Modeling Fiscal Implications of Education Policies - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 30
About This Presentation
Title:

Modeling Fiscal Implications of Education Policies

Description:

... Develop different scenarios with varying assumptions Results Evolution of expenditures by type Evolution of education system ... data Objectives ... enrolment in ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:85
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 31
Provided by: wb19
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Modeling Fiscal Implications of Education Policies


1
Part 2
  • Modeling Fiscal Implications of Education
    Policies
  • Sajitha Bashir
  • May 3, 2006

2
Structure of the Presentation
  • Why model fiscal implications of education
    policy?
  • Structure of models
  • Choice of Scenarios
  • Examples DRC and Benin
  • Limitations

3
What will NOT be covered
  • How to build a model
  • Building a model is a technical exercise takes
    time and care. But it is a tool which can be done
    by a technician
  • For the PER author, what is important is to
    understand how to use this tool

4
Why Undertake Fiscal Modeling?
  • PER analysis should reveal areas where public
    resources are
  • not aligned with government objectives
  • not used efficiently
  • do not promote equity
  • Government Education Plan sets out objectives and
    strategies - usually without costs

5
Usefulness of Fiscal Modeling in PER
  • Identifies fiscal impact of measures to improve
    efficiency
  • Can assess sustainability/feasibility of proposed
    plan
  • Has impact on policy discussions, especially with
    Ministry of Finance

6
Different Modeling Approaches
  • Aggregate Fiscal Discipline
  • Sectoral Expenditure Envelope set by MOF (3-5
    years) usually as part of MTEF
  • Within Sector determine priorities, objectives,
    strategies (PER sectoral analysis)
  • Cost Strategies
  • Is it consistent with resource availability?
  • Iterations alternative strategies suggest
    savings
  • Simulation Model
  • Set Sectoral Objectives and Strategies
    (PER/sectoral analysis/sectoral plan)
  • Estimate costs
  • Check macro/budget implications
  • Estimate domestic resource gap compare with
    external financing
  • Iterations come up with realistic resource gap

7
Simulation Model
  • Purpose
  • Evaluate tradeoffs required to arrive at fiscally
    sustainable and technically sound educational
    strategy consistent with government objectives
    for coverage, quality, equity
  • Method
  • Develop different scenarios with varying
    assumptions
  • Results
  • Evolution of expenditures by type
  • Evolution of education system (pupil numbers,
    staff, schools, classes)

8
Structure of Model
  • Spreadsheet all quantifiable variables of
    education system are linked to each other
  • Five categories of elements
  • Base year data
  • Objectives
  • Assumptions about macro environment
  • Policy parameters
  • Results

9
Simple or Complex Models?
  • Model whole education sector?
  • Usually desirable to see sub-sectoral trade-offs
  • Level of complexity should be determined by
    purpose of exercise and results of sectoral
    analysis
  • If focus is on primary, more detailed strategies
    at primary level

10
Limit Number of Scenarios
  • Macro Assumptions x Objectives x Policy
    Parameters potentially scores of scenarios
  • Choose 3 5 scenarios!
  • Judgment is required base selections on
    PER/sectoral analysis
  • What are the critical decisions confronting the
    government?

11
Macro Assumptions
  • Economic growth
  • Determines public receipts, public expenditures
  • Demographic growth
  • Determines growth of child population entering
    primary school
  • Usually invariant across scenarios

12
Sector Objectives
  • Pre-primary
  • Population coverage
  • Primary
  • Entry and completion rates (usually 100)
  • Secondary and higher
  • Transition rates
  • Years by which objectives are to be achieved can
    also vary

13
Key Policy Parameters (1)
  • Internal efficiency
  • Repetition and drop out rates
  • Service delivery targets (access/quality)
  • School availability (proximity to habitation) and
    size
  • Teacher pay (by category of teacher)
  • Pupil-teacher ratio
  • Ratio of teachers to non-teaching staff
  • Use of multigrade teaching
  • Spending on non-salary items
  • Year for attainment of target is also variable

14
Key Policy Parameters (2)
  • Construction
  • Type of construction (community?)
  • Financing
  • of enrolment in private sector (residual
    determines maximum for public financing)
  • Set public financing as ratio of domestic
    resources
  • Household financing in public sector (by category
    of expenditure and sub-sector) reasonable in
    relation to household income?
  • External financing (by category of expenditure
    and sub-sector) - realistic?

