The Wolf Report Perspectives from Europe - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

The Wolf Report Perspectives from Europe

Description:

The Wolf Report Perspectives from Europe Dr Andrew McCoshan Associate Fellow Centre for Education and Industry University of Warwick – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:108
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: andrewm143
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Wolf Report Perspectives from Europe


1
The Wolf ReportPerspectives from Europe
  • Dr Andrew McCoshan
  • Associate Fellow
  • Centre for Education and Industry
  • University of Warwick

2
Wolf Report Overview
  • Purpose to consider how we can improve
    vocational education for 14-19 year olds and
    thereby promote successful progression into the
    labour market and into higher level ET routes
  • UK faces similar labour market trends to Europe,
    especially youth position
  • UK VET system is structurally different market
    system qualifications play key role
  • Problems stem from too much/wrong type of
    government intervention

3
Wolf Report Details
  • 14-16(a) recent vocational qualifications are
    valueless in the labour market and dont enable
    progression(b) balance of vocational and
    general is out of kilter with trends in Europe
  • 16-19(a) application of occupational standards
    is inappropriate, too narrow(b) offer broader
    programmes of study(c) government should limit
    itself to setting general principles, allowing
    educational institutions to offer any
    qualifications they please from a recognised
    (i.e. regulated) awarding body(d) strengthen
    WRL and apprenticeships

4
Issues
  • Much (but not all!) of the diagnosis is
    incontrovertible
  • Many of the solutions are left open
  • How do other European countries approach these
    common issues?
  • What are their starting points?
  • What can we learn?
  • Two main examples Netherlands and Sweden

Health Warning - Make international comparisons
at your peril!
5
(No Transcript)
6
Progression patterns
General upper secondary 44
Primary lower secondary levels
VET upper secondary 56
Labour market is majority choice
Post-secondary non-tertiary attainment Ireland
10, Greece 8, Germany 6, Portugal 1
Tertiary VET c15 of tertiary enrolments Perhaps
3-4 of current total population cohort But
growing
7
EU policies
  • Copenhagen process the Open Method of
    Coordination in VET
  • Quality and attractiveness labour market
    relevance
  • Accessibility
  • Flexible systems, learning outcomes
  • Transparent qualifications European education
    and training area
  • Information, guidance and counselling

8
EU tools
  • Qualifications and credit transfer systems EQF,
    ECVET- focus on learning outcomes-
    unpacking and repacking of training- need for
    trust- effectively Wolf concludes such tools
    have been misapplied
  • Validation of non-formal and informal
    learning- access to formal examinations-
    access to formal education if entry criteria met
    through prior learning- individual competence
    assessment to shorten VET- integrating
    non-formal and informal learning

9
VET in the compulsory phase (lower secondary)
  • Becoming increasingly unpopular but its more
    complicated than that
  • Being reformed/repositioned rather than
    abolished
  • Generally becoming more pre-vocational and
    focused on preventing early school leaving

10
A Dutch Example
Track 2009 B / G 2000-09 B / G
VWO 20 / 23 4 / 3
HAVO 23 / 24 3 / 2
VMBO plus support/special types 21 / 16 4 / 6
VMBO 42 / 37 -10 / -11
11
VET in the compulsory phase (lower secondary)
  • Dutch system offers four VET routes (2008
    figures)
  • Theoretical - 36Combined - 12Pre-voc higher
    27Pre-voc lower 25
  • 2006-08 enrolments down in all tracks except
    combined
  • Better pathways opened up in to upper secondary
    VET

12
Programmes and qualifications 16-19
  • Qualifications reform commonplace in Europe
  • Sweden - over-generalised the curriculum-
    now revocationalising - 17 national
    programmes 13 vocationally oriented 4
    academic- VET programmes typically 85
    school-based- 8 core subjects make up 30 of
    the credits (Swedish, maths, general science,
    English, the arts, PE and health, social studies,
    religion)- at least 15 weeks workplace based
    training (optional in general tracks)- in 2nd
    and 3rd years there can be local and regional
    variations to respond to labour market needs
    municipalities assemble subjects from different
    programmes. 10 of cohort in 2009

13
Programmes and qualifications 16-19
  • Netherlands - new competence-based
    qualifications structure in 2011- 25 national
    competence types- occupational profiles
  • - core tasks, work processes- process
    competence matrix

14
Work-related learning and apprenticeships
  • Sweden informal model- 15 weeks work
    placement- education providers responsible for
    finding places and student supervision major
    effort- place availability depends on schools
    links with local social partners leading to great
    variability in quantity and quality- schools
    have to ensure that workplace supervisors have
    enough knowledge of ET to ensure that placement
    is positive experience

15
Work-related learning and apprenticeships
  • Sweden informal model contd- new
    apprenticeships piloted since 2008, roll out in
    2011- expected to attract 10 of cohort- core
    course loads in all subjects except science and
    arts will be reduced- at least 50 work-based
    training, apprentices may or may not receive a
    wage- municipalities to set up local
    apprenticeship councils

16
Work-related learning and apprenticeships
Netherlands pathways model Lower
secondaryBasic vocational programmes may offer
programmes combining work and study practical
out-of-school component of 80-160 days in last 2
years Upper secondary2 tracks both lead to
same qualifications- school-based with
internships 20-60 of time as interns
(participants mostly young)- apprenticeship
at least 60 in the workplace (40 participants
aged over 24)
17
Netherlands - Participation in Upper Secondary
VET by level and learning pathways, 2007
School-based route (BOL) Dual (apprenticeship) route (BBL)
Assistant training 3 7
Basic vocational training 19 41
Vocational training 23 33
Management training 56 19
TOTAL 101 100
18
Work-related learning and apprenticeships
  • Netherlands pathways model contd.
  • - web-based service introduced 2009 to broker
    internships www.stagemarkt.nl- joint website
    of all 17 sectoral Knowledge Centres- more
    than 223,000 accredited training companies
    regularly offer places- 6.6 million searches
    since launch

19
Work-related learning and apprenticeships
  • Norway unified model aka 22 model-
    Normally 2 years at school with practical
    training in school workshops and short industry
    placements- Then 2 years apprenticeship- But
    variations on 22 depending on the model- 9
    vocational areas progressive specialisation
    over the 4 years- High degree of confidence
    amongst stakeholders, though some query initial
    breadth of programmes- By international
    standards relatively inclusive and few parity of
    esteem issues - But challenges include weak
    basic skills of entrants non-completion QA
    student choice skills of enterprise-based
    trainers and counsellors

20
Progression
  • Widespread moves to open up progression
  • But most people stay within their tracks e.g.
    Netherlands
  • VET to general progression is a particular
    issue- bridge courses- double qualifying
    pathways- EQF (equivalence issue)
  • VET students can struggle to make the transition

21
Progression
Source Cedefop VET in Europe Netherlands Country
Report
22
Conclusions/speculations
  • Move in Europe to more flexibility within
    well-structured systems around which there is
    consensus
  • More structure makes it easier to open up
    pathways
  • Programmes versus qualifications?
  • Variety of work placement models horses for
    courses ?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com