Overview-ch.16: Pdot and U rate - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 52
About This Presentation
Title:

Overview-ch.16: Pdot and U rate

Description:

Pdot = % P u = U/LF The Phillips curve relates u and Pdot. Shifts in the Phillips curve - the role of expectations. P and PEPdot and PdotE – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:87
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 53
Provided by: StephenM190
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Overview-ch.16: Pdot and U rate


1
Overview-ch.16 Pdot and U rate
  • Pdot ?P u U/LF
  • The Phillips curve relates u and Pdot.
  • Shifts in the Phillips curve - the role of
    expectations. P and PEgtgtPdot and PdotE
  • Shifts in the Phillips curve - the role of supply
    shocks.
  • The cost of reducing inflation.

2
Pdot and u
  • How are inflation and unemployment related in the
    short run? In the long run?
  • What factors alter this relationship?
  • What is the short-run cost of reducing inflation?
    LR?
  • How does this relate to AD and AS?

3
Conclusion
  • In the long run, inflation unemployment are
    unrelated Neutrality
  • The inflation rate depends mainly on growth in
    the money supply.
  • Unemployment (the natural rate) depends on the
    minimum wage, the market power of unions,
    efficiency wages, and the process of job search.
  • SRPC is related to cycles.AD and SRAS.

4
How much Inflation? Rule of 70
5
Inflation and Unemployment
  • The Natural Rate of Unemployment
  • depends on various features of the labour market,
    (e.g. minimum-wage laws, the market power of
    unions, the role of efficiency wages, and
    effectiveness of job search).
  • The Inflation Rate.
  • depends primarily on growth in the quantity of
    money, controlled by the
  • B of C.

6
Inflation and Unemployment
  • Macroeconomics focuses on three primary areas of
    our economy - output, prices, and unemployment.
  • If policy-makers expand aggregate demand, they
    can lower unemployment, in the short-run, but
    only at the cost of higher inflation.
  • If they contract aggregate demand, they can lower
    inflation, but at the cost of higher unemployment.

7
The Phillips Curve
  • Illustrates the tradeoff between inflation and
    unemployment -- a short-run relationship.
  • The Phillips Curve relates inflation and
    unemployment in the short-run as shifts in the
    aggregate demand curve move the economy along the
    short-run aggregate supply curve.
  • 1958 A.W. Phillips showed that nominal wage
    growth (Wdot) was negatively correlated with
    unemployment in the U.K.

8
Deriving the Phillips Curve
  • Suppose P 100 this year.
  • The following graphs show two possible outcomes
    for next year
  • A. aggregate demand low, small increase in P
    (i.e., low inflation-P goes to 102), low output,
    high unemployment.
  • B. aggregate demand high, big increase in P
    (i.e., high inflation-P to 106), high output, low
    unemployment.

9
Phillips Curve and AD-SRAS
10
The Phillips Curve in the 1950s and 1960s
11
The Phillips Curve, Aggregate Demand and
Aggregate Supply
  • The greater the aggregate demand for goods and
    services, the greater is the economys output and
    the higher the overall price level.
  • A higher level of output results in a lower level
    of unemployment.
  • Monetary and fiscal policy can shift the
    aggregate demand curve along SRAS , thus moving
    the economy along the SR Phillips curve.

12
Phillips Curve
Inflation Rate
B
6
A
2
Unemployment Rate
0
4
7
13
The Tradeoff Between Inflation and Unemployment
  • Policy-makers face a tradeoff between inflation
    and unemployment, and the Phillips Curve
    illustrates that tradeoff.
  • Okuns law (PAST DATA) tells us that greater
    output means a lower rate of unemployment but the
    Phillips Curve says this is at a higher overall
    price level.
  • SR Relationship

14
Shifts in the Phillips Curve
  • It has been suggested that the Phillips curve
    offers policy-makers a menu of possible economic
    outcomes. Choices
  • Historical events have shown that the Phillips
    Curve can shift due to
  • Expectations
  • Supply Shocks

15
Shifts in the Phillips Curve
  • The concept of a stable Phillips Curve broke down
    in the 1970s and 1980s. During the 70s and 80s
    the economy experienced high inflation and high
    unemployment simultaneously.
  • Economists determined that monetary policy was
    effective in the short-run in picking a
    combination of inflation and unemployment, but
    not in the long-run.

16
The Breakdown of the Phillips Curve
17
Phillips curve data--US
18
LRPC and LRAS
  • Natural-rate hypothesis the theory that
    unemployment eventually returns to its normal or
    natural rate, regardless of the inflation rate.
  • Based on the classical dichotomy (neutrality)
    and the vertical LRAS curve.

