Task 11 Remote Sensing of Ocean Color and Aerosol Properties NASA Grant (NAS5-00203) Assessment, Validation, and Refinement of the Atmospheric Correction Algorithm for the Ocean Color Sensors Menghua Wang The JCET Annual Report Retreat Port Deposit - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Task 11 Remote Sensing of Ocean Color and Aerosol Properties NASA Grant (NAS5-00203) Assessment, Validation, and Refinement of the Atmospheric Correction Algorithm for the Ocean Color Sensors Menghua Wang The JCET Annual Report Retreat Port Deposit

Description:

Title: Task 11 Remote Sensing of Ocean Color and Aerosol Properties NASA Grant (NAS5-00203) Assessment, Validation, and Refinement of the Atmospheric Correction ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:90
Avg rating:3.0/5.0

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Task 11 Remote Sensing of Ocean Color and Aerosol Properties NASA Grant (NAS5-00203) Assessment, Validation, and Refinement of the Atmospheric Correction Algorithm for the Ocean Color Sensors Menghua Wang The JCET Annual Report Retreat Port Deposit


1
 Atmospheric Correction using the MODIS SWIR
Bands (1240 and 2130 nm)
Menghua Wang (PI, NASA NNG05HL35I) NOAA/NESDIS/OR
A Camp Springs, MD 20746, USA Support from Wei
Shi UMBC, NOAA/NESDIS/ORA Camp Springs, MD
20746, USA The MODIS Science Team Meeting
January 4-6, 2006, Radisson Plaza Lord Baltimore
Hotel, Maryland
2
Status of the Algorithm Modifications and
Refinements
  • 1. Wang, M. and W. Shi, Estimation of ocean
    contribution at the MODIS near-infrared
    wavelengths along the east coast of the U.S. Two
    case studies, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L13606,
    doi10.1029/2005GL022917 (2005).
  • 2. Wang, M., A refinement for the Rayleigh
    radiance computation with variation of the
    atmospheric pressure, Int. J. Remote Sens. (In
    press).
  • Status Implemented into the MODIS/SeaWiFS data
    processing.
  • 3. Wang, M., Effects of ocean surface
    reflectance variation with solar elevation on
    normalized water-leaving radiance, App. Opt. (In
    press).
  • Status Implemented into the MODIS/SeaWiFS data
    processing.
  • 4. Wang, M. and W. Shi, Cloud masking for ocean
    color data processing in the coastal regions,
    IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. (Submitted).
  • Status Developed cloud masking using MODIS SWIR
    bands (1240/1640/2130 nm). Scheme can be easily
    implemented into the MODIS data processing
    system.
  • 5. Developed schemes using idea of Wang and
    Gordon (1994) to identify cases for the strongly
    absorbing aerosols and turbid waters with the
    MODIS data.
  • Status A poster is presented in this meeting.
    Work is in progress.
  • 6. Atmospheric correction using the MODIS SWIR
    bands.
  • Status This presentation. Work is in progress.

3
Atmospheric Correction
MODIS and SeaWiFS algorithm (Gordon and Wang 1994)
  • ?w is the desired quantity in ocean color remote
    sensing.
  • T?g is the sun glint contributionavoided/masked/c
    orrected.
  • T?wc is the whitecap reflectancecomputed from
    wind speed.
  • ?r is the scattering from moleculescomputed
    using the Rayleigh lookup tables (atmospheric
    pressure dependence).
  • ?A ?a ?ra is the aerosol and Rayleigh-aerosol
    contributions estimated using aerosol models.
  • For Case-1 waters at the open ocean, ?w is
    usually negligible at 750 865 nm. ?A can be
    estimated using these two NIR bands. Ocean is
    usually not black at NIR for the coastal regions.
  • Gordon, H. R. and M. Wang, Retrieval of
    water-leaving radiance and aerosol optical
    thickness over the oceans with SeaWiFS A
    preliminary algorithm, Appl. Opt., 33, 443-452,
    1994.

4
Atmospheric Correction Longer NIR
  • In general, to effect the atmospheric correction
    operationally using the NIR bands at 748 and 869
    nm, or using the spectral optimization with
    measurements from 412-865nm, Case-2 bio-optical
    model that has strongly regional dependence is
    needed.
  • At the longer NIR wavelengths (gt1000 nm), ocean
    water is much strongly absorbing and ocean
    contributions are significant less. Thus,
    atmospheric correction may be carried out at the
    coastal regions without using the bio-optical
    model.
  • Examples using the MODIS Aqua 1240 and 2130 nm
    data to derive the ocean color products.
  • We use the longer NIR (2130 nm) for the cloud
    masking. This is necessary for the coastal
    region waters.

5
Water Absorption
6
Water Absorption Relative to 865 nm
Black ocean at the longer NIR bands Absorption
at the longer NIR bands is at least an order
larger than that at the 865 nm
7
The Rayleigh-Corrected TOA Reflectance
748 nm
869 nm
1240 nm
1640 nm
Rayleigh-Removed
8
Aerosol Single-Scattering Epsilon (l0 865 nm)
9
Aerosol Single-Scattering Epsilon (l0 2130 nm)
10
Data Processing Using the SWIR Bands
  • Software Modifications
  • Atmospheric correction package has been
    significantly modified based on SeaDAS 4.6.
  • Data structure and format of aerosol lookup
    tables and diffuse transmittance tables have been
    changed.
  • With these changes, it is flexible now to run
    with different aerosol models (e.g., absorbing
    aerosols) and with various band combinations for
    atmospheric correction.
  • Lookup Tables Generation and Implementation
  • Rayleigh lookup tables for the SWIR bands (for
    all MODIS 16 bands).
  • Aerosol optical property data (scattering phase
    function, single scattering albedo, extinction
    coefficients) for the SWIR bands (12 models).
  • Aerosol radiance lookup tables (12 aerosol
    models) for the SWIR bands. Table structures are
    completely changed (different from the current
    ones).
  • Data Processing
  • Regenerated MODIS L1B data including all SWIR
    band data (for SeaDAS).
  • Developed cloud masking using the MODIS
    1240/1640/2130 nm band.
  • For MODIS Aqua, atmospheric correction can be
    operated using 1240/2130 bands, 869/1240 bands,
    and 869/2130 bands.
  • Current 8 bands 412, 443, 488, 531, 551, 869,
    1240, and 2130 nm.

