Title: What Are Reasonable Accommodations Under the Amended ADA?
1- What Are Reasonable Accommodations Under the
Amended ADA?
Sponsored by ADA Minnesota and Minnesota
Vocational Rehabilitation October 19-20,
2009 Presented by Barry Taylor, Legal Advocacy
Director and Alan Goldstein, Senior Attorney at
Equip for Equality Materials Prepared Under a
Grant from the DBTAC Great Lakes ADA Center
2Overview
- Introduction to the ADA
- ADA Amendments Act Changes
- Reasonable Accommodation Overview
- Types of Reasonable Accommodations
- The Reasonable Accommodation Process
- Resources
3Introduction to the ADA as Amended
4Protected Individuals
- An person is protected under the ADA if
- They have a physical or mental impairment that
substantially limits one or more major life
activities - They have a record of a disability
- They are regarded as having a disability.
- Discrimination is also prohibites based on an
association with a person with a disability. - The definition of disability is more broadly
construed under the ADA Amendments Act of 2008. - 42 U.S.C. 12102(2), 12102(B)(4), 1211229 29
C.F.R. 1630.2(g).
5The ADA and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act
- The ADA used the same definition of disability
as found in the Rehabilitation Act. - Under Section 504, the Supreme Court in School
Board of Nassau County v. Arline, 480 U.S. 273,
284 (1987), interpreted the definition of
disability very broadly and acknowledged that
societys myths and fears about disability and
disease are as handicapping as are the physical
limitations that flow from actual impairment. - Under the Rehabilitation Act, there are no
reported cases of individuals found not to meet
the definition of disability.
6Court Interpretations Narrow ADA Coverage
- Unfortunately, ADA goals have not been met due to
restrictive court decisions - Sutton Trilogy mitigating measures ruling
restricted definition of disability - Toyota v. Williams established that
definition of disability should be interpreted
strictly to create a demanding standard.
7Lower Court Decisions Finding No ADA Disability
- Under Sutton and Williams, no ADA disability was
found in cases where people had impairments of - Intellectual Disability Littleton v.
Wal-Mart, (11th Cir. 2007) - Epilepsy Todd v. Academy Corp., (S.D. Tex.
1999) - Diabetes Orr v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., (8th
Cir. 2002) - Bipolar Condition Johnson v. North Carolina
Dept of Health and Human Services, (M.D.N.C.
2006) - Multiple Sclerosis Sorensen v. Univ. of Utah
Hosp., (10th Cir. 1999) - Hard of Hearing Eckhaus v. Consolidated Rail
Corp., (D.N.J. 2003) - Back Injury Wood v. Crown Redi-Mix, Inc., (8th
Cir. 2003)
8Lower Court Decisions Finding No ADA Disability
- Vision in Only One Eye Albertson's, Inc. v.
Kirkingburg, 527 U.S. 555 (1999) - Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Rohan v.
Networks Presentations LLC, (4th Cir. 2004) - Heart Disease Epstein v. Kalvin-Miller
Intern., Inc., (S.D.N.Y. 2000) - Depression McMullin v. Ashcroft, (D. Wyo.
2004) - HIV Infection Cruz Carrillo v. AMR Eagle,
Inc., (D.P.R. 2001) - Asthma Tangires v. Johns Hopkins Hosp., (D.
Md. 2000) - Cancer Burnett v. LFW, Inc., 472 F.3d 471 (7th
Cir. 2006)
9ADA Amendments Act Purposes
- Reject the reasoning in the Sutton Toyota
cases and reinstate reasoning from Arline - Ensure that a primary focus in ADA cases is
whether entities have complied with their
obligations Convey that whether a persons
impairment is an ADA disability should not demand
extensive analysis and - Make clear Congress expects that the EEOC will
revise its current regulations that defines the
term substantially limits as significantly
restricted. - Notice of Proposed Rule Making (NPRM) Issued by
EEOC Sept. 23, 2009 at http//edocket.access.gpo.
gov/2009/E9-22840.htm.
