Analyzing the Effects of Tolls and Operating Costs on Statewide Travel Patterns - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Analyzing the Effects of Tolls and Operating Costs on Statewide Travel Patterns

Description:

Title: Analyzing the Effects of Tolls and Operating Costs on Statewide Travel Patterns Author: Vishal Gossain Last modified by: Vishal Gossain Created Date – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:42
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 46
Provided by: VishalG
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Analyzing the Effects of Tolls and Operating Costs on Statewide Travel Patterns


1
Analyzing the Effects of Tolls and Operating
Costs on Statewide Travel Patterns
Vishal Gossain
Thomas A. Williams Joseph P. Savage
Jr. Christopher E. Mwalwanda
2
OBJECTIVES
  • Illustrate the application of the Generalized
    Cost Function (GCF) as a proxy to a toll
    diversion curve
  • Investigate the use of Operating Costs in the GCF
  • Highlight pros and cons of implementing the GCF
    for statewide modeling.
  • The analysis presented here does not represent
    the WSA procedure for toll based revenue
    estimation.

3
MODEL USED
  • Texas Statewide Analysis Model (Texas Department
    of Transportation)
  • Four Step Travel Demand Model
  • Implemented in TransCAD using GISDK programming

4
SALIENT FEATURES
5
288 COUNTIES COVERED (Including some
outside Texas)
6
4600 Zones 142 External Stations, 323,350
square miles
more than 35 million
population
7
106,000 miles of network, 54,500 links with over
1 billion VMT
8
Four Step Model
  • 2030 horizon year chosen, base year data grown to
    2030 based on TDC forecasts and disaggregated.
  • Passenger Trip Generation TripCAL5
  • Passenger Trip Distribution ATOM2
  • Passenger Mode Choice Nested logit

9
Four Step Model
  • Freight Trip Generation using regression
    equations developed based on Reebie and WEFA
  • Freight Trip Distribution ATOM2
  • Mode Choice Logit

10
Assignments
  • All or Nothing Assignment
  • STOCH Assignment
  • Incremental Assignment
  • Capacity Restraint
  • User Equilibrium
  • Stochastic User Equilibrium
  • System Optimum Assignment

11
User Equilibrium Assignment
  • TransCAD Multi Modal Multi Class Assignment
    utilized.
  • All travelers have identical perceptions of time
    and cost.
  • Equilibrium problem No traveler can reduce
    his/her travel time by switching to another path
    (Wardrop conditions)

12
User Equilibrium Equation
Generalized Cost Function
Dummy variable
Number of vehicles from i to j
13
Implementation
Compute GC for each link using seed values (Free
flow times)
Compute GC for each link with new solution
Compute shortest paths for every O-D minimizing
GC (Solcurr)
Assign all O-D trips to shortest path (Soltemp)
Solcurr (1-?) Solcurr ? Soltemp , ? chosen to
minimize new objective function (Frank-Wolfe
algorithm)
No
Solution converged?
Yes
Terminate
14
Crux of Equilibrium VDF function
  • Bureau of Public Records Function

Capacity
Free Flow Time
15
Crux of Equilibrium VDF function
  • Conical Volume Delay Function

16
A Generalized Cost Delay Function
Value of Time for mode m
Passenger Car Equivalent
Volume Delay Function
Toll for Section i and mode m
17
Toll Sensitivity
  • What is the current and anticipated demand in the
    corridor?
  • Toll Sensitivity as a proxy to potential demand
  • How to incorporate sensitivities related to
    willingness to pay operating cost ?

