Project Echelon: Surveillance of Long, Linear, Static Structures The OSU Team Kickoff - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Project Echelon: Surveillance of Long, Linear, Static Structures The OSU Team Kickoff

Description:

... Technology Development Middleware Services Clock Sync (UCLA,OSU) Group Formation (OSU, UCB) Localization (UIUC) Remote Programming (UCB) Routing ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:114
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: Anish
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Project Echelon: Surveillance of Long, Linear, Static Structures The OSU Team Kickoff


1
Project Echelon Surveillance of Long, Linear,
Static Structures The OSU Team Kickoff
January 2004
2
Retreat Goals
  • To think through document
  • Requirements
  • User, Hardware, Middleware Application
  • Metrics
  • Operational Technical
  • Process
  • Roles
  • Internal External

3
New Team Members
  • Rajiv Ramnath Project Management
  • Prasun Sinha Tier 2 (802.11a) Networking
  • Emre Ertin our EE person ?
  • Signal Processing
  • Hardware

4
Concept of OperationsPrimary Effort
  • Problem
  • Too vast an area for limited personnel resources
    (mobile guards)
  • Hostile actions
  • Destruction (explosives)
  • Damage to pumps and transformers
  • Stripping of copper power lines (for pumps)
  • Operational Need
  • Reliable automated surveillance to detect
    movement in security zone
  • FY04 Experiment
  • Sense movement of personnel and/or vehicles
    toward the pipeline
  • Track the movement and the stop/start of movement

Pipeline
Damage in Iraq
5
Concept of Operations (cont.)Primary Effort
Detection and tracking of vehicles
Mobile Patrol
Pipeline
10 km
Pump Station
Detection of unknowns
?
Guard Force Alerted
Pipeline
Security Zone
Detection and tracking of personnel
1 km
Reaction Force
6
CONOPSRelated Efforts
Similar Long, Linear, Static Structures
Enemy Observation Point (OP)
  • Surveillance of Supply Routes
  • Detect potential ambush sites
  • Personnel w/shoulder fired weapons (e.g., RPGs)
  • IEDs
  • FY04 Experiment
  • Sense movement of personnel/vehicles toward
    supply route, and then
  • They remain near a point
  • They remain for a while and then leave
  • Sense suspicious movement on the road

Wire to OP
IED
IED
7
Candidate Applications
Convoy protection 1D
Detect anomalous driving patterns on road
Convoy protection 2D
Detect anomalous activity along roadside
Hide Site
IED
8
CONOPSRelated Efforts
Similar Long, Linear, Static Structures
  • Border Surveillance
  • Detect illegal border crossings
  • U.S. Customs
  • Military operations in Iraq
  • FY04 Experiment
  • Detect movement of personnel/vehicles across area
    adjacent to a border

9
Comparison
Delay tolerance
Hot problem
Full network
Existing comms
Processing load
No alternative
Existing sensors
Hardware tolerance
Cost/length
CONOPS
Kansas Pipeline
Northern border
Colombian Pipeline
2D Convoy protection
1D Convoy protection
10
Preliminary Program PlanSystem Metrics
  • Operational Metrics
  • Latency
  • lt10 seconds (90 of the time)
  • Probability of False Alarm (Pfa)
  • lt1 per day
  • Probability of Detection (Pd)
  • 0.99 for vehicles
  • 0.95 for dismounts
  • Classification
  • TBD
  • XSM Node Lifetime
  • TBD
  • Relay Node Lifetime
  • TBD
  • Network Deployment time
  • lt1 hour
  • Network Uninstallation time
  • lt 1 hour
  • Cost
  • Technical Metrics
  • Robustness
  • Of node
  • Of network
  • Sensor coverage
  • Sensor density
  • Effective bandwidth
  • Of first-tier network
  • Of second-tier network
  • Endurance
  • Of node
  • Of network

11
Preliminary Program PlanTechnology Transition
  • Transition Partners
  • Transition Process
  • Joint DARPA/Partner identification of operational
    challenges and potential solutions
  • DARPA development of technical solution to
    operational challenges
  • Joint evaluation of technical solution
  • Joint Memorandum of Agreeement (MOA) / Memorandum
    of Understanding (MOU)

12
Experiment Site Characteristics
  • Relatively flat, open area
  • Easy for observers to see large section of
    experiment site
  • No forests
  • No large physical obstructions to line-of-site
    comms
  • Relatively good weather (little rain, light
    winds, etc.)