10ADA Amendments Act Major Life Activities
- caring for oneself walking standing
- seeing lifting
- hearing learning
- eating speaking
- sleeping breathing
- performing manual tasks concentrating
thinking - working (type of work) reading (new in ADAAA)
- bending (new in ADAAA) communicating (ADAAA)
- Interacting with others (Very New - Not in
ADAAA) - List is Not Exhaustive - no negative implication
by omission
11ADAAA New Category Major Bodily Functions
- In ADAAA Added in NPRM
- immune system neurological special sense organs
skin - normal cell growth brain genitourinary
- digestive respiratory cardiovascular
- bowel circulatory hemic
- bladder endocrine lymphatic
- reproductive functions musculoskeletal
- EEOC NPRM contains three lists
- 1. Impairments that should consistently be a
disability, - 2. Impairments that may be disabling for some but
not others, - 3. Impairments that are usually not disabilities
. Prop. Rule 1630.2(h)
12EEOC Proposed Regulations
- An impairment is a disability if it
substantially limits'' the ability of an
individual to perform a major life activity as
compared to most people in the general
population. - An impairment need not prevent, or
significantly or severely restrict, the
individual from performing a major life activity
in order to be considered a disability. - Note EEOC NPRM comments suggest that people now
covered under the ADAAA will not require
extensive or expensive accommodations. NPRM also
contains a nice survey or reasonable
accommodation research. - NPRM 29 C.F.R. 1630.2 (j)(1).
13Regarded As Prong
- The bill broadens coverage under the ADAs
regarded as prong of the definition of
disability. - This prong may apply whether or not the
impairment limits or is perceived to limit a
major life activity. - No reasonable accommodations for people who are
only covered under the regarded as prong. - Exception Impairments that are both
transitory (lasting or expected to last for six
months or less) and minor. - Sprains, fractures that heal completely, mild
intestinal virus, - Exception to the Exception According to EEOC
NPRM comments, transitory conditions may be
covered under the actual disability prong of the
definition of disability
14Additional Provisions
- The definition of disability shall be construed
in favor of broad coverage to the maximum
extent permitted - Episodic conditions are examined when active.
- No cause of action for reverse discrimination.
- Mitigating measures are not examined (except
ordinary eye glasses and contact lenses). - Note Comments to Proposed EEOC Regulations
state people who use eyeglasses may be regarded
as being disabled if they must take a vision
test without glasses or contacts.
15Additional Provisions
- EEOC NPRM Mitigating measures may include
- Medication, medical supplies, equipment, or
appliances, low-vision devices, prosthetics ,
hearing aids and cochlear implants or other
implantable hearing devices, mobility devices, or
oxygen therapy equipment and supplies - Use of assistive technology
- Reasonable accommodations or auxiliary aids or
services - Learned behavioral or adaptive neurological
modifications or - Surgical interventions, except for those that
permanently eliminate an impairment.
16Additional Provisions
- Employers cannot use qualification standards,
employment tests, or other selection criteria
based on an individuals uncorrected vision that
are not job-related and consistent with
business necessity. - EEOC Proposed Regulations note that this issue
may be raised by a person without a disability. - The effective date of the law is January 1, 2009.
17ADAAA Ramifications
- More coverage for people with
- Episodic conditions
- Mitigating measures (except glasses/lenses)
- Limiting conditions that do not meet the old
standard - Who are regarded as being disabled (no RA)
- Emphasis will be on employers conduct rather
than employees medical condition. - Make sure job criteria meets business
necessity test. - Having training on the new requirements,
periodic ADA training, and reevaluating ADA
policies may be helpful.
18Title I of the ADA
- Overview on Reasonable Accommodation
19Workplace Protections
- Discrimination is prohibited in any facet of
employment, including - Job application procedures
- Hiring
- Benefits and Compensation
- Advancement
- Training
- Discipline / Termination
- Company events
- Any terms, conditions, or privileges of
employment - 42 U.S.C. 12112(b)
20Reasonable Accommodation General Requirements
- Discrimination under the ADA may include
- Not providing a reasonable accommodation for
known limitations caused by a disability. - Discrimination does not have to be intentional.