19
LRAS and LRPC In LR faster money growth just
causes Pdot
20
Reconciling theory and data
  • Evidence (from 60s) PC slopes downward.
  • Theory PC is vertical in the long run.
  • To bridge the gap between theory and evidence,
    Friedman and Phelps introduced a new variable
    expected inflation a measure of how much people
    expect the price level to change.

21
The Phillips Curve Equation
  • U rate Natural U a (Actual inflation-expected
    inflation) Like the SRAS equation
  • Short run BofC can reduce u-rate below the
    natural u-rate by making inflation greater than
    expected.
  • Long run Expectations catch up to reality,
    u-rate goes back to natural u-rate whether
    inflation is high or low.

22
The Role of Expectations
  • In the long-run, expected inflation adjusts to
    changes in actual inflation, and the short-run
    Phillips Curve shifts.
  • Once people anticipate inflation, the only way to
    get unemployment below the natural rate is for
    actual inflation to be above the anticipated
    rate.
  • As a result, the long-run Phillips Curve is
    vertical at the natural rate of unemployment.

23
The Role of Expectations
  • In the long-run, with a vertical Phillips Curve
    at the natural rate of unemployment, the actual
    rate of inflation and unemployment will depend
    upon aggregate supply factors and the fiscal and
    monetary policies pursued by the government.

24
The Role of Expectations
  • The view that unemployment eventually returns to
    its natural rate, regardless of the rate of
    inflation is called the natural-rate hypothesis.

25
Expected Inflation Shifts the SRPC
26
Exam
  • Same format as December
  • Monday April 18---9AM
  • Next week-chapter 17
  • Last class Tuesday April 5Review discuss exam
  • Office hours after term ends
  • April 11 3-430 and
  • April 13 and April 14 from 930-11

27
How Expected Inflation Shifts the PC
  • At A, expected actual inflation
    3,unemployment natural rate (6).
  • BOC makes inflation 2 higher than expected,
    u-rate falls to 4 at B.
  • In the long run, expected inflation increases, PC
    shifts upward, unemployment returns to natural
    rate at C.

28
Phillips curve
  • Unstable in LR because Pedot changes.
  • SR MS?, AD ?,Y ?,u?--Pdot ? on SRAS but sticky
    WP so that Pdotgt Pedot
  • Firms increase output but wages and other costs
    are sticky
  • Workers supply more labour but greater Pdot means
    real wages are lower.
  • When Pdot becomes fully expected, the SR changes
    are reversed as SRPC shifts

29
Shifts in the Phillips Curve The Role of
Supply Shocks
  • The short-run Phillips Curve also shifts because
    of shocks to aggregate supply.
  • An adverse supply shock, such as an increase in
    world oil prices, gives policy-makers a less
    favourable trade-off between inflation and
    unemployment.
  • Example 1974 OPEC price increases 2011

30
The Role of Supply Shocks
  • Major changes in aggregate supply can worsen
    the short-run tradeoff between unemployment and
    inflation.
  • Eg higher oil prices shift the SRPC rightward.

31
The Role of Supply Shocks
  • Example OPEC in the 1970s
  • (1) cut output and (2) raised prices. This shifts
    SRAS up so P ? and Y ? . As Y ? , u ? .
  • The tradeoff in this situation resulted in two
    choices
  • Fight the unemployment battle with monetary
    expansion (and accelerate inflation).
  • Stand firm against inflation (but endure even
    higher unemployment).

32
Adverse supply shock and SRPC
33
The 1970s Oil Price Shocks
  • Oil per barrel
  • 1973 3.50
  • 1974 10.10
  • 1979 14.85
  • 1980 32.50
  • 1981 38.00
  • The BOC chose to accommodate the firstshock in
    1973 with faster money growth.
  • Result Higher expected inflation, which further
    shifted PC.
  • 1979-81 Oil prices surged again, worsening the
    BOC tradeoff.

34
Real and nominal oil prices
35
The 1970s Oil Price Shocks
36
The Cost of Reducing Inflation
  • To reduce inflation, the B of C has to pursue
    contractionary monetary policy (e.g.
    Contractionary OMO, raising interest rates).
  • When the B of C slows the rate of money growth
  • It contracts aggregate demand (AD), which
  • reduces the quantity of output that firms
    produce, which leads to a fall in employment.
  • Long run output unemployment return to their
    natural rates.