13
Final Demo Experiment Sites
  • Candidate Sites
  • Naval Air Weapons Facility, China Lake
  • 150 miles NE of Los Angeles
  • Encompasses 1.1 million acres of land in
    California's upper Mojave Desert, ranging in
    altitude from 2,100 to 8,900 feet
  • Varies from flat dry lake beds to rugged piñon
    pine covered mountains.
  • Weather should be consistent
  • Summer will be hot

14
WPAFB Experiment Site
The area in the red ellipse is the one for the
test range. It is approximately 7500 x 2500.
15
Another improvised view of the area.
16
OSU Experiment Site
  • Don Scott Airfield North Runway area .5km x
    .5km
  • Internal Testbed Space Candidates
  • North Rec Centre (floor)
  • Warehouses in Kinnear or Goodale area (may have
    to pay for space)

17
Preliminary Program PlanRoles and
Responsibilities
Systems Integration Ohio State
Technology Development
Display Unit Ohio State
Xtreme Scaling Mote Crossbow Technology
Relay Node Crossbow Technology
Sensors Crossbow
  • Middleware Services
  • Clock Sync (UCLA,OSU)
  • Group Formation (OSU, UCB)
  • Localization (UIUC)
  • Remote Programming (UCB)
  • Routing (OSU, UCB)
  • Sensor Fusion (OSU)
  • Power Management (UCB)
  • Relay Node Services (UCLA)

Application Layer Ohio State UC Berkeley
Operating System UC Berkeley
GUI Ohio State
Application Tools Ohio State UCLA UC Berkeley
MAC Layer UC Berkeley
  • Auxiliary Services
  • Testing (OSU, MITRE, CNS Technologies)
  • Monitoring, logging, and testing infrastructure
    (UCB, OSU)
  • Evaluation (MITRE)
  • Logistics, site planning (CNS Technologies, OSU)
  • ConOps development (Puritan Research, CNS
    Technologies, SouthCom, US Customs Border
    Protection, MITRE, OSU)
  • Simulation tools (UCB, UCLA, Vanderbilt, OSU)

Transition Partners USSOUTHCOM, U.S. Customs
Border Protection, USSOCOM, AFRL
18
Agenda (Friday)
  • 9am                Team introduction Goals for
    the retreat    Preliminary Application and
    ConOps                        Requirements and
    Metrics                       Hardware,
    Middleware, Application Architecture overview 
    10am              Risks (Rajiv
    Ramnath)
  • 1030-11am     TimeSync (Ted Herman)
  • 11am-12noon   Localization (Ted
    Herman)12-1pm            Lunch brought in
    (Oxleys)1-145pm         Echelon topology
    (SK)145-215pm    Clustering Group
    Management (MD)200-3pm        Simulation
    (Mikhail Nesterenko)315-400pm   
    Monitoring  (SB)4-5pm             Power
    management (SK)
  •  615pm            Out-of-towners Dinner
  • (Host Prof. CK Chang, China Dynasty on
    Lane Ave)

19
Agenda (Saturday)
  • 9am                Routing (Mohamed Gouda,
    HZ)10-1030         TDMA (Sandeep Kulkarni,
    HZ)1030-noon      Localization (w/ Gul Agha
    (217)359-0789)12-130pm       Lunch brought in
    (Chipotle)
  • 130-2pm         Border Patrol (Rajiv
    Ramnath)  2-3pm    Tier 2 networking
    (Prasun Sinha)3-4pm         Hardware
    (PD, Emre Ertin, HC)                
    Antenna discussion400-500         Process
    discussion (Rajiv Ramnath)    
  • 5pm                 Budget515pm           
    ALineInTheSand writeups planning6pm
    Dinner (Everyone to Anish's residence)

20
Agenda (Sunday)
  • 9am Taking Stock, Planning
  • 930-1130 Requirements and Metrics
  • Application, ConOps, Hardware specifications
  • 1130am-1   New research ideas               
       MobiLoc                   BGP

21
To Do
  • Sign Up for Lunch
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com