- Policies or actions that have the effect of
discriminating against an employee with a
disability may also constitute discrimination
under the ADA. - 42 U.S.C. 12112(b)(5)(A),(B)
21What are Reasonable Accommodations?
- EEOC Regulations define reasonable accommodations
as - Modifications or adjustments to the work
environment, or - to the manner or circumstances under which the
position is customarily performed, - that enable a qualified individual with a
disability to perform the essential functions
of that position or - enjoy equal benefits and privileges of
employment. - 29 C.F.R. 1630.2(o)(1)
22Essential Job Functions
- Essential Functions
- Fundamental Job Duties
- Employers are not required to reallocate
essential functions but may chose to do so
anyway. - Job descriptions may be used as evidence but are
not necessarily determinative, - If they are outdated and/or
- Do not accurately reflect the job duties.
- 29 C.F.R. 1630.2(n) EEOC Enforcement Guidance
on Reasonable Accommodation and Undue Hardship.
23What are Reasonable Accommodations?
- Employees often use the following accommodations
- Job restructuring
- Part- time or modified work schedules
- Reassignment to a vacant position
- Appropriate adjustment or modifications of
examinations, training materials or policies - This List is Not Exhaustive
- 42 U.S.C. 12111(9)(B) 29 C.F.R. 1630.2(o)
24Reasonable Accommodation
- Other possible accommodations may include
- Acquisition or modification of equipment or
devices - The provision of qualified readers or
interpreters - Making the workplace accessible
- Providing auxiliary aids and services
- Other similar accommodations
- This List is Not Exhaustive
- 42 U.S.C. 12111(9)(B) 29 C.F.R. 1630.2(o)
25Reasonable Accommodation Limitations
- An Accommodation does not
- have to be provided if it
- Is unreasonable
- Requires reallocation of essential job functions
- Will not enable the employee to be qualified
- Causes an undue hardship to the employer or
- Results in a direct threat to the health or
safety of the - employee or others
- 29 C.F.R. 1630.2(o)
26Reasonable Accommodation Limitations
- Undue hardship
- Significant difficulty or expense.. in light
of - The nature and net cost of the accommodation
- the impact upon the operation of the
facility, including - the impact on the ability of other employees to
perform their duties and - the impact on the facility's ability to conduct
business. - 29 C.F.R. 1630.2(p).
27Reasonable Accommodation Limitations
- Direct threat
- A significant risk of substantial harm to the
health or safety of the individual or others - that cannot be eliminated or reduced by
reasonable accommodation. - Requires an an individualized assessment
- based on a reasonable medical judgment that
relies on - the most current medical knowledge and/or
- on the best available objective evidence.
- 29 C.F.R. 1630.2(r).
28Title I of the ADA
- The Reasonable Accommodation Process
29Reasonable AccommodationThe First Step
- The reasonable accommodation process usually
starts with a request from the employee - The request need not be in writing but employees
may want to do so anyway - Employers can follow-up an accommodation
request with a written confirmation. - There is no specific language that must be used.
- Another person may request an accommodation on
the employees behalf. - EEOC Enforcement Guidance on Reasonable
Accommodation and Undue Hardship.
30The Request for a Reasonable Accommodation
- The request should describe
- The nature of the disability and resulting
limitations - The need for an accommodation
- A requested accommodation, if known
- Note In limited circumstances, employers may
have a duty to investigate accommodations absent
a specific request from the employee. - EEOC Enforcement Guidance on Reasonable
Accommodation and Undue Hardship. See also,
Bultemeyer v. Fort Wayne Community Schools, 100
F.3d 1281 (7th Cir. 1996).
31Requirements of the Accommodation Request
- Employers are only required to reasonably
accommodate known limitations and disabilities. - An employee was not entitled to an accommodation
prior to being diagnosed with depression.