11
We have carried out vicarious calibration using a
MOBY scene from the standard processing
Vicarious Gains
12
Initial Results
  • We compare the current MODIS results (downloaded
    directly from Web) and results from algorithm
    using SWIR bands.

13
Chlorophyll-a (2004071.1825)
New Processing (1240, 2130 nm)
Standard Processing (748, 869 nm)
March 12, 2004
14
Chlorophyll-a (2004071.1825)
New Processing (1240, 2130 nm)
Standard Processing (748, 869 nm)
March 12, 2004
15
Three weeks late
Chlorophyll-a (2004096.1820)
New Processing (1240, 2130 nm)
Standard Processing (748, 869 nm)
April 6, 2004
16
nLw(443) (2004071.1825)
New Processing (1240, 2130 nm)
Standard Processing (748, 869 nm)
March 12, 2004
17
nLw(531) (2004071.1825)
New Processing (1240, 2130 nm)
Standard Processing (748, 869 nm)
March 12, 2004
18
nLw(869) (2004071.1825)
nLw(869)
New Processing (1240, 2130 nm)
NIR ocean contributions
March 12, 2004
19
Three weeks late
nLw(443) (2004096.1820)
New Processing (1240, 2130 nm)
Standard Processing (748, 869 nm)
April 6, 2004
20
Three weeks late
nLw(531) (2004096.1820)
New Processing (1240, 2130 nm)
Standard Processing (748, 869 nm)
April 6, 2004
21
nLw(869) (2004096.1820)
nLw(869)
NIR ocean contributions
New Processing (1240, 2130 nm)
Three weeks late
April 6, 2004
22
Outer Banks
Outside of Outer Banks
HistogramnLw(412) (2004071.1825)
Standard Processing (748, 869 nm)
New Processing (1240, 2130 nm)
March 12, 2004
23
Outer Banks
Outside of Outer Banks
HistogramnLw(443) (2004071.1825)
Standard Processing (748, 869 nm)
New Processing (1240, 2130 nm)
March 12, 2004
24
Outer Banks
Outside of Outer Banks
HistogramnLw(488) (2004071.1825)
Standard Processing (748, 869 nm)
New Processing (1240, 2130 nm)
March 12, 2004
25
Outer Banks
Outside of Outer Banks
HistogramnLw(531) (2004071.1825)
Standard Processing (748, 869 nm)
New Processing (1240, 2130 nm)
March 12, 2004
26
HistogramnLw(869) (2004071.1825)
Chesapeake Bay
Outer Banks
New Processing (1240, 2130 nm)
Open Ocean
SC Coast
March 12, 2004
27
An example from the west coast
Chlorophyll-a (2004130.2125)
Standard Processing (748, 869 nm)
New Processing (1240, 2130 nm)
May 10, 2004
28
An example from the west coast
nLw(412) (2004130.2125)
Standard Processing (748, 869 nm)
New Processing (1240, 2130 nm)
May 10, 2004
29
An example from the west coast
nLw(488) (2004130.2125)
Standard Processing (748, 869 nm)
New Processing (1240, 2130 nm)
May 10, 2004
30
An example from the west coast
nLw(531) (2004130.2125)
Standard Processing (748, 869 nm)
New Processing (1240, 2130 nm)
May 10, 2004
31
nLw(869) (2004130.2125)
New Processing (1240, 2130 nm)
NIR ocean contributions
May 10, 2004
32
Effects of band noises
Chlorophyll-a (2004071.1825)
New Processing (1240, 2130 nm)
New Processing (1240, 2130 nm)
Fixed Model M90
Fixed Model C50
March 12, 2004
33
Effects of band noises
nLw(531) (2004071.1825)
New Processing (869, 2130 nm)
New Processing (1240, 2130 nm)
March 12, 2004
34
Effects of band noises
nLw(531) (2004071.1825)
New Processing (869, 1240 nm)
Standard Processing (748, 869 nm)
March 12, 2004
35
Effects of Band NoiseHistogramnLw(531)(Open
Ocean) (2004071.1825)
Standard
1240, 2130 nm
STD ValueStandard 0.05091240, 2130
0.1177869, 2130 0.0704869, 1240 0.0786
869, 2130 nm
869, 1240 nm
36
Conclusions
  • It works!
  • For the turbid waters in coastal regions, ocean
    is not black at the NIR bands. This leads to
    underestimation of the sensor-measured
    water-leaving radiances with current
    SeaWiFS/MODIS atmospheric correction algorithm.
  • Ocean is black for turbid waters at wavelengths
    gt1000 nm, e.g., 1240 and 2130 nm. Thus, the
    longer NIR bands can be used for atmospheric
    correction over the turbid waters. No ocean
    model is needed!
  • Future ocean color sensor needs to include
    wavelengths gt 1000 nm with high SNR values.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com