18
Key Variables
  • Value of Time
  • Operating Costs
  • Volume Delay Curves Travel Time Savings (Urban
    vs. Rural)

19
Toll Corridor
20
Toll Corridor
21
Toll Corridor
  • A high speed (gt80 mph) competing toll corridor
  • Separate Auto only (6 lanes) and Truck only
    Routes (4 lanes)
  • Separate Toll Rates for Auto and Truck
  • Limited Access (provided to only FM and above
    category roadways)

22
Value of Time for Auto
  • Urban versus Intercity Markets
  • Income / Wage Rate Distribution
  • Rural / Purpose Segmentation and Distribution
  • Average 10-12 cents per minute (7.2 per
    hour) for rural interstate travel in 2005 dollars

23
Variations in Value of Time for Auto
2004 Value of Time per Hour
2004 Value of Time per Hour
24
Value of Time for Trucks
  • Commercial Vehicle/Commodity Composition
  • Fleet/Shipper versus Independent Operator
  • Just-in-Time versus Flexible Scheduling
  • Long versus Short Haul
  • 26.7 per hour
  • 17.4 - 22.6 per hour
  • 23.4 per hour based on logit model
  • Adopted Value of 42 cents per minute (25.2 per
    hour) in 2005 dollars

25
Operating Costs
  • Helps to control utilization of unrealistic paths
    compared to a pure time based GC function
  • Full Costs versus Perceived Costs

26
Operating Costs
  • Direct Costs
  • Importance of fuel costs with the current
    volatility in fuel prices.
  • Indirect/Hidden Costs
  • Maintenance (tires, oil and other work)
  • Unanticipated repairs
  • Depreciation in the value of the vehicle
  • Depends on speed (magnitude and duration)
  • Depends on pavement roughness

27
Operating Costs
  • 15.3 cents per mile recommended for auto and 43.4
    cents recommended for trucks
  • City Driving conditions (19.1 cents and 52.9
    cents respectively)
  • Poor pavement quality (17.9 cents and 48.9 cents)
  • All costs mentioned in 2003 dollars 14 cents per
    mile for auto and 42 cents per mile for trucks
    used in 2005 dollars

28
Modeling Criteria
  • Values of Time and Operating Costs based on
    overall market averages
  • Toll rates set at 0 to 30 cents per mile
  • UE Assignment, BPR VDF
  • Optimal number of iterations and convergence
    criteria

29
Typical Toll Rates Ranges
2004 Cash Toll Rates per mile
Nationwide Toll Facilities Averages (USA - 75
Facilities)
30
Toll Sensitivity Curve (12 runs)
UE BPR
31
Sensitivities to Toll
Percentage of the total length of the corridor
which has traffic more than 1000 vehicles for the
considered toll rate
32
UE Assessment
  • Fixed point equilibrium cut off
  • The same generalized cost function for all links
    (toll or non toll)
  • Perfect perception of time and costs along each
    route by all drivers.

33
Stochastic User Equilibrium
  • No perfect information about network
    characteristics
  • Different travel costs perception
  • Eliminates zero volume roads
  • Implemented in TransCAD (utilizes Method of
    Successive Averages)
  • Requires large number of iterations and hence a
    longer run time

34
Stochastic User Equilibrium
  • Utility Maximization.
  • Random error term added to the utility to mimic
    differences in perceived costs and imperfect
    information.

Randomly distributed error
Deterministic Utility
All influencing factors
35
Stochastic User Equilibrium
  • Estimate probability
  • Multinomial Logit, Multinomial Probit etc.

36
Stochastic User Equilibrium (8 runs)
37
Stochastic User Equilibrium
38
Conical Volume Delay Function (12 runs)
39
Conical Volume Delay Function
40
Operating Cost Analysis
41
Operating Cost Analysis
42
Operating Cost Analysis
43
SUMMARY
  • Toll road modeling using statewide models has its
    limitations.
  • Inclusion of operating costs is beneficial and
    requires further analysis.
  • Different assignment techniques should be
    evaluated on a case by case basis.
  • The analysis presented here does not represent
    the WSA procedure for toll based revenue
    estimation.

44
SUMMARY
  • A single Generalized Cost function alone may not
    be adequate to capture the differences in the
    elasticity associated with tolls and travel
    times.
  • Volume delay functions (reflecting adequate delay
    in urban vs rural areas) and GC function should
    be carefully considered and analyzed on a case by
    case basis.

45
QUESTIONS / COMMENTS
  • WILBUR SMITH ASSOCIATES
  • http//www.wilbursmith.com
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com