- Estades-Negroni v. Assoc. Corp. of N. America,
377 F.3d 58 (1st Cir. 2004). - --------------------------------------------------
--------- - The request must relate to an employees
disability. - An employee with depressive disorder and anxiety
was not entitled to a change in his shift time to
accommodate his daughters school schedule. - Boutin v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., 490 F.Supp.2d
98 (D.Mass. 2007).
32Accommodation RequestCase Examples
- Employee with bipolar disorder stated I need
to leave and I need to leave right now before
leaving early. - This was not a reasonable accommodation request
as she did not mention a medical basis for her
statement. - Russell v. TG Missouri Corp., 340 F.3d 735 (8th
Cir. 2003). - --------------------------------------------------
--------- - An employee disclosed bipolar disorder
requesting a reduction inobjectives and
lessening ofpressure. - This was not a reasonable accommodation request
as no limitations were disclosed. - Taylor v. Principal Financial Group, Inc., 93
F.3d 155 (5th Cir. 1996) But See, Bultemeyer
(next slide).
33Accommodation RequestCase Example - Bultemeyer
- A custodians psychiatrist requested a less
stressful environment. - Court said
- The psychiatrists letter can be seen as
requesting that accommodations previously in
place be reinstated. - Employer should have engaged in interactive
process. - This decision, from what is considered a
conservative circuit, contains empathetic
language concerning people with mental illness. - Bultemeyer v. Fort Wayne Community Schools, 100
F.3d 1281 (7th Cir. 1996).
34Bultemeyer Court Quote O the Day
- Courts Quote
- The employer has to meet the employee
half- way, and if it appears that the employee
may need an accommodation but doesn't know how
to ask for it, the employer should do what it
can to help. The employer must make a
reasonable effort to determine the appropriate
accommodation. internal citation omitted.
Bultemeyer at 1285 - 1286.
35Accommodation Request Yay or Nay
- An employee tells her supervisor, "I'm having
trouble getting to work on time due to my medical
treatments. - An employee's spouse phones the employee's
supervisor and says that the employee had a
medical emergency due to his MS and needs to be
hospitalized. - An employee tells his supervisor that he would
like a new chair because his present one is
uncomfortable. - An employee who has been out of work for six
months with a WC injury is released to return to
work, but with certain work restrictions. - EEOC Enforcement Guidance on Reasonable
Accommodation, and Undue Hardship.
36The Interactive ProcessMedical Information
- Employers may request medical information if the
disability and/or need for accommodation is not
obvious. - The request must be job-related and consistent
with business necessity. - The request should be limited in scope, related
to the accommodation request. - Employees must comply with reasonable requests.
- Employers should seek clarification if the
information seems vague, incomplete, or
contradictory. - 42 U.S.C. 12112(d)(4)(A) EEOC Enforcement
Guidance on Disability-Related Inquiries EFE
Disability Disclosure FAQ
37Medical Information
- In most cases, an employer cannot ask for an
employees complete medical records. - All medical information must be kept
confidential. - In a separate location
- Only staff who needs to know should have
access. - Other federal or state confidentiality laws may
also apply, e.g., HIPAA. - As discrimination can only be found for known
disabilities, employers may not want extraneous
medical information. - 42 U.S.C. 12112(d)(4)(C) EEOC Guidance on
Disability-Related Inquiries and Medical
Examinations of Employees Under the ADA
38Title I of the ADA
- Specific
- Reasonable Accommodations
39Identifying Reasonable Accommodations
- The four main categories of possible reasonable
accommodations are - Job restructuring
- Part-time or modified work schedules
- Reassignment, and
- Reasonable modifications of the work
environment - and/or policies.
- The Job Accommodation Network (JAN) is a useful
Resource, www.jan.wvu.edu.
40Job Restructuring In General
- Job restructuring may include
- Reassigning non-essential functions
(reallocating essential job functions is not
required, although employers may choose to do
so). - Work at home / Telework
- Altering the time or manner in which a job
function is performed - Interpersonal interaction changes among
employees or between an employee and a
supervisor. - 42 U.S.C. 12111(9)(B) 29 C.F.R. 1630 app.
