OPM3 - What's In It For Me - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 66
About This Presentation
Title:

OPM3 - What's In It For Me

Description:

The DoD and the problem of software bugs The need to identify reliable contractors The Software Engineering ... Development Day PMI Honolulu - May 3, ... Historical ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:180
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 67
Provided by: WalterA152
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: OPM3 - What's In It For Me


1
Professional Development Day PMI Honolulu - May
3, 2006
OPM3 - Organizational Project Management
Maturity Model
Walter A. Viali, CSQA, PMP PMO To Go LLC
2
What is OPM3
  • PMIs Organizational Project Management Maturity
    Model
  • Organizational project management is the
    systematic management of projects, programs and
    portfolios in alignment with the achievement of
    strategic goals

3
Walter A. Viali
  • Over 32 years in Information Technology
  • Retired from Texaco Inc. in 1999 after 25 years
  • Co-founder and Principal Consultant for PMO To Go
    LLC
  • Certified Software Quality Analyst (CSQA)
  • Certified Project Management Professional (PMP)
  • Certified Project Management Instructor
  • Member of the faculty of the Project Management
    Program for the Bauer College Business
    (University of Houston)
  • JAD Session Leader with over 4,000 hours of
    planning and project facilitation experience
  • SEI CMM and PMI OPM3 knowledge and assessment
    experience
  • Implemented several Project Management Office
    (PMO) organizations
  • Experience in Strategic Business and IT Planning
  • Past President of the Houston Chapter of the
    Society for Software Quality (SSQ) and of the
    Texas Application Process User Group
  • Sr. Vice President, External Operations, PMI
    Houston Chapter
  • Consulting with major companies on Process
    Improvement, Project Management, PMO
    implementation, Strategic Planning, JAD
    facilitation

4
What are Maturity Models?
  • Tools for analyzing business and technical
    performance of 3 interrelated components
  • People
  • Processes
  • Technology
  • Detailed models that help identify performance
    characteristics of these components at various
    stages of growth
  • Frameworks for benchmarking the effectiveness of
    an organization

5
The Need for Maturity Models
  • Progress and continuous improvement are an
    integral part of our way of life
  • Organizations need a well construed approach to
    understand where they are, where they need to be
    and the resulting gap
  • Current maturity models offer a well organized
    and linear roadmap for continuous improvement
  • Maturity models offer a quick and often precise
    snapshot of an organizations effectiveness and
    reliability

6
The Standish Group 1994 Chaos Report
  • 17 of projects succeed
  • 31 of projects fail
  • 52 of projects are challenged
  • 78 billion dollars total project waste (against
    250 billion in project spending)

7
The Standish Group 2003 Chaos Report
  • 34 of projects succeed (100 improvement over
    1994)
  • 15 of projects fail (down from 31 in 1994)
  • 51 of projects are challenged
  • 55 billion dollars total project waste (against
    255 billion in project spending)
  • 38 billion in lost dollars for US projects in
    2002
  • 17 billion in cost overruns

8
Need for Improved Performance with
Could dismal results be a clue?
9
Where did it all start?
  • The DoD and the problem of software bugs
  • The need to identify reliable contractors
  • The Software Engineering Institute (SEI) is
    established at Carnegie Mellon University in
    Pittsburgh, PA
  • Watts Humphrey, former IBM executive, is placed
    in charge of the SEI
  • The SEI collects best practices from large U.S.
    companies

10
(No Transcript)
11
Proliferation of Maturity Models
  • SEI People CMM
  • Compensation, Participatory Culture, Monitoring
    and Workforce Innovation
  • SEI Software Acquisition CMM
  • Requirements, Solicitation, Acquisition, Project
    Management, Risk, Contract
  • SEI Systems Engineering CMM
  • Engineering, Project and Organization Domains
  • SEI Integrated Product Development
  • Product lifecycle, design, product built, tested,
    supported and retired
  • SEI PSP
  • Personal Software Process, the SW CMM for the
    individual
  • SEI CMMI
  • Integration of SW-CMM, IPD, SE, SA maturity models

12
Proliferation of Maturity Models
  • Data Management Maturity Model
  • Testing Maturity Model
  • Security Maturity Model
  • Internal Controls Maturity Model
  • Project Management Maturity Models
  • PMO Maturity Models
  • Etc.

13
Project Management Maturity Models
  • ESI Framework for Project Management
  • Dr. William Ibbs PM Maturity Model (Berkeley)
  • PM Solutions PM and PMO Maturity Models
  • Institute for International Learning PM and PMO
    Maturity Models
  • Etc.

