information to
    consciousness
  • Relevant conclusions of previous studies
  • Interference between target and mask is
    associated with increased activation of
    frontoparietal network
  • Includes lateral frontal, anterior cingulate, and
    interparietal areas

21
Kranczioch et al
  • Methods
  • A RVSP sequence of 20 capital black letters and 1
    capital green letter were shown with no
    inter-stimulus interval
  • RSVPrapid serial visual presentation
  • The capital green letter played the role of being
    a defined target that the subject should focus
    on. ?will be referred to as T1 (target 1)
  • The letter X was then denoted as the second
    target ? T2
  • In the experiment, subjects were required to
    indicate after seeing the RSVP sequence if
  • T1 was a vowel
  • T2 was present
  • Responses given via a response pad

22
Kranczioch et al
  • Methods Side Note
  • T1 and T2 target relations in previous studies
  • In an RSVP sequence when T2 followed T1 between
    200-400ms later, the detection of T2 was
    significantly impaired ? attentional blink window
  • Accuracy for T2 detection was highest when
    immediately following T1 or at least 500 ms after
    T1

23
Kranczioch et al
  • Methods continued
  • fMRIs were retrieved while sequence evaluation
    was taking place

24
Kranczioch et al
  • Results
  • 6 conditions were studied
  • Lag refers to amount of time which T2 followed
    after T1
  • T2 detected (lag 1? 100ms after T1)
  • T2 detected (lag 2)
  • T2 missed (lag 1)
  • T2 missed (lag 2)
  • T2 detected
  • No T2

25
Kranczioch et al
  • Results
  • (A) Regions of the brain that were active when T2
    was detected and when T2 was absent
  • (B) Regions of the brain that were active when T2
    was detected and when T2 was missed

26
Kranczioch et al
27
Kranczioch et al
  • Conclusion
  • Findings support that T2 is not detected because
    it doesnt reach working memory
  • Targets that do not reach awareness are processed
    beyond a first stage of perceptual identification
  • Supported by findings of increased activity of
    inferior frontal, parietal, and frontal/anterior
    cingulate cortex in the T2 missed trials in
    comparison to the T2 absent trials

28
Pins and ffytche
  • Purpose
  • To Identify whether neural correlates of visual
    consciousness are localized or distributed.
  • To Identify where the neural correlates are
    located

29
Pins and ffytche
  • Basic Ideas to keep in mind
  • Whether the stimulus is seen or not seen
    indicates a difference between visual input and
    visual perception.
  • If stimulus is seen, then visual perception has
    taken place
  • Perception for this experiment is defined as a
    conscious visual experience

30
Pins and ffytche
  • Methods
  • Visual stimulus portrayed
  • Visual stimulus is composed of a circular
    sinosoidal grating of 1 cycle/degree appearing
    on a grayscale background.
  • Each stimulus trial is composed of 5 parts
  • Pre-stimulus warning sound
  • Pre-stimulus waiting period (random variations in
    length of period to ensure no pre-stimulus
    anticipatory response)
  • Stimulus presentation
  • Post-stimulus warning sound
  • Post-stimulus waiting period
  • Every time the stimulus was seen, the participant
    was to indicate so by pressing a button

31
Pins and ffytche
  • Methods continued
  • For each trial a fMRI (functional magnetic
    resonance imaging) was simultaneously taken.
  • 16 axial slides parallel to the plane passing
    through the anterior and posterior commissures
    were taken every 2 sec per trial
  • For each trial a EP (evoked potential) was
    simultaneously recorded as well
  • EP neurophysiological components evoked by the
    task

32
Pins and ffytche
  • Results of fMRI
  • Activations
  • Visual Areas
  • Thalamus, striate cortex, fusiform gyrus, and
    medial occipital lobe
  • Motor Related areas
  • Left sensory motor cortex
  • Right cerebellar hemisphere
  • Supplementary motor cortex in both hemispheres
  • Auditory system
  • Superior temporal gyrus bilaterally in the insula

33
Pins and ffytche
  • Results of fMRI
  • Suppression
  • Supra-marginal gyrus (parietal)
  • Posterior cingulate and parahippocampul gyrus
    (limbic)
  • In an extended region passing from supperior
    frontal sulcus through the medial frontal gyrus
    to the anterior cingulate gyrus

34
Pins and ffytche
35
Pins and ffytch
  • Results of EP recordings during task
  • Early components
  • High-contrast supra-threshold grating evoked a
    series of positive and negative waves over OL and
    PL
  • Intermediate latency components
  • Yes trials elicited a negative
  • Maximal over left parietal
  • Late components
  • A negative slow wave was present for yes trials
    but not for no trials or catch trials.
  • Maximal over left parietal lobe

36
Pins and ffytch
37
Pins and ffytche
38
Pins and ffytche
  • Conclusions
  • Activity correlating with consciousness is
    distributed over time
  • Suggest that there is a segregation in primary
    and secondary correlates
  • OL activity after stimulus presentation is likely
    to be the primary correlate of consciousness
  • PL, FL, motor and auditory regions are most
    likely the secondary correlates of consciousness
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com