1630.2(o), 1630.9 EEOC Enforcement Guidance
on Reasonable Accommodation
41Job Restructuring Interpersonal Interactions
- Reasonable modifications in interpersonal
interactions depend on the situation involved and
may include - Providing for regular or informal meetings
- Modifying the manner in which expectations are
communicated, (using written means instead of
oral communication or vice versa) - Utilizing checklists, and
- Redirecting activity when necessary
- JANs Searchable Online Accommodation Resource on
Psychiatric Impairments, www.jan.wvu.edu/soar/psyc
h.html.
42Job Restructuring Work at Home / Telework
- The ADA does not require that employers create a
teleworking policy if none exists. - If a telework program does exist, people with
disabilities should be able to participate. - If there is no teleworking policy, employers must
still consider it as a possible reasonable
accommodation. - Some courts have found working at home is a
reasonable accommodation. - Other courts have strictly interpreted these
types of reasonable accommodation requests. - EEOC Fact Sheet Work At Home/Telework as a
Reasonable Accommodation
43Job Restructuring Work at Home / Telework Cases
- Work at home not reasonable where physical
attendance at the administration center was an
essential function of the service coordinator
position, a low-level position requiring
supervision and teamwork. - Mason v. Avaya Communications, Inc., 357 F.3d
1114 (10th Cir. 2004). - --------------------------------------------------
--------- - Working from home was not reasonable as presence
at the workplace was necessary for meetings
mediations. - Accommodation of a distraction free environment
was effective. - Mobley v Allstate Insurance Company,
- 2006 WL 2735906 (S.D. Ill. Sept. 22, 2006)
44Job Restructuring CaseWork at Home / Telework
- Working at home, (or leave), might be a
reasonable accommodation for a medical
transcriptionist with obsessive-compulsive
disorder (OCD). - Allowed for others in the same position
- Employee had previously been provided a
flexible start time as an accommodation but it
proved ineffective. - Humphrey v. Memorial Hospitals Association,
- 239 F.3d 1128, (9th Cir. 2001).
45Part-Time or Modified Work Schedules In General
- May be need by someone who requires active
treatment or whose stamina is limited due to
their disability or medication. - Leave for a period of time
- Intermittent leave
- Extra break time
- Modifying shifts
- Flexible work schedules
- 42 U.S.C. 12111(9)(B) 29 C.F.R. 1630.2(o).
See JANs Searchable Online Accommodation
Resource.
46Part-Time or Modified Work Schedules Leave
- Leave may involve the ADA and Family and
Medical Leave Act (FMLA), 29 U.S.C. 2601 et.
seq. (1993). - FMLA provides up to twelve weeks of leave per
year - ADA provides for reasonable amount of leave
- May apply at expiration of FMLA leave
- If both ADA FMLA apply, the law providing the
broadest protection to the employee applies. - Under the ADA, it is best to specific a period
of leave - Requests for indefinite leave may be unreasonable
(though still requiring an interactive
process.) - EEOC Fact Sheet The FMLA, the ADA, and Title
VII of the Civil Rights Act
47Part-Time or Modified Work Schedules Leave
Cases
- Medical leave of 4-5 months for treatment for
an employee with PTSD was reasonable as the
employers other leave policies provided up to
one year of leave. - Rascon v. U.S. West Communications, Inc.,
- 143 F.3d 1324 (10th Cir. 1998).
- --------------------------------------------------
--------- - A request for extended, indefinite leave may
not be reasonable where the employee could not
show it would enable him to become qualified to
perform the essential job functions. - Byrne v. Avon Products, Inc., 328 F.3d 379 (7th
Cir. 2003).
48Reassignment In General
- Reassignment to a vacant position for which the
employee is qualified may be an appropriate
accommodation under the ADA . - Reassignment may be useful for an employee has
limitations in handling a heavy workload,
workplace stress, or who needs periodic leave. - Reassignment is generally not reasonable where it
is sought to obtain a new supervisor or to escape
certain co-workers. - EEOC Enforcement Guidance on Reasonable
Accommodation and Undue Hardship See, U.S.
