Clean Nuclear Energy And its future in The U.S. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Clean Nuclear Energy And its future in The U.S.

Description:

Clean Nuclear Energy And its future in The U.S. PRESENTED BY: KAYLA ROONEY, MIKE MORRISON, & SHAUN PIERRE Without a central waste repository we cannot continue ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:189
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: babayaga
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Clean Nuclear Energy And its future in The U.S.


1
Clean Nuclear Energy And its future in The U.S.
  • PRESENTED BY
  • KAYLA ROONEY, MIKE MORRISON, SHAUN PIERRE

2
Why do we need a repository?
  • Spent nuclear fuel and waste are hazardous
  • Remain toxic for thousands of years
  • Environmental damage
  • Cause cancer
  • Other harmful effects/threats

3
How much is there?
  • 75,000 metric tons
  • Produced from 80 sites throughout 35 states
  • Expected to be doubled by 2055

4
Where is it now?
  • Interim
  • Temporary designated areas
  • On-site storage
  • Plants have storage areas

5
On-Site Storage Problems
  • Plants generally commissioned for 40 years
  • Some recommission for 20
  • Storage areas reaching capacity
  • Reracking/organization
  • 60 years to safely decommission a plant
  • Storage considered safe for another 60 years
    after that

6
Permanent Repository Options
  • Space
  • High costs
  • Risks associated with launch failure
  • Transmutation to harmless materials
  • High costs
  • Not necessarily 100 effective
  • Geological

7
Geological Repositories
  • Nuclear Waste Policy Act, 1982
  • Yucca Mountain, 1987
  • Funding shut down in 2010
  • Political reasons
  • Locals unsatisfied

8
Nuclear power does not have a future without a
central waste repository.
  • VIEWPOINT 1

9
Currently?
  • Nuclear waste generated in the U.S. is stored at
    or near one of the 121 facilities across the
    country where it is generated

10
(No Transcript)
11
On Site Storage?
  • In the short term, irradiated reactor fuel should
    be stored as safely as possible on site or as
    close to the point of generation as possible for
    an interim period.

12
On-site storage is not a sound strategy for the
long term
  • Possibility of reprocessing
  • Leaks and accidents
  • Requires constant monitoring
  • Destruction of waste storage containers by
    natural disasters or terrorism

13
On-site storage is not a sound strategy for the
long term
  • The temporary casks are only licensed to hold
    radioactive waste for 20 years.

Another 49,000 metric tons is being held in
spent-fuel pools, waiting to be placed in vessels.
More than 800 filled casks await a final
destination, holding 14,000 metric tons of waste.
A further 2,000 metric tons of nuclear reactor
waste is created every year.
14
Maine Yankee Facility
  • Nuclear power plant built in Wiscasset, Maine
  • Operated from 1972-1996
  • Decommissioned and dismantled between 1997-2005
  • Left behind 64 steel and concrete casks that
    hold 542 metric tons of radioactive waste
  • Protected by barbed wire, cameras, and a security
    force

15
Federal Governments Obligation to Remove and
Dispose of Nuclear Waste
  • More than 10 years behind schedule
  • Has paid nuclear utilities 565 million in
    compensation for costs incurred because of its
    failure to meet that schedule.
  • DOE currently estimates that liabilities to
    electric utilities for such damages will total
    more than 12 billion if the department begins to
    accept nuclear waste by 2020.

-Kim Cawley, chief of the Natural and Physical
Resources Cost Estimates Unit
16
Viewpoint 2 Is there a future?Yes.
  • Nuclear Energy is a modern energy
  • Still Being debated to use or not
  • Is it safe
  • Is it manageable
  • Will it sustain our growing energy needs

17
The Building of New Nuclear
  • In 2005, 30 nations declare first nuclear
    installs plus 65 claim interests plus 30 already
    running
  • 14 Global Electricity (2012)
  • 20 apps have been filed with Nuclear Regulatory
    Commission,18 Col Apps
  • 28 Reactors/ 18 sites in US

18
Slow But Sure Progress
  • Bureaucratic Approval/ Re-approvals
  • Focus on Form and Function
  • Safety measurements built-in
  • Cooperation between Govt., Privet, and Safety
  • This assures the best plants possible
  • Prepared for all possible scenarios

19
Remy Carle(SES) French ElectricsNuclear Power
(presses Universitaires de France 1994)
  • Accident prevention, from the initial design
    stage, through careful sizing of all
    installations, the taking into account of
    possible equipment failures and human error, the
    taking into account of external hazards, the
    implementation of safety systems, and the quality
    control of the design and execution of equipment
    and work
  • Continuous monitoring during operation, according
    to procedures monitored by national authorities
  • Implementation of safety systems to maintain the
    cooling of nuclear fuel and prevent the release
    of radioactive products in the event of abnormal
    operation
  • De?nition of emergency planning and procedures to
    deal with the highly improbably event of a
    serious accident

20
Looking Ahead Fast Reactors
  • Gen IV, much more efficient
  • Large cut in waste volume
  • To this date Safer than current Reactors
  • Universal Push ( US, Japan, France)

21
Aggressive Govt. Support
  • Govt. loans
  • Incentives for early investors
  • Adding a CO2 tax on coal and Natural Gas
  • Ensures competitive cost to Nuclear
  • Pushes Privet investors towards Nuclear

22
Gallup Polls show support rising
23
Our consensus
  • A central repository is necessary for nuclear
    powers future

24
Work-sited
  • Ahearne, John F, Albert V. Carr, JR. Harold A
    Felveson, Daniel Ingersoll, Andrew C Klein,
    Stephen Maloney, Ivan Oelrich, Sharon Swuassoni,
    and Richard Wolfson. "The Future Of Nuclear Power
    In The United States." Ed. Charles C Ferguson and
    Frank A Settle. Federation Of American
    Scientists/ Wahsington and Lee University, 1 Jan.
    2012. Web. Nov. 2014. lthttp//fas.org/pubs/_docs/
    Nuclear_Energy_Report-lowres.pdfgt.
  • "Fast Neutron Reactors." World Nuclear
    Association. World Nuclear Association, 1 Jan.
    2014. Web. Nov. 2014. lthttp//www.world-nuclear.o
    rg/info/Current-and-Future-Generation/Fast-Neutron
    -Reactors/gt.
  • http//www.greenamerica.org/programs/climate/dirty
    energy/nuclear.cfm
  • http//ieer.org/resource/factsheets/yucca-mountain
    /
  • http//www-formal.stanford.edu/jmc/progress/nuclea
    r-faq.html
  • http//www.smartplanet.com/blog/smart-takes/tickin
    g-time-bombs-what-should-we-do-with-nuclear-waste/
    ?tagcontent3Bcol1
  • http//ansnuclearcafe.org/2014/09/16/surface-stora
    ge-of-used-nuclear-fuel-safe-cost-effective-and-fl
    exible/
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com