Improved Modeling of the Glucose-Insulin Dynamical System Leading to a Diabetic State - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 42
About This Presentation
Title:

Improved Modeling of the Glucose-Insulin Dynamical System Leading to a Diabetic State

Description:

Title: Improved Modeling of the Glucose-Insulin Dynamical System Leading to a Diabetic State Author: Generic User Last modified by: Generic User – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:74
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 43
Provided by: Generi6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Improved Modeling of the Glucose-Insulin Dynamical System Leading to a Diabetic State


1
Improved Modeling of the Glucose-Insulin
Dynamical System Leading to a Diabetic State
  • Clinton C. Mason
  • Arizona State University
  • National Institutes of Diabetes and Digestive and
    Kidney Diseases
  • Feb. 4th, 2006

2
Diabetes Overview
  • The cells in the body rely primarily on glucose
    as their chief energy supply
  • This glucose is mostly a by-product of the food
    we eat
  • After digestion, glucose is secreted into the
    bloodstream for transport to the various cells of
    the body

3
Diabetes Overview
  • Glucose is not able to enter most cells directly
    insulin is required for the cells to uptake
    glucose
  • Insulin is secreted by the pancreas, at an amount
    regulated by the current glucose level a
    feedback loop
  • If the steady state level of glucose in the
    bloodstream gets too high (200 mg/dl) Type 2
    Diabetes is diagnosed

4
Glucose-Insulin Modeling
  • Various models have been proposed to describe the
    short-term glucose-insulin dynamics
  • The Minimal Model (Bergman, 1979) has been widely
    accepted

5
Minimal Model
Net Glucose Uptake Product of Remote Insulin
and Glucose
Change in Glucose
Const. times Plasma Insulin minus Const. times
Remote Insulin
Change in Remote Insulin
2nd Phase Insulin Secretion depends on Glucose
excess of threshold (e) minus amount of 1st Phase
Secretion
Change in Plasma Insulin
6
(No Transcript)
7
(No Transcript)
8
(No Transcript)
9
Minimal Model
  • The model describes quite well the short-term
    dynamics of glucose and insulin
  • Drawbacks
  • No Long-term simulations possible
  • Describes return to a normal glucose steady state
    level only
  • Provides no pathway for diabetes development

10
ßIG Model
  • The first model to describe long-term
    glucose-insulin dynamics was the ßIG model (Topp,
    2000)
  • This model provided a pathway for diabetes
    development through the introduction of a 3rd
    dynamical variable ß - cell mass

11
ßIG Model
  • The ßIG model combines the fast dynamics of the
    minimal model, with the slower changes in ß-cell
    mass due to glucotoxicity
  • This effect was modeled from data gathered from
    studies on Zucker diabetic fatty rats

12
ßIG Model
13
ßIG Model
Change in Glucose
Change in Insulin
Change in Beta-cell Mass
14
ßIG Model
Same as Minimal Model
Change in Glucose
Variant of Minimal Model
Change in Insulin
ß-cell mass changes as a parabolic function of
Glucose
Change in Beta-cell Mass
15
ßIG Model
Fast dynamics
Fast dynamics
Slow dynamics
16
Steady States
17
3 Steady States
18
Steady States
Shifting the 1st steady state to the origin and
linearizing, we obtain
19
Steady States
As the diagonal elements (eigenvalues) are
negative for all normal parameter ranges, we find
the steady state to be a locally stable node
20
Steady States
The 2nd steady state is a saddle point, and the
3rd steady state is a locally stable spiral
This 3rd s.s. represents a normal physiological
steady state. The change of a given parameter can
move this steady state closer and closer to the
glucose level of the 2nd unstable steady state,
and upon crossing this threshold, a saddle node
bifurcation occurs, leaving only the 3rd steady
state - approached rapidly by all trajectories
21
Parameter h decreasing
22
  • The saddle-node bifurcation describes a scenario
    in which ß -cell mass goes to zero, and the
    glucose level rises greatly.
  • This is typical of what happens in Type 1
    diabetes (usually only occurs in youth)

23
  • In Type 2 diabetes, the ß-cell level is sometimes
    decreased, but the zero level of B-cell mass is
    never reached.
  • In fact, in some Type 2 diabetics, the ß -cell
    level is completely normal.

24
Parameter h decreasing
25
(Butler, 2003)
63 Reduction in ß -cell MassBetween largest
glucose changes
26
  • Hence, it appears that for these individuals, the
    deficit in ß -cells is not extreme enough to
    encounter the saddle-node bifurcation, and
    approach the s.s with ß -cell mass 0
  • Yet, there is a fast jump in glucose values when
    approaching the diabetic level

27
  • We will explore a different pathway for diabetes
    development that is independent of the ß -cell
    level (i.e. let ß 0)
  • The pathway involves an increase in insulin
    resistance which causes insulin secretion levels
    to rise

28
  • Although the ß -cells can increase their capacity
    to secrete insulin, there is a maximal level, and
    once reached, further increases in IR will cause
    the glucose steady state value to rise
  • Such a scenario may be sufficient to explain this
    pathway to diabetes.

29
  • This scenario is possible by merely looking at
    the 2-dimensional glucose-insulin dynamics.

30
ßIG Model Revision 1
Change in Glucose
Change in Insulin
Change in Insulin Resistance
Change in Beta-cell Mass
31
(No Transcript)
32
ßIG Model Revision 2
  • The model is formulated to describe a slow moving
    fluctuation of beta-cells due to glucotoxicity
  • However, the ßIG model has beta cell mass
    dynamics that fluctuate rapidly, as ß-cell level
    is modeled as a function of glucose level rather
    than steady state glucose level

33
ßIG Model without correction
34
ßIG Model Revision 2
A correction can be made by substituting in the
glucose steady state value
35
ßIG Model Revision 2
Additionally, regular perturbations to the
glucose system occur as often as we eat
While these perturbations have usually decayed by
the time of the next feeding, they may be modeled
to give a more realistic profile
36
(Sturis, 1991)
37
(No Transcript)
38
ßIG Model Revision 2
Additionally, we may add, a glucose forcing term
to simulate daily feeding cycles
39
ßIG Model Revision 2
40
  • Using the revised model, we may compare the
    glucose profiles obtained over a long time course
    with actual data from longitudinal studies

41
Hypothetical Overlay of Revised ßIG Model and
Actual Long Term Data
42
Works Cited
  • Bergman RN, Ider YZ, Bowden CR, Cobelli C.
    Quantitative estimation of insulin sensitivity.
    Am J Physiol. 1979 Jun236(6)E667-77.
  • Butler AE, Janson J, Bonner-Weir S, Ritzel R,
    Rizza RA, Butler PC. Beta-cell deficit and
    increased beta-cell apoptosis in humans with type
    2 diabetes. Diabetes. 2003 Jan52(1)102-10.
  • Sturis, J., Polonsky, K. S., Mosekilde, E., Van
    Cauter, E. Computer model for mechanisms
    underlying ultradian oscillations of insulin and
    glucose. Am. J. Physiol. 1991 260, E801-E809.
  • Topp, B., Promislow, K., De Vries, G., Miura, R.
    M., Finegood, D. T. A Model of ß-cell mass,
    insulin, and glucose kinetics pathways to
    diabetes, J. Theor. Biol. 2000 206, 605-619.
  • Background image modified from http//www.fraktals
    tudio.de/index.htm
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com