37
Disinflation MP and AD
38
The Cost of Reducing Inflation
  • Given the actions of the B of C in combating
    inflation, the economy moves along (downward) the
    short-run Phillips Curve, resulting in lower
    inflation but higher unemployment.
  • If an economy is to reduce inflation it must
    endure a period of high unemployment and low
    output.

39
Zero inflation target
  • Some economists believe that if the central bank
    makes a credible statement of its intention to
    deflate, that lower rates of inflation can be
    obtained at smaller cost. PE adjusts faster.
  • In 1988, the Bank of Canada announced its
    zero-inflation target, and in 1989 monetary
    contraction began
  • The target was reached in 1994, by which time the
    unemployment rate exceeded 10 percent.
  • Inflation fell from 4.5 to 1.1.

40
The Cost of Reducing Inflation
  • The sacrifice ratio is the number of percentage
    points of one years output that is lost in the
    process of reducing inflation by one percentage
    point.
  • A typical estimate of the sacrifice ratio is
    between 2 and 5 percentage points.
  • We can also express the sacrifice ratio in terms
    of unemployment. Reducing inflation by 1
    percentage point requires a sacrifice of between
    1 and 2.5 percentage points of unemployment.

41
The Cost of Reducing Inflation
  • In some years (e.g. 1979) the sacrifice ratio was
    very large indicating a high level of
    unemployment was to be experienced in order to
    reduce inflation to acceptable levels.

42
Rational Expectations
  • The theory of rational expectations suggested
    that the time and therefore the sacrifice-ratio,
    could be shorter and lower than estimated.
  • The theory of rational expectations suggests that
    people optimally use all the information they
    have, including information about government
    policies, when forecasting the future.

43
Rational Expectations (RE)
  • Expected inflation is an important variable that
    explains why there is a tradeoff between
    inflation and unemployment in the short-run, but
    not in the long-run.
  • How quickly the short-run tradeoff disappears
    depends on how quickly expectations adjust.
  • RE says they adjust quickly, making U costs
    smaller less sacrifice.

44
The Cost of Reducing InflationThe Zero Inflation
Target
  • The B of C in the 1980s, asserted that the sole
    goal of the B of C would thereafter be to achieve
    and maintain a stable price level and close to
    zero inflation.
  • The Banks target was reached by 1992 by which
    time the unemployment rate had increased to over
    11 percent.

45
Disinflation in the 80s and 90s
46
INFLATION SINCE 1960s
  • Low in 1960s
  • Upward spike through 70s into 1980s
  • Disinflation-positive but declining in the
    1980s
  • Low and stable since.

47
Bank of Canada
  • Central banks wish to avoid future inflation
    episodes.
  • Analysis of 1970s indicated
  • Pdot f (Mdot).
  • Since late 1980s, central banks have been
    credibly committed to price stability.
  • Implies low Pedot

48
Why so much inflation?
  • Mistakes by central banksdid not recognize that
    M growth would cause so much inflation.
  • Bad theoryinflation will buy lower U.---PC
  • Political pressures to inflate (instead of taxes
    to pay for spending).

49
Policy nowB of C
  • Current M growth targets are designed to limit M
    growth if
  • GDP approaches potential. gtgtYfe
  • Prices start to increase by more than 2.

50
Conclusion
  • Our understanding of the tradeoffs between
    inflation and unemployment has changed
    dramatically over the past forty years.
  • New evidence, new experiences, and additional
    analysis have led to more agreement about this
    phenomena than in the past. Particularly for the
    LR-Mankiws rules.

51
Summary
  • The Phillips curve describes a negative
    relationship between inflation and unemployment.
  • By expanding aggregate demand, policymakers can
    choose a point on the Phillips curve with higher
    inflation and lower unemployment.
  • By contracting aggregate demand, policymakers can
    choose a point on the Phillips curve with lower
    inflation and higher unemployment.

52
Summary
  • The tradeoff between inflation and unemployment
    described by the Phillips curve holds only in the
    short run.
  • The long-run Phillips curve is vertical at the
    natural rate of unemployment.
  • The short-run Phillips curve also shifts because
    of shocks to aggregate supply.
  • An adverse supply shock gives policymakers a less
    favorable tradeoff between inflation and
    unemployment.

53
Summary
  • When the Bank of Canada contracts growth in the
    money supply to reduce inflation, it moves the
    economy along the short-run Phillips curve.
  • This results in temporarily high unemployment.
  • The cost of disinflation depends on how quickly
    expectations of inflation fall. RE
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com