14
OPM3
  • PMIs answer to the plethora of Project
    Management Maturity Models is OPM3
  • Organizational Project Management Maturity Model
  • Comprised of three general elements
  • Knowledge content of the standard
  • Assessment method for comparison with the
    standard
  • Improvement setting the stage for
    organizational changes

15
The OPM3 Standard
16
PMIs OPM3
  • Organizational Project Management Maturity Model
  • Standard developed under the stewardship of PMI
  • Provide a way to understand organizational
    project management
  • Measure a companys maturity against a
    comprehensive set of project management Best
    Practices
  • Improve organizational project management maturity

17
Bridging the Gap
Moving to Project Driven Organizational Models
18
(No Transcript)
19
Links Among the Process Groups in a Project Phase
and in OPM3
Planning Processes
Initiating Processes
Controlling Processes
Executing Processes
Closing Processes
20
Organizational Project Management Processes the
Domains
21
Organizational Project Management Improving
Performance
22
PM Maturity Increases Along a Continuum
23
OPM3 Stages of Maturity
24
(No Transcript)
25
(No Transcript)
26
OPM3Portfolio Management Process Models
  • Portfolio Initiating Processes (1)
  • Portfolio Planning Processes (21)
  • Portfolio Executing Processes (7)
  • Portfolio Controlling Processes (8)
  • Portfolio Closing Processes (2)

27
OPM3Program Management Process Models
  • Program Initiating Processes (1)
  • Program Planning Processes (21)
  • Program Executing Processes (7)
  • Program Controlling Processes (8)
  • Program Closing Processes (2)

28
What About Project Management?
2
2
7
12
21
29
OPM3Portfolio and Program Management Process
Models
Portfolio Scope Initiation
Controls
Outputs
Inputs
Tools Techniques
  1. Program and Project Selection Methods
  2. Scoring Methods
  3. Techniques such as NPV and ROI
  4. Expert Judgment
  1. Organizational financial expectations or
    constraints
  2. Risk Tolerance
  3. Business Goals
  4. Investment Decisions
  5. Executive Oversight
  1. Portfolio Charter
  2. Portfolio Leader identified and assigned
  3. Portfolio Project Mix
  4. Constraints
  5. Assumptions
  1. Organizational Objective function description
  2. Strategic Plan
  3. Historical Information

30
Links Among the Process Groups in a Project Phase
and in OPM3
Planning Processes
Initiating Processes
21
Controlling Processes
Executing Processes
Closing Processes
31
Portfolio Planning Processes
  • Portfolio Plan Development
  • Use the output of the other planning processes,
    including strategic planning to create a
    consistent, coherent document that can be used to
    guide both Portfolio execution and Portfolio
    control
  • Portfolio Scope Planning
  • Progressively determining and defining the scope
    of the Portfolio
  • Portfolio Scope Definition
  • Further categorization of the types of Projects
    and Products that the organization is expected to
    undertake
  • Portfolio Project Activity Definition
  • Activities that must be performed to produce the
    various Portfolio products (Portfolio Program and
    Project lists)
  • Portfolio Project Dependency Analysis
  • Identifying and documenting schedule dependencies
    across Programs and Projects within the Portfolio

32
Portfolio Planning Processes
  • Portfolio Duration Estimating for Programs and
    Projects
  • Estimating the number of work periods needed to
    complete the Programs and Projects in the
    Portfolio
  • Portfolio Schedule Development
  • Analyzing Program and Project sequences, duration
    and resource requirements to create the Portfolio
    schedule
  • Portfolio Resource Planning
  • Define resource options and best fit of resources
    to proposed Programs/Projects and initiatives,
    with constraints and tolerances to maximize
    results
  • Portfolio Cost Estimating
  • Develop an estimate of the costs of the resources
    needed to complete Portfolio activities
  • Portfolio Cost Budgeting
  • Establish priorities and make preliminary budget
    allocations among existing and proposed
    Programs/Projects

33
Portfolio Planning Processes
  • Portfolio Quality Planning
  • Identify which standards are relevant to the
    Portfolio and determine how to satisfy them
  • Portfolio Organizational Planning
  • Identify, document and assign Portfolio roles,
    responsibilities and reporting relationships
  • Portfolio Staff Acquisition
  • Plan for the continued availability of
    appropriate human resources needed to support the
    Portfolio
  • Portfolio Communications Planning
  • Determine the information and communication needs
    of the Portfolio stakeholders who needs what
    information, when they need it and how it will be
    given to them
  • Portfolio Risk Management Planning
  • Evaluate and plan risk management activities
    across the Portfolio