15
Illustration Democratic Republic of Congo
  • Challenges limited public resources high
    dependence on private financing low coverage
    even at primary level but rapid growth at other
    levels inefficiency in public spending
  • Policy issues expansion of post primary levels
    abolition of fees raising teacher salaries
  • EFA plan sets ambitious objectives and strategies
    which are not costed

16
DRC- Common Assumptions of Scenarios
17
(No Transcript)
18
DRC- Cost Saving Measures of Scenarios 3 and 4
19
DRC- Impact on Education Indicators
20
DRC- Expenditure Requirements (FC and 2001US )
21
DRC - Preliminary Conclusions
  • Universal pre-school is not feasible
  • Staffing rationalization/use of multigrade
    teaching yields considerable savings
  • Reducing transition rates in post primary
    education is still required
  • Scenario 4 is most acceptable
  • Examine relative unit costs and composition of
    expenditures to further assess suitability

22
Other trade-offs are possible
  • Eliminate school feeding - expensive even when
    targeted to 30 of pupils
  • What is its objective ? (increase attendance?
    improve student attentiveness?) Are resources
    better used elsewhere e.g., to raise teachers
    salaries?
  • Raise pupil-teacher ratio
  • Stagger construction
  • Raise private financing share in higher education
    (but equity trade-off)

23
Benin Issues
  • Primary GER 97 but high disparities between
    regions, gender and social groups
  • Quality very low less than 10 percent of 3rd
    graders could read with comprehension
  • Primary completion rate 46
  • Repetition rate 36 in final primary grade
  • Less than 2 of domestic education budget on
    books and teacher training
  • Very rapid growth in higher education (mainly
    private, but also public)

24
Large Differences in Salaries of Primary Teachers
Salary per teacher in ( of per cap GDP) of total teachers
Primary teachers 1 860 (4.9) 100
Permanent 3 011 (7.9) 56.1
Contractual 750 (2.0) 19.9
Community 300 (0.8) 23.9
Francophone Africa (6.3)
Anglophone Africa (3.6)
25
Distribution of schools by pupil-teacher ratio in
grade 1
26
Objectives for Primary Education
Goal Target Impact
Primary completion 100 (1.76 millions pupils by 2015) Classrooms/ teachers
Quality Pupil-teacher ratio  40 Teachers
Internal efficiency Repetition rate  10 Reduces rooms/teachers
27
Expenditure requirements policy trade-offs
  • Number of teachers will need to double
  • If only permanent teachers at current salary
    levels expenditure needs will multiply by 4
  • Using contractual/community teachers
    expenditures will multiply by 3
  • A new statute for teachers?
  • Post primary transition rate will also need to be
    reduced

28
Major Reforms to Improve Quality Difficult to
Model
  • Example Benin French as language of
    instruction from class 1 may be impeding quality
  • Alternatives are
  • use local language (18 in Benin)
  • use small groups in classes 1 and 2 (teaching
    aides?)
  • Use radio instruction to reinforce learning
  • How do you model costs?
  • Use some key cost drivers (eg additional
    teachers teacher support additional materials)

29
To Improve Efficiency of Public Spending Link
with Budgetary Processes
  • Usually modeling serves analytical purpose
    illustrates possible choices
  • Whether it is used in practice to guide policy
    choices depends on institutional framework
  • Often difficult to link with budget preparation
  • Policy parameters with greatest fiscal impact
    often the most difficult to change (e.g., teacher
    pay policy, ratios of teachers to administrative
    staff)

30
Address Public Expenditure Management and
Institutional Framework
  • Who undertakes modeling in the sector?
  • Are results evaluated by key policy makers?
  • Are scenarios used in budget preparation? eg is
    discussion within MTEF framework based on these
    trade-offs?
  • Is the model updated regularly?
  • Is there willingness to undertake this work
    within the government?
  • If so, what are capacity building requirements?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com