Airways, Inc. v. Barnett, 535 U.S. 391 (2002)
Gile v. Untied Airlines, 213 F. 3d 365 (7th Cir.
2000).
49Barnett Reassignment and Seniority Policies
- U.S. Airways v. Barnett, 535 U.S. 391 (2002)
- Reassignment may be available to a cargo handler
despite a policy granting vacant positions by
seniority. - However, a person must show the seniority
provision was not strictly followed in other
cases in order to prevail. - Otherwise, the seniority policy trumps
reassignment. - Of Note
- Refers to reasonable accommodations as special
and preferential.
50Reasonable Modifications In General
- Reasonable modifications may involve policies
for - Attendance
- Working from home
- Leave
- Training
- Service animals
- Personal assistants
- Job coaches
- 42 U.S.C. 12111(9)(B) 29 C.F.R. 1630.2(o)
51Reasonable Modifications Cases
- Providing a teachers aide to assist a school
librarian with classroom control may be a
reasonable accommodation. - Borkowski v. Valley Central School District, 63
F.3d 131 (2nd Cir, 1995). - --------------------------------------------------
--------- - A medical facility nurse with depression could
not fulfill the essential function of
administering drugs to patients. - It was not a reasonable accommodation to have
another employee perform this essential function.
- E.E.O.C. v. Amego, Inc., 110 F.3d 135 (1st Cir,
1997).
52Additional Reasonable Accommodations
- Acquisition or modification of equipment or
devices - Software or hardware for computer access
- Tape recorder to record review instructions
- Use of color or pictures to mark
files/bins/controls - Large button telephone
- TTY / NextTalk / Other Communication Devices
- Providing Auxiliary Aids or Services
- Readers
- ASL (or similar) interpreters
- Pagers
- Assistive Listening Systems
- Demonstrating job tasks
- 42 U.S.C. 12111(9)(B) 29 C.F.R. 1630.2(o).
53Additional Reasonable Accommodations
- Additional possible accommodations
- Information in alternative formats.
- Large Print
- Braille
- CD-ROM / Electronic
- Graphic (pictures, charts, color coding, ).
- Making the workplace accessible
- Including computer, intranet, and web access
- Other similar accommodations
- 42 U.S.C. 12111(9)(B) 29 C.F.R. 1630.2(o).
54Title I of the ADA
55The Interactive Process
- After an accommodation is requested
- Employers should initiate an informal,
interactive process with the individual - This may include the employee, their supervisor,
and possibly HR, Drs., VR agency, computer
experts, etc. - Employers may request limited medical info if the
disability or need for accommodation is not
apparent. - The nature, severity, and duration of the
impairment. - The activity or activities that the impairment
limits. - The extent of the limitations of the impairment.
- How the impairment(s) relate to the
accommodation. - 29 C.F.R. 1630.2(o)(3) EEOC Enforcement
Guidance.
56The Interactive Process
- The process should identify the precise
limitation and potential reasonable
accommodations that could overcome those
limitations. - The employer must take affirmative steps to
assist the employee in identifying a possible
accommodation. - Both employee and employer must act in good
faith. - The employees preference gets primary
consideration. - Employers must provide an effective
accommodation, but not necessarily the requested
one. - The duty to accommodate is ongoing.
- 29 C.F.R. 1630.2(o)(3) EEOC Enforcement
Guidance.
57Resources
- ADA Minnesota www.ADAMinnesota.org
- Minnesota Vocational Rehabilitation
www.deed.state.mn.us - Equip For Equality - www.equipforequality.org
- DBTAC Great Lakes ADA Center -
www.adagreatlakes.org - Equal Employment Opportunity Commission -
www.eeoc.gov - Job Accommodation Network - www.jan.wvu.edu
58What Are Reasonable Accommodations Under the
Amended ADA?
59What Are Reasonable Accommodations Under the
Amended ADA?
Sponsored by ADA Minnesota and Minnesota
Vocational Rehabilitation October 19-20,
2009 Materials Prepared Under a Grant from the
DBTAC Great Lakes ADA Center