Title: Clean Nuclear Energy And its future in The U.S.
1Clean Nuclear Energy And its future in The U.S.
- PRESENTED BY
- KAYLA ROONEY, MIKE MORRISON, SHAUN PIERRE
2Why do we need a repository?
- Spent nuclear fuel and waste are hazardous
- Remain toxic for thousands of years
- Environmental damage
- Cause cancer
- Other harmful effects/threats
3How much is there?
- 75,000 metric tons
- Produced from 80 sites throughout 35 states
- Expected to be doubled by 2055
4Where is it now?
- Interim
- Temporary designated areas
- On-site storage
- Plants have storage areas
5On-Site Storage Problems
- Plants generally commissioned for 40 years
- Some recommission for 20
- Storage areas reaching capacity
- Reracking/organization
- 60 years to safely decommission a plant
- Storage considered safe for another 60 years
after that
6Permanent Repository Options
- Space
- High costs
- Risks associated with launch failure
- Transmutation to harmless materials
- High costs
- Not necessarily 100 effective
- Geological
7Geological Repositories
- Nuclear Waste Policy Act, 1982
- Yucca Mountain, 1987
- Funding shut down in 2010
- Political reasons
- Locals unsatisfied
8Nuclear power does not have a future without a
central waste repository.
9Currently?
- Nuclear waste generated in the U.S. is stored at
or near one of the 121 facilities across the
country where it is generated
10(No Transcript)
11On Site Storage?
- In the short term, irradiated reactor fuel should
be stored as safely as possible on site or as
close to the point of generation as possible for
an interim period.
12On-site storage is not a sound strategy for the
long term
- Possibility of reprocessing
- Leaks and accidents
- Requires constant monitoring
- Destruction of waste storage containers by
natural disasters or terrorism
13On-site storage is not a sound strategy for the
long term
- The temporary casks are only licensed to hold
radioactive waste for 20 years.
Another 49,000 metric tons is being held in
spent-fuel pools, waiting to be placed in vessels.
More than 800 filled casks await a final
destination, holding 14,000 metric tons of waste.
A further 2,000 metric tons of nuclear reactor
waste is created every year.
14Maine Yankee Facility
- Nuclear power plant built in Wiscasset, Maine
- Operated from 1972-1996
- Decommissioned and dismantled between 1997-2005
- Left behind 64 steel and concrete casks that
hold 542 metric tons of radioactive waste - Protected by barbed wire, cameras, and a security
force
15Federal Governments Obligation to Remove and
Dispose of Nuclear Waste
- More than 10 years behind schedule
- Has paid nuclear utilities 565 million in
compensation for costs incurred because of its
failure to meet that schedule. - DOE currently estimates that liabilities to
electric utilities for such damages will total
more than 12 billion if the department begins to
accept nuclear waste by 2020.
-Kim Cawley, chief of the Natural and Physical
Resources Cost Estimates Unit
16Viewpoint 2 Is there a future?Yes.
- Nuclear Energy is a modern energy
- Still Being debated to use or not
- Is it safe
- Is it manageable
- Will it sustain our growing energy needs
17The Building of New Nuclear
- In 2005, 30 nations declare first nuclear
installs plus 65 claim interests plus 30 already
running - 14 Global Electricity (2012)
- 20 apps have been filed with Nuclear Regulatory
Commission,18 Col Apps - 28 Reactors/ 18 sites in US
-
18Slow But Sure Progress
- Bureaucratic Approval/ Re-approvals
- Focus on Form and Function
- Safety measurements built-in
- Cooperation between Govt., Privet, and Safety
- This assures the best plants possible
- Prepared for all possible scenarios
19Remy Carle(SES) French ElectricsNuclear Power
(presses Universitaires de France 1994)
- Accident prevention, from the initial design
stage, through careful sizing of all
installations, the taking into account of
possible equipment failures and human error, the
taking into account of external hazards, the
implementation of safety systems, and the quality
control of the design and execution of equipment
and work - Continuous monitoring during operation, according
to procedures monitored by national authorities - Implementation of safety systems to maintain the
cooling of nuclear fuel and prevent the release
of radioactive products in the event of abnormal
operation - De?nition of emergency planning and procedures to
deal with the highly improbably event of a
serious accident
20Looking Ahead Fast Reactors
- Gen IV, much more efficient
- Large cut in waste volume
- To this date Safer than current Reactors
- Universal Push ( US, Japan, France)
21Aggressive Govt. Support
- Govt. loans
- Incentives for early investors
- Adding a CO2 tax on coal and Natural Gas
- Ensures competitive cost to Nuclear
- Pushes Privet investors towards Nuclear
22 Gallup Polls show support rising
23 Our consensus
- A central repository is necessary for nuclear
powers future
24Work-sited
- Ahearne, John F, Albert V. Carr, JR. Harold A
Felveson, Daniel Ingersoll, Andrew C Klein,
Stephen Maloney, Ivan Oelrich, Sharon Swuassoni,
and Richard Wolfson. "The Future Of Nuclear Power
In The United States." Ed. Charles C Ferguson and
Frank A Settle. Federation Of American
Scientists/ Wahsington and Lee University, 1 Jan.
2012. Web. Nov. 2014. lthttp//fas.org/pubs/_docs/
Nuclear_Energy_Report-lowres.pdfgt. - "Fast Neutron Reactors." World Nuclear
Association. World Nuclear Association, 1 Jan.
2014. Web. Nov. 2014. lthttp//www.world-nuclear.o
rg/info/Current-and-Future-Generation/Fast-Neutron
-Reactors/gt. - http//www.greenamerica.org/programs/climate/dirty
energy/nuclear.cfm - http//ieer.org/resource/factsheets/yucca-mountain
/ - http//www-formal.stanford.edu/jmc/progress/nuclea
r-faq.html - http//www.smartplanet.com/blog/smart-takes/tickin
g-time-bombs-what-should-we-do-with-nuclear-waste/
?tagcontent3Bcol1 - http//ansnuclearcafe.org/2014/09/16/surface-stora
ge-of-used-nuclear-fuel-safe-cost-effective-and-fl
exible/