Rural Statistical Areas: A Rural-Centric Approach to Defining Geographic Areas - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

Rural Statistical Areas: A Rural-Centric Approach to Defining Geographic Areas

Description:

Rural Statistical Areas: A Rural-Centric Approach to Defining Geographic Areas Michael Ratcliffe Geography Division U.S. Census Bureau COPAFS Quarterly Meeting – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:112
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: MarkH246
Learn more at: https://copafs.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Rural Statistical Areas: A Rural-Centric Approach to Defining Geographic Areas


1
Rural Statistical AreasA Rural-Centric Approach
to Defining Geographic Areas
  • Michael Ratcliffe
  • Geography Division
  • U.S. Census Bureau
  • COPAFS Quarterly Meeting
  • December 2, 2011

2
What Are Rural Statistical Areas?
  • A set of geographic areas defined using counties,
    county subdivisions, and/or census tracts as
    building blocks.
  • Defined as part of a 3-year joint research
    project between the Census Bureau and the State
    Data Centers to tabulate and analyze ACS 1-year
    estimates for areas of 65,000 or more people.
  • Goal was to create rural, or predominantly rural,
    sub-state areas of 65,000 or more people.
  • Initial delineation focused on county-based
    areas.
  • As the joint research project progressed, county
    subdivisions and census tracts also were used to
    define areas.

3
RSA Delineation Process
  • State Data Center Steering Committee provided the
    initial concept county groupings of 65,000 or
    more focus on rural counties counties of 65,000
    or more people would be standalone RSAs.
  • Geography Division used the USDAs Urban
    Influence Codes to classify counties.
  • Created an aggregation net to create initial
    grouping of counties, then modified
    interactively.
  • SDCs reviewed and made additional changes.
  • SDCs made additional changes to boundaries and
    building blocks as the 3-year joint project
    progressed.

4
Urban Influence Codes (UICs)
Metropolitan Counties Metropolitan Counties
1 In Large Metro Area with Population gt 1 million
2 In Small Metro Area with Population lt 1 million
Non-Metropolitan Counties Non-Metropolitan Counties
3 Micropolitan Adjacent to Large Metro Area
4 Noncore Adjacent to Large Metro Area
5 Micropolitan Adjacent to Small Metro Area
6 Noncore Adjacent to Small Metro Area , with own town
7 Noncore Adjacent to Small Metro Area , without own town
8 Micropolitan NOT Adjacent to Metro Area
9 Noncore Adjacent to Micropolitan Area , with own town
10 Noncore Adjacent to Micropolitan Area, without own town
11 Noncore NOT Adjacent to Metro or Micropolitan Area, with own town
12 Noncore NOT Adjacent to Metro or Micropolitan Area, without own town
5
Urban Influence Codes for Counties With
Population Less Than 65,000
6
(No Transcript)
7
Problems Arising With Initial Aggregation
  • County with UIC 8-12 completely surrounded by
    counties with different UICs
  • Solution aggregate county with other
    non-stand-alone counties

8
Problems Arising With Initial Aggregation
  • Completely surrounded by stand-alone counties
  • Solution aggregate with contiguous stand-alone
    county

9
Problems Arising with Initial Aggregation
  • Total population of aggregated counties within
    net is below 65,000
  • Solution combine areas across aggregation
    polygons

89,712
8,549
3,600
1 2 (Metropolitan) 3 4 (Adjacent to Large
Metro) 5 7 (Adjacent to Small Metro) 8 12
(Not Adjacent to Metro) Stand Alone
County Aggregation Net
31,953
10
Rural Statistical Areas
All Counties Included
11
Rural Statistical Areas Alaska
12
Rural Statistical Areas Hawaii
13
North Dakota RSAs
14
Oregon RSAs2009 Proposal
15
Vermont Planning Regions suggested as
potential RSAs
16
Questions and thoughts that arose during the
joint research project
  • Should RSAs be contiguous?
  • It might be valuable to define multiple,
    noncontiguous micropolitan statistical areas as a
    single RSA, separate from surrounding Outside
    CBSA counties
  • Rural counties with similar demographic
    characteristics may not be contiguous, but for
    analytical purposes should be in the same RSA
  • Can a variety of building blocks be used to form
    RSAs?
  • Group counties, county subdivisions, and census
    tracts, as appropriate, to form meaningful areas
  • Should counties of 130,000 population be split
    into multiple areas?

17
Next Steps
  • The State Data Center Steering Committee has
    requested that the Census Bureau adopt RSAs as a
    standard tabulation geography
  • Review concept more widely within Census Bureau
  • Prepare Federal Register notice with proposal for
    comment
  • Think of a better term for these areas since some
    are obviously urban or predominantly urban

18
Thanks!
  • Comments, questions
  • Michael Ratcliffe
  • Geography Division
  • Census Bureau
  • 301-763-8977
  • michael.r.ratcliffe_at_census.gov
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com