34
Portfolio Planning Processes
  • Portfolio Risk Identification
  • Determine which risks might affect the Portfolio
    and document their characteristics
  • Portfolio Qualitative Risk Analysis
  • Perform a qualitative analysis of risks and
    conditions to prioritize their effects on
    Portfolio objectives
  • Portfolio Quantitative Risk Analysis
  • Measure the probability and consequences of
    Portfolio risks and estimate their implications
    for Portfolio objectives

35
Portfolio Planning Processes
  • Portfolio Risk Response Planning
  • Develop procedures and techniques to enhance
    opportunities and reduce threats to the
    Portfolios objectives
  • Portfolio Procurement Planning
  • Determine what to procure and when. Identify
    economic opportunities across the portfolio
  • Portfolio Solicitation Planning
  • Document organizational requirements and identify
    potential sources to meet procurement need

36
The OPM3 Cycle
  • Step One Prepare for the Assessment
  • Step Two Perform the Assessment
  • Step Three Plan for Improvements
  • Step Four Implement Improvements
  • Step Five Repeat the Process

37
The OPM3 Cycle
38
(No Transcript)
39
(No Transcript)
40
(No Transcript)
41
(No Transcript)
42
(No Transcript)
43
(No Transcript)
44
(No Transcript)
45
(No Transcript)
46
(No Transcript)
47
OPM3 Structure
  • Best Practices (586)
  • Capability (two or more) per Best Practice
  • Measurable Outcomes per Capability
  • Key Performance Indicator for each Outcome
  • Paths to each Best Practice
  • Applicable to Portfolio, Program and Project
    Management, as well as to the Standardization,
    Measurement, Control and Continuous Improvement
    Maturity Phases

48
OPM3 Structure
49
(No Transcript)
50
(No Transcript)
51
(No Transcript)
52
(No Transcript)
53
Comprehensive Assessment
  • Determine which capabilities exist or are absent
    for each Best Practice
  • Which outcomes exist and are observable in the
    organization for each capability?
  • Gain a more in-depth understanding of the
    organizations maturity in organizational project
    management

54
(No Transcript)
55
Dependencies Between Best Practices
56
(No Transcript)
57
(No Transcript)
58
OPM3 - What's In It For Me
  • Great project management will be of limited
    effect in the absence of organizational project
    management
  • In fact, PMP certification can be viewed only as
    the first step in improving internal project
    management practices

59
OPM3 - What's In It For Me
  • Companies wishing to align internal project
    management practices with PMIs PMBOK Guide and
    future PMI standards, should begin to embrace
    PMIs OPM3, especially if ready to embark on a
    project management improvement journey
  • PMOs need the right tools to improve the
    organizations project management practices

60
Maturity Models and the PMO
Project Management Office
Project Portfolio Management
Projects
Maturity Models
61
OPM3 - What's In It For Me
  • PMI will continue to enhance this model and allow
    third-party vendors to develop and market
    products and services based on OPM3
  • OPM3 2008 Update Project under way
  • DNV (Det Norske Veritas) and the APS program
  • Its important to embrace organizational project
    management and make sure we dont lose the boat
    the way IT vendors did with the SEI CMM during
    the past 15 years

62
The Future of Maturity Models
DoD
CMMI
OPM3
Common Standard ?
ISO
Baldrige
63
In Conclusion
  • Maturity Models are a very important component of
    the overall organizational effectiveness picture
  • The IT industry has ignored process improvement
    for too long and is now paying the price
  • This is analogous to the way American industry
    ignored Deming after WWII, as he was exiled to
    Japan

64
In Conclusion
  • Instead of taking the easy way out, companies
    need to embrace maturity models as part of
    organizational project management and start the
    long journey towards survival
  • Fortunately, some of the largest U.S.
    corporations are embracing organizational project
    management and not all hope is lost
  • However, if organizational project management
    continues to be ignored by the majority of
    companies, tomorrows project managers and PMOs
    will go the same way as the programmers and
    other outsourced professionals of today

65
You think you have problems.
  • The Great Pyramid at Giza.
  • Schedule of 10 years
  • Built starting around 2,550 b.c.
  • 3 years to prepare, 5 years to build, 2 years to
    clean up
  • Resources
  • 13,200 men (peak of 40,000)
  • Artisan village (4,000-5,000 people)
  • 2 million blocks
  • Labor expended
  • 36.7 million days or 131,200 man-years
  • Labor costs
  • 111 million jugs of beer
  • 126 million loaves of bread

66
OPM3 - Organizational Project Management
Maturity Model
Professional Development Day PMI Honolulu - May
3, 2006
  • Walter A. Viali, CSQA, PMP
  • PMO To